On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 09:48:43PM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote: > My thought is that one conceivable explanation could be the file had > got too big. It was over 42KB in size. It seems to have shrunk down > to 39KB.
Both these are trivially tiny. B.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 09:48:43PM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote: > My thought is that one conceivable explanation could be the file had > got too big. It was over 42KB in size. It seems to have shrunk down > to 39KB.
Both these are trivially tiny. B.