Re: [toaster] Odd Delivery Problems...

2003-05-31 Thread Matthew Walker 
Yes, they are two seperate machines. Sitting in the same room, but they are
seperate.

Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold said:
> On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 22:06, Matthew Walker wrote:
>> *tears hair out* Another test message just pulled the old trick again.
>> Nothing different from any of the other tests.
>
> Are kydance and forgeglobal 2 separate servers?  I get this :
>
> Note that according to my testing, I'm seeing 2 separate servers...
> arsenic and lanparty...  Is lanparty forwarding everything to arsenic
> for some reason?
>

Not as far as I can tell. As I've said before, lanparty recieves mail from
everywhere except arsenic just fine. The only time it doesn't work is when
sending mail directly from arsenic to lanparty. (Though, if I hand-enter the
message, it works...)

My current suspicion is that somehow the headers are getting screwed up by
the encryption the two boxes are using to communicate. Does anyone know how
I can turn it off?

Re: [toaster] Odd Delivery Problems...

2003-05-31 Thread Tom Collins 
On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 08:24  AM, Matthew Walker wrote:
Not as far as I can tell. As I've said before, lanparty recieves mail 
from
everywhere except arsenic just fine. The only time it doesn't work is 
when
sending mail directly from arsenic to lanparty. (Though, if I 
hand-enter the
message, it works...)
My guess is that for some reason arsenic is deciding that the mail is 
local and doesn't need to be delivered to lanparty.

Unless you're seeing it get delivered with TLS and then immediately 
returned.

Can you post the full headers from one of the mis-behaving messages?

--
Tom Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [toaster] Odd Delivery Problems...

2003-05-31 Thread Matthew Walker 
Tom Collins said:
> On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 08:24  AM, Matthew Walker wrote:
>> Not as far as I can tell. As I've said before, lanparty recieves mail
>> from
>> everywhere except arsenic just fine. The only time it doesn't work is
>> when
>> sending mail directly from arsenic to lanparty. (Though, if I
>> hand-enter the
>> message, it works...)
>
> My guess is that for some reason arsenic is deciding that the mail is
> local and doesn't need to be delivered to lanparty.
>
> Unless you're seeing it get delivered with TLS and then immediately
> returned.

Exactly.

>
> Can you post the full headers from one of the mis-behaving messages?

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 27981 invoked from network); 30 May 2003 15:26:22 -
Received: from unknown (HELO lanparty.mthmarketing.com) (216.190.203.151)
 by mail.kydance.net with SMTP; 30 May 2003 15:26:22 -

^^ Forgeglobal.com returning it to Kydance.net re-addressed. Notice the
'delivered-to' header.

Received: (qmail 15992 invoked by uid 89); 30 May 2003 15:26:21 -
Received: from unknown (HELO arsenic.mthmarketing.com) (216.190.203.134)
 by 0 with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 30 May 2003 15:26:21 -

^^ Forgeglobal.com recieving it from Kydance.net


Received: (qmail 27976 invoked by uid 81); 30 May 2003 15:26:21 -
Received: from 216.190.203.130
 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mwalker%kydance.net)
 by squirrelmail.kydance.net with HTTP;
 Fri, 30 May 2003 09:26:21 -0600 (MDT)

^^ SquirrelMail delivering it to Qmail.


Message-ID:
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References:
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 09:26:21 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: RE: Testing
From: "Matthew Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

^^ I know this isn't authoritative, but notice the correct
forgeglobal.com address here.


User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal