Jakub Nowak <jakub.jakub.no...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Thank for your interest Miguel. I have no experience with CPython codebase so I'll be glad if you work on this. I think treating ZipFile's like a separate drive would be the best. If we agree on this then probably all of the properties and methods from pathlib could be implemented. But without this at least `suffix`, `suffixes`, `stem`, `with_name()`, `with_stem()`, and `with_suffix()` makes perfect sense. If some of the properties/methods won't be implemented on zipfile.Path then it would be useful to raise `NotImplementedError`. Currently, trying to use suffix property, raises the error `AttributeError: 'Path' object has no attribute 'suffix'`. This is confusing as the name of the class is the same as in `pathlib.Path` so it's not immediately obvious that it meant `zipfile.Path`. The use-case for mimicking those two interfaces closely is to use both interchangeably (thanks to duck-typing). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44095> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
