chuck <jan.hos...@gmail.com> added the comment: Depends on how verbose we want to be. It should say why one might want to use urandom() instead of random (if you decide you are interested you can still look up the documentation). I think it would be nice to say why random does not use urandom if urandom is better, so you end up with a very short pro/con of urandom, which should be appropriate for users who are seeking information on getting random numbers.
Unfortunately I don't know enough about random. I guess it's a speed/security tradeoff? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7076> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com