Re: (new try) - Running a second wsgi script from within the first wsgi script
On Sun, 09 Sep 2018 18:47:49 -0700, Νίκος Βέργος wrote: > I have 3 wsgi scripts listening on 3 locations. What i'm trying to run > an wsgi script from within another wsgi script with the following > statement. > > page = 'clientele' > pdata = requests.get( 'http://superhost.gr/' + page ) > pdata = pdata.text + counter page = the location of another wsgi app. > > The error i'am getting when for i.e i try to load > http://superhost.gr/clientele > > mod_wsgi (pid=7152): Exception occurred processing WSGI script > '/home/nikos/public_html/app.py' > OSError: Apache/mod_wsgi failed to write response data: Broken pipe. > The other script by itself executes normally but NOT from within my > app.py script. > > Any ideas on how to execute a wsgi app (b) from within a wsgi app(a) and > store the response as html data? repeatedly asking the same question will not get you answered any faster in fact it may simply get you black-listed by many posters -- Why are you so hard to ignore? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
on rasberry pi 3 python 2.7 , trying to run code on geckodriver with selenium and getting error
hi ,
on rasberry pi 3 python 2.7 , trying to run code on geckodriver with selenium
and getting an error the Firefox browser is opened automatically :) it just
don't work I'm not getting the stock value on the print BTW it works on my PC
with ChromeDriver -
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/pi/Desktop/Automation RatiL works on PC.py", line 22, in
driver.get('https://www.investing.com/equities/ratio-par')
File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/selenium/webdriver/remote/webdriver.py",
line 248, in get
self.execute(Command.GET, {'url': url})
File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/selenium/webdriver/remote/webdriver.py",
line 234, in execute
response = self.command_executor.execute(driver_command, params)
File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/selenium/webdriver/remote/remote_connection.py",
line 401, in execute
return self._request(command_info[0], url, body=data)
File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/selenium/webdriver/remote/remote_connection.py",
line 433, in _request
resp = self._conn.getresponse()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/httplib.py", line , in getresponse
response.begin()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/httplib.py", line 444, in begin
version, status, reason = self._read_status()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/httplib.py", line 408, in _read_status
raise BadStatusLine(line)
BadStatusLine: ''
thanks all
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Lightweight Learn Python book
wrote a small guide on python, feedbacks appreciated https://www.pythonmembers.club/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/lightweight_learn_python_draft_1-1.pdf Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: "glob.glob('weirdness')" Any thoughts?
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Gilmeh Serda
wrote:
>
> # Python 3.6.1/Linux
> (acts the same in Python 2.7.3 also, by the way)
>
from glob import glob
>
glob('./Testfile *')
> ['./Testfile [comment] some text.txt']
>
glob('./Testfile [comment]*')
> []
>
glob('./Testfile [comment? some text.*')
> ['./Testfile [comment] some text.txt']
>
The behaviour is stated rather clearly in the documentation:
For glob:
"No tilde expansion is done, but *, ?, and character ranges expressed
with [] will be correctly matched. This is done by using the
os.scandir() and fnmatch.fnmatch() functions in concert, and not by
actually invoking a subshell." [1]
And then for fnmatch, since that is used by glob:
"For a literal match, wrap the meta-characters in brackets. For
example, '[?]' matches the character '?'." [2]
Therefore glob('./Testfile [[]comment[]]*') is what you are looking
for. It should be straightforward to wrap all the meta-characters
which you want to use in their literal form in square brackets.
The results of your analysis are also stated in the documentation for
the glob patterns [1], so there is no guessing required. Your analysis
about escaping special characters is wrong though.
While backslashes are often used as escape characters, they are not
used in such a fashion everywhere. In this case they are not used as
escape characters, which makes a lot of sense when considering that
the directory separator in Windows is a backslash and additionally
using backslashes as escape characters would lead to quite some
confusion in this case.
[1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/glob.html
[2] https://docs.python.org/3/library/fnmatch.html
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: don't quite understand mailing list
On 09/06/2018 07:40 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: On Thu, 06 Sep 2018 13:06:22 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote: On 09/06/2018 12:42 PM, Reto Brunner wrote: What do you think the link, which is attached to every email you receive from the list, is for? Listinfo sounds very promising, doesn't it? And if you actually go to it you'll find: "To unsubscribe from Python-list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options enter your subscription email address" So how about you try that? Reto, your response is inappropriate. If you can't be kind and/or respectful, let someone else respond. No it wasn't inappropriate, and your attack on Reto is uncalled for. It was inappropriate, and I wasn't attacking Reto. Reto's answer was kind and infinitely more respectful than your unnecessary criticism. As far as I can tell, this is Reto's first post here. After your hostile and unwelcoming response, I wouldn't be surprised if it was his last. His answer was both helpful and an *amazingly* restrained and kind response to a stupid question[1] asked by somebody claiming to be an professional software engineer. It was not condescending or mean- spirited, as you said in another post, nor was it snarky. Wow. I suddenly feel like I'm running for political office to get hit with such a distortion of facts. But even had the OP been a total beginner to computing, it was still a helpful response containing the information needed to solve their immediate problem (how to unsubscribe from the list) with just the *tiniest* (and appropriate) hint of reproach to encourage them to learn how to solve their own problems for themselves so that in future, they will be a better contributor to whatever discussion forums they might find themselves on. Yes, there was some helpful content. That doesn't excuse the manner of delivery. Ethan, you are a great contributor on many of the Python mailing lists, but your tone-policing is inappropriate, and your CoC banning of Rick and Bart back in July was an excessive and uncalled for misuse of moderator power. Mailing lists consists of two things: content and tone, and both are equally important. I volunteered to be a moderator for Python List as it felt to me like the existing moderators were overwhelmed by the sheer volume of this list, and a few bad actors were making this venue an unpleasant place to be. To my shame, I didn't say anything at the time, but I won't be intimidated any longer by fear of the CoC and accusations of incivility. I'm speaking up now because your reply to Reto is unwelcoming, unhelpful and disrespectful, and coming from a moderator who has been known to ban people, that makes it even more hostile. Actually, you did say something at the time: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list What I find most interesting in this post, though, is your declaration "I won't be intimidated any longer by fear of the CoC" -- it doesn't strike me as a scary document; it basically says, "be nice". [1] Yes, there are such things as stupid questions. If your doctor asked you "remind me again, which end of the needle goes into your arm?" what would you do? I would laugh, because he would be joking. -- ~Ethan~ -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: don't quite understand mailing list
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Ethan Furman wrote: > On 09/06/2018 07:40 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> Ethan, you are a great contributor on many of the Python mailing lists, >> but your tone-policing is inappropriate, and your CoC banning of Rick and >> Bart back in July was an excessive and uncalled for misuse of moderator >> power. >> >> To my shame, I didn't say anything at the time, but I won't be >> intimidated any longer by fear of the CoC and accusations of incivility. >> I'm speaking up now because your reply to Reto is unwelcoming, unhelpful >> and disrespectful, and coming from a moderator who has been known to ban >> people, that makes it even more hostile. > > > Actually, you did say something at the time: > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list Not sure what this link is stating. Did you intend to link directly to a post? Or are you saying generally that "stuff was said, check the archive"? > What I find most interesting in this post, though, is your declaration "I > won't be intimidated any longer by fear of the CoC" -- it doesn't strike me > as a scary document; it basically says, "be nice". It doesn't have to be worded scarily. Suppose the CoC simply said "be nice" - literally just those two words. It would actually be *more* scary, because its power would be far more arbitrary and at the whim of the individual moderators. Perhaps the mods would be less scary if there were more words in the CoC, such that we could point to section 5, subsection b2q, paragraph theta, as an explanation of the ban. I don't think it'd make python-list a better place, but at least it'd remove any accusations of "misuse of moderator power". For what it's worth, I support Ethan's actions - including when I've been on the receiving end of the criticism. The banning of Rick and Bart was most assuredly NOT misuse of power, at least not in my opinion (which, I'm aware, has zero weight, but hey, we all have one). Maybe people are forgetting that python-list IS a moderated list, and should be treated as one? ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: "glob.glob('weirdness')" Any thoughts?
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On 09/09/2018 02:20 PM, Gilmeh Serda wrote:
>>
>>
>> # Python 3.6.1/Linux
>> (acts the same in Python 2.7.3 also, by the way)
>>
> from glob import glob
>>
>>
> glob('./Testfile *')
>>
>> ['./Testfile [comment] some text.txt']
>>
> glob('./Testfile [comment]*')
>>
>> []
>>
[...]
>
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/glob.html#glob.escape demonstrates a way
> of escaping that works:
>
> glob('./Testfile [[]comment]*')
>
That is about the least correct working solution one could conceive.
Of course your suggested "glob('./Testfile [[]comment]*')" works in
the positive case, but pretty much comes down to a glob('./Testfile
[[]*').
And in the negative case it would provide many false positives. (e.g.
"Testfile [falacy]", "Testfile monty", "Testfile ]not quite" and so
on)
Even if you wanted to use that strange character class, which is not a
good idea (as explained above), using "[[]coment]" would be better,
since there is no reason to repeat a character.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: "glob.glob('weirdness')" Any thoughts?
On 10/09/18 14:40, Max Zettlmeißl via Python-list wrote:
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/glob.html#glob.escape demonstrates a way
of escaping that works:
glob('./Testfile [[]comment]*')
That is about the least correct working solution one could conceive.
Of course your suggested "glob('./Testfile [[]comment]*')" works in
the positive case, but pretty much comes down to a glob('./Testfile
[[]*').
And in the negative case it would provide many false positives. (e.g.
"Testfile [falacy]", "Testfile monty", "Testfile ]not quite" and so
on)
Even if you wanted to use that strange character class, which is not a
good idea (as explained above), using "[[]coment]" would be better,
since there is no reason to repeat a character.
>>> from glob import glob
>>> glob('test *')
['test comment', 'test [co]mment', 'test [fallacy]', 'test [comments]',
'test [comment] a']
>>> glob('test [[]*')
['test [co]mment', 'test [fallacy]', 'test [comments]', 'test [comment] a']
>>> glob('test [[]c*')
['test [co]mment', 'test [comments]', 'test [comment] a']
>>> glob('test [[]comment]*')
['test [comment] a']
>>>
I'm escaping the '[' as '[[]'. You can escape the ']' as well if you
want, but there's no need as a ']' is not special unless it's preceded
by an unescaped '['.
To match the character class I think you thought my glob was matching,
you'd have to use '[][comment]' rather than '[[]comment]'.
-- Thomas
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: "glob.glob('weirdness')" Any thoughts?
Max Zettlmeißl via Python-list wrote:
>> glob('./Testfile [[]comment]*')
>>
>
> That is about the least correct working solution one could conceive.
> Of course your suggested "glob('./Testfile [[]comment]*')" works in
> the positive case, but pretty much comes down to a glob('./Testfile
> [[]*').
>
If you know regular expressions there is an easy way to verify that you are
wrong:
>>> import fnmatch
>>> fnmatch.translate("foo [[]bar]*")
'foo\\ [[]bar\\].*\\Z(?ms)'
And if you don't:
>>> re.compile(_, re.DEBUG)
literal 102
literal 111
literal 111
literal 32
literal 91
literal 98
literal 97
literal 114
literal 93
max_repeat 0 4294967295
any None
at at_end_string
re.compile('foo\\ [[]bar\\].*\\Z(?ms)', re.MULTILINE|re.DOTALL|re.DEBUG)
>>> chr(91)
'['
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: don't quite understand mailing list
On 09/10/2018 05:23 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Ethan Furman wrote: Actually, you did say something at the time: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list Not sure what this link is stating. Did you intend to link directly to a post? Or are you saying generally that "stuff was said, check the archive"? No, it was a supposed to be a link, which I obviously mis-copied. Sorry. -- ~Ethan -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: don't quite understand mailing list
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 07:10:10PM +, VanDyk, Richard T wrote: > Greetings; > > I sent in a question on how to install robot framework on python 3.7 > using pip (or any other way). None of the commands on the >>> seem > to work for me. I was asked to update the c/c++ runtime which I > don't know what that means. In such cases I ask google, like, literally type "update c/c++ runtime" in it. > I was also asked to subscribe to the mailing list. I did that but > don't want everyone's submitted question to come to me. Judging from what you wrote here, you: a) are going to use Python a bit in a near future b) have a bit to read before you understand what you are doing If both a) and b) are true, then I advice that you stay on list and keep reading whichever mail tingles your curiosity, or even at random. If you do this for long enough, you will finally learn enough to solve your problem(s). Maybe you will even be able to unsubscribe on your very own? HTH -- Regards, Tomasz Rola -- ** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature. ** ** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home** ** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened... ** ** ** ** Tomasz Rola mailto:tomasz_r...@bigfoot.com ** -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: "glob.glob('weirdness')" Any thoughts?
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
from glob import glob
glob('test *')
> ['test comment', 'test [co]mment', 'test [fallacy]', 'test [comments]',
> 'test [comment] a']
glob('test [[]*')
> ['test [co]mment', 'test [fallacy]', 'test [comments]', 'test [comment] a']
glob('test [[]c*')
> ['test [co]mment', 'test [comments]', 'test [comment] a']
glob('test [[]comment]*')
> ['test [comment] a']
>
> I'm escaping the '[' as '[[]'. You can escape the ']' as well if you want,
> but there's no need as a ']' is not special unless it's preceded by an
> unescaped '['.
>
> To match the character class I think you thought my glob was matching, you'd
> have to use '[][comment]' rather than '[[]comment]'.
>
That is of course correct.
I'm sorry. Now that I looked at it again, I can't see how I came to
that wrong conclusion.
Your suggested "[][comment]" is exactly what I thought your
"[[]comment]" to be and I can't explain to myself anymore how I came
to that conclusion.
There actually is glob.ecape [1] which escapes all the glob
meta-characters in a path and does so exactly as in your example.
(Since it is obviously the shortest and therefore in this case best
way.)
[1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/glob.html#glob.escape
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: perplexing error
On 8 Sep 2018 19:10:09 GMT, Stefan Ram wrote: > Peter Pearson writes: >>On 8 Sep 2018 17:25:52 GMT, Stefan Ram wrote: >>>In such cases, I do: >>>print( 'at position 1' ) >>This approach is especially valuable when it turns out that >>the file you're editing is not the file being included. > > I am not sure whether this is taken to be literally or as > being sarcastic. [snip] No sarcasm intended. I've made the editing-wrong-file goof many times. -- To email me, substitute nowhere->runbox, invalid->com. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: perplexing error
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 7:50 AM, Peter Pearson wrote: > On 8 Sep 2018 19:10:09 GMT, Stefan Ram wrote: >> Peter Pearson writes: >>>On 8 Sep 2018 17:25:52 GMT, Stefan Ram wrote: In such cases, I do: print( 'at position 1' ) >>>This approach is especially valuable when it turns out that >>>the file you're editing is not the file being included. >> >> I am not sure whether this is taken to be literally or as >> being sarcastic. > [snip] > > No sarcasm intended. I've made the editing-wrong-file goof many times. > Me too. Or it's the right file, but not being deployed correctly. Or you're working on the wrong computer (especially if you have editors open via SSH). Or you just plain forgot to save... This sort of smoke test is invaluable. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
logging module - how to include method's class name when using %(funcName)
I'm using the Python logging module and looking for a way to include a method's class name when using %(funcName). Is this possible? When you have several related classes, just getting the function (method) name is not enough information to provide context on the code being executed. I'm outputting module name and line number so I can always go back and double check a caller's location in source, but that seems like an archaic way to find this type of information. Thank you, Malcolm -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: on rasberry pi 3 python 2.7 , trying to run code on geckodriver with selenium and getting error
alon.naj...@gmail.com writes: > on rasberry pi 3 python 2.7 , trying to run code on geckodriver with selenium > and getting an error the Firefox browser is opened automatically :) it just > don't work I'm not getting the stock value on the print BTW it works on my PC > with ChromeDriver - > > Traceback (most recent call last): > ... > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/httplib.py", line 408, in _read_status > raise BadStatusLine(line) > BadStatusLine: '' This means that the (HTTP/HTTPS) server response in not valid HTTP -- maybe, because the server died during the request processing. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: logging module - how to include method's class name when using %(funcName)
Malcolm Greene writes: > I'm using the Python logging module and looking for a way to include a > method's class name when using %(funcName). Is this possible? If it does not happen automatically, the standard logging components will not let you do it (the name "funcName" is rather explicit; you get what the name promises). However, all logging components can be customized. The logging implementation has a fine grained architecture (read the documentation of the "logging" package). The component for your kind of customization is likely called "formatter". By registering you own "formatter", you will be able to get what you want. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
