Re: [Sursound] Which order (but not extactly high order)?

2012-11-10 Thread Eric Carmichel
Hello Eric,
Many thanks for the link to Knowles' miniature mics, as that is more current 
than the HA mic articles (e.g. Killion et al) I have on file. Clearly, such 
mics aren't intended to compete with Neumann, Schoeps, etc. studio mics, but 
their performance is quite amazing for such tiny mic elements! And their 
miniscule size might make them entirely suitable for multi-element "point 
source" mics, too.
Boosting the low end, as you pointed out, certainly has a deleterious effect on 
noise performance. Although F0 (first formant) isn't needed for intelligible 
speech--at least for normal-hearing persons--it does find an important purpose 
in EAS (electric-acoustic stimulation) devices. Briefly, persons with profound 
hearing loss (but with residual low-frequency hearing) have poor speech 
comprehension using only their low-frequency hearing. Cochlear implant 
(electric) hearing yields modest speech scores for many of these persons. But 
when the low-frequency (acoustic) hearing is added to electric stimulation, the 
combined results are amazingly good--much better than what researchers might 
have anticipated. One of the earlier problems was preserving low-frequency 
hearing while implanting an electrode array. Nowadays, shallow electrodes are 
implanted in order to preserve low-frequency hearing (note: a hearing aid is 
still needed to boost the low frequencies).

Questions, of course, remain, and it will be useful to study the effects of EAS 
in reverberant conditions and a variety of noise types. Whether the mic used to 
boost the low frequencies (conventional amplification) should be omni or 
directional may not be clear, and same goes for the mic or mics used to process 
the mid and high frequencies.
As you had also pointed out, there's a head-mic interaction, and this must be 
considered. After all, we're looking at a system, and a holistic approach is my 
objective. Although not every possible variable can be accounted for, it 
doesn't hurt to try a few representative scenarios that a CI recipient would 
encounter. The ability to hear and discern warning signals (and their 
direction) or moving vehicles can be studied. Restaurants, Houses of Worship, 
and classrooms are typical listening environments, and Ambisonic recordings 
certainly provide opportunity to re-create acoustic events over and over again 
in a controlled, repeatable manner. Even without loudspeakers, I believe it is 
feasible to study mic directionality when using Ambisonic recordings. Combining 
mic polar characteristics with HRIRs is the next step.
Thanks for reading my posts, and for taking time to share you wisdom.
Best,
Eric
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20121110/9ba1b1bf/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


[Sursound] Upgrading a voice recorder with a hex editor - TEAC VR-20 to Tascam DR-08 audio recorder

2012-11-10 Thread Andrew Castiglione
Hi!

 

For the 'Geeks' among us.

 

http://hackaday.com/2012/11/10/upgrading-a-voice-recorder-with-a-hex-editor/


 

The solution to improving the bitrate for the TEAC VR-20 was as simple as
copying the first 20 bytes from the 

TEAC firmware over to the first 20 bytes of the Tascam firmware. 

 

After that, it's a simple matter of upgrading his TEAC and getting the
ability to record at 96kHz.

 

 

Cheers!!!

 

Andrew Castiglione

 

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20121110/f5f89fbd/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


Re: [Sursound] Upgrading a voice recorder with a hex editor - TEAC VR-20 to Tascam DR-08 audio recorder

2012-11-10 Thread David Pickett

Read also the comments...

david

At 15:50 10-11-12, Andrew Castiglione wrote:
>Hi!

>For the 'Geeks' among us.

>http://hackaday.com/2012/11/10/upgrading-a-voice-recorder-with-a-hex-editor/

>The solution to improving the bitrate for the TEAC VR-20 was as simple as
>copying the first 20 bytes from the

>TEAC firmware over to the first 20 bytes of the Tascam firmware.

>After that, it's a simple matter of upgrading his TEAC and getting the
>ability to record at 96kHz.

___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


Re: [Sursound] Upgrading a voice recorder with a hex editor - TEAC VR-20 to Tascam DR-08 audio recorder

2012-11-10 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 01:50:44PM -0800, Andrew Castiglione wrote:

> For the 'Geeks' among us.
> 
> http://hackaday.com/2012/11/10/upgrading-a-voice-recorder-with-a-hex-editor/

It's a very cool hack, but the actual advantages for that type 
of equipment are dubious (as already mentioned in some of the
comments).

There are some advantages to 96 kHz, but ** only if you don't
use the full bandwidth (up to 48 kHz) ** it offers:

* it can simplify the implementation of some effects algorithms,
  in partular those that require interpolation between samples
  (pitch shifting, time stretching and the like),

* it can allow the use of shorter anti-aliasing filters and
  hence reduce delay, reason why most of the 'digital snakes' 
  used to replace the expensive multicore cables connecting 
  the stage to a FOH mixer operate at 96 kHz.

The rest is just myths.

Ciao,

-- 
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound