Re: disk quota issue
The howto i used stated it as quota.user,I'll try it again with this new insight. Thanks Tunde --- Aaron Konstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:20:18AM -0800, Babatunde Adebayo wrote: > > Hi all, > > How best ca i enable disk quota,i have 3 partions '/' , /boot and /swap > > and i wish to limit disk space for users in my home directory(under '/'). > > And please what those it mean when quotafile cannot be located eventhough i > > created them in '/'. > > > > Regards > > Tunde > What is the name of the file you created. The name should be > aquota.user . > -- > --- > Aaron Konstam > Computer Science > Trinity University > 715 Stadium Dr. > San Antonio, TX 78212-7200 > > telephone: (210)-999-7484 > email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris
Ops... I saw some logs, and may be is a bug. I will try bugzilla. Talk to you ASAP. Regards "Bala murugan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> con fecha 28/03/2003 08:21:44 a.m. Destinatarios: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris thankyou for your valuable info . when i execute this command it displays list of solaris servers. but if i click to connect nothing happens. should i modify any file? What could be the problem.. Please .. >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris >Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:40:07 +0100 > > >In my RH8 I can do this executing gdmchooser > > >HTH > > > > > >"Bala murugan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com con fecha 25/03/2003 >04:17:50 p.m. > >Por favor, responda a [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Destinatarios: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >CC: > >Asunto: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris > >Dear Admins > > >here is my setup > >we have 150 machines running on windows2000 Prof in our office. also 50 >solaris server running for our developement. all windows machine has >installed humming Bird exceed software to connect solaris desktop. Now we >are planning to go linux instead of windows,to avoid spending money for >licence on microsoft prodeuct as well as exceed software. > >can any one tell me how do i configure XDMCP chooser in linux.? because >linux connects only local server.( all solaris server running on XDMCP >broadcast) so that i can select solaris host in linux box as exceed >software >does. > >Thanks in advance >Balamurugan > > > >_ >Call US for just Rs. 5. http://www.msn.co.in/webtelephony/ Get a phone card > > > >-- >Psyche-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > > > > > > >-- >Psyche-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list _ Visit Malaysia. Win a free trip! http://server1.msn.co.in/msnspecials/malaysiatourism/index.asp Have an exotic holiday -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: WineX
Thanks Frank, it somewhat worked for me. The wineserver starts up auto and I can at least try to install programs. I'm further along than I was before. I'm currently getting stopped during the Dreamweaver install program with an error code -113any thoughts there? Thanks again, DD On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 22:56, Frank Jahn wrote: > Uninstall the RH wine packages and then install the wine-20030318-1rh8winehq > packages from http://sourceforge.net and it will work. > > Frank > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Doug B > Gesendet: Freitag, 28. März 2003 05:15 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: WineX > > > On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 18:02, Jack Bowling wrote: > > ** Reply to message from Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 > Mar 2003 14:48:45 -0900 > > > > > Anyone get errors about /username/.wine/wineserver-something/socket not > > > existing? Any ideas? I got it from freshrpms.net > > > > Yep. Apparently both VMWare and Wine were affected by the change to NPTL > in glibc which uses two registers for the new threading that were previously > used by one or both of the affected apps. You can find more info on Google. > The Wine problem affects me. Haven't figured out how to deal with it yet. > > > > jb > > > > -- > > Jack Bowlingmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Prince George, BC > > - > >From the FAC at codeweavers: > > 5.1.1.3. I updated my RedHat 8.0 packages with Up2date, now I'm getting > an "Unable to get info about installed DLLS" error. > > This problem is caused by the RedHat network updating the glibc > libraries past the point of compatibility with CrossOver. To revert to > your original glibc configuration, first insert your RedHat 8.0 > installation CD #1 and then enter the following commands: > $ su - > # mount /mnt/cdrom > # rpm -Uvh --nodeps --force /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS/glibc*.rpm > - > > If you don't need the upgraded fixes, this *might* solve your problems. > I think NSCD was 'upgraded' at the same time. You might need to downgrade > it also. > > A word of caution... the downgrade broke postfix on my machine. > > I had to manually change some files and symlinks in > /var/spool/postfix/lib after the downgrade. Don't know yet if anything > else took a hit. > > Doug > > > > -- Dan Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: disk quota issue
do not create the file by yourself. I have the same problem using RH7.3 and 8.0 trying to enable quota on a ext3 fs. the solution, inmediatly after remounting my filesystem wioth quota enabled run the program quotachek . At least, in my case, an d in 3 different machines, it solve the problems, and create the right file used by RH. REgards and good luck! -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris
Forget last message, no bugs, my brain bug :/ , need to touch some /etx/X11/gdm/gdm.conf values. In a short time i will try to say you what values hare different. [EMAIL PROTECTED]@redhat.com con fecha 28/03/2003 09:42:53 a.m. Por favor, responda a [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destinatarios: "Bala murugan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris Ops... I saw some logs, and may be is a bug. I will try bugzilla. Talk to you ASAP. Regards "Bala murugan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> con fecha 28/03/2003 08:21:44 a.m. Destinatarios: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris thankyou for your valuable info . when i execute this command it displays list of solaris servers. but if i click to connect nothing happens. should i modify any file? What could be the problem.. Please .. >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris >Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:40:07 +0100 > > >In my RH8 I can do this executing gdmchooser > > >HTH > > > > > >"Bala murugan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com con fecha 25/03/2003 >04:17:50 p.m. > >Por favor, responda a [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Destinatarios: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >CC: > >Asunto: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris > >Dear Admins > > >here is my setup > >we have 150 machines running on windows2000 Prof in our office. also 50 >solaris server running for our developement. all windows machine has >installed humming Bird exceed software to connect solaris desktop. Now we >are planning to go linux instead of windows,to avoid spending money for >licence on microsoft prodeuct as well as exceed software. > >can any one tell me how do i configure XDMCP chooser in linux.? because >linux connects only local server.( all solaris server running on XDMCP >broadcast) so that i can select solaris host in linux box as exceed >software >does. > >Thanks in advance >Balamurugan > > > >_ >Call US for just Rs. 5. http://www.msn.co.in/webtelephony/ Get a phone card > > > >-- >Psyche-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > > > > > > >-- >Psyche-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list _ Visit Malaysia. Win a free trip! http://server1.msn.co.in/msnspecials/malaysiatourism/index.asp Have an exotic holiday -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: disk quota issue
I still can't get it to work. I have tried using both quota.user and aquota.user no luck. I also tried without creating the quota file hoping it will automatically generate them,no luck again.pls help! Still in NEED! Tunde > On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:20:18AM -0800, Babatunde Adebayo wrote: > > Hi all, > > How best ca i enable disk quota,i have 3 partions '/' , /boot and /swap > > and i wish to limit disk space for users in my home directory(under '/'). > > And please what those it mean when quotafile cannot be located eventhough i > > created them in '/'. > > > > Regards > > Tunde > What is the name of the file you created. The name should be > aquota.user . > -- > --- > Aaron Konstam > Computer Science > Trinity University > 715 Stadium Dr. > San Antonio, TX 78212-7200 > > telephone: (210)-999-7484 > email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris
> -Original Message- > From: Bala murugan > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 9:18 AM > Subject: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris > > > Dear Admins > > > here is my setup [...] > can any one tell me how do i configure XDMCP chooser in > linux.? because linux connects only local server.( all > solaris server running on XDMCP broadcast) so that i can > select solaris host in linux box as exceed software > does. > Have you followed the examples listed in /etc/X11/gdm/gdm.conf for startng an X server on display 1 which runs gdmchooser? i.e. ctrl-alt-F8. Ex: 1=Terminal -indirect localhost Steve Cowles -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
red hat 9, 10, 11, 12 ... until... ???
red hat 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 ... until.. ??? is this just for market ??? wouldn't better uses kernel version number in place of sequencial numbers for determine the distro version? like this: red hat 2.4.18-27.8.0 or simply: redhat 2.4.18r1 redhat 2.4.18r2 the sys admin is more intersting about kernel version than simply number of distro version ... example: mandrake 9 ... what's the kernel comes with it ??? i don't know ... this is only my mess mind! =)) see ya !!! -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: red hat 9, 10, 11, 12 ... until... ???
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 09:49:13AM -0300, Sergio Durand wrote: > this is only my mess mind! =)) Yes, I think so. What happens if they supply both a 2.2 and 2.4 kernel? Or kernel gets many errata updates. Besides, what difference does it make? Both are just labels. -- Hal Burgiss -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: WineX
I have uninstalled and reinstalled the RPMs till I'm blue in the face... it just doesn't seem to be working. I read something about an errata update that may have changed something, but my errors seem to be related to not finding stuff: wineserver: lstat /tmp/.wine-mmills/server-303-2f885 : No such file or directory or wineserver: lstat /tmp/.wine-root : No such file or directory I have also seen the socket error somewhere in the mix of me trying to fix this. I have -e erased the RPM, removed /.wine and reinstalled to no avail. Any other ideas? Michael On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:56:49AM +0100, Frank Jahn wrote: > Uninstall the RH wine packages and then install the wine-20030318-1rh8winehq > packages from http://sourceforge.net and it will work. Not on my box :(( Just tried and it fails. -- Jack Bowling mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list <>
disk quota issue-RESOLVED!
Hi all, I finally got it working! The key to it was to run quotacheck -i -c -M /yourmountpoint (read man quotacheck)This will generate the necessary aquota.user file, from then on the journey becomes very smooth. Very simple. Thank you all for the ideas. Warm wishes Tunde __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
find and replace text in files
I have a directory of about 60 files. I want to search these files and replace some text. Is there an easy way to do this from a command line? -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Terminfo help -- Newbie
Hello dear friends, I am newbie in advanced linux field. I have one small but very big problem troubling me from last 15 days. I have redhat 8 installed on my system. I am making one application in ncurses and in that I am not able to show the BORDERS in the windows. My TERM variable is set to 'linux' and language to en_US.utf8. I tried downloading new terminfo source file and compiled it with tic then also no solution. I mean I can see everything but no border at all and seeing blank spaces instead of horizontal and vertical line. Please help me out of this ASAP. As my time limit is running towards me with a horrible face. Hoping best reply from some one. :-( Vishal Soni. ___ Odomos - the only mosquito protection outside 4 walls - Click here to know more! http://r.rediff.com/r?http://clients.rediff.com/odomos/Odomos.htm&&odomos&&wn -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: find and replace text in files
On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 15:15, ghwbush wrote: > I have a directory of about 60 files. I want to search these files and > replace some text. Is there an easy way to do this from a command > line? for file in `ls` ; do cat $file | sed 's/search/replace/' > $file.new ; done assuming you are searching for "search" and want to replace it with "replace" Piero -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: find and replace text in files
On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 14:35, Piero Calucci wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 15:15, ghwbush wrote:
> > I have a directory of about 60 files. I want to search these files and
> > replace some text. Is there an easy way to do this from a command
> > line?
>
> for file in `ls` ; do cat $file | sed 's/search/replace/' > $file.new ;
> done
>
> assuming you are searching for "search" and want to replace it with
> "replace"
You may also want to try:
for file in `ls` ; do perl -pie 's/search/replace/' $file ; done
or, which may be better if you want your files are in various
subdirectories:
find . -type f -exec perl -pie 's/search/replace/' \{\} \;
which stands for:
find, from here, files and perform perl -pie 's' on them
Hugs, Rui
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RH 9 - new glibc
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:20:42PM -0600, Doug B wrote:
> If I understand correctly, it seems the reason to jump a major version
> is because the new glibc breaks binary compatability.
>
> OK... that makes sense.
>
> Why then would RedHat introduce a new glibc into RH 8 that breaks
> compatabilty with some programs (wine comes to mind and apparently
> VMWare)? Shouldn't they have patched the glibc version that shipped
> (and worked) rather than break RH 8 with a new version?
Do you know for sure that it breaks things? I'm about to install
it today ...
$ rpm -qp --changelog glibc-2.3.2-4.80.src.rpm | head -14
* Wed Mar 19 2003 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.3.2-4.80
- build as 8.0 errata
- turn compatibility only symbols which are referenced in libc.so's
relocations back into @@ symvers, as otherwise statically linked
RHL 8 apps segfault when doing NSS or iconv
- move __libc_fork, __libc_stack_end, __libc_wait and __libc_waitpid
from GLIBC_PRIVATE symver for the errata
- remove {INIT,PREINIT,FINI}_ARRAY support, since it requires
binutils changes
- don't build NPTL libraries
- strip libraries and binaries, recreate glibc-debug-static
subpackage
Regards,
Bill Rugolsky
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: RH 9 - new glibc
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:01:09AM -0500, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote: > Do you know for sure that it breaks things? I'm about to install > it today ... I can verify some PHP breakage (phpwiki's use of gdbm seems to do a number on the glibc upgrade, while other dba_XX() backends seem to be unaffected; rolling back fixes it). Search bugzilla.redhat.com for bugs filed against glibc, and you'll see a few others (wine, Netscape Communicator). > $ rpm -qp --changelog glibc-2.3.2-4.80.src.rpm | head -14 That's the one. Most of my servers and desktops are fine with it, but I have a webserver that has to have a working phpwiki using gdbm storage, and I've had to roll that one back to glibc 2.2. Once RHL 9 comes out, I'll see if I have the same problem there (since I've got at least one machine ready to be my guinea pig for the release ;-). (This is a call for help, btw: if anyone else is seeing this particular issue, I would love a little help putting together a reproducable test case that doesn't involve half the phpwiki source code, to help the RH folks track this down a little faster. Time to start reading through the glibc 2.3 changelog...) -- Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://esm.logic.net/ Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Broken gcc 3.2 in RH8.0 with glibc-2.3.2
I'm having a problem with gcc/glibc comaptibility on systems that I have upgraded to RH 8.0 On systems that had the standard gcc that came with 7.3, when upgraded to 8.0, then I installed the new glibc-2.3.2 rpms, no problems building things with gcc 3.2. On systems on which I have previously installed gcc 2.95.3 from tarball sources, in /usr/local/bin, when I upgrade to 8.0 and install the new glibc-2.3.2 rpms, gcc 3.2 is broken--there are numerous unresolved references in the link step---, but I can still build things with gcc 2.95.3. Can anyone help me fix this-- i.e. make gcc 3.2 work? Thanks John Ketchum Qualcomm Inc. -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: one our time drift
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 14:46, Nicolas Turro wrote: > Hi, > > I report the same bug as in thread : > > Time Drift / Shift Problem - Please > help > > > by Charlie McVeigh... > > My computer goes 1hour ahead a few hours after i > set the 'right' time. > > 1-My bios clock is right > 2-I set the sytem clock with hwclock --hctosys > 3-the clock is ok for a while, then jumps 1 hour ahead. > > Using ntp or not doesn't change anything, and eventually > ntpd dies saying something like "drift larger than 3600s" > in /var/log/messages. > > Here is my /etc/sysconfig/clock : > ZONE="Europe/Paris" > UTC=0 > ARC=0 > > which seems correct. > > I don't use apmd (because when it decides to suspend > the network interface, i have problems with amd) > > It's not a laptop (and no battery applet is running). For information, this problem disapeared after i did 2 things : - reboot (never rebooted during my atempts to fix the problem) - disable 'energy management' in the COMPAQ bios I actually don't know which one solved the issue. -- Nicolas Turro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> INRIA -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
APM with MSI-6167 doesn't work
Hi, I've got problems power-off my MSI-6167-motherboard with Psyche. The system stops but doesn't power down. I use the standard-kernel installed by the normal installation (Athlon). The apmd seems to work normally in my process-list. I also read something, that APM is old and ACPI is that what we have to use... but I haven't find a simple howto for redhat 8.0. What to do for a normal power-down with APM (or ACPI) ? Henning -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: WineX
That's what i'm using...On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 21:56, Frank Jahn wrote: > Uninstall the RH wine packages and then install the wine-20030318-1rh8winehq > packages from http://sourceforge.net and it will work. > > Frank > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Doug B > Gesendet: Freitag, 28. März 2003 05:15 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: WineX > > > On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 18:02, Jack Bowling wrote: > > ** Reply to message from Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 > Mar 2003 14:48:45 -0900 > > > > > Anyone get errors about /username/.wine/wineserver-something/socket not > > > existing? Any ideas? I got it from freshrpms.net > > > > Yep. Apparently both VMWare and Wine were affected by the change to NPTL > in glibc which uses two registers for the new threading that were previously > used by one or both of the affected apps. You can find more info on Google. > The Wine problem affects me. Haven't figured out how to deal with it yet. > > > > jb > > > > -- > > Jack Bowlingmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Prince George, BC > > - > >From the FAC at codeweavers: > > 5.1.1.3. I updated my RedHat 8.0 packages with Up2date, now I'm getting > an "Unable to get info about installed DLLS" error. > > This problem is caused by the RedHat network updating the glibc > libraries past the point of compatibility with CrossOver. To revert to > your original glibc configuration, first insert your RedHat 8.0 > installation CD #1 and then enter the following commands: > $ su - > # mount /mnt/cdrom > # rpm -Uvh --nodeps --force /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS/glibc*.rpm > - > > If you don't need the upgraded fixes, this *might* solve your problems. > I think NSCD was 'upgraded' at the same time. You might need to downgrade > it also. > > A word of caution... the downgrade broke postfix on my machine. > > I had to manually change some files and symlinks in > /var/spool/postfix/lib after the downgrade. Don't know yet if anything > else took a hit. > > Doug > > > > -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: WineX
Where do you get the other wine tools? On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 07:56, Dan Devine wrote: > Hi Michael, > > do you have the other wine tools also?.like winecheck, winesetuptk > and winetools?.I know these are not required, but having them did > make my job easier. Winecheck also helped me identify some basic config > issues which I missed.I just kept tweaking and re-running winecheck > until my score started to get into the 90%'s > > One additional thing I've observed.don't try to run wine as root! I > actually receive a LOWER overall score from winetest when running as > root than I do with the same settings from my normal user account.I > see the root username tagged into your message > > Before this rpm update, I had to manually start the wineserver from the > command line before I could start anything with wine. > > Try the most basic.like notepad.exe or winemine.exe to debug. > > DD > > On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 05:48, Michael Mills wrote: > > I have uninstalled and reinstalled the RPMs till I'm blue in the face... it just > > doesn't seem to be working. I read something about an errata update that may have > > changed something, but my errors seem to be related to not finding stuff: > > wineserver: lstat /tmp/.wine-mmills/server-303-2f885 : No such file or directory > > or > > wineserver: lstat /tmp/.wine-root : No such file or directory > > > > I have also seen the socket error somewhere in the mix of me trying to fix this. > > > > I have -e erased the RPM, removed /.wine and reinstalled to no avail. Any other > > ideas? > > > > Michael > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:56:49AM +0100, Frank Jahn wrote: > > > Uninstall the RH wine packages and then install the wine-20030318-1rh8winehq > > > packages from http://sourceforge.net and it will work. > > > > Not on my box :(( Just tried and it fails. > > > > -- > > Jack Bowling > > mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > Dan Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: find and replace text in files
Hi, Good answer, but if your want to replace all "search" terms in a line (and not only the first found), just add the "g" parameter at the end of sed command : (g = globally)... for file in `ls` ; do cat $file | sed 's/search/replace/g' > $file.new ; > done If I make no mistake, as I did not use it for a long time, but used to work with it in my former job. Cheers, -- Philippe, Chiangmai, Thailand On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 21:35, Piero Calucci wrote: > On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 15:15, ghwbush wrote: > > I have a directory of about 60 files. I want to search these files and > > replace some text. Is there an easy way to do this from a command > > line? > > for file in `ls` ; do cat $file | sed 's/search/replace/' > $file.new ; > done > > assuming you are searching for "search" and want to replace it with > "replace" > > Piero -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: find and replace text in files
perl -pi -e 's/oldtext/newtext/' * >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/28/03 12:27PM >>> Hi, Good answer, but if your want to replace all "search" terms in a line (and not only the first found), just add the "g" parameter at the end of sed command : (g = globally)... for file in `ls` ; do cat $file | sed 's/search/replace/g' > $file.new ; > done If I make no mistake, as I did not use it for a long time, but used to work with it in my former job. Cheers, -- Philippe, Chiangmai, Thailand On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 21:35, Piero Calucci wrote: > On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 15:15, ghwbush wrote: > > I have a directory of about 60 files. I want to search these files and > > replace some text. Is there an easy way to do this from a command > > line? > > for file in `ls` ; do cat $file | sed 's/search/replace/' > $file.new ; > done > > assuming you are searching for "search" and want to replace it with > "replace" > > Piero -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
/usr/lib/libXft.so.2
I am getting an error as of this morning from KDE or GNOME when starting X: relocation error: /usr/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Set_Hint_Flags I am not sure what I did to do this. I updated the Kerbos (sp?) packages yesterday and Kapital as well. Only my userid seems affected. I am able to log in as root. So, I deleted all .gnome*, .gtdk*, .kde, .metacity, .mcop*, and perhaps a few others thinking that it must have been a customization issue. It wasn't. Perhaps it is a file permissions error? Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Harry -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Broken gcc 3.2 in RH8.0 with glibc-2.3.2
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:28:54AM -0500, John Ketchum wrote: > I'm having a problem with gcc/glibc comaptibility on systems that I have > upgraded to RH 8.0 > > On systems that had the standard gcc that came with 7.3, when upgraded to > 8.0, then I installed the new glibc-2.3.2 rpms, no problems building things > with gcc 3.2. > > On systems on which I have previously installed gcc 2.95.3 from tarball > sources, in /usr/local/bin, when I upgrade to 8.0 and install the new > glibc-2.3.2 rpms, gcc 3.2 is broken--there are numerous unresolved > references in the link step---, but I can still build things with gcc 2.95.3. > > Can anyone help me fix this-- i.e. make gcc 3.2 work? Please file a bugzilla bug with exact details what are you doing and what errors do you get. Jakub -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Hardware change breaks RHN applet
I moved my disk from a P-III laptop to a P4 laptop. When I booted up, hardware detection went smoothly. Had to reconfigure X to set the display (which wasn't recognized) and the wireless card MAC address, but all-in-all, it was pretty easy. (Wonder how well Windows would have handled it..., nah, I don't really.) Also had to delete the old profile from RHN and register the new one. The only thing now is that the RHN applet crashes every time it attempts to check in with "SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE, certificate verify failed" error. Any idea how to fix that? Thanks. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: ULOGD and iptables -j ULOG?
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 09:42:13 -0600, Miguel M wrote > Mike Vanecek wrote: > >BTW, this works better if one uses the kern.=debug format. > > You are right Mike! > kern.=debug is more efficient > > >Of course, I hope that nothing else is generating kern.debug messages > > mmm... How about using a unique log prefix and then filtering? > For example: > > # /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -j LOG --log-level DEBUG --log-prefix "vanecek: " > ... > # grep vanecek /var/log/packets I use the --log-prefix to track each class of packets I am logging. However, with the change above, it is not needed. -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Hardware change breaks RHN applet
On Friday 28 March 2003 10:25, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > Also had to delete the old profile from RHN and register the new one. > The only thing now is that the RHN applet crashes every time it attempts > to check in with "SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE, certificate verify failed" > error. Any idea how to fix that? Double check the time on the new laptop. I've seen RHN connections get refused with an SSL error due to the time being wildly off on the client system. -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE http://geek.j2solutions.net Mondo DevTeam (http://www.microwerks.net/~hugo/) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Crack for MD5 Passwords?- correction
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 02:00:58 -0500, Raúl D. Pittí Palma wrote > Ronald W. Heiby wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Thanks to all for the pointer to "John". It installed with very little > > trouble. Probably the trickiest part was figuring out that it was > > using its own (tiny) word list, rather than the big list that comes in > > the distro, and where to change it in the config file. > > > > Anyway, I've got one of my fastest machines at work using its spare > > cycles to test our group's passwords. > > > > I temporarily created a password of "apple" on an account that > > ordinarily does not allow logins, and it found that within a couple of > > minutes. So, I guess it's working! Fortunately, after about 36 hours, > > it has not yet found one of the "real" passwords. Should be > > interesting. > > > > Thanks again! Ron. > gogle on "muffet dictionary" and feed it to john. you might be > surprised.. :-) Not sure what I am suppose to be looking for; is this the wordlist you had in mind: ftp://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/dict/local from http://www.openwall.com/PR/wordlists/ I also found a smaller wordlist at http://www.openwall.com/PR/wordlists/common.txt Also found links to several word lists at http://wordlist.sourceforge.net/ (I did find a whole bunch more on recovery at http://members.aol.com/jpeschel/crack.htm#ktools). However, I am not sure if any of these is the one to which you refer? -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: WineX
On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 01:56, Frank Jahn wrote: > Uninstall the RH wine packages and then install the wine-20030318-1rh8winehq > packages from http://sourceforge.net and it will work. The only wine stuff I'm using is the crossover plugin and office. Can I use this "fix" to get the codeweavers stuff to work? I know it would be a very big undertaking to walk through and manually replace the wine binaries for codeweavers stuff but I'm curious as to whether it would work at all. -- Farewell neighbor. Thank you for giving us a safe place for so many years. Fred Rodgers - 1928-2003 -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Broken gcc 3.2 in RH8.0 with glibc-2.3.2
On further investigation, it turns out that this problem is specific to C++ programs. When compiling with gcc 3.2, the linker can't find libstdc++, or has unresolved symbols for some other reason, without explicitly referring to -lstdc++ in the link step. When using gcc 2.95.3, the explicit reference to -lstdc++ isn't necessary. I will enter this in Bugzilla. Is this a bug or a "feature"? At 12:53 PM 3/28/2003 -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:28:54AM -0500, John Ketchum wrote: > I'm having a problem with gcc/glibc comaptibility on systems that I have > upgraded to RH 8.0 > > On systems that had the standard gcc that came with 7.3, when upgraded to > 8.0, then I installed the new glibc-2.3.2 rpms, no problems building things > with gcc 3.2. > > On systems on which I have previously installed gcc 2.95.3 from tarball > sources, in /usr/local/bin, when I upgrade to 8.0 and install the new > glibc-2.3.2 rpms, gcc 3.2 is broken--there are numerous unresolved > references in the link step---, but I can still build things with gcc 2.95.3. > > Can anyone help me fix this-- i.e. make gcc 3.2 work? Please file a bugzilla bug with exact details what are you doing and what errors do you get. Jakub -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list John Ketchum Qualcomm Inc. 9 Damonmill Square Suite 2A Concord, MA 01742 -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Broken gcc 3.2 in RH8.0 with glibc-2.3.2
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:08:39PM -0500, John Ketchum wrote: > On further investigation, it turns out that this problem is specific to C++ > programs. When compiling with gcc 3.2, the linker can't find libstdc++, > or has unresolved symbols for some other reason, without explicitly > referring to -lstdc++ in the link step. When using gcc 2.95.3, the > explicit reference to -lstdc++ isn't necessary. I will enter this in > Bugzilla. Are you linking using g++ driver (and not using gcc, or even worse ld alone)? (only g++ adds -lstdc++ automatically). Jakub -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Broken gcc 3.2 in RH8.0 with glibc-2.3.2
Not using g++ driver-- just gcc. I guess you're saying its not a bug, its a feature. At 02:16 PM 3/28/2003 -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:08:39PM -0500, John Ketchum wrote: > On further investigation, it turns out that this problem is specific to C++ > programs. When compiling with gcc 3.2, the linker can't find libstdc++, > or has unresolved symbols for some other reason, without explicitly > referring to -lstdc++ in the link step. When using gcc 2.95.3, the > explicit reference to -lstdc++ isn't necessary. I will enter this in > Bugzilla. Are you linking using g++ driver (and not using gcc, or even worse ld alone)? (only g++ adds -lstdc++ automatically). Jakub -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list John Ketchum Qualcomm Inc. 9 Damonmill Square Suite 2A Concord, MA 01742 -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Adding Language support after install
Hello, Is it possible to add language support after you install RH in English? I couldn't find it under the redhat-config-packages utility. -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Hardware change breaks RHN applet
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Friday 28 March 2003 10:25, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > Also had to delete the old profile from RHN and register the new one. > > The only thing now is that the RHN applet crashes every time it attempts > > to check in with "SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE, certificate verify failed" > > error. Any idea how to fix that? > > Double check the time on the new laptop. I've seen RHN connections get > refused with an SSL error due to the time being wildly off on the client > system. That wasn't it, but rebooting appears to have solved the problem. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 22:38:52 -0500, Michael Fratoni wrote > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 26 March 2003 05:01 pm, Mike Vanecek wrote: > > Mozilla 1.3 release notes say that it is only compatible with java > > compiled with GCC 3.2 which is available from the Blackdown project. > > > > However, they also say a version with GCC 3.2 is also rumored to be > > available from Sun sometime soon. > > > > I have j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs installed. I have looked at the java doco, > > but am unable to determine if this is the version compiled with GCC > > 3.2. Hate to reinstall the Blackdown project one if it is not > > necessary. How can I tell whether j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs was compiled with > > GCC 3.2? > > It appears that mozilla only requires that the plugin be compiled > with gcc-3.2. I was able to keep my older version of Sun's j2re rpm > package > (j2re-1.4.1-fcs). > > I downloaded and uncompressed the blackdown java package built with > gcc-3.2, and copied only the plugin to my existing java directory. > In my case: /usr/java/j2re1.4.1/plugin/i386/ns610/javaplugin_oji.so > > I removed the old link in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/, and created one > to the new version. (in other words, I removed the link to > libjavaplugin_oji.so and created a new one pointing to javaplugin_oji.so. > > Seems to work fine. Did not work for me. My guess is that I have j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs from java.sun installed. However, the blackstone is for j2sdk-1.4.1-01. Installation details shown below. The java plugin shows up in Mozilla, but if I link to something that uses java Mozilla hangs. Do you see anything I missed? I guess I either wait for a gcc 3.2 from sun or I rpm -e the sun version and install the blackstone version. Sun version of java installed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | grep -i j2 j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs Installed Mozilla 1.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | grep -i mozilla mozilla-1.3-0_rh8_xft mozilla-nss-1.3-0_rh8_xft mozilla-psm-1.3-0_rh8_xft mozilla-nspr-1.3-0_rh8_xft downloaded the Blackstone version of java [EMAIL PROTECTED] admin]$ d j2sdk-1.4.1-01-linux-i586-gcc3.2.bin -rwxr-1 adminadmin 39M Mar 28 11:49 j2sdk-1.4.1-01-linux-i586-gcc3.2.bin* Extracted the plugin and copied it to the java plugin location and inserted the required symbolic link [EMAIL PROTECTED] mozilla]$ pwd /home/admin/j2sdk1.4.1/jre/plugin/i386/mozilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] mozilla]$ d total 260K drwxr-xr-x2 adminadmin4.0K Jan 13 10:03 ./ drwxr-xr-x4 adminadmin4.0K Feb 11 12:10 ../ -rw-r--r--1 adminadmin244K Jan 13 10:03 javaplugin_oji.so Copied blackstone version after renaming the sun version: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns610]# pwd /usr/java/j2sdk1.4.1_02/jre/plugin/i386/ns610 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns610]# d total 532K drwxr-xr-x2 root bin 4.0K Mar 28 14:46 ./ drwxr-xr-x5 root bin 4.0K Mar 28 14:24 ../ -rwxr-xr-x1 root bin 244K Mar 28 14:33 libjavaplugin_oji.so* -rwxr-xr-x1 root bin 267K Feb 20 17:07 libjavaplugin_oji.so.org* Symbolic link: [EMAIL PROTECTED] plugins]# pwd /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins [EMAIL PROTECTED] plugins]# d total 1.6M drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4.0K Mar 28 14:39 ./ drwxr-xr-x3 root root 4.0K Jan 19 21:04 ../ -rw-r--r--1 root root 856 Jan 19 21:15 flashplayer.xpt -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1.4M Jan 19 21:14 libflashplayer.so* lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 66 Mar 28 14:39 libjavaplugin_oji.so -> /usr/java/j2sdk1.4.1_02/jre/plugin/i386/ns610/libjavaplugin_oji.so* -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 127K Oct 17 00:08 nppdf.so* -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 28K Aug 28 2002 plugger.so* Thank you for the help. Mike. -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: Need help...Sybase12.5
replaced glibc-2.3.2 with glibc-2.2.5-93 Same result... Is there any problems if glibc -2.2.4-32 is used on RH8.0? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Naum Stolarskiy Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Need help...Sybase12.5 Here it is: /lib /usr/lib /usr/lib/qt-1.45/lib /usr/kerberos/lib /usr/lib/wine /usr/lib/mysql /usr/lib/sane /usr/sybase-12.5/lib /usr/lib/qt-2.3.0/lib /usr/lib/qt-3.0.5/lib /usr/X11R6/lib /opt/sybase-12.5/OCS/lib /opt/sybase-12.5/ASE/lib Naum. On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 17:52, csieh wrote: > Naum, > > What are the contents of /etc/ld.so.conf and the value of LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > > -Connie Sieh > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, csieh wrote: > > > Naum, > > > > What version of glibc do you have? > > Any error messages? > > > > Connie Sieh > > > > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Naum Stolarsky > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Here we go again... > > > > > > Did anybody installed Sybase 12.5 on RH8.0? > > > What version of glibc do you have? > > > My srvbuild can't create master.dat... > > > Everything I've found so far points to glibc. > > > Thanks in advance, > > > Naum. > > > > > > -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Hardware change breaks RHN applet
That wasn't it, but rebooting appears to have solved the problem. waooo!! just like windows!! ;-D -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Adding Language support after install
Stephen Mah wrote: Hello, Is it possible to add language support after you install RH in English? I couldn't find it under the redhat-config-packages utility. install the apropiates rpm's. (gettext, languages extensions for gnome, kde, etc.) RP -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Recovering a Damaged RH 8.0 System
I am working with another person repairing a damaged RH 8.0 system. Now that we know what is wrong, how could this happen becomes an interesting question. Here is the exact scenario. This is a laptop loaded with RH 8.0 and a number of diagnostic tools. Up2date had just been run and the machine shut down. The machine was booted the next day and brought up to the login prompt, but no login was done. The machine was unplugged from external power and went to battery power and was taken to a lab. A priority situation arose and the laptop was left in this state till it's battery wore out several hours later. After recharging the battery, the machine would not boot. After digging around after booting with the CD, we found the problem was the soft links in /lib were corrupted. The link contents were corrupted differently on each link, but letters were changed. For example, on many links, the 'i' in lib was changed to a ')'. The 's' in .so was often changed to a '3'. Telling the CD to upgrade the system does no good because the check against the RPM files says nothing needs to be changed and nothing gets done. So we are going through the links and fixing them one at a time. Has anyone seen this before? Is there any automated way to recover this without wiping out the partitions? -- Robert E. Styma Principal Engineer (DMTS) AG Communication Systems, Phoenix - A subsidiary of Lucent Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 623-582-7323 FAX: 623-581-4884 Company: http://www.agcs.com Personal: http://www.swlink.net/~styma -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: Need help...Sybase12.5
Naum, So, the issue seems to be that if /lib:/usr/lib are in LD_LIBRARY_PATH then /lib/libc-2.2.4.so is used; and with them not /lib/i686/libc-2.2.4.so is used. The 686 lib is working, the other is not. Investigation is underway So since you have /lib and /usr/lib in /etc/ld.so.conf I suggest taking those out and rerunning ldconfig. And make sure /lib:/usr/lib are not part of LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Note that the issue above is described in Bugzilla 86398 and 86359. -Connie Sieh Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Naum Stolarsky wrote: > replaced glibc-2.3.2 with glibc-2.2.5-93 > Same result... > Is there any problems if glibc -2.2.4-32 is used on > RH8.0? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Naum > Stolarskiy > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Need help...Sybase12.5 > > > Here it is: > /lib > /usr/lib > /usr/lib/qt-1.45/lib > /usr/kerberos/lib > /usr/lib/wine > /usr/lib/mysql > /usr/lib/sane > /usr/sybase-12.5/lib > /usr/lib/qt-2.3.0/lib > /usr/lib/qt-3.0.5/lib > /usr/X11R6/lib > /opt/sybase-12.5/OCS/lib > /opt/sybase-12.5/ASE/lib > Naum. > > On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 17:52, csieh wrote: > > Naum, > > > > What are the contents of /etc/ld.so.conf and the > value of LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > > > > -Connie Sieh > > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, csieh wrote: > > > > > Naum, > > > > > > What version of glibc do you have? > > > Any error messages? > > > > > > Connie Sieh > > > > > > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Naum Stolarsky > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Here we go again... > > > > > > > > Did anybody installed Sybase 12.5 on RH8.0? > > > > What version of glibc do you have? > > > > My srvbuild can't create master.dat... > > > > Everything I've found so far points to glibc. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Naum. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Gateway 600YG2 laptop problems with video
I have a Gateway 600YG2 with a Radeon Mobility 9000 video card and I can not get X-Windows to startup. The system is not finding the LCD panel at all and I have tried various generic laptop LCD panel settings using the redhat-config-xfree86 tool. When I start X-Windows the system just hangs, I can ctrl-c out of it, but x-windows does not come up. If I run Xtest I get a display and everything seems to work fine. I check the XFree86.0.log and there are no errors. Any suggestions, I am not sure if this is a Radeon problem or a problem with the LCD display. Thanks in advance, Cory _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: WineX
On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 09:21, Michael Smith wrote: > Where do you get the other wine tools? I got winetools from http://www.franksworld.net/winetools/ Franksworld has a lot of information about wineI don't know what his exact connection is with wine is, but the site is helpful. winesetuptk is available (I think) on Sourceforgethe searching appears to be down right now though. winecheck.pl is somewhere on google, if you don't find it, I could mail you my copy offline. It appears that the people running the wine site have taken all of these interesting glibc notes to heart, "Know Your glibc"...they have some additional knowledge about this at: http://www.winehq.org/index.php?issue=163#Making%20Wine%20Run%20With%20glibc%202.3 I'm going to try using their workaround, I'll report back. DD -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: WineX
I am out of the office until 4-2-2003. I will respond to your email at that time. If you need immediate assistance, call the help desk. -Michael -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: Need help...Sybase12.5
Removed /lib;/usr/lib from ld.so.conf # more /etc/ld.so.conf /usr/lib/qt-1.45/lib /usr/kerberos/lib /usr/lib/wine /usr/lib/mysql /usr/lib/sane /usr/sybase-12.5/lib /usr/lib/qt-2.3.0/lib /usr/lib/qt-3.0.5/lib /usr/X11R6/lib /opt/sybase-12.5/OCS/lib /opt/sybase-12.5/ASE/lib Ran ldconfig -v # $LD_LIBRARY_PATH bash: /opt/office52/adabas/lib:/opt/office52/adabas/lib:/opt/office52/adabas/lib ran asecfg ... same result...same error message Thanks, Naum.. On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 16:42, csieh wrote: > Naum, > > So, the issue seems to be that if /lib:/usr/lib are in LD_LIBRARY_PATH > then /lib/libc-2.2.4.so is used; and with them not /lib/i686/libc-2.2.4.so > is used. The 686 lib is working, the other is not. Investigation is > underway > > So since you have /lib and /usr/lib in /etc/ld.so.conf I suggest taking > those out and rerunning ldconfig. And make sure /lib:/usr/lib are not > part of LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > > Note that the issue above is described in Bugzilla 86398 and 86359. > > -Connie Sieh > Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory > On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Naum Stolarsky wrote: > > > replaced glibc-2.3.2 with glibc-2.2.5-93 > > Same result... > > Is there any problems if glibc -2.2.4-32 is used on > > RH8.0? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Naum > > Stolarskiy > > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:59 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Need help...Sybase12.5 > > > > > > Here it is: > > /lib > > /usr/lib > > /usr/lib/qt-1.45/lib > > /usr/kerberos/lib > > /usr/lib/wine > > /usr/lib/mysql > > /usr/lib/sane > > /usr/sybase-12.5/lib > > /usr/lib/qt-2.3.0/lib > > /usr/lib/qt-3.0.5/lib > > /usr/X11R6/lib > > /opt/sybase-12.5/OCS/lib > > /opt/sybase-12.5/ASE/lib > > Naum. > > > > On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 17:52, csieh wrote: > > > Naum, > > > > > > What are the contents of /etc/ld.so.conf and the > > value of LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > > > > > > -Connie Sieh > > > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, csieh wrote: > > > > > > > Naum, > > > > > > > > What version of glibc do you have? > > > > Any error messages? > > > > > > > > Connie Sieh > > > > > > > > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Naum Stolarsky > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here we go again... > > > > > > > > > > Did anybody installed Sybase 12.5 on RH8.0? > > > > > What version of glibc do you have? > > > > > My srvbuild can't create master.dat... > > > > > Everything I've found so far points to glibc. > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > Naum. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: WineX
Thanks, I figured out most of what I needed... (and found winecheck somewhere) On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 13:10, Dan Devine wrote: > On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 09:21, Michael Smith wrote: > > Where do you get the other wine tools? > I got winetools from http://www.franksworld.net/winetools/ > > Franksworld has a lot of information about wineI don't > know what his exact connection is with wine is, but the site is helpful. > > > winesetuptk is available (I think) on Sourceforgethe searching appears > to be down right now though. > > winecheck.pl is somewhere on google, if you don't find it, I could mail you > my copy offline. > > It appears that the people running the wine site have taken all of these > interesting glibc notes to heart, "Know Your glibc"...they have some > additional knowledge about this at: > http://www.winehq.org/index.php?issue=163#Making%20Wine%20Run%20With%20glibc%202.3 > > > I'm going to try using their workaround, I'll report back. > > DD -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: RH 9 - new glibc
Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:20:42PM -0600, Doug B wrote: If I understand correctly, it seems the reason to jump a major version is because the new glibc breaks binary compatability. OK... that makes sense. Why then would RedHat introduce a new glibc into RH 8 that breaks compatabilty with some programs (wine comes to mind and apparently VMWare)? Shouldn't they have patched the glibc version that shipped (and worked) rather than break RH 8 with a new version? Do you know for sure that it breaks things? I'm about to install it today ... Yes! It break things!!! Bart smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
RE: Need help...Sybase12.5
> Removed /lib;/usr/lib from ld.so.conf > # more /etc/ld.so.conf > /usr/lib/qt-1.45/lib > /usr/kerberos/lib > /usr/lib/wine > /usr/lib/mysql > /usr/lib/sane > /usr/sybase-12.5/lib > /usr/lib/qt-2.3.0/lib > /usr/lib/qt-3.0.5/lib > /usr/X11R6/lib > /opt/sybase-12.5/OCS/lib > /opt/sybase-12.5/ASE/lib > > Ran ldconfig -v > > # $LD_LIBRARY_PATH > bash: > /opt/office52/adabas/lib:/opt/office52/adabas/lib:/opt/office52/adabas/lib > > > ran asecfg > ... same result...same error message > Thanks, > Naum.. > > On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 16:42, csieh wrote: > > Naum, > > > > So, the issue seems to be that if /lib:/usr/lib are in LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > then /lib/libc-2.2.4.so is used; and with them not /lib/i686/libc-2.2.4.so > > is used. The 686 lib is working, the other is not. Investigation is > > underway > > > > So since you have /lib and /usr/lib in /etc/ld.so.conf I suggest taking > > those out and rerunning ldconfig. And make sure /lib:/usr/lib are not > > part of LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > > > > Note that the issue above is described in Bugzilla 86398 and 86359. > > > > -Connie Sieh > > Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Naum Stolarsky wrote: > > > > > replaced glibc-2.3.2 with glibc-2.2.5-93 > > > Same result... > > > Is there any problems if glibc -2.2.4-32 is used on > > > RH8.0? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Naum > > > Stolarskiy > > > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:59 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: Need help...Sybase12.5 > > > > > > > > > Here it is: > > > /lib > > > /usr/lib > > > /usr/lib/qt-1.45/lib > > > /usr/kerberos/lib > > > /usr/lib/wine > > > /usr/lib/mysql > > > /usr/lib/sane > > > /usr/sybase-12.5/lib > > > /usr/lib/qt-2.3.0/lib > > > /usr/lib/qt-3.0.5/lib > > > /usr/X11R6/lib > > > /opt/sybase-12.5/OCS/lib > > > /opt/sybase-12.5/ASE/lib > > > Naum. > > > > > > On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 17:52, csieh wrote: > > > > Naum, > > > > > > > > What are the contents of /etc/ld.so.conf and the > > > value of LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > > > > > > > > -Connie Sieh > > > > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, csieh wrote: > > > > > > > > > Naum, > > > > > > > > > > What version of glibc do you have? > > > > > Any error messages? > > > > > > > > > > Connie Sieh > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Naum Stolarsky > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here we go again... > > > > > > > > > > > > Did anybody installed Sybase 12.5 on RH8.0? > > > > > > What version of glibc do you have? > > > > > > My srvbuild can't create master.dat... > > > > > > Everything I've found so far points to glibc. > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Naum. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Psyche-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > > > -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: [psyche] Re: Red Hat 9
Joe Klemmer wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 18:27, Guy Fraser wrote:
You must be talking about home users without any important data.
Many servers and workstations run until they can not be feasibly
maintained, or there is a compelling reason to upgrade.
Well, since we are discussing RH's Personal/Professional product, it
goes without saying that we're not talking about systems that should be
running any of their Enterprise offerings. RH 9 is for desktop usage
and for development usage and for that standard web/file/app servers.
These are the ones that are already used to and have been using the 4 to
6 month upgrade cycle. Systems like major database and critical
production servers haven't been running RH personal/professional anyway
(usually running Solaris or AIX or some such). Now that RH has an
Enterprise line you will see Linux moving into this area of the data
center. For small and medium size businesses there won't be much of a
change with the new breakout of the OS offerings.
That is why the company I work for has migrated all but two RH servers
to FreeBSD. I am in the
process of upgrading an application I wrote for those servers, to be
more enhanced while updating
it to compile on FreeBSD and RH without any errors. When finished those
two machines will be
migrated ino a single more robust machine running FreeBSD. My
workstation will prbably be next
if wine does not get fixed by RedHat Next Month. We have already
replaced all our Sparc and Alpha
boxes with Intel/AMD machines running FreeBSD. I was the only UNIX
administrator left that
is fluent in the other many flavors of *NIX/Linux platforms we once ran.
Moving to FreeBSD has
been an improvement over OSF/1,True64, Solaris, SCO, BSDI and all other
Linux Platforms.
I disagree that Solaris and AIX are better solutions, having used them
and payed for them over and
over again, with their often slow patch support, they were overly
burdensome. We have been running
FreeBSD for over 15 Months now and I am happy with the release rate of
patches and easy to use
software ports system. Proprietary UNIX systems often have many queer
libraries and functions not
reqiured for Programming with Linux or FreeBSD. I prefered programming
on linux, due the more
POSIXly correct libraries and functions, but FreeBSD is still better
than Solaris and OSF/1 for
programming. I do prefer the more 'standard' directory hiearchy of FreeBSD.
It really pissed me off when RH dropped elm. My god is nothing safe,
from the wrath of replacing
usefull small utilities with new sophisticated {or was that
siphilisticated} programs like mutt.
Next thing you know pico or vi will be dropped leaving only emacs
{bloat, bloat} editor.
Most servers do not run on enterprise class machines and standard or
proffesional Red Hat Linux
was just fine.
Guy
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: RH 9 - new glibc
There is a WINE workaround... http://www.winehq.org/index.php?issue=163#Making%20Wine%20Run%20With%20glibc%202.3 -Michael On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 13:39, Bart SCHELSTRAETE wrote: > Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:20:42PM -0600, Doug B wrote: > > > > > If I understand correctly, it seems the reason to jump a major version > > > is because the new glibc breaks binary compatability. > > > > > > OK... that makes sense. > > > > > > Why then would RedHat introduce a new glibc into RH 8 that breaks > > > compatabilty with some programs (wine comes to mind and apparently > > > VMWare)? Shouldn't they have patched the glibc version that shipped > > > (and worked) rather than break RH 8 with a new version? > > > > > > > Do you know for sure that it breaks things? I'm about to install > > it today ... > > > > Yes! It break things!!! > > > > > > Bart -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Editor Documentation
Jay Crews wrote: Wolfgang Gill writes Thanks for that, it was EXACTLY was I was looking for. I'd also assume that these commands and functions can be used in scripting?? Without any trouble? Well..not exactly. Or not really for writing scripts like I think you are talking about. Not sure what he's after either. For simple editin in the middle of a larger script, ed is a fine tool though. However, you will see similarities in some of the commands and tools like 'sed.' I think it has something to do with 'ed' commands, which vi is a frontend, or somethingSomeone with more history info can probably explain better. Why does vi keep comming up? He asked for help with ed. OK, OK, I know. vi is really a full screen verion of ex. ex and ed are line based editors (you work on one line at a time) but there are many differenceds, enough that they arent interchangable. ed only uses single letter commands, ex has long names as well. ex commands are more like vi (understandable since they are basicly the same program) than ed, so if you know vi, ex migh be better for you. ex also offers some enhancements that ed doesn't have. But if you are starting out today, and want to write some scripts, you will do yourself well to learn Perl. Learning perl is a very good idea. You can never know too many languages. Help pick the best one for a given task. can do, and you can learn Perl in about the same time as learning both sed and awk. PLUS, anything you cannot do with a Perl command, you can invoke a shell command and pull the results back into Perl to process. AND.Perl makes string parsing a piece of cake, whereas it's a NIGHTMARE doing much of it with just regular unix commands piped together. And Perl is VERY portable, and here to stay. It really depend on what he's wanting to do. The original question sounded like ed world be fine, or sed might be good to, depends on weather you need to jump aroung in the file. sed (and perl) are designed for sequential, start to finish work. ed for jumping around with random edits. -Thomas -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: Need help...Sybase12.5
Naum, Go to $SYBASE/ASE-12_5/bin and runs "ldd dataserver" what path does it show on the libc library? It should show /lib/i686/libc.so.xxx -Connie Sieh On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Naum Stolarskiy wrote: > Removed /lib;/usr/lib from ld.so.conf > # more /etc/ld.so.conf > /usr/lib/qt-1.45/lib > /usr/kerberos/lib > /usr/lib/wine > /usr/lib/mysql > /usr/lib/sane > /usr/sybase-12.5/lib > /usr/lib/qt-2.3.0/lib > /usr/lib/qt-3.0.5/lib > /usr/X11R6/lib > /opt/sybase-12.5/OCS/lib > /opt/sybase-12.5/ASE/lib > > Ran ldconfig -v > > # $LD_LIBRARY_PATH > bash: > /opt/office52/adabas/lib:/opt/office52/adabas/lib:/opt/office52/adabas/lib > > > ran asecfg > ... same result...same error message > Thanks, > Naum.. > > On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 16:42, csieh wrote: > > Naum, > > > > So, the issue seems to be that if /lib:/usr/lib are in LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > then /lib/libc-2.2.4.so is used; and with them not /lib/i686/libc-2.2.4.so > > is used. The 686 lib is working, the other is not. Investigation is > > underway > > > > So since you have /lib and /usr/lib in /etc/ld.so.conf I suggest taking > > those out and rerunning ldconfig. And make sure /lib:/usr/lib are not > > part of LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > > > > Note that the issue above is described in Bugzilla 86398 and 86359. > > > > -Connie Sieh > > Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Naum Stolarsky wrote: > > > > > replaced glibc-2.3.2 with glibc-2.2.5-93 > > > Same result... > > > Is there any problems if glibc -2.2.4-32 is used on > > > RH8.0? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Naum > > > Stolarskiy > > > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:59 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: Need help...Sybase12.5 > > > > > > > > > Here it is: > > > /lib > > > /usr/lib > > > /usr/lib/qt-1.45/lib > > > /usr/kerberos/lib > > > /usr/lib/wine > > > /usr/lib/mysql > > > /usr/lib/sane > > > /usr/sybase-12.5/lib > > > /usr/lib/qt-2.3.0/lib > > > /usr/lib/qt-3.0.5/lib > > > /usr/X11R6/lib > > > /opt/sybase-12.5/OCS/lib > > > /opt/sybase-12.5/ASE/lib > > > Naum. > > > > > > On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 17:52, csieh wrote: > > > > Naum, > > > > > > > > What are the contents of /etc/ld.so.conf and the > > > value of LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > > > > > > > > -Connie Sieh > > > > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, csieh wrote: > > > > > > > > > Naum, > > > > > > > > > > What version of glibc do you have? > > > > > Any error messages? > > > > > > > > > > Connie Sieh > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Naum Stolarsky > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here we go again... > > > > > > > > > > > > Did anybody installed Sybase 12.5 on RH8.0? > > > > > > What version of glibc do you have? > > > > > > My srvbuild can't create master.dat... > > > > > > Everything I've found so far points to glibc. > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Naum. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Psyche-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > > > > > > > -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: Need help...Sybase12.5
This is what I got: # ldd dataserver libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4003) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40051000) libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x40054000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x40068000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40098000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000) I checked /lib there no i686 directory. Thanks, Naum. On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 18:20, csieh wrote: > Naum, > > Go to $SYBASE/ASE-12_5/bin and runs > "ldd dataserver" what path does it show on the libc > library? It should show /lib/i686/libc.so.xxx > > -Connie Sieh > On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Naum Stolarskiy wrote: > > > Removed /lib;/usr/lib from ld.so.conf > > # more /etc/ld.so.conf > > /usr/lib/qt-1.45/lib > > /usr/kerberos/lib > > /usr/lib/wine > > /usr/lib/mysql > > /usr/lib/sane > > /usr/sybase-12.5/lib > > /usr/lib/qt-2.3.0/lib > > /usr/lib/qt-3.0.5/lib > > /usr/X11R6/lib > > /opt/sybase-12.5/OCS/lib > > /opt/sybase-12.5/ASE/lib > > > > Ran ldconfig -v > > > > # $LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > bash: > > /opt/office52/adabas/lib:/opt/office52/adabas/lib:/opt/office52/adabas/lib > > > > > > ran asecfg > > ... same result...same error message > > Thanks, > > Naum.. > > > > On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 16:42, csieh wrote: > > > Naum, > > > > > > So, the issue seems to be that if /lib:/usr/lib are in LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > > then /lib/libc-2.2.4.so is used; and with them not /lib/i686/libc-2.2.4.so > > > is used. The 686 lib is working, the other is not. Investigation is > > > underway > > > > > > So since you have /lib and /usr/lib in /etc/ld.so.conf I suggest taking > > > those out and rerunning ldconfig. And make sure /lib:/usr/lib are not > > > part of LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > > > > > > Note that the issue above is described in Bugzilla 86398 and 86359. > > > > > > -Connie Sieh > > > Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory > > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Naum Stolarsky wrote: > > > > > > > replaced glibc-2.3.2 with glibc-2.2.5-93 > > > > Same result... > > > > Is there any problems if glibc -2.2.4-32 is used on > > > > RH8.0? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Naum > > > > Stolarskiy > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:59 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: Need help...Sybase12.5 > > > > > > > > > > > > Here it is: > > > > /lib > > > > /usr/lib > > > > /usr/lib/qt-1.45/lib > > > > /usr/kerberos/lib > > > > /usr/lib/wine > > > > /usr/lib/mysql > > > > /usr/lib/sane > > > > /usr/sybase-12.5/lib > > > > /usr/lib/qt-2.3.0/lib > > > > /usr/lib/qt-3.0.5/lib > > > > /usr/X11R6/lib > > > > /opt/sybase-12.5/OCS/lib > > > > /opt/sybase-12.5/ASE/lib > > > > Naum. > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 17:52, csieh wrote: > > > > > Naum, > > > > > > > > > > What are the contents of /etc/ld.so.conf and the > > > > value of LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > > > > > > > > > > -Connie Sieh > > > > > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, csieh wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Naum, > > > > > > > > > > > > What version of glibc do you have? > > > > > > Any error messages? > > > > > > > > > > > > Connie Sieh > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Naum Stolarsky > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here we go again... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did anybody installed Sybase 12.5 on RH8.0? > > > > > > > What version of glibc do you have? > > > > > > > My srvbuild can't create master.dat... > > > > > > > Everything I've found so far points to glibc. > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > > Naum. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Psyche-list mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Broken gcc 3.2 in RH8.0 with glibc-2.3.2
John Ketchum wrote: Not using g++ driver-- just gcc. I guess you're saying its not a bug, its a feature. No it's a feature. If you compile C++ programs with the C++ compiler libstdc++ is automatically linked. that compiler is called g++. gcc is a C compiler, that just happend to beable to figure out C++. But you should use the C++ compiler to compile C++ source code. libstdc++ is the C++ equivelent of libc, which the C compiler automatically links with. But whay should the C compiler link to the C++ library (libstdc++) any more that it would link to the java library libgcj -Thomas -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris
Affected files For runlevel: /etc/inittab For GDM: /etc/X11/gdm/gdm/conf /etc/X11/xdm/xdm-config /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess For KDM: /etc/X11/xdm/kdmrc /usr/share/kdm/kdmrc /usr/share/config/kdm/kdmrc /etc/opt/kde2/share/config/kdm/kdmrc For Firewall: /etc/sysconfig/ipchains Step 1. Change runlevel to enable gdm or kdm. 1. vi /etc/inittab 2. Change the runlevel to 5 as following: id:5:initdefault: Step 2. GDM configuration (When the Linux is using gdm) 1. vi /etc/X11/gdm/gdm.conf 2. Go to the [xdmcp] section. 3. Set the value of "Enable" option to "1". Step 3. KDM configuration (When the Linux is using kdm) 1. vi /etc/X11/xdm/xdm-config 2. Comment out "request port" option as following: DisplayManager.requestPort: 0 ? ! DisplayManager.requestPort: 0 3. vi /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess 4. Remove the initial "#" character for the following line: #* #any host can get a login window ? * #any host can get a login window 5. vi /etc/X11/xdm/kdmrc, /usr/share/config/kdm/kdmrc or etc/opt/kde2/share/config/kdm/kdmrc file 6. Change the value of "Enable" option to "true" Step 4. Firewall configuration (If a firewall has been configured) 4. vi /etc/sysconfig/ipchains 4. Add the following lines at the top of the file: -A input -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 177 -j ACCEPT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 telnet -j ACCEPT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 ssh -j ACCEPT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 login -j ACCEPT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 exec -j ACCEPT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 shell -j ACCEPT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 7100 -j ACCEPT Step 5. Restart your Linux Server to activate the changes. - Original Message - From: "Cowles, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 8:33 PM Subject: RE: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris > -Original Message- > From: Bala murugan > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 9:18 AM > Subject: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as solaris > > > Dear Admins > > > here is my setup [...] > can any one tell me how do i configure XDMCP chooser in > linux.? because linux connects only local server.( all > solaris server running on XDMCP broadcast) so that i can > select solaris host in linux box as exceed software > does. > Have you followed the examples listed in /etc/X11/gdm/gdm.conf for startng an X server on display 1 which runs gdmchooser? i.e. ctrl-alt-F8. Ex: 1=Terminal -indirect localhost Steve Cowles -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: RH 9 - new glibc
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Bart SCHELSTRAETE wrote: > Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote: > > >On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:20:42PM -0600, Doug B wrote: > > > > > >>If I understand correctly, it seems the reason to jump a major version > >>is because the new glibc breaks binary compatability. > >> > >>OK... that makes sense. > >> > >>Why then would RedHat introduce a new glibc into RH 8 that breaks > >>compatabilty with some programs (wine comes to mind and apparently > >>VMWare)? Shouldn't they have patched the glibc version that shipped > >>(and worked) rather than break RH 8 with a new version? > >> > >> > > > >Do you know for sure that it breaks things? I'm about to install > >it today ... > > > > > Yes! It break things!!! Reportedly, VMware is one of the things that breaks, but the patches in ftp://platan.vc.cvut.cz/pub/vmware/vmware-any-any-update25.tar.gz seem to fix that issue. I just ran VMware on a fully up2date RH8 system and it seemed just fine. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: RH 9 - new glibc
Yeah, this baffles me too. It's not like they were close to a 9.0 release anyways, as if they were on like RH 8.7 or something and just took a small leap. They went from 8.0 to 9.0 with no intermediate steps. If this is such a huge jump and so much is going to break, then it seems mighty foolish to me... I know I won't be upgrading my RH 8.0 boxes until well into RH 9.x (assuming there is one and RH doesn't $hit on us again and jump to 10.0 after this release). RH is notorious for blundering their .0 releases, and for them to use a brang new glibc known to break things already, seems extremely dangerous to me. Am I not understanding something? Do any other distros use this new/broken glibc yet? Is there that much with this glibc that is s unbelievably awesome that we just *had* to have it in this RH version and it couldn't wait till after 8.1, 8.2, 8.5 or whatever...? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:20:42PM -0600, Doug B wrote: > > If I understand correctly, it seems the reason to jump a > major version > > is because the new glibc breaks binary compatability. > > > > OK... that makes sense. > > > > Why then would RedHat introduce a new glibc into RH 8 that breaks > > compatabilty with some programs (wine comes to mind and apparently > > VMWare)? Shouldn't they have patched the glibc version that shipped > > (and worked) rather than break RH 8 with a new version? -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: RH 9 - new glibc
On Friday 28 March 2003 17:37, Daevid Vincent wrote: > Yeah, this baffles me too. It's not like they were close to a 9.0 release > anyways, as if they were on like RH 8.7 or something and just took a small > leap. They went from 8.0 to 9.0 with no intermediate steps. If this is such > a huge jump and so much is going to break, then it seems mighty foolish to > me... I know I won't be upgrading my RH 8.0 boxes until well into RH 9.x > (assuming there is one and RH doesn't $hit on us again and jump to 10.0 > after this release). RH is notorious for blundering their .0 releases, and > for them to use a brang new glibc known to break things already, seems > extremely dangerous to me. Am I not understanding something? Do any other > distros use this new/broken glibc yet? Is there that much with this glibc > that is s unbelievably awesome that we just *had* to have it in this RH > version and it couldn't wait till after 8.1, 8.2, 8.5 or whatever...? Ugh. Glibc doesn't "break" things, just old things aren't compatible with the new glibc. It happens all the time. IT's not broken, just too new. Most the reason for the 8.0 -> 9 is the Linux threads, which are supposedly very cool, and very worth it. You just can't win, either you're too old for the people that want new stuff, or your too new for the people that want old stuff, or you don't include 8x alternatives for every app, or you include way too many alternatives for each app... *sigh* I guess it's like a judge, they know they're doing their job if _both_ sides are pissed off at the end. -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE http://geek.j2solutions.net Mondo DevTeam (http://www.microwerks.net/~hugo/) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 28 March 2003 04:02 pm, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> Did not work for me. My guess is that I have j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs from
> java.sun installed. However, the blackstone is for j2sdk-1.4.1-01.
> Installation details shown below. The java plugin shows up in Mozilla,
> but if I link to something that uses java Mozilla hangs.
>
> Do you see anything I missed?
>
> I guess I either wait for a gcc 3.2 from sun or I rpm -e the sun
> version and install the blackstone version.
>
> Sun version of java installed:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | grep -i j2
> j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs
Looks like the only real difference is the java version.
$ rpm -qa | grep -i j2
j2re-1.4.1-fcs
> Installed Mozilla 1.3
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | grep -i mozilla
> mozilla-1.3-0_rh8_xft
> mozilla-nss-1.3-0_rh8_xft
> mozilla-psm-1.3-0_rh8_xft
> mozilla-nspr-1.3-0_rh8_xft
$ rpm -qa | grep -i mozilla
mozilla-1.3-0_rh8_xft
mozilla-nss-1.3-0_rh8_xft
mozilla-psm-1.3-0_rh8_xft
mozilla-nspr-1.3-0_rh8_xft
> downloaded the Blackstone version of java
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] admin]$ d j2sdk-1.4.1-01-linux-i586-gcc3.2.bin
> -rwxr-1 adminadmin 39M Mar 28 11:49
> j2sdk-1.4.1-01-linux-i586-gcc3.2.bin*
j2re-1.4.1-01-linux-i586-gcc3.2.bin
> Extracted the plugin and copied it to the java plugin location and
> inserted the required symbolic link
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mozilla]$ pwd
> /home/admin/j2sdk1.4.1/jre/plugin/i386/mozilla
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mozilla]$ d
> total 260K
> drwxr-xr-x2 adminadmin4.0K Jan 13 10:03 ./
> drwxr-xr-x4 adminadmin4.0K Feb 11 12:10 ../
> -rw-r--r--1 adminadmin244K Jan 13 10:03
> javaplugin_oji.so
>
> Copied blackstone version after renaming the sun version:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns610]# pwd
> /usr/java/j2sdk1.4.1_02/jre/plugin/i386/ns610
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns610]# d
> total 532K
> drwxr-xr-x2 root bin 4.0K Mar 28 14:46 ./
> drwxr-xr-x5 root bin 4.0K Mar 28 14:24 ../
> -rwxr-xr-x1 root bin 244K Mar 28 14:33
> libjavaplugin_oji.so* -rwxr-xr-x1 root bin 267K Feb 20
> 17:07 libjavaplugin_oji.so.org*
>
> Symbolic link:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] plugins]# pwd
> /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] plugins]# d
> total 1.6M
> drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4.0K Mar 28 14:39 ./
> drwxr-xr-x3 root root 4.0K Jan 19 21:04 ../
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 856 Jan 19 21:15 flashplayer.xpt
> -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1.4M Jan 19 21:14
> libflashplayer.so* lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 66 Mar 28
> 14:39 libjavaplugin_oji.so ->
> /usr/java/j2sdk1.4.1_02/jre/plugin/i386/ns610/libjavaplugin_oji.so*
> -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 127K Oct 17 00:08 nppdf.so*
> -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 28K Aug 28 2002 plugger.so*
The only difference I see is that I didn't rename the plugin.
$ ll /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/
total 1740
- -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 856 Mar 22 23:40 flashplayer.xpt
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 55 Mar 15 19:30 javaplugin_oji.so
- -> /usr/java/j2re1.4.1/plugin/i386/ns610/javaplugin_oji.so
- -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1470464 Mar 22 23:41 libflashplayer.so
- -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 129611 Oct 17 01:08 nppdf.so
- -rwxr-xr-x1 root root28277 Aug 28 2002 plugger.so
- -r-xr-xr-x2 root root 131580 May 18 2001 rpnp.so
Just to be sure, I tested a few applets in mozilla and they all worked
fine. I poked around here:
http://javaboutique.internet.com/stats/archive.html
- --
- -Michael
pgp key: http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.{2,3}|8.0 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+hQYgn/07WoAb/SsRApSqAJ9bDWgIY1QCUMvyaWU6HPSwQNPiawCdH8S7
U4T6Kflk0qz1K4IEonGNfSA=
=shk3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RH 9.x
Jumping the gun on RH9 was a smart move. They can EOL 7.x and of course nobody is gonna load 9.x on production boxes which means they only have to support 8.x. Not a bad idea at all. -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 21:34:08 -0500, Michael Fratoni wrote > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Friday 28 March 2003 04:02 pm, Mike Vanecek wrote: > > > Did not work for me. My guess is that I have j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs from > > java.sun installed. However, the blackstone is for j2sdk-1.4.1-01. > > Installation details shown below. The java plugin shows up in Mozilla, > > but if I link to something that uses java Mozilla hangs. > > > > Do you see anything I missed? > > > > I guess I either wait for a gcc 3.2 from sun or I rpm -e the sun > > version and install the blackstone version. > > > > Sun version of java installed: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | grep -i j2 > > j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs > > Looks like the only real difference is the java version. > > $ rpm -qa | grep -i j2 > j2re-1.4.1-fcs It appears that this is a critical difference. I find that Blackstone works fine, but the Blackstone plugin does not work with either 1.4.1_01 or 1.4.1_02 from sun. I did not try to go back to 1.4.1 since you have it working. > The only difference I see is that I didn't rename the plugin. Should not make a difference if it shows up in the About Plugin? The name should not cause a hang. > Just to be sure, I tested a few applets in mozilla and they all > worked fine. I poked around here: http://javaboutique.internet.com/stats/archive.html The biggest difference is that you are using j2re1.4.1. I removed j2sdk1.4.1_02 and installed j2sdk1.4.1_01 from sun, copied the plugin over, and Mozilla still hangs (even though it is visible at About Plugins). I installed the Blackstone sdk1.4.1_01 and everything works as advertised. Evidently something happened after _00 to _01 that makes a difference. I was really surprised to find that the Blackstone plugin would not work with the Sun sdk when both were version 1.4.1_01. I expected them to be compatible. I am downloading the sun non-rpm version 1.4.1_01 sdk and will do a quick compare (when I get a chance) to see if I can find where the two builds differ. I would be so much easier if sun would just make a gcc 3.2 version available... I would like to have an rpm of the java sdk. I have been doing this on my test machine. Mozilla 1.3 is really much better than 1.3a in terms of speed. I guess I will need to do a rpm -e on the production machine and install the Blackstone version. I wish someone would provide a rpm or spec file so that the install could be recorded in the rpm database. -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
SATA controller for Linux
Does anybody know of a (non-promise) SATA controller that will work in Linux? We're looking for a $50~ range 2port card to package up in our systems. I know 3ware has one, but it's mostly for raid, and it comes w/ a $100 pricetag. Any help would be cool. -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE http://geek.j2solutions.net Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Preference Files In Use (2nd Try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello psyche-list, Since sharing my home directory using NFS / automount, I sometimes find the following message on the X Window screen before Gnome gets going. "Your preferences files are currently in use. (If you are logged in to this same account from another computer, the other login session is probably using your preferences files.) You can choose to continue, but be aware that other login sessions may become temporarily confused. If you are not logged in elsewhere, it should be harmless to continue." [Cancel] [Continue] So, who's holding what preferences files open, as opposed to opening the file only when needed for getting preference information or updating it with changes? How do I get them to cut it out? What "confusion" might I see in other login sessions? (So far, I've noticed none.) Since I *am* logged in elsewhere, am I doing some harm by continuing? Am I the first one to try sharing home directories via NFS and automount? Or, am I doing something remarkably stupid? Ron. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8 Comment: Until recently, the last PGP with full source disclosure. iQA/AwUBPmkNZ28pw+2/9pUJEQJtDgCg4//5pjBbWcTDCeO7jjq3txO6ebIAniUt 6LEQPHrbaxN10OMpH7J1yKRT =YwEP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: RH 9 - new glibc
Maybe it would be helpful to know or get some idea of what will not work anymore? I mean, for the most part, my servers are pretty stock RH8. I use PHP, Apache 1.3.27, mySQL (but the newer RPMS from mysql.com since RH is pure failure in their update departement here). And honestly not a lot more than that. Will I still have a working system? Can I still use Apache 1.3.27 since PHP and Apache 2.0 isn't suggested for real servers? Will RH9 have everything that RH8 did at least? What NEW stuff is there (aside from version updates). What is this "linux threads" thing? Is it part of the kernel? What is it responsible for and where will I see improvement by using it? F.e. I know that the 2.6 kernel has some awesome scheduler where people are reporting improved response in everthing from download times to loading times; will this linux threads thing be something noticeable too, or is it just a necessary evil to migrate to something bigger and better down the line (like when Linux switched to ELF was it?) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jesse Keating > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 5:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RH 9 - new glibc > > > On Friday 28 March 2003 17:37, Daevid Vincent wrote: > > Yeah, this baffles me too. It's not like they were close to > a 9.0 release > > anyways, as if they were on like RH 8.7 or something and > just took a small > > leap. They went from 8.0 to 9.0 with no intermediate steps. > If this is such > > a huge jump and so much is going to break, then it seems > mighty foolish to > > me... I know I won't be upgrading my RH 8.0 boxes until > well into RH 9.x > > (assuming there is one and RH doesn't $hit on us again and > jump to 10.0 > > after this release). RH is notorious for blundering their > .0 releases, and > > for them to use a brang new glibc known to break things > already, seems > > extremely dangerous to me. Am I not understanding > something? Do any other > > distros use this new/broken glibc yet? Is there that much > with this glibc > > that is s unbelievably awesome that we just *had* to > have it in this RH > > version and it couldn't wait till after 8.1, 8.2, 8.5 or > whatever...? > > Ugh. Glibc doesn't "break" things, just old things aren't > compatible with the > new glibc. It happens all the time. IT's not broken, just > too new. Most > the reason for the 8.0 -> 9 is the Linux threads, which are > supposedly very > cool, and very worth it. > > You just can't win, either you're too old for the people that > want new stuff, > or your too new for the people that want old stuff, or you > don't include 8x > alternatives for every app, or you include way too many > alternatives for each > app... *sigh* > > I guess it's like a judge, they know they're doing their job > if _both_ sides > are pissed off at the end. > > -- > Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE > http://geek.j2solutions.net > Mondo DevTeam (http://www.microwerks.net/~hugo/) > > Was I helpful? Let others know: > http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: RH 9 - new glibc
On Friday 28 March 2003 20:23, Daevid Vincent uttered: > Maybe it would be helpful to know or get some idea of what will not work > anymore? I mean, for the most part, my servers are pretty stock RH8. I use > PHP, Apache 1.3.27, mySQL (but the newer RPMS from mysql.com since RH is > pure failure in their update departement here). And honestly not a lot more > than that. Will I still have a working system? Can I still use Apache > 1.3.27 since PHP and Apache 2.0 isn't suggested for real servers? Will RH9 > have everything that RH8 did at least? What NEW stuff is there (aside from > version updates). What is this "linux threads" thing? Is it part of the > kernel? What is it responsible for and where will I see improvement by > using it? F.e. I know that the 2.6 kernel has some awesome scheduler where > people are reporting improved response in everthing from download times to > loading times; will this linux threads thing be something noticeable too, > or is it just a necessary evil to migrate to something bigger and better > down the line (like when Linux switched to ELF was it?) Why don't you just wait for the release notes, when it's actually released. Or sign up for RHN and get it a week early. -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE http://geek.j2solutions.net Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: RH hangs on large filetransfers Was[ Linux vs Windows]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've noticed what may be a related problem. This has existed in the 7.x series, and I just replicated it under 8.0 (with all updates). My linux box has ext2 filesystems and fat32 filesystems. I have some of each shared via Samba. Within the linux box, I can copy or move large files among the various filesystems with no problem. From my Win2K box, I can copy large files onto the Samba shares that have ext2 filesystems underlying them. I can copy small files (a couple dozen megabytes) onto Samba shares with either ext2 or fat32 filesystems underlying them. However, if I attempt to copy a large file onto a Samba share that has a fat32 filesystem under it, the transfer starts and proceeds for a couple of minutes, then stops. I get a popup on the Win2K box saying that the network device is no longer available. Right after this, I can click on the share under the Win2K "My Network Places", and things seem just fine. In fact, on at least one occasion, I see the file there that failed during the copy, claiming to be the full size of the file, but the contents are not correct. I just tried it again, and successfully copied a file of 179 Megabytes and one of 251 Meg, but a couple days ago, it failed when I tried copying a file of > 300 Meg. Ron. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8 Comment: Until recently, the last PGP with full source disclosure. iQA/AwUBPoUudm8pw+2/9pUJEQIrZgCgxuwyoqnM/1eGATxWkdiuBiReXWMAoPF5 yGDbinMkjX2BZqrdZnKxkA5N =VTj9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: [psyche] Re: Red Hat 9
Hiya, > Most servers do not run on enterprise class machines and standard or > proffesional Red Hat Linux > was just fine. I have to disagree here. For a small company, meaning less than 150 people maybe. Most companies run servers on server class equipment. In mine for example is all Dell and Compaq servers costing about $1- $15000 each. Anything mission critical should run on server class hardware. We run the "Personal" version of RH though as the enterprise line is just not needed really. Well, if they keep up like this it just may be. For desktops and productivity though, RH just may be replaced where I work soon, with one of the other distro's that wine and such work with. > > Guy > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > > -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
(no subject)
_ IncrediMail - El E-mail ha evolucionado finalmente - Haga clic aquí
Re: ULOGD and iptables -j ULOG?
Mike Vanecek wrote: BTW, this works better if one uses the kern.=debug format. You are right Mike! kern.=debug is more efficient Of course, I hope that nothing else is generating kern.debug messages mmm... How about using a unique log prefix and then filtering? For example: # /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -j LOG --log-level DEBUG --log-prefix "vanecek: " ... # grep vanecek /var/log/packets Cheers, Miguel _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
RE: WineX
Hi Michael, do you have the other wine tools also?.like winecheck, winesetuptk and winetools?.I know these are not required, but having them did make my job easier. Winecheck also helped me identify some basic config issues which I missed.I just kept tweaking and re-running winecheck until my score started to get into the 90%'s One additional thing I've observed.don't try to run wine as root! I actually receive a LOWER overall score from winetest when running as root than I do with the same settings from my normal user account.I see the root username tagged into your message Before this rpm update, I had to manually start the wineserver from the command line before I could start anything with wine. Try the most basic.like notepad.exe or winemine.exe to debug. DD On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 05:48, Michael Mills wrote: > I have uninstalled and reinstalled the RPMs till I'm blue in the face... it just > doesn't seem to be working. I read something about an errata update that may have > changed something, but my errors seem to be related to not finding stuff: > wineserver: lstat /tmp/.wine-mmills/server-303-2f885 : No such file or directory > or > wineserver: lstat /tmp/.wine-root : No such file or directory > > I have also seen the socket error somewhere in the mix of me trying to fix this. > > I have -e erased the RPM, removed /.wine and reinstalled to no avail. Any other > ideas? > > Michael > > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:56:49AM +0100, Frank Jahn wrote: > > Uninstall the RH wine packages and then install the wine-20030318-1rh8winehq > > packages from http://sourceforge.net and it will work. > > Not on my box :(( Just tried and it fails. > > -- > Jack Bowling > mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
