[issue41365] Python Launcher is sorry to say... No pyvenv.cfg file
New submission from Chuck : on Windows 10 64 after install of Python 3.8.5 and after install of decrypt_bitcoinj_seed.pyw <--- and after double click, I get "Python Launcher is sorry to say... No pyvenv.cfg file". I have tried multiple reinstalls of Python to no avail. When a search is performed on the entire C:\ drive, no pyvenv.cfg file is present so c:\>python -m venv myenv c:\path\to\myenv does not create the pyvenv.cfg file. The Python Script requires PIP (Google Protobuf and pylibscrypt) and I understand it's included in 3.8.5. Please provide step by step instructions for how to either create or download the pyvenv.cfg file and the exact Python path to folder name it needs to go so I can overcome this error. Or if someone has a different solution, that's fine too... I just need the decrypt_bitcoinj_seed.pyw to work. -- components: Windows messages: 374083 nosy: Packhash, paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Python Launcher is sorry to say... No pyvenv.cfg file type: behavior versions: Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue41365> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue41365] Python Launcher is sorry to say... No pyvenv.cfg file
Chuck added the comment: Mr. Dower, I apologize for not being more specific... since this is Windows based and not console driven, the file used for execution should be pythonw.exe according to the instructions at https://github.com/gurnec/decrypt_bitcoinj_seed so I right clicked on decrypt_bitcoinj_seed.pyw and went to properties and changed it's association to pythonw.exe so it would run in a non-console manner. After doing this however, it still didn't work with the error "No pyvenv.cfg file". Would I still follow your instructions, choosing Python instead of pythonw.exe? Do you happen to know why the pyvenv.cfg never got created in the first place? After all, when I do a search it's no where to be found on my C: drive. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue41365> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue41365] Python Launcher is sorry to say... No pyvenv.cfg file
Chuck added the comment: Does anyone know why when Python Launcher is executed by double clicking on the Python script called ecrypt_bitcoinj_seed.pyw a small window pops of stating... "Python Launcher is sorry to say... No pyvenv.cfg file" as in the image? Why wouldn't the pyvenv.cfg file NOT get created like it's supposed to. After doing a search for it on C: drive it is not found. If anyone has a copy of the file, would you please provide it and also tell me the folder to place it in? Thank you -- Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file49330/screenshot.png ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue41365> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6941] Socket error when launching IDLE
Changes by chuck : -- status: pending -> open title: Socket error when launching IDL -> Socket error when launching IDLE ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6941> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7076] Documentation add note about SystemRandom
chuck added the comment: Depends on how verbose we want to be. It should say why one might want to use urandom() instead of random (if you decide you are interested you can still look up the documentation). I think it would be nice to say why random does not use urandom if urandom is better, so you end up with a very short pro/con of urandom, which should be appropriate for users who are seeking information on getting random numbers. Unfortunately I don't know enough about random. I guess it's a speed/security tradeoff? -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7076> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7069] inspect.isabstract to return boolean values only
chuck added the comment: That's fine with me. Looks like nobody wants to check it in anyways. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7069> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7138] elementtree segfaults on invalid xml declaration
chuck added the comment: I'm seeing this on the built-in python on os x 10.6, too: Python 2.6.1 (r261:67515, Jul 7 2009, 23:51:51) [GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646)] on darwin But neither with the trunk Python 2.7a0 (trunk:75433M, Oct 15 2009, 08:27:13) [GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646)] on darwin nor with a ports installation Python 2.6.3 (r263:75183, Oct 7 2009, 07:05:03) [GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646)] on darwin -- nosy: +chuck ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7138> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7076] Documentation add note about SystemRandom
chuck added the comment: I think many people who are looking for a random number generator end up on this page and need to be informed if there are alternatives so they can make up their own mind. If you want to discourage people to use it, that's fine and we can do so, but I think it's wrong to hide it from people who don't suspect random functions which are os dependent to be in the os package instead of the random package or don't even know about the os random facility. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7076> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7063] Memory errors in array.array
Chuck added the comment: I attached a patch, in which I removed v and all code having to do with inserting elements. In particular, I changed the value of b to being positive, since there is no distinction between increasing and decreasing size anymore. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +Chuck Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29121/array_del_slice.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7063> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [ python-Bugs-1215887 ] String and list methods deeply hidden
SourceForge.net wrote this on Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:16:19AM -0700. My reply is below. The way the docs are written makes perfect sense to me ~ now ~ but I too had difficulty navigating them at first, particularly with finding the methods of sequence types from the TOC. Eventually, I must have looked them up in the alphabetic index and backtracked to find the appropriate TOC headings. Isn't that what everyone does? I think that's what everyone should do! Not being a "C" programmer, I must refer to "2.3.6.2 String Formatting Operations" continually, and I'm not complaining that it's not buried under "2.3.6.1 String Methods." Exposing the fourth level of subtopics in section 2.3 of the lib.html document would be nice, though. -- .. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI .. http://www.excel.net/~crhode/RockyGnashtoothsWeather/ .. 72?F. Wind WSW 9 mph. Partly cloudy. ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6978] compiler.transformer dict key bug d[1,] = 1
Chuck Rhode added the comment:
Here are four ways to generate things called in the documentation Abstract
Syntax Trees (ASTs). Obviously they are not all the same kind of object:
#!/usr/local/bin/python2.6
import sys
import compiler
import parser
import ast
STATEMENT = 'd[1,] = 2'
print 'level %s' % sys.version
print compiler.parse(STATEMENT)
print parser.suite(STATEMENT).tolist()
print ast.dump(
compile(STATEMENT, '', 'exec', ast.PyCF_ONLY_AST),
annotate_fields=False,
include_attributes=False,
)
print ast.dump(
ast.parse(STATEMENT),
annotate_fields=False,
include_attributes=False,
)
# Fin
Here are the results:
>>> level 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Jun 29 2009, 08:08:18)
[GCC 4.3.2]
>>> Module(None, Stmt([Assign([Subscript(Name('d'), 'OP_ASSIGN', [Const(1)])],
>>> Const(2))]))
>>> [257, [267, [268, [269, [270, [327, [304, [305, [306, [307, [308, [310,
>>> [311, [312, [313, [314, [315, [316, [317, [318, [1, 'd']], [322, [9, '['],
>>> [323, [324, [304, [305, [306, [307, [308, [310, [311, [312, [313, [314,
>>> [315, [316, [317, [318, [2, '1', [12, ',']], [10,
>>> ']', [22, '='], [327, [304, [305, [306, [307, [308, [310,
>>> [311, [312, [313, [314, [315, [316, [317, [318, [2, '2']],
>>> [4, '']]], [0, '']]
>>> Module([Assign([Subscript(Name('d', Load()), Index(Tuple([Num(1)],
>>> Load())), Store())], Num(2))])
>>> Module([Assign([Subscript(Name('d', Load()), Index(Tuple([Num(1)],
>>> Load())), Store())], Num(2))])
To me the *compiler* module has vestigial utility. It would be nice if it
returned correct results.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6978>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6978] compiler.transformer dict key bug d[1,] = 1
Chuck Rhode added the comment: > I don't see why the compiler module is any better than any of the other > ways that produce reasonable AST. It is available on Python releases older than 2.6? -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6978> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6978] compiler.transformer dict key bug d[1,] = 1
Chuck Rhode added the comment: PythonTidy encounters this problem. o http://lacusveris.com/PythonTidy/PythonTidy.python It is unable correctly to render line 694 of test_grammar.py in the Python Test Suite: d[1,] = 2 becomes: d[1] = 2 because the *compiler* module does not return an abstract syntax tree containing a tuple for the subscript. -- nosy: +ChuckRhode ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6978> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7210] Proposed Syntax Checks in Test Suite
New submission from Chuck Rhode : PythonTidy is a code beautifier written three years ago and downloaded numerous times. o http://lacusveris.com/PythonTidy/PythonTidy.python It suffers a bug, which has only recently come to light. It considers the following lines equivalent: if False is (2 is 3): pass if False is 2 is 3: pass They're not. PythonTidy handles other non-associative operators such as division correctly. I was unable to generalize from arithmetic operators to comparison operators because the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) generated by the *compiler* module returns a different structure for them. I tested PythonTidy by running the Python Test Suite (the *test* module scripts) through it and executing the results, thought I had all my bases covered because most tests succeeded, and missed this case, so I am suggesting an amplification of the Python Test Suite for developers who may be using it for purposes other than testing Python. I wish to add these lines to the foot of *test_grammar.py*. verify(16 // (4 // 2) == 8, '16 // (4 // 2) == 8') verify((16 // 4) // 2 == 2, '(16 // 4) // 2 == 2') verify(16 // 4 // 2 == 2, '16 // 4 // 2 == 2') verify((False is (2 is 3)) == True, '(False is (2 is 3)) == True') verify(((False is 2) is 3) == False, '(((False is 2) is 3) == False') verify((False is 2 is 3) == False, '(False is 2 is 3) == False') -- components: Tests files: test_grammar.patch keywords: patch messages: 94501 nosy: ChuckRhode severity: normal status: open title: Proposed Syntax Checks in Test Suite type: feature request versions: Python 2.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15206/test_grammar.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7210> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7210] Proposed Syntax Checks in Test Suite
Chuck Rhode added the comment: You mean like this? -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15209/test_grammar.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7210> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7210] Proposed Syntax Checks in Test Suite
Changes by Chuck Rhode : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15209/test_grammar.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7210> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7210] Proposed Syntax Checks in Test Suite
Changes by Chuck Rhode : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15206/test_grammar.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7210> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7210] Proposed Syntax Checks in Test Suite
Chuck Rhode added the comment: Well, the last two patch files weren't very good, but I hope the third time's the charm. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15210/test_grammar.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7210> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7210] Proposed Syntax Checks in Test Suite
Chuck Rhode added the comment: Yet another patch file -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15213/test_grammar.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7210> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7210] Proposed Syntax Checks in Test Suite
Changes by Chuck Rhode : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15213/test_grammar.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7210> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7210] Proposed Syntax Checks in Test Suite
Chuck Rhode added the comment: Sorry I'm having so much trouble with this patch. Here's another. Thanks for your patience. -ccr- -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15231/test_grammar.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7210> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7210] Proposed Syntax Checks in Test Suite
Changes by Chuck Rhode : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15231/test_grammar.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7210> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7210] Proposed Syntax Checks in Test Suite
Chuck Rhode added the comment: Oh! That's very different. :-) I can do that. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15237/test_grammar_trunk.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7210> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7210] Proposed Syntax Checks in Test Suite
Chuck Rhode added the comment: Thanks. -ccr- -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7210> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
