[toaster] Recieved by "0" and Squirrelmail
Hi - I've installed the toaster on a new box as per the toaster instructions (bar an upgrade to latest vpopmail and also I'm using debians installation of daemontools etc). I'm trying to get the squirrelmail spam (rbl list filters) plugin to work but I need to set my SpamFilters_YourHop variable up. This needs to be set to something unique in my Received headers. Normally I could do this by using the Received header that has my hostname in it, but with the toaster this appears to be missing - I get a "0" where I'd expect the hostname. Is this normal? - I get the expected header on a non-toaster build of qmail (admittedly on a different machine) Thanks Marcus -- My headers are (the relevant header is preceded with a *): Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 4604 invoked by uid 89); 16 Sep 2004 10:06:58 - * Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-relay01.plus.net) (212.159.14.212) * by 0 with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 16 Sep 2004 10:06:58 - Received: from [81.174.233.49] (helo=quinticltd.force9.co.uk) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1C7t9x-00083D-Sr for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:06:37 + Received: (qmail 5314 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 10:06:37 - Received: from unknown (HELO pokemon.quintic.bogus) (192.9.200.88) by bart.quintic.bogus with SMTP; 16 Sep 2004 10:06:37 - Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:08:00 +0100 From: Marcus Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.0.15) Professional Organization: Quintic Ltd X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ------ -- Marcus Williams -- http://www.quintic.co.uk Quintic Ltd, 39 Newnham Road, Cambridge, UK This message is private [ ] public [*]
Re: [toaster] Recieved by "0" and Squirrelmail
On 16/09/2004, Marcus Williams wrote: > Normally I could do this by using the > Received header that has my hostname in it, but with the toaster this > appears to be missing - I get a "0" where I'd expect the hostname. bah. Should've checked the run scripts. I didnt notice the "-l 0" on the tcpserver command line. Sorry for noise. Marcus -- Marcus Williams -- http://www.quintic.co.uk Quintic Ltd, 39 Newnham Road, Cambridge, UK This message is private [ ] public [*]
[toaster] Upgrading to 0.7.x
Hi - I'm currently running toaster 0.6 and I want to upgrade to the 0.7 toaster. I'm wondering if theres anything special I have to do or be aware of whilst upgrading. Presumably if I kill my qmail my backup mx will deal with incoming mails so I shouldnt get bounces - or is that only true if the machine itself is offline? As for actually doing the upgrade do I just do a straight install over the old one or is better to try and remove everything installed for the old 0.6? Thanks Marcus
Re: [toaster] Upgrading to 0.7.x
On 01/02/2005 10:04, Eero Volotinen wrote: Well. it depends if you want to keep vpopmail accounts? Yep. Sorry, I should have been a little more clear with my "remove everything from previous install" bit. Vpopmail doesnt bother me much - I've done plenty of upgrades straight over the top of it before and that all works. qmailadmin is alright as well. I've not used courier-imap before this toaster install so I'm a bit wary of just installing straight over the top of that incase theres stuff I'm going to break (like the current certificates etc). As for qmail I usually just install straight over that as well but there appears to be quite a few changes in this release that affect qmail so I'm wondering if a fresh start would be more sensible here. Most of the rest of the packages that get installed I install direct from Debian rather than install from source because I can track them more easily (I could never get courier-imap from debian to work with the toaster though). Thanks Marcus
[toaster] Updating expired certs
Hi - How do I update the certificates in the toaster? All of mine expired the other day. Do I just run mk(imapd|pop3d)cert for clients and rerun make cert for smtp? I've tried make cert and it doesnt seem to update the certificate - I'd remove the old ones and try but I dont want to break anything! Ta, Marcus -- Marcus Williams -- http://www.cad-schroer.co.uk CAD Schroer UK, 39 Newnham Road, Cambridge, UK
Re: [toaster] Updating expired certs
On 03/10/2005 15:12, Rick Macdougall wrote: Move the old ones and re-run the make cert (and update_tmprsdha) and mkomapdcert Do I only need to mv/rm the servercert and clientcert.pem files (ones a sym link anyway)? Or should I mv/rm all the pem files in /var/qmail/control. imap/pop certs updated correctly in place. Thanks Marcus -- Marcus Williams -- http://www.cad-schroer.co.uk CAD Schroer UK, 39 Newnham Road, Cambridge, UK
[toaster] Bounce after virus/spam checks
Hi - Using the current toaster I'd like to bounce messages heading for unknown users _after_ a spam/virus check. That way I can set up the system not to bounce virus or spam messages just bin them. Currently chkusr is returning no such user errors and bouncing straight away. I realise this will add load to our system for non-existing user messages but I cant just set the catchall to delete messages and I dont want to bounce viruses onwards. Thanks Marcus -- Marcus Williams -- http://www.cad-schroer.co.uk CAD Schroer UK, 39 Newnham Road, Cambridge, UK
Re: [toaster] Bounce after virus/spam checks
On 02/12/2005 Shane wrote: Why would you want to accept the message and them process it? Keep using chkuser to reject at the smtp level for "no such users" and setup simscan to query spamassassin / clamav and also reject virus/spam at the smtp level as well. This way the responsibility is back on the sending server and not yours and they, not you will be likely to hit a spam trap and end up in places such as SORBS, SPEWS and Spamcop etc. what I neglected to mention was the way we receive mail - this is a non-internet host that picks up mails from our real SMTP server from an ISP using fetchmail which in turn forwards them to this box. Historical baggage really but for reasons I wont bother to go into we cant change this. So we cant do anything at the SMTP level because we have to deal with it! :( Cheers Marcus -- Marcus Williams -- http://www.cad-schroer.co.uk CAD Schroer UK, 39 Newnham Road, Cambridge, UK
[toaster] Clamav patches
The toaster patches clamav with 3 patches - are they necessary? I ask because I run the toaster without simscan at the moment (I do scanning separately with maildrop + clamav). I'd like to move to a simscan installation, but my clamav comes from the debian volatile package and I'd rather keep it that way if I can. Thanks, Marcus
[toaster] Toaster upgrades
I'm running a mix of a 0.6 toaster with upgraded packages (so I track qmailadmin, courier-imap and vpopmail stable releases). I'd like to get up to date with the toaster patch as well - whats the easiest way to do this? Should I reverse the 0.6 patch and then apply 0.8 and rebuild/install netqmail or is that likely to break things badly Thanks Marcus
[toaster] [OT?] Help with djbdns
Hi - My server is housed with a company thats just gone bust :( I've got about 48 hours to migrate everything across to a new server (with new dns). Luckily I had planned to do this soon anyway so I've done most of the work (toaster migrated very easily with the help of this list thanks!). The only problem is that now I've been forced to move my nameserver as well. Rather than change the IP of the underlying primary server ns1 (as I'm not sure this will work - how do registrars deal with this, dont they have an set IP?) I'm trying to get all domains to change the primary nameserver to a new server ns2. I've just been told by godaddy that they wont change it to this new address because they are only able to use authoritative name servers. I've updated my old server dns settings to: .bar-coded.net::ns2.bar-coded.net .50.144.10.217.in-addr.arpa:217.10.144.50:ns2.bar-coded.net:259200 =ns1.bar-coded.net:213.151.36.176 +ns2.bar-coded.net:217.10.144.50 (snipped other non-essential dns). I've replicated this on the new dns at 217.10.144.50, but I cant get godaddy to accept the update. I thought that this meant that ns2 was an authoritive ns? Anyone got any ideas? I can send more info if needed, but its a bit of a rush job unfortunately (and I might lose the server completely :( Thanks Marcus
Re: [toaster] [OT?] Help with djbdns
On 24/03/2006 Marcus Williams wrote: I've just been told by godaddy that they wont change it to this new address because they are only able to use authoritative name servers. Cancel that - operator error :) looks like you have to register your server for use with godaddy strangely. Done that now and it all works fine. Sorry for noise. Marcus
Re: [toaster] clamav-0.88.1
On 05/04/2006 Bob Hutchinson wrote: One of the toaster patches failed: (0.87) I'm running the toaster with clamav from Debian volatile (0.88) with no patches and everything seems fine - can someone tell me what the patches do? I dont run with custom error messages setup on qmail either as I assumed that the patches allowed error messages on the output stream or something. Thanks Marcus
Re: [toaster] mail lost after maildrop
On 18/04/2007 Maciej SoBtysiak wrote: > I am observing this weird problem. One user sends mail to another on the > same domain. > The mail appears in all the logs, also in a maildrop log (logfile > "/home/vpopmail/maildrop.log") > but the mail seems to never appear in the inbox nor the spam folder, any > ideas? I dont know where you put your .mailfilter or how you're getting it to run from vpopmail, but it looks like you are assuming that the current directory is the VHOME directory. Are you sure you dont need to prepend all your "Maildir" with $VHOME? HTH Marcus -- Marcus Williams, CAD Schroer UK Limited 39 Newnham Road, Cambridge, CB3 9EY
[toaster] Mail refused with temporary errors
Hi - I'm running an old copy of the toaster (5.4.10 area?) but I've just started having problems with qmail refusing to send email. The toaster will run for a while (days sometimes) and then suddenly start refusing incoming email with a "mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)" error. Looking through the list it looks like other people are seeing this occasionally but no one seems to have got to the bottom of it. Once I start getting this message a reboot is required to fix it. Restarting any of the services involved doesnt seem to fix it and I cant find anywhere in the logs that might point to why its doing it. Any one any ideas of where I should look? Thanks Marcus
Re: [toaster] Mail refused with temporary errors
On 09/10/2007 md ekram wrote: > check whether you clamav running or do u update simscan? > Clamav, spamassassin are all running when this happens. simscan appears to have no obvious errors as well. Although I just noticed that the perms on the /var/qmail/simscan directory are wrong: [tomsk: marcus]$ ls -l /var/qmail total 11 drwxr-sr-x 2 alias qmail 192 2004-09-13 21:39 alias/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root qmail 1504 2006-12-30 22:22 bin/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root qmail 288 2004-09-13 15:58 boot/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root qmail 680 2007-10-09 01:02 control/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root qmail 784 2004-09-13 15:58 doc/ drwxr-xr-x 10 root qmail 240 2004-09-13 15:58 man/ drwxr-x--- 11 qmailq qmail 264 2004-09-13 15:58 queue/ -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 215 2004-09-13 16:02 rc* drwxr-x--- 7 clamav root 248 2007-10-09 13:56 simscan/ drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 208 2007-09-10 20:50 supervise/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root qmail 128 2007-10-04 09:18 users/ I though that the simscan directory should have drws--x--x (4711). The makefile sets it to that anyway. Marcus
Re: [toaster] Mail refused with temporary errors
On 09/10/2007 Marcus Williams wrote: > I though that the simscan directory should have drws--x--x (4711). The > makefile sets it to that anyway. ... and then I remembered setuid dirs under linux are ignored. So I'm still no closer. Thanks Marcus
Re: [toaster] Mail refused with temporary errors
[sent again, apols if duplicate] On 09/10/2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> As suggested earlier please check that you don't have a stale >> socket for clamd, this usually happens after an unclean shutdown. >> Check the log of clamav as it will complain about the stale socket >> if this is the case. Delete the stale socket and restart the clamav >> service. I wondered about this, but I didnt get any warnings about a stale socket this time - I had one warning in september sometime that may have coincided with this problem, but its hard to say. Presumably the only way to get an unclean shutdown of clamd is to kill it or for it to crash (and I havent killed it)? If its a crash in one of the clamd threads would that bring down the rest of the daemon or just the thread? At least if the whole thing stops I can detect that with a monitor script. Marcus
Re: [toaster] Mail refused with temporary errors
On 10/10/2007 I wrote: > If its a crash in one of the clamd threads would that bring down the > rest of the daemon or just the thread? At least if the whole thing stops > I can detect that with a monitor script. .. on that note, for anyone else that wants something similar - I found a clamd monitor script that makes sure clamd is up and scanning at [1] Hopefully this will confirm its a clamd problem. Thanks Marcus [1] http://mikecathey.com/postfix-cyrus-amavis/clamdwatch.txt/
Re: [toaster] Daemontools on Ubuntu 7.04
On 16/10/2007 Tom Nats wrote: > I'm having trouble with the package/install part of daemontools. Personally I just use the Debian package (its probably in Ubuntu as well): apt-get install daemontools or apt-get install daemontools-installer Theres also one for ucspi and djbdns. They seem to work well with the toaster (I also track the debian spamassassin and clamav rather than install from the toaster sources with no problems) Marcus
Re: [toaster] Daemontools on Ubuntu 7.04
On 18/10/2007 Jaroslav wrote: > So qmailctl is giving me the following error: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send# qmailctl stat > > /service/qmail-send: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist > > /service/qmail-send/log: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not > exist > > /service/qmail-smtpd: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist > > /service/qmail-smtpd/log: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not > exist Sorry, been away otherwise I'd have replied as well - Which debian packages did you install (as in which toaster packages did you install the debian versions of?) I think these files/pipes are created by the supervise program which under debian will be in /usr/bin. This is run by svscan (I think) so your paths have to be right - if it cant find it or run it in some way these dont get created I guess. Did you make sure you removed your built installation of daemontools before installing the debian one? Whats the output of "pstree -aAl `pidof svscan`" (no outer quotes) Marcus
