Jakub Nowak added the comment:
Thank for your interest Miguel. I have no experience with CPython codebase so
I'll be glad if you work on this.
I think treating ZipFile's like a separate drive would be the best. If we agree
on this then probably all of the properties and methods from pathlib could be
implemented. But without this at least `suffix`, `suffixes`, `stem`,
`with_name()`, `with_stem()`, and `with_suffix()` makes perfect sense.
If some of the properties/methods won't be implemented on zipfile.Path then it
would be useful to raise `NotImplementedError`. Currently, trying to use suffix
property, raises the error `AttributeError: 'Path' object has no attribute
'suffix'`. This is confusing as the name of the class is the same as in
`pathlib.Path` so it's not immediately obvious that it meant `zipfile.Path`.
The use-case for mimicking those two interfaces closely is to use both
interchangeably (thanks to duck-typing).
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44095>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com