[python-uk] Peer-to-peer dojo
Hi again everyone (except recruiters), Well the dojo was fun last night wasn't it! The "build a peer to peer chat network" proved interesting if a little tricky to finish in the time. And with that in mind, I think some of the teams/dojoers would enjoy seeing if they can get their network working. I've added team1's code as a submodule to this dojo repo: https://github.com/ldnpydojo/p2p-chat-task So if any teams would like to post their achievements, email me your code or git repo details and I'll add it to the ldnpydojo repo. See you again next month! Cheers, Tom ___ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
[python-uk] gosh this is exciting
On 03/01/2013 23:19, Michael Foord wrote: >> > > FWIW on lists where reply-to goes to the individual I*very* >> > >regularly see messages accidentally sent only to the original sender >> > >and not to the list. Does anyone else smell a rat? How would he know Is Mr Foord READING ALL OUR EMAILS!?!?!?! Thank you all for providing a stream of giggles to brighten my day. -- Jonathan Hartleytart...@tartley.comhttp://tartley.com Made of meat. +44 7737 062 225 twitter/skype: tartley ___ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
Re: [python-uk] gosh this is exciting
Hi, Of course we smelt a rat. As soon as that comment came out, I gave up on even reading the discourse that followed. Fundamentally many of the commentators do not realise that forcing people to participate - i.e. forcing reply-to to be public - (imagine be *required* to attend *every* Python-related meetup in London; no matter what) simply does not work. No technical means to enforce / create a community has worked. Enough people elaborated on the (many) technical pitfalls of having reply-to, so I won't, the community one is often overlooked. Anand On 8 January 2013 19:02, Jonathan Hartley wrote: > On 03/01/2013 23:19, Michael Foord wrote: > >>> > > FWIW on lists where reply-to goes to the individual I *very* >>> > > regularly see messages accidentally sent only to the original sender >>> > > and not to the list. > > > Does anyone else smell a rat? How would he know Is Mr Foord READING ALL > OUR EMAILS!?!?!?! > > Thank you all for providing a stream of giggles to brighten my day. > > -- > Jonathan Hartleytart...@tartley.comhttp://tartley.com > Made of meat. +44 7737 062 225 twitter/skype: tartley > > > ___ > python-uk mailing list > python-uk@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk > -- “Don’t be sad because it’s over. Smile because it happened.” – Dr. Seuss ___ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
Re: [python-uk] gosh this is exciting
Exciting indeed, this is seriously the most participation I've seen on any thread or subject in all my time on this mailing list! (ok it's only been a couple of years...) This might actually be my first reply to this mailing list :) I don't know how a reply-to setting "forces" participation in any way but so that the argument makes more sense to me I suggest we rename it to "reply-or-...@python.org". Eleni On 8 Jan 2013, at 23:10, Anand Kumria wrote: > Hi, > > Of course we smelt a rat. > > As soon as that comment came out, I gave up on even reading the > discourse that followed. > > Fundamentally many of the commentators do not realise that forcing > people to participate - i.e. forcing reply-to to be public - (imagine > be *required* to attend *every* Python-related meetup in London; no > matter what) simply does not work. > > No technical means to enforce / create a community has worked. > > Enough people elaborated on the (many) technical pitfalls of having > reply-to, so I won't, the community one is often overlooked. > > Anand > > > On 8 January 2013 19:02, Jonathan Hartley wrote: >> On 03/01/2013 23:19, Michael Foord wrote: >> >> FWIW on lists where reply-to goes to the individual I *very* >> regularly see messages accidentally sent only to the original sender >> and not to the list. >> >> >> Does anyone else smell a rat? How would he know Is Mr Foord READING ALL >> OUR EMAILS!?!?!?! >> >> Thank you all for providing a stream of giggles to brighten my day. >> >> -- >> Jonathan Hartleytart...@tartley.comhttp://tartley.com >> Made of meat. +44 7737 062 225 twitter/skype: tartley >> >> >> ___ >> python-uk mailing list >> python-uk@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk >> > > > > -- > “Don’t be sad because it’s over. Smile because it happened.” – Dr. Seuss > ___ > python-uk mailing list > python-uk@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk ___ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
