[pgAdmin4][Patch] - Issue fixes reported by SonarQube
Hi, Please find the attached patch for some of the fixes reported by SonarQube related to : - Properties of variables with "null" or "undefined" values should not be accessed - Variables should not be self-assigned - "in" should not be used with primitive types Thanks, Khushboo sonarqube_fixes.patch Description: Binary data
[pgAdmin][Patch] RM4226 - Table Properties - select all checkbox only selects the first 50 tables
Hi Hackers, Please find attached patch fixing behaviour on checking select-all checkbox from properties tab for more than 50 entities. Thanks, Yogesh Mahajan QA - Team EnterpriseDB Corporation Phone: +91-9741705709 RM4226_v1.patch Description: Binary data
Re: Patch to contribute in pgAdmin to increase the maximum length of the server password
Thanks Aditya for looking into this. I have done the changes noting your suggestion to pass the maxLength param for the password field. PFA of the patch for the same. On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 11:41 AM Aditya Toshniwal wrote: > > Hi Mishika, > > You've changed the defaults directly which will change the maxLength for all > the text boxes across pgAdmin. > If you want to change the maxLength for the server dialog password field then > you can pass the maxLength param for the password field. This will affect the > password field only without affecting others. > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:46 AM Mishika Singh wrote: >> >> Hi Team, >> >> I have created an issue :https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/5592. >> In pgAdmin4 there is a restriction on the password length while trying >> to connect to the server, the limit is 255. We have use cases where >> the password length is more than that. >> >> PFA of the patch to increase the maximum length. >> >> -- >> Regards >> Mishika Singh > > > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" -- Regards Mishika Singh server_password_length.patch Description: Binary data
pgAdmin 4 commit: Added support of Row Security Policies. Fixes #5516
Added support of Row Security Policies. Fixes #5516 Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=18277543b6c702fa84f332c3a74840c376cd43e2 Author: Pradip Parkale Modified Files -- docs/en_US/release_notes_4_23.rst | 1 + .../servers/databases/schemas/tables/__init__.py | 11 + .../tables/row_security_policies/__init__.py | 589 + .../static/img/coll-row_security_policy.svg| 37 ++ .../static/img/row_security_policy.svg | 22 + .../static/js/row_security_policy.js | 184 +++ .../tables/row_security_policies/tests/__init__.py | 16 + .../tests/default/alter_policy.sql | 11 + .../tests/default/alter_policy_msql.sql| 2 + .../tests/default/create_insert_policy.sql | 11 + .../tests/default/create_public_policy.sql | 11 + .../tests/default/create_select_policy.sql | 11 + .../row_security_policies/tests/default/test.json | 86 +++ .../row_security_policies/tests/rls_test_data.json | 493 + .../row_security_policies/tests/test_rls_add.py| 116 .../row_security_policies/tests/test_rls_delete.py | 91 .../tests/test_rls_delete_multiple.py | 94 .../row_security_policies/tests/test_rls_get.py| 98 .../row_security_policies/tests/test_rls_put.py| 122 + .../tables/row_security_policies/tests/utils.py| 140 + .../schemas/tables/row_security_policies/utils.py | 145 + .../databases/schemas/tables/static/js/table.js| 61 ++- .../row_security_policies/sql/9.5_plus/create.sql | 22 + .../row_security_policies/sql/9.5_plus/delete.sql | 1 + .../sql/9.5_plus/get_parent.sql| 5 + .../sql/9.5_plus/get_policy_name.sql | 9 + .../sql/9.5_plus/get_position.sql | 2 + .../row_security_policies/sql/9.5_plus/nodes.sql | 13 + .../sql/9.5_plus/properties.sql| 19 + .../row_security_policies/sql/9.5_plus/update.sql | 33 ++ .../tables/templates/tables/sql/10_plus/create.sql | 17 + .../templates/tables/sql/10_plus/properties.sql| 2 +- .../tables/templates/tables/sql/11_plus/create.sql | 17 + .../templates/tables/sql/11_plus/properties.sql| 2 +- .../tables/templates/tables/sql/11_plus/update.sql | 24 + .../tables/templates/tables/sql/12_plus/create.sql | 17 + .../templates/tables/sql/12_plus/properties.sql| 2 +- .../tables/templates/tables/sql/12_plus/update.sql | 25 + .../templates/tables/sql/9.6_plus/create.sql | 18 + .../templates/tables/sql/9.6_plus/properties.sql | 2 +- .../templates/tables/sql/9.6_plus/update.sql | 25 + .../tables/templates/tables/sql/default/create.sql | 15 + .../templates/tables/sql/default/properties.sql| 2 +- .../tables/templates/tables/sql/default/update.sql | 24 + .../servers/databases/schemas/tables/utils.py | 34 ++ web/webpack.config.js | 1 + web/webpack.shim.js| 1 + 47 files changed, 2678 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Re: [pgAdmin][RM5516]: Added support of Row Security Policies
Thanks, patch applied with the following modifications: - js file name should be "row_security_policy.js" instead of "row_security_policies.js". - Node name should be "row_security_policy" instead of "row_level_policies". Node name should not be pluralized and it matches the folder name. - Icon name should be "coll-row_security_policy.svg" and "row_security_policy.svg", it should matches with the Node name. - The 'Owner' should be renamed to 'Role' and there must be a role 'public' in the drop-down list. If the user does not provide any role then by default it is public. - Keywords like select, where, As should be in upper case in Jinja template. - The policy node is disappeared when updating any value. Fixed that issue. - There is no icon showing after creating the RLS node. On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 4:45 PM Pradip Parkale < pradip.park...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Hackers, > > Please find the attached patch for the 'Row Level Security' feature. > I have added RE-SQL and API test cases also. > > To run the RE-SQL cases - > >- python runtests.py --pkg resql --modules row_security_policies. > > To run the API cases - > >- python runtests.py --pkg > > browser.server_groups.servers.databases.schemas.tables.row_security_policies.tests > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Pradip Parkale > QMG, EnterpriseDB Corporation > -- *Thanks & Regards* *Akshay Joshi* *Sr. Software Architect* *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
Re: [pgAdmin][Patch] RM4226 - Table Properties - select all checkbox only selects the first 50 tables
Hi Yogesh, this.data.splice is not required as you are adding the entire dataset into collection. Thanks, Khushboo On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:01 PM Yogesh Mahajan < yogesh.maha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Hackers, > > Please find attached patch fixing behaviour on checking select-all > checkbox from properties tab for more than 50 entities. > > Thanks, > Yogesh Mahajan > QA - Team > EnterpriseDB Corporation > > Phone: +91-9741705709 >
Re: Patch to contribute in pgAdmin to increase the maximum length of the server password
Hi Mishika, The patch looks good to me. Just out of curiosity, what is the use case where the password is more than 1000 characters ? :O On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:41 PM Mishika Singh wrote: > Thanks Aditya for looking into this. I have done the changes noting > your suggestion to pass the maxLength param for the password field. > PFA of the patch for the same. > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 11:41 AM Aditya Toshniwal > wrote: > > > > Hi Mishika, > > > > You've changed the defaults directly which will change the maxLength for > all the text boxes across pgAdmin. > > If you want to change the maxLength for the server dialog password field > then you can pass the maxLength param for the password field. This will > affect the password field only without affecting others. > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:46 AM Mishika Singh > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Team, > >> > >> I have created an issue :https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/5592. > >> In pgAdmin4 there is a restriction on the password length while trying > >> to connect to the server, the limit is 255. We have use cases where > >> the password length is more than that. > >> > >> PFA of the patch to increase the maximum length. > >> > >> -- > >> Regards > >> Mishika Singh > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks and Regards, > > Aditya Toshniwal > > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune > > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" > > > > -- > Regards > > Mishika Singh > -- Thanks and Regards, Aditya Toshniwal pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
Re: Reg - [sonarqube] Refactor this code so that this expression does not always evaluate to true
Hi, The patch looks good to me. On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:20 AM Satish V wrote: > Hi Hackers, > > Please find the patch in the attachment which clears the sonarqube error, > related to expressions evaluated to true/false always. Kindly review the > patch and share the changes required > > > Thanks, > Sathish V > -- Thanks and Regards, Aditya Toshniwal pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
Patch for SonarQube UI fixes.
Hi Team, I have fixed some UI related issues of SonarQube scan. Mainly fixes are related to removing duplicate properties in css class and few js standard syntax fixes. PFA patch. sonarqube_ui_fix.patch Description: Binary data
Re: Patch to contribute in pgAdmin to increase the maximum length of the server password
Hi Aditya, I am part of Adobe Experience Platform - Query Service team. Query Service uses the Postgres protocol to query data in Platform. We have enabled a variety of client applications to connect to Query Service like Aqua Data Studio, Power BI, Tableau. [ https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/experience-platform/query/clients/overview.html ] Length of the password to connect to query service is more than 1000 characters. On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:55 PM Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Mishika, > > The patch looks good to me. Just out of curiosity, what is the use case > where the password is more than 1000 characters ? :O > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:41 PM Mishika Singh wrote: > >> Thanks Aditya for looking into this. I have done the changes noting >> your suggestion to pass the maxLength param for the password field. >> PFA of the patch for the same. >> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 11:41 AM Aditya Toshniwal >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Mishika, >> > >> > You've changed the defaults directly which will change the maxLength >> for all the text boxes across pgAdmin. >> > If you want to change the maxLength for the server dialog password >> field then you can pass the maxLength param for the password field. This >> will affect the password field only without affecting others. >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:46 AM Mishika Singh >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Team, >> >> >> >> I have created an issue :https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/5592. >> >> In pgAdmin4 there is a restriction on the password length while trying >> >> to connect to the server, the limit is 255. We have use cases where >> >> the password length is more than that. >> >> >> >> PFA of the patch to increase the maximum length. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> Mishika Singh >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks and Regards, >> > Aditya Toshniwal >> > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune >> > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards >> >> Mishika Singh >> > > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" > -- Regards Mishika Singh
Re: Patch for SonarQube UI fixes.
Hi, The patch looks good to me. On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:22 PM Nikhil Mohite < nikhil.moh...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > I have fixed some UI related issues of SonarQube scan. > Mainly fixes are related to removing duplicate properties in css class and > few js standard syntax fixes. > PFA patch. > -- Thanks and Regards, Aditya Toshniwal pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
pgAdmin 4 commit: Tidy up some code to keep SonarQube happy.
Tidy up some code to keep SonarQube happy. Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=a23fad0ba8e16cf0adc8d6d8107b6777956fb71e Author: Akshay Joshi Modified Files -- runtime/ConfigWindow.cpp | 8 ++-- runtime/ConfigWindow.h | 1 - runtime/FloatingWindow.cpp | 21 + runtime/FloatingWindow.h | 1 - runtime/LogWindow.cpp | 21 +++-- runtime/LogWindow.h| 2 -- runtime/Logger.h | 1 - runtime/MenuActions.cpp| 18 ++ runtime/MenuActions.h | 4 ++-- runtime/Server.cpp | 41 + runtime/TrayIcon.cpp | 22 -- runtime/TrayIcon.h | 1 - 12 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
Re: [pgAdmin][patch] Runtime fixes reported by SonarQube
Thanks - committed with a minor change to sleep for 250ms in the loop whilst we're waiting for the server thread to shut down, during which time we process any Qt events. On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:21 AM Akshay Joshi wrote: > Hi Hackers, > > Attached is the patch to fix runtime issues reported by SonarQube. > Please review it. > > -- > *Thanks & Regards* > *Akshay Joshi* > > *Sr. Software Architect* > *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* > *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246* > -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Re: Patch for SonarQube UI fixes.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:42 PM Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The patch looks good to me. > I think the dashboard.js fix is not accurate as when you return something you have to assign that value to any variable. > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:22 PM Nikhil Mohite < > nikhil.moh...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> I have fixed some UI related issues of SonarQube scan. >> Mainly fixes are related to removing duplicate properties in css class >> and few js standard syntax fixes. >> PFA patch. >> > > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >
Re: Patch for SonarQube UI fixes.
Hi, On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:45 PM Khushboo Vashi < khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:42 PM Aditya Toshniwal < > aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The patch looks good to me. >> > I think the dashboard.js fix is not accurate as when you return something > you have to assign that value to any variable. > It's the map function which requires the return. Not necessary to assign the return value. > >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:22 PM Nikhil Mohite < >> nikhil.moh...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Team, >>> >>> I have fixed some UI related issues of SonarQube scan. >>> Mainly fixes are related to removing duplicate properties in css class >>> and few js standard syntax fixes. >>> PFA patch. >>> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks and Regards, >> Aditya Toshniwal >> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune >> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >> > -- Thanks and Regards, Aditya Toshniwal pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
pgAdmin 4 commit: Fix 'expressions evaluated to true/false always' issu
Fix 'expressions evaluated to true/false always' issue reported by SonarQube. Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=eb1b17b636cfd6cbf00df98dbbdbadac8976043d Author: Satish V Modified Files -- .../static/js/domain_constraints.js| 3 +- .../databases/schemas/domains/static/js/domain.js | 2 +- .../foreign_tables/static/js/foreign_table.js | 85 +++--- .../schemas/functions/static/js/function.js| 2 +- .../schemas/functions/static/js/procedure.js | 2 +- .../functions/static/js/trigger_function.js| 2 +- 6 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
pgAdmin 4 commit: Ensure that pgadmin should be able to connect to the
Ensure that pgadmin should be able to connect to the server which has password more than 1000 characters. Fixes #5592 Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=38cd3327f354c2c2a850b08086a7602c85a4f48c Author: Mishika Singh Modified Files -- docs/en_US/release_notes_4_23.rst | 3 ++- web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/static/js/server.js | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
pgAdmin 4 commit: Some clumsy coding related fixes reported by SonarQub
Some clumsy coding related fixes reported by SonarQube. Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=641f7bbe9d12068560ebce47bcb82d54723247ed Author: Aditya Toshniwal Modified Files -- .../databases/languages/static/js/language.js | 21 +-- web/pgadmin/browser/utils.py | 6 +- .../pg_utilities_backup_restore_test.py| 5 +- web/pgadmin/misc/file_manager/__init__.py | 10 +- web/pgadmin/tools/debugger/__init__.py | 30 ++--- .../tools/debugger/utils/debugger_instance.py | 16 +-- web/pgadmin/tools/restore/__init__.py | 42 +++--- web/pgadmin/tools/sqleditor/__init__.py| 22 ++-- web/pgadmin/tools/sqleditor/command.py | 6 +- web/pgadmin/utils/driver/psycopg2/__init__.py | 7 +- web/pgadmin/utils/driver/psycopg2/connection.py| 145 ++--- .../utils/driver/psycopg2/server_manager.py| 11 +- web/pgadmin/utils/preferences.py | 7 +- web/pgadmin/utils/route.py | 9 +- web/pgadmin/utils/session.py | 15 +-- web/pgadmin/utils/sqlautocomplete/sqlcompletion.py | 12 +- web/regression/runtests.py | 28 ++-- 17 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 208 deletions(-)
pgAdmin 4 commit: Fix following issues reported by SonarQube:
Fix following issues reported by SonarQube: 1) Properties of variables with "null" or "undefined" values should not be accessed 2) Variables should not be self-assigned 3) "in" should not be used with primitive types Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=8ab358ccecc7e8f0e4e4c364eb162368df8b74f2 Author: Khushboo Vashi Modified Files -- .../servers/databases/schemas/tables/rules/static/js/rule.js | 4 ++-- .../server_groups/servers/databases/schemas/views/static/js/mview.js | 2 +- web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/static/js/variable.js | 2 +- web/pgadmin/browser/static/js/browser.js | 4 ++-- web/pgadmin/browser/static/js/collection.js | 2 +- web/pgadmin/browser/static/js/node.js | 4 ++-- 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Re: [pgAdmin][patch] Clumsy coding related fixes
Thanks, patch applied. On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:08 PM Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Please ignore the previous patch, attached is the updated patch. > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:50 AM Aditya Toshniwal < > aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Few more clumsy coding related fixes. >> Please review. >> >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 3:25 PM Akshay Joshi < >> akshay.jo...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, patch applied. >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:40 AM Aditya Toshniwal < >>> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> Hi Hackers, Attached is the patch for some clumsy coding related fixes as reported by SonarQube. This is the first batch, and will be sending another later. Please review. -- Thanks and Regards, Aditya Toshniwal pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Thanks & Regards* >>> *Akshay Joshi* >>> >>> *Sr. Software Architect* >>> *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* >>> *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246* >>> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks and Regards, >> Aditya Toshniwal >> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune >> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >> > > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" > -- *Thanks & Regards* *Akshay Joshi* *Sr. Software Architect* *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
Re: Reg - [sonarqube] Refactor this code so that this expression does not always evaluate to true
Thanks, patch applied. On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:19 PM Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The patch looks good to me. > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:20 AM Satish V > wrote: > >> Hi Hackers, >> >> Please find the patch in the attachment which clears the sonarqube error, >> related to expressions evaluated to true/false always. Kindly review the >> patch and share the changes required >> >> >> Thanks, >> Sathish V >> > > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" > -- *Thanks & Regards* *Akshay Joshi* *Sr. Software Architect* *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
Re: Patch to contribute in pgAdmin to increase the maximum length of the server password
Thanks, patch applied. On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:28 PM Mishika Singh wrote: > Hi Aditya, > > I am part of Adobe Experience Platform - Query Service team. Query Service > uses the Postgres protocol to query data in Platform. We have enabled a > variety of client applications to connect to Query Service like Aqua Data > Studio, Power BI, Tableau. [ > https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/experience-platform/query/clients/overview.html > ] > Length of the password to connect to query service is more than 1000 > characters. > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:55 PM Aditya Toshniwal < > aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi Mishika, >> >> The patch looks good to me. Just out of curiosity, what is the use case >> where the password is more than 1000 characters ? :O >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:41 PM Mishika Singh >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Aditya for looking into this. I have done the changes noting >>> your suggestion to pass the maxLength param for the password field. >>> PFA of the patch for the same. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 11:41 AM Aditya Toshniwal >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi Mishika, >>> > >>> > You've changed the defaults directly which will change the maxLength >>> for all the text boxes across pgAdmin. >>> > If you want to change the maxLength for the server dialog password >>> field then you can pass the maxLength param for the password field. This >>> will affect the password field only without affecting others. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:46 AM Mishika Singh >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi Team, >>> >> >>> >> I have created an issue :https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/5592. >>> >> In pgAdmin4 there is a restriction on the password length while trying >>> >> to connect to the server, the limit is 255. We have use cases where >>> >> the password length is more than that. >>> >> >>> >> PFA of the patch to increase the maximum length. >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Regards >>> >> Mishika Singh >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Thanks and Regards, >>> > Aditya Toshniwal >>> > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune >>> > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards >>> >>> Mishika Singh >>> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks and Regards, >> Aditya Toshniwal >> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune >> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >> > > > -- > Regards > Mishika Singh > -- *Thanks & Regards* *Akshay Joshi* *Sr. Software Architect* *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch] - Issue fixes reported by SonarQube
Thanks, patch applied. On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:17 PM Khushboo Vashi < khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Please find the attached patch for some of the fixes reported by SonarQube > related to : > >- Properties of variables with "null" or "undefined" values should not >be accessed >- Variables should not be self-assigned >- "in" should not be used with primitive types > > > Thanks, > Khushboo > -- *Thanks & Regards* *Akshay Joshi* *Sr. Software Architect* *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
pgAdmin 4 commit: Fixed RESQL test cases, regression of RLS policy.
Fixed RESQL test cases, regression of RLS policy. Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=a21e6448ce7afb43fc56a06cf2d1ce2dbace6729 Modified Files -- .../tables/row_security_policies/tests/default/alter_policy.sql| 7 +++ .../row_security_policies/tests/default/alter_policy_msql.sql | 2 +- .../row_security_policies/tests/default/create_insert_policy.sql | 7 +++ .../row_security_policies/tests/default/create_public_policy.sql | 7 +++ .../row_security_policies/tests/default/create_select_policy.sql | 7 +++ .../schemas/tables/row_security_policies/tests/default/test.json | 2 +- .../tables/templates/row_security_policies/sql/9.5_plus/create.sql | 1 - 7 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
pgAdmin 4 commit: Remove duplicate properties in CSS and few js standar
Remove duplicate properties in CSS and few js standard fixes reported by SonarQube. Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=023a1f222f05abb2ded1e9f8bfc38f89fd3dd4d2 Author: Nikhil Mohite Modified Files -- web/pgadmin/dashboard/static/js/dashboard.js | 2 ++ web/pgadmin/misc/file_manager/static/css/file_manager.css| 1 - web/pgadmin/misc/file_manager/static/scss/_file_manager.scss | 2 -- web/pgadmin/misc/static/explain/scss/_explain.scss | 1 - 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Re: Patch for SonarQube UI fixes.
Thanks, patch applied. On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:49 PM Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:45 PM Khushboo Vashi < > khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:42 PM Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The patch looks good to me. >>> >> I think the dashboard.js fix is not accurate as when you return something >> you have to assign that value to any variable. >> > It's the map function which requires the return. Not necessary to assign > the return value. > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:22 PM Nikhil Mohite < >>> nikhil.moh...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> Hi Team, I have fixed some UI related issues of SonarQube scan. Mainly fixes are related to removing duplicate properties in css class and few js standard syntax fixes. PFA patch. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> Aditya Toshniwal >>> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune >>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >>> >> > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" > -- *Thanks & Regards* *Akshay Joshi* *Sr. Software Architect* *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
[pgAdmin4][Patch] - Issue fixes reported by SonarQube
Hi, Please find patching fixing issues related to shadowing variables - Thanks, Yogesh Mahajan QA - Team EnterpriseDB Corporation Phone: +91-9741705709 SonarQubeFix1_v1.patch Description: Binary data
Re: [pgAdmin][Patch] RM4226 - Table Properties - select all checkbox only selects the first 50 tables
Hi Hackers, Please find an updated patch. Thanks, Yogesh Mahajan QA - Team EnterpriseDB Corporation Phone: +91-9741705709 On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:52 PM Khushboo Vashi < khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Yogesh, > > this.data.splice is not required as you are adding the entire dataset into > collection. > > Thanks, > > Khushboo > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:01 PM Yogesh Mahajan < > yogesh.maha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi Hackers, >> >> Please find attached patch fixing behaviour on checking select-all >> checkbox from properties tab for more than 50 entities. >> >> Thanks, >> Yogesh Mahajan >> QA - Team >> EnterpriseDB Corporation >> >> Phone: +91-9741705709 >> > RM4226_v2.patch Description: Binary data
Re: Patch for SonarQube UI fixes.
As per my earlier comment, the dashboard.js fix is still failing. On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:16 PM Akshay Joshi wrote: > Thanks, patch applied. > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:49 PM Aditya Toshniwal < > aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:45 PM Khushboo Vashi < >> khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:42 PM Aditya Toshniwal < >>> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> Hi, The patch looks good to me. >>> I think the dashboard.js fix is not accurate as when you return >>> something you have to assign that value to any variable. >>> >> It's the map function which requires the return. Not necessary to assign >> the return value. >> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:22 PM Nikhil Mohite < nikhil.moh...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > I have fixed some UI related issues of SonarQube scan. > Mainly fixes are related to removing duplicate properties in css class > and few js standard syntax fixes. > PFA patch. > -- Thanks and Regards, Aditya Toshniwal pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >>> >> >> -- >> Thanks and Regards, >> Aditya Toshniwal >> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune >> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >> > > > -- > *Thanks & Regards* > *Akshay Joshi* > > *Sr. Software Architect* > *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* > *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246* >
Re: Patch for SonarQube UI fixes.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:22 AM Khushboo Vashi < khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > As per my earlier comment, the dashboard.js fix is still failing. > But assigning the return value is not a solution. Replace map with forEach so that it doesn't expect a return value at all (as there is none). > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:16 PM Akshay Joshi < > akshay.jo...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Thanks, patch applied. >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:49 PM Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:45 PM Khushboo Vashi < >>> khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:42 PM Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The patch looks good to me. > I think the dashboard.js fix is not accurate as when you return something you have to assign that value to any variable. >>> It's the map function which requires the return. Not necessary to assign >>> the return value. >>> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:22 PM Nikhil Mohite < > nikhil.moh...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> I have fixed some UI related issues of SonarQube scan. >> Mainly fixes are related to removing duplicate properties in css >> class and few js standard syntax fixes. >> PFA patch. >> > > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" > >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> Aditya Toshniwal >>> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune >>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Thanks & Regards* >> *Akshay Joshi* >> >> *Sr. Software Architect* >> *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* >> *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246* >> > -- Thanks and Regards, Aditya Toshniwal pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
Re: Patch for SonarQube UI fixes.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:46 AM Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:22 AM Khushboo Vashi < > khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> As per my earlier comment, the dashboard.js fix is still failing. >> > But assigning the return value is not a solution. Replace map with forEach > so that it doesn't expect a return value at all (as there is none). > I think this is not a problem of map but the combination, Object.keys.map which expects return value and that is the reason I previously pointed out that *this is not the accurate fix*. > >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:16 PM Akshay Joshi < >> akshay.jo...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, patch applied. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:49 PM Aditya Toshniwal < >>> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> Hi, On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:45 PM Khushboo Vashi < khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:42 PM Aditya Toshniwal < > aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The patch looks good to me. >> > I think the dashboard.js fix is not accurate as when you return > something you have to assign that value to any variable. > It's the map function which requires the return. Not necessary to assign the return value. > >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:22 PM Nikhil Mohite < >> nikhil.moh...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Team, >>> >>> I have fixed some UI related issues of SonarQube scan. >>> Mainly fixes are related to removing duplicate properties in css >>> class and few js standard syntax fixes. >>> PFA patch. >>> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks and Regards, >> Aditya Toshniwal >> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune >> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >> > -- Thanks and Regards, Aditya Toshniwal pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Thanks & Regards* >>> *Akshay Joshi* >>> >>> *Sr. Software Architect* >>> *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* >>> *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246* >>> >> > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >
Re: Patch for SonarQube UI fixes.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:57 AM Khushboo Vashi < khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:46 AM Aditya Toshniwal < > aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:22 AM Khushboo Vashi < >> khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> As per my earlier comment, the dashboard.js fix is still failing. >>> >> But assigning the return value is not a solution. Replace map with >> forEach so that it doesn't expect a return value at all (as there is none). >> > > I think this is not a problem of map but the combination, Object.keys.map > which expects return value and that is the reason I previously pointed out > that *this is not the accurate fix*. > That's what I said - Replace map with forEach so that it doesn't expect a return value at all (as there is none) :) > > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:16 PM Akshay Joshi < >>> akshay.jo...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> Thanks, patch applied. On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:49 PM Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:45 PM Khushboo Vashi < > khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:42 PM Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The patch looks good to me. >>> >> I think the dashboard.js fix is not accurate as when you return >> something you have to assign that value to any variable. >> > It's the map function which requires the return. Not necessary to > assign the return value. > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:22 PM Nikhil Mohite < >>> nikhil.moh...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> Hi Team, I have fixed some UI related issues of SonarQube scan. Mainly fixes are related to removing duplicate properties in css class and few js standard syntax fixes. PFA patch. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> Aditya Toshniwal >>> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune >>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >>> >> > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" > -- *Thanks & Regards* *Akshay Joshi* *Sr. Software Architect* *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246* >>> >> >> -- >> Thanks and Regards, >> Aditya Toshniwal >> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune >> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >> > -- Thanks and Regards, Aditya Toshniwal pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
Re: Patch for SonarQube UI fixes.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 9:20 AM Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:57 AM Khushboo Vashi < > khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:46 AM Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:22 AM Khushboo Vashi < >>> khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> As per my earlier comment, the dashboard.js fix is still failing. >>> But assigning the return value is not a solution. Replace map with >>> forEach so that it doesn't expect a return value at all (as there is none). >>> >> >> I think this is not a problem of map but the combination, Object.keys.map >> which expects return value and that is the reason I previously pointed out >> that *this is not the accurate fix*. >> > That's what I said - Replace map with forEach so that it doesn't expect a > return value at all (as there is none) :) > I have replied to prove that my yesterday's comment was right. :P > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:16 PM Akshay Joshi < akshay.jo...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Thanks, patch applied. > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:49 PM Aditya Toshniwal < > aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:45 PM Khushboo Vashi < >> khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:42 PM Aditya Toshniwal < >>> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> Hi, The patch looks good to me. >>> I think the dashboard.js fix is not accurate as when you return >>> something you have to assign that value to any variable. >>> >> It's the map function which requires the return. Not necessary to >> assign the return value. >> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:22 PM Nikhil Mohite < nikhil.moh...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > I have fixed some UI related issues of SonarQube scan. > Mainly fixes are related to removing duplicate properties in css > class and few js standard syntax fixes. > PFA patch. > -- Thanks and Regards, Aditya Toshniwal pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >>> >> >> -- >> Thanks and Regards, >> Aditya Toshniwal >> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune >> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >> > > > -- > *Thanks & Regards* > *Akshay Joshi* > > *Sr. Software Architect* > *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* > *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246* > >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> Aditya Toshniwal >>> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune >>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >>> >> > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >
[pgAdmin][patch] SonarQube reported vulnerabilities and design suspicions
Hi Hackers, Attached patch will fix few vulnerabilities and few design suspicions where two conditional structures are having same implementation. Please review. -- Thanks and Regards, Aditya Toshniwal pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" sonarqube.vulnerable.patch Description: Binary data
pgAdmin 4 commit: Fixed an issue where select all checkbox only selects
Fixed an issue where select all checkbox only selects the first 50 tables. Fixes #4226 Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=2ae5c0ec4f8c29575bde0b18dc0f4ba1faad94bc Author: Yogesh Mahajan Modified Files -- docs/en_US/release_notes_4_23.rst | 1 + web/pgadmin/browser/static/js/collection.js | 11 +++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
pgAdmin 4 commit: Fixed issue related to shadowing variables reported b
Fixed issue related to shadowing variables reported by SonarQube. Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=697f4aec95dc1f7887ab7c2a3c46d2ecfb7681be Author: Yogesh Mahajan Modified Files -- .../server_groups/servers/static/js/server.js | 40 +++--- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
pgAdmin 4 commit: Fixed vulnerabilities and few design suspicions where
Fixed vulnerabilities and few design suspicions where two conditional structures are having the same implementation. Reported by SonarQube Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=3e00fe2b0fd19d3837b7ab45c25036d8c96a551f Author: Aditya Toshniwal Modified Files -- .../servers/databases/schemas/functions/__init__.py | 5 ++--- .../servers/databases/schemas/static/js/schema.js | 7 ++- .../schemas/tables/constraints/check_constraint/utils.py | 5 ++--- .../tables/constraints/exclusion_constraint/__init__.py | 11 ++- .../schemas/tables/constraints/exclusion_constraint/utils.py | 6 +++--- .../schemas/tables/constraints/foreign_key/__init__.py| 11 ++- .../databases/schemas/tables/constraints/foreign_key/utils.py | 6 +++--- .../servers/databases/schemas/tables/indexes/__init__.py | 6 ++ .../databases/schemas/tables/indexes/static/js/index.js | 4 +--- .../servers/databases/schemas/tables/rules/static/js/rule.js | 4 +--- web/pgadmin/static/js/backform.pgadmin.js | 2 +- web/regression/python_test_utils/template_helper.py | 3 ++- 12 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch] - Issue fixes reported by SonarQube
Thanks, patch applied. On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:43 PM Yogesh Mahajan < yogesh.maha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Please find patching fixing issues related to shadowing variables - > > Thanks, > Yogesh Mahajan > QA - Team > EnterpriseDB Corporation > > Phone: +91-9741705709 > -- *Thanks & Regards* *Akshay Joshi* *Sr. Software Architect* *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
Re: [pgAdmin][patch] SonarQube reported vulnerabilities and design suspicions
Thanks, patch applied. On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:01 AM Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Hackers, > > Attached patch will fix few vulnerabilities and few design suspicions > where > two conditional structures are having same implementation. > Please review. > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" > -- *Thanks & Regards* *Akshay Joshi* *Sr. Software Architect* *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
Re: [pgAdmin][Patch] RM4226 - Table Properties - select all checkbox only selects the first 50 tables
Thanks, patch applied. On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:58 PM Yogesh Mahajan < yogesh.maha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Hackers, > > Please find an updated patch. > > Thanks, > Yogesh Mahajan > QA - Team > EnterpriseDB Corporation > > Phone: +91-9741705709 > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:52 PM Khushboo Vashi < > khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi Yogesh, >> >> this.data.splice is not required as you are adding the entire dataset into >> collection. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Khushboo >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:01 PM Yogesh Mahajan < >> yogesh.maha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Hackers, >>> >>> Please find attached patch fixing behaviour on checking select-all >>> checkbox from properties tab for more than 50 entities. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Yogesh Mahajan >>> QA - Team >>> EnterpriseDB Corporation >>> >>> Phone: +91-9741705709 >>> >> -- *Thanks & Regards* *Akshay Joshi* *Sr. Software Architect* *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited* *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
