Re: 911 FORGERY bigger than the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
SteveF wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Do not bury your head in the sand ... Do not practice denial ... It > > will only bring you to terrible shame and grief ... Do not be afraid of > > saying the truth ... Do not be afraid of death ... God will take care > > of you and your kins as he took care of the flock of Abraham, Moses and > > Jesus. > > > > Here you will find all the truth, movies, audios and proof for your > > eyes to see (even the swiss are beginning to doubt 911) : > > > > [snip] > > I just want to know how long it takes you to type this out while wearing a > strait jacket. Do you hold the pencil in your mouth and peck away? Or does > your mouth get tired and you have someone stick the pencil up your nose? > > Steve. Hey Steve Did you just pull your head out of your ass to type this? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: 911 FORGERY bigger than the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
tadchem wrote: > "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" was a fraud > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion > http://ddickerson.igc.org/protocols.html > http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mzionprotocol.html > http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoaxorum/hoaxorum1869.html > > The fraud was proven by identifying the sources used by the plagiarist > in 1921, but there are *still* those who believe it because it > justifies their racial hatred. > > Of course, like the 'Protocols', the 9/11 conspiracy hoax will be > embraced by those whose will to believe something that justifies their > irrational prejuduces exceeds their will to understand the implications > of rational data. > > As can be expected, there is a lot of overlap between the hateful > racists of the antisemitic groups and the delusional paranoids involved > in the 9/11 conspiracy theories. > > Tom Davidson > Richmond, VA There were many people who reported numerous explosions in the WTC buildings. When the firefighters arrived all the ground floor windows had been blown out. There were explosions in the sub-basement floors as reported by severely-injured caretakers who came up from there and by firefighters on the scene. Seismic records substantiate these claims. Isn't 'delusional paranoia' a little less substantive than that? Maybe you should actually *look* at the data- I know as a physicist you've kinda gotten away from that mindset. John -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Firefighters at the site of WTC7 "Move away the building is going to blow up, get back the building is going to blow up."
On May 2, 9:46 pm, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 2, 7:10 pm, Midex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > I guess the explanation that people were looking at the building and > watching its' structure deform is too rational. Also, that was a Larry Silverstein impostor who said they were going to 'pull it'. And the only reason he took out huge amounts of extra insurance on the buildings two months before this happened was because of global warming, because we all know a little bit of heat will bring down steel buildings. John -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Firefighters at the site of WTC7 "Move away the building is going to blow up, get back the building is going to blow up."
On May 3, 12:18 am, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 2, 10:14 pm, malibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On May 2, 9:46 pm, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On May 2, 7:10 pm, Midex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > I guess the explanation that people were looking at the building and > > > watching its' structure deform is too rational. > > > Also, that was a Larry Silverstein impostor who > > said they were going to 'pull it'. > > ...maybe if you read the context, it would make a little more rational > sense. Fucking nutter. > > > And the only reason he took out huge amounts > > of extra insurance on the buildings two months > > before this happened was because of global > > warming, because we all know a little bit of heat > > will bring down steel buildings. > > A little heat and major structural damage. > > > > > John Gee, I'll bet all those explosions in the subfloors of WTC1 + WTC2 did some structural damage also! Come to think of it. When the firefighters got there, all the glass on the street floors was blown out. Shock wave from the plane hitting 80 floors up? Janitors and such coming up from the basement levels bleeding and dazed. Jet fuel trickling down the elevator shafts being ignited by someone's roach? And exploding? Severing the three-foot thick steel columns? All 5 dozen of them? (That's mighty fine primo, pardner!) Your brain got structural damage? Dropped on your head as a kid? Don't put that fire iron too close to the flames, honey. It'll melt and deform! John -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
