hijack of NetSurf Wiki
Has the NetSurf Wiki been abandoned? The link: http://wiki.netsurf-browser.org/Main_Page leads to an article "5 Ways to Make Money in Commodities". John -- John Rickman - http://rickman.orpheusweb.co.uk/lynx Foot it featly here and there And, sweet sprites, the burden bear. WS
Re: hijack of NetSurf Wiki
In article <9befc2b655.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk>, John Rickman Iyonix wrote: > Has the NetSurf Wiki been abandoned? > The link: > http://wiki.netsurf-browser.org/Main_Page > leads to an article "5 Ways to Make Money in Commodities". I suspect not abandoned ... but spammed. A user was created at 14:09 on 24th August, and within an hour they had changed the main page 3 times to what you see now. If you are registered, a bug should be raised, but afraid I am not. Martin
Netsurf on Amiga 68k
Hey, I have this annoying issue with the current Netsurf for the Amiga 68k in that lots of websites returns with this annoying error "Unable to fetch document." My understanding this is the cause because of timeout. Is there anyone this can be fixed. Also another issue when viewing pages, it open them in tile 100 by 100 and this is annoying and unpleasurable is there anyone this can be fixed? Other questions to ask. Will there be in the future support for html5 that will allow gmail to be opened in full html5 mode and not in classical mode? Will we be able to run html5 games or view html5 movies just fine? My understanding is that the hardware spec is too inferior for this. Can you make two versions...one that works fine on classic Amiga (with Vampire installed) and others on WinUAE where hardware power is no longer a factor? The one for WinUAE will have full functioning power both RAM, speed and EVEN RTG to be able to run the latest FireFox...so it should be able to run the heavy require minimum 500 MB of RAM NetSurf that supports lots of the bells and whistles. I know the common sense logical question...why? What is the purpose? What is the point? I will answer it by thisinstead of waiting for a hardware to become strong enough to port this...we have the software already build and ready for the 68k Amiga that...all it takes is having a more powerful hardware. This way, the hurdle of having a software or someone programming is...is all over...because the software is simply waiting for the hardware to catch up which is easier than the otherway around. Please can someone consider? -- Yours truly, Fahed Al Daye
Re: Segmentation fault started with no apparent cause
In message <20160826091352.gp26...@platypus.pepperfish.net> on 26 Aug 2016 Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:21:52PM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote: >> There appear to be 106 URLs in there. I'm not going to test each one >> to find where the problem is. > Assuming there is nothing personally identifying or secret in your URL > file, attaching it to the bug would be helpful. It did occur to me that one way to search for the problem was binary - split the file in two and find which half has the problem. Then repeat. Except after splitting it, neither half caused problems. Putting the original back also didn't restore the problem. My thought is that one conceivable explanation could be the file had got too big. It was over 42KB in size. It seems to have shrunk down to 39KB. If things are still as clear as mud then waiting to see if anyone else has a similar problem may be a good way forward. Regards Andrew -- Andrew Pinder
Re: Segmentation fault started with no apparent cause
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 09:48:43PM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote: > My thought is that one conceivable explanation could be the file had > got too big. It was over 42KB in size. It seems to have shrunk down > to 39KB. Both these are trivially tiny. B.
