[Sursound] Hmmm - gamechanger ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ZZ5LoQw-O4U Of course the preamps might need a bit of hacking - I wonder how it will compare to the tascam dr680. For those of us who are still waiting for our sound devices toy from Father Christmas this might be an interesting option -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130714/29aced06/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Re: [Sursound] Hmmm - gamechanger ?
Well it's legendary - even before it's been released, so it must be good. John On 14 Jul 2013, at 16:17, Augustine Leudar wrote: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ZZ5LoQw-O4U > > Of course the preamps might need a bit of hacking - I wonder how it will > compare to the tascam dr680. For those of us who are still waiting for our > sound devices toy from Father Christmas this might be an interesting > option > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130714/29aced06/attachment.html> > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Re: [Sursound] Hmmm - gamechanger ?
or . it cost less than 2000 euros - so it must be bad. On 14 July 2013 18:24, John Leonard wrote: > Well it's legendary - even before it's been released, so it must be good. > > John > > On 14 Jul 2013, at 16:17, Augustine Leudar > wrote: > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ZZ5LoQw-O4U > > > > Of course the preamps might need a bit of hacking - I wonder how it will > > compare to the tascam dr680. For those of us who are still waiting for > our > > sound devices toy from Father Christmas this might be an interesting > > option > > -- next part -- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: < > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130714/29aced06/attachment.html > > > > ___ > > Sursound mailing list > > Sursound@music.vt.edu > > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > -- 07580951119 augustine.leudar.com ------ next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130714/cb64cc16/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Re: [Sursound] Hmmm - gamechanger ?
Here's my good and bad impressions: - Six channels is good (simultaneous stereo and Ambisonics recording) - Cheap and good enough (but then, what's "good enough"?) - No EQ at the inputs is good (to be verified) (the capsules on the H2 are slightly EQed, and the EQs are hard wired) - Only two channels for the interchangeable microphones? (then no possibility for a FOA interchangeable microphone) - Portable but a bit messy, with two pairs of inputs on each side That's not so bad for an upcoming product... We don't know if it's yet another "good enough" product from Zoom, but after 3 years with a Zoom H2 I got a Yamaha C24, because it's better, much smaller, and in the same price range. What I'd like is a recording device as small as possible, with 4 channels, a minimalistic display and a minimal amount of buttons (only on/off, record, play, and stop). Something hackable. Maybe it already exist in the form of a plugin device for phones or a small recording USB module (with 4 channels). Marc Augustine Leudar a écrit : > or . it cost less than 2000 euros - so it must be bad. > > On 14 July 2013 18:24, John Leonard wrote: > > > Well it's legendary - even before it's been released, so it must be > > good. > > > > John > > > > On 14 Jul 2013, at 16:17, Augustine Leudar > > wrote: > > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ZZ5LoQw-O4U > > > > > > Of course the preamps might need a bit of hacking - I wonder how > > > it will compare to the tascam dr680. For those of us who are > > > still waiting for > > our > > > sound devices toy from Father Christmas this might be an > > > interesting option > > > -- next part -- > > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > > URL: < > > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130714/29aced06/attachment.html > > > > > > ___ > > > Sursound mailing list > > > Sursound@music.vt.edu > > > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > > > > ___ > > Sursound mailing list > > Sursound@music.vt.edu > > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > > > > > ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Re: [Sursound] Hmmm - gamechanger ?
--On 14 July 2013 13:02 -0400 Marc Lavallée wrote: - Only two channels for the interchangeable microphones? (then no possibility for a FOA interchangeable microphone) Well, it could be done with fly-leads to two of the fixed-socket channels, a bit hacky, but no very big deal. Paul -- Paul Hodges ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
[Sursound] Zoom H6 (Was Hmmm - gamechanger ?)
Augustine Leudar wrote: Of course the preamps might need a bit of hacking - I wonder how it will compare to the tascam dr680. Its level controls seem to be analog and can't be easily ganged. So for use with TetraMic you'd have to somehow lock the levels down for the four channels, send them each a calibrated tone, and then correct them in post-production. Note that the two-XLR expansion kit doesn't provide phantom power. Len Moskowitz (mosko...@core-sound.com) Core Sound LLC www.core-sound.com Home of TetraMic ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Re: [Sursound] Zoom H6 (Was Hmmm - gamechanger ?)
One big screwup on the ST350 and 450 from Soundfield is the lack of a tone generator which is the same at each output. Would make things much easier. I asked Soundfield for it after I bought the ST350, and they hummed and hahhed and the did nothing about it. Not that I was surprised, given how glacial and somewhat sad their software development is. And their inability to discuss whether I could upgrade my 350 to 450 spec by changing either the mic unit or the box. They couldn¹t work out I was happy to buy one unit if that¹s where most of the benefits were, and couldn¹t shake the idea that I was trying to trade in an item. Which I wasn¹t. Sigh. Pain in the ass company to deal with, unfortunately. Jon On 14/07/2013 17:50, "Len Moskowitz" wrote: >Augustine Leudar wrote: > >> Of course the preamps might need a bit of hacking - I wonder how it will >> compare to the tascam dr680. > >Its level controls seem to be analog and can't be easily ganged. So for >use >with TetraMic you'd have to somehow lock the levels down for the four >channels, send them each a calibrated tone, and then correct them in >post-production. > >Note that the two-XLR expansion kit doesn't provide phantom power. > > >Len Moskowitz (mosko...@core-sound.com) >Core Sound LLC >www.core-sound.com >Home of TetraMic > >___ >Sursound mailing list >Sursound@music.vt.edu >https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
