[Tagging] Combined use of addr:place and addr:street
Hello Regarding to the use of addr:place together with addr:street, I see a discrepancy between [1] which says: "Should not be used together with addr:street=*" And [2], which says: "Use addr:place additional to addr:street=* for such building, whose numbers belong not to street, but to some other object. It is proposed to delete addr:street=* from such houses in the future" I will like to correct this with a unified criterion in both places. Which one is the prefered criterion for you? I think that the addr:place tag should be used when there isn't a street with name to assign to the address so I don't see corret to use addr:street together with addr:place. What is your opinion? Regards, Javier Sanchez [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:place ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Combined use of addr:place and addr:street
2017-06-23 10:01 GMT+02:00 Javier Sánchez Portero : > Regarding to the use of addr:place together with addr:street, I see a > discrepancy between [1] which says: "Should not be used together with > addr:street=*" > > And [2], which says: "Use addr:place additional to addr:street=* for such > building, whose numbers belong not to street, but to some other object. It > is proposed to delete addr:street=* from such houses in the future" > > I will like to correct this with a unified criterion in both places. Which > one is the prefered criterion for you? I think that the addr:place tag > should be used when there isn't a street with name to assign to the address > so I don't see corret to use addr:street together with addr:place. What is > your opinion? > I agree with you, either use addr:place or use addr:street As the reason for using addr:place is that there isn't a street to which the address refers, I also don't see which street should go into addr:street, it makes no sense. Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Combined use of addr:place and addr:street
I edited the wiki and tried to improve the text a bit. As English is not my native langauge any additional correction will be appreciated. Best regards. 2017-06-23 10:18 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > 2017-06-23 10:01 GMT+02:00 Javier Sánchez Portero : > >> Regarding to the use of addr:place together with addr:street, I see a >> discrepancy between [1] which says: "Should not be used together with >> addr:street=*" >> >> And [2], which says: "Use addr:place additional to addr:street=* for such >> building, whose numbers belong not to street, but to some other object. It >> is proposed to delete addr:street=* from such houses in the future" >> >> I will like to correct this with a unified criterion in both places. >> Which one is the prefered criterion for you? I think that the addr:place >> tag should be used when there isn't a street with name to assign to the >> address so I don't see corret to use addr:street together with addr:place. >> What is your opinion? >> > > > I agree with you, either use > addr:place > > or use > addr:street > > As the reason for using addr:place is that there isn't a street to which > the address refers, I also don't see which street should go into > addr:street, it makes no sense. > > > Cheers, > Martin > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging