Re: Send-Hooks
Hi Mikko! On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > > > Ah. Well, then, you probably want to set "use_from" and "alternates" > > > in your .muttrc > > > > Both set and still no joy. I tried unsetting (commenting out) my defaults > > send-hook my_hdr but to no avail. I think I will just for the moment have to > > have several commented out my_hdr From lines to suit. > > I think the variable you're looking for is $reverse_name, not $use_from > (though having that defined is probably a good idea too). However, > $reverse_name doesn't work well with mh_hdr From (which always takes > precedence). So instead you probably should switch to setting the $from > variable, available in Mutt 1.1.1i which you seem to use, rather than > having my_hdr From in your send-hooks. The $from variable was > introduced just to get around the problem of $reverse_name and my_hdr > >From not working together. > > Many thanks, that has done the job. I am learning more and more just how powerfull mutt is :) Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject My Current Uptime is 0d, 15h and 4m on Linux 2.2.13 ...Generated by Uptimer - http://tcob1.dhs.org PGP signature
Signing problem since 1.1.4i
msg.pgp
PGP signing problem
msg.pgp
Lists
Hi All, In my muttrc I have Lists mutt-users otherlists but if I reply to a list which is listed and there is a reply to, then Mutt uses the reply-to not the list, I know about the Global reply but would just prefer to reply to the list only. Any suggestions Sean -- PGP ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 Powered by SuSe Linux 6.0 2.2.12 Kernel and a 128k Tele2 connection
Re: Lists
Hi Carsten! On Fri, 08 Oct 1999, Carsten Luckmann wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 04:04:00PM +0000, Sean Rima wrote: > > In my muttrc I have Lists mutt-users otherlists > > > > but if I reply to a list which is listed and there is a reply to, then Mutt > > uses the reply-to not the list, I know about the Global reply but would just > > prefer to reply to the list only. Any suggestions > > Hello Sean! > > There's a function `list-reply' in mutt, bound to L by default. > I think this is what you're searching for. > > Bye, > Carsten > Err, yeah, Kinda forgot that one :) Sean -- PGP ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 Powered by SuSe Linux 6.0 2.2.12 Kernel and a 128k Tele2 connection
Re: Lists
Hi E! On Fri, 08 Oct 1999, E Forrest Carpenter wrote: > > In my muttrc I have Lists mutt-users otherlists > > > > but if I reply to a list which is listed and there is a reply to, then Mutt > > uses the reply-to not the list, I know about the Global reply but would just > > prefer to reply to the list only. Any suggestions > > set ignore_list_reply_to > Got that one but it doesn't work, or well doesn't seem to. Sean -- PGP ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 Powered by SuSe Linux 6.0 2.2.12 Kernel and a 128k Tele2 connection
Procmail and Mutt
Hi Folks, I am trying to setup Procmail to store mail from certain lists to a file in my Mutt Mail/ directory and I have listed both in muttrc as mailboxes ! =elebbs-linux. But the =elebbs-linux never gets checked unless I do it manually. Unless I am doing something wrong with Procmail. Sean -- PGP ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 Powered by SuSe Linux 6.0 2.2.12 Kernel and a 128k Tele2 connection
Procmail/Mutt
Please ignore my last, as I think I got it working. Sean -- PGP ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 Powered by SuSe Linux 6.0 2.2.12 Kernel and a 128k Tele2 connection
Procmail/Mutt
Thanks to Telsa and others who mailed me privately. I have now really sorted this out. I discovered that if I copied a mail to a mailbox that I wanted Mutt to watch, ie =IN.mutt-users which doesn't exist and then get procmail to move new mail to Mail/IN.mutt-users/new then mutt notifies me that there is mail. Haven't tried what would happen if there is mail in two or more boxes yet :) Sean -- PGP ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 Powered by SuSe Linux 6.0 2.2.12 Kernel and a 128k Tele2 connection
Re: pattern search & aliases
Hi Mikko! On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Jan Houtsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 11 Oct 1999: > > How do i "browse" the aliases??? > > Press TAB in the To: or Cc: prompt. > Excellent, I often wondered that myself :) Sean PGP signature
Sig files
Hi, instead of defining a sig file, it is possible to use a tin like feature and use an external program to generate the sig file. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813
Re: enriched.sh
Hi Martin! On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Martin Schröder wrote: > On 1999-10-21 23:26:19 -0700, Brandon Long wrote: > > On 10/20/99 Martin Schröder uttered the following other thing: > > > Where to get it? > > > > It is located at: > > http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/done.html#autoview > > > > But, its no longer necessary, as the included text/enriched support in > > mutt is much better now. > Silly question, but this happened to me :) Did you add it to ~/.mime.types It may make no difference but I found that it didn't work until I add the correct line to .mime.types. Sean GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 ...Linux uptime=26 Days 21 Hours 9 Minutes
Re: enriched.sh
Hi Martin! On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Martin Schröder wrote: > On 1999-10-22 10:49:07 +0000, Sean Rima wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Martin Schröder wrote: > > > On 1999-10-21 23:26:19 -0700, Brandon Long wrote: > > > > On 10/20/99 Martin Schröder uttered the following other thing: > > > > > Where to get it? > > > > > > > > It is located at: > > > > http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/done.html#autoview > > > > > > > > But, its no longer necessary, as the included text/enriched support in > > > > mutt is much better now. > > > > > Silly question, but this happened to me :) Did you add it to ~/.mime.types > > It may make no difference but I found that it didn't work until I add the > > correct line to .mime.types. > > Of course I didn't. What's the magic line? :-) > TBH, I just used text/enriched without showing any extensions Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 ...Linux uptime=26 Days 23 Hours 3 Minutes PGP signature
Re: Clearsigning outgoing messages using GnuPG and mutt
Hi m4v3r1ck! On Sat, 06 Nov 1999, m4v3r1ck wrote: > Hi all mutt users... > > As you can see from my User-Agent: header, I'm using Mutt 1.1i. > I have installed GnuPG 1.0.0 too... > > My PGP related config is as follow: > $ cat .mutt/muttrc > unset pgp_autosign > set pgp_replysign > source ~/.mutt/gpgrc > > $HOME/.mutt/gpgrc is the same file as $MUTT1.1i_TARBALL/contrib/gpg.rc > I use in muttrc: set pgp_create_traditional=ask-no So if I do a y it creates a traditional PGP stule sign message. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 My Current Uptime is 2d, 2h and 32m on Linux 2.2.13 ...Internet?...whazzat? Some sort of Irish fisherman's prayer? PGP signature
Re: Clearsigning outgoing messages using GnuPG and mutt
Hi Rejo! On Sat, 06 Nov 1999, Rejo Zenger wrote: > ++ 06/11/99 18:30 + - Sean Rima: > >set pgp_create_traditional=ask-no > > Will propably only work when using one of the development versions. > Those who don't use such a version will see an error on startup. > He said he was using 1.1i which I also use. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 My Current Uptime is 2d, 3h and 34m on Linux 2.2.13 ...Internet?...whazzat? Some sort of Irish fisherman's prayer? PGP signature
Re: Clearsigning outgoing messages using GnuPG and mutt
Hi m4v3r1ck! Are you using Procmail with the PGP bit to create the application/pgp lines in the mail. If so then this will do it everytime to then mails. Sean On Sun, 07 Nov 1999, m4v3r1ck wrote: > On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 06:30:35PM +0000, Sean Rima wrote: > > | set pgp_create_traditional=ask-no > | So if I do a y it creates a traditional PGP stule sign message. > > Thanks for the tip. > It worked, but not like the one I wanted. Maybe because of my misconfig? > > I sent my self a test message, and i get this: > > [-- BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE --] > > Test... > > -- > m4v3r1ck -- ICQ UIN #26095019 > Old UNIX programmers didn't just die. They turn into zombie processes... > > [-- END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE --] > > There was no GnuPG sig at the end of my mails. I was hoping for the one > like this: > > Test... > -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 My Current Uptime is 2d, 17h and 24m on Linux 2.2.13 ...Internet?...whazzat? Some sort of Irish fisherman's prayer? PGP signature
Re: pronounce
Hi Thomas! On Tue, 09 Nov 1999, Thomas Roessler wrote: Nice gif, pity I keep getting that image/gif is unsupported, even though defined in mailcap and .mime.types. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 My Current Uptime is 1d, 0h and 47m on Linux 2.2.13 ...Internet?...whazzat? Some sort of Irish fisherman's prayer?
Re: gpg fails
Hi Micha! On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Micha Holzmann wrote: > Hello Christian, > > > n the mutt versions after 1.0i (1.1i and 1.1.1i) the gpg call doesnt > > work anymore. After the input of the passphrase mutt just says > > 'Invoking PGP ...' and doesnt do anything ... > > > > any hints? > > i posted a similar mail here. Concerning mutt and pgp 6.5.1i. > It seems not to be interest to someone here on the list. > Or there is no solution. > > In your case i think it is an error in your .muttrc, gpg > works here. > I found that GPG works better using gpg-2comp and gpg.rc. Maybe it will work without them but I put them that way and they work so I ain't changing it. I use 1.1i. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 My Current Uptime is 0d, 4h and 26m on Linux 2.2.13 ...Internet?...whazzat? Some sort of Irish fisherman's prayer?
Vacation problem
Hi Folks, Seriously OT but maybe not. I went on holiday and left vacation to answer my mail, however, it should not send any mail back to the list. I was unsubscribed from the list and I wanted to know if my vacation sent an auto-respond message. I only ask as I plan on putting it back on again this weekend and don't want it to send any messages back to the list/list-users. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 My Current Uptime is 0d, 5h and 5m on Linux 2.2.13 ...Internet?...whazzat? Some sort of Irish fisherman's prayer?
Re: mutt v1.1.1i and pgp
msg.pgp
Re: Vacation problem
Hi Russell! On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Russell Van Tassell wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 01:25:52PM +0000, Sean Rima wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > Seriously OT but maybe not. I went on holiday and left vacation to answer my > > mail, however, it should not send any mail back to the list. > > Ummm... simply put, use procmail/formail... you'll have less problems > with it. (there are decent examples of making this work in the > procmailex man page) > There are, but I took over maintaining vacation and I was only wondering if my disappearance from the list was related to a stray message from it. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 My Current Uptime is 0d, 13h and 14m on Linux 2.2.13 ...Internet?...whazzat? Some sort of Irish fisherman's prayer?
Re: Vacation problem
Hi Shane! On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Shane Castle wrote: > >Seriously OT but maybe not. I went on holiday and left vacation to answer my > >mail, however, it should not send any mail back to the list. > > > >I was unsubscribed from the list and I wanted to know if my vacation sent an > >auto-respond message. > > > >I only ask as I plan on putting it back on again this weekend and don't want > >it to send any messages back to the list/list-users. > > IMNSHO, and speaking as a sysadmin, I'd love to remove the vacation > program from all my systems and give anyone that used it 50 lashes with > old brittle tri-leads. It serves absolutely no useful purpose and causes > more problems that anything it was intended to solve. PLEASE don't use > it! Don't even try to fix it; it's too broken! > > And I'm trying to use and like mutt but I just can't seem to wean myself > from the taste of turpentine. > For those who need such a thing it is handy. Yes there are broken versions out there but if all systems updated to the newest version and reported problems then it would not be such an issue. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 My Current Uptime is 0d, 10h and 43m on Linux 2.2.13 ...Internet?...whazzat? Some sort of Irish fisherman's prayer?
Re: Vacation problem (non-list content)
Hi Steve! On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Steve Kennedy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 05:16:03PM -0800, Russell Van Tassell wrote: > > > Well, quite honestly, I've "disappeared" from the list because of an > > overloaded mail server or mis-behaving/looping upstream relay (there's > > been a couple of weird ones that, all told, lasted an hour or two)... > > so I think the person to ask is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > I'm apologising this time for probably being too harsh on bouncing > mail - I went on vacation for 9 days and came back to over 4000 > emails, lots of which were bounces. > > However if you look at the volume of the mutt lists on several days, > a single "off-net" system, can cause LOTS of bounces .. > That is no problem Steve, it was just that I did not know. I will look into it and see if I can find out the problem. I will not put it back online bacause of this reason. Sean PS The reason I was switching it on is because my partner is due to give birth to our twins :) -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject My Current Uptime is 0d, 18h and 41m on Linux 2.2.13 It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux...
Re: Alternates, Groups, Lists, and Work
Hi David! On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, David DeSimone wrote: > > In the end I want that the 'X' flag actually shows possible spams; and > > work related mails are usually not spam. ;-) > > My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts the > header 'X-Status: D'. Thus, when I enter my mailbox, all the spam is > pre-marked for deletion, and I can either choose to examine it, and > undelete the occasional non-spam message (and update my mail filter to > let it pass), or simply ignore them and let them get deleted when I > close the folder. > Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject My Current Uptime is 0d, 0h and 41m on Linux 2.2.13 It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux...
Re: Vacation problem (non-list content)
Hi Mutt! On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Sean Rima wrote: > Hi Steve! > > On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Steve Kennedy wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 05:16:03PM -0800, Russell Van Tassell wrote: > > > > > Well, quite honestly, I've "disappeared" from the list because of an > > > overloaded mail server or mis-behaving/looping upstream relay (there's > > > been a couple of weird ones that, all told, lasted an hour or two)... > > > so I think the person to ask is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > I'm apologising this time for probably being too harsh on bouncing > > mail - I went on vacation for 9 days and came back to over 4000 > > emails, lots of which were bounces. > > > > However if you look at the volume of the mutt lists on several days, > > a single "off-net" system, can cause LOTS of bounces .. > > > That is no problem Steve, it was just that I did not know. I will look into > it and see if I can find out the problem. I will not put it back online > bacause of this reason. > > Sean > PS The reason I was switching it on is because my partner is due to give > birth to our twins :) > > SEAN pay closer attention :) Noticed was a reply to me. Also I checked the db log for vacation here (my devel version) and it didn't send out any mails to the list. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject My Current Uptime is 0d, 1h and 39m on Linux 2.2.13 It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux...
Re: Alternates, Groups, Lists, and Work
Hi David! On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, David DeSimone wrote: > Sean Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts > > > the header 'X-Status: D'. > > > > Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good. > > Alas, my current mail filter is a home-brewed perl script, which is easy > for me to tweak and modify, since I wrote it, but I fear it might be a > bit of trouble for others to make sense of it. > (Cut to save) That is no problem. I get enough spam these days so maybe I can do something myself. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject My Current Uptime is 0d, 0h and 28m on Linux 2.2.13 It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux...
Re: Alternates, Groups, Lists, and Work
Hi Rejo! On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Rejo Zenger wrote: > ++ 11/11/99 22:11 + - Sean Rima: > >> My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts the > >> header 'X-Status: D'. Thus, when I enter my mailbox, all the spam is > >> > >Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good. > > I have same kind of setup. I have procmail check for a some things that > may point to spam. Other, similar, checks are also done. > > The filter checks for spammers that use insecure systems or messages > without RFC822 and RFC1123 valid Message-Id or Date fields. It checks to > see if the mail was addressed to a spamtrap. It checks to see if the > used mail servers are in the ORBS, RSS or RBL. If it finds a thing that > does not look correct, it'll add a X-Note field with the problem found. > > In Mutt i have these X-Note headers light up in bright white (while > other header fields are in green), so i can eassily not if something is, > possibly, wrong. > > Some of them are derived from the Spamdunk filters, but have been > changed and extended over the course of time. See my procmailrc at > http://www.mediaport.org/~sister/personal/procmailrc for more info. > Thanks, will have a butchers. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject My Current Uptime is 0d, 0h and 29m on Linux 2.2.13 It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux...
Re: Automatic CC adding
Hi Mikko! On Sat, 13 Nov 1999, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Martin Baehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 13 Nov 1999: > > not in my case (i have the same problem) because the To: > > address is one of my alternates... > > i need it there, because it is an admin-role adress > > where all replies should come with a From: with that address > > How about remove it from alternates and use a send-hook to set the > sender address? Admittedly you can't then use $reverse_name, unless > you start using the developement version of Mutt which supports > set from= (instead of needing to use my_hdr From, which is not > compatible with $reverse_name). > Does the set from= allow you to use Regexp expresssions. I use 4 different email addresses from this account and wish to be able to set the from sometimes. Sean -- Born Nov 12 1999 Amber Rose and Victoria May at 2.36pm and 2.49pm. Mother and babies doing fine *all donations of Beer welcome* Linux Uptime = 0 Days, 14 Hours and 57 Minutes
Re: Automatic CC adding
Hi Mikko! I think you miss my point, I have the following email addresses into this box: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (5 more) I send an email to a majordomo but the primary email is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as per my default hook. But I may decide to use another problem and unless I have every possible majordomo in send-hooks then there is no way to use multiple local addresses. Sean On Sat, 13 Nov 1999, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Sean Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 13 Nov 1999: > > Does the set from= allow you to use Regexp expresssions. I use 4 different > > email addresses from this account and wish to be able to set the from > > sometimes. > > Well, as far as I've understood, the $from variable works practically > just like my_hdr From: with the only difference being that you can use > it with $reverse_name set. That is, $reverse_name takes precedence over > $from. With my_hdr From:, $reverse_name is overridden which is mostly > an undesired behaviour. > > So depending on how you want to use regexp expressions this may or may > not help you. You can already use a variable From header address based > on recipient with send-hooks (or other hooks too), as in > send-hook (condition) my_hdr From: (name and address) > > > This brings my mind a question to "those who know", can I choose to > use $reverse_name in send-hooks? Ie. if I have > > send-hook . set reverse_name; blah blah > send-hook '~t some@recipient' unset reverse_name; blah blah > > Will something like that work? The idea is of course that I only want > $reverse_name to work for *some* of my email addresses. And > particularly, if someone happens to send me email at eg. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want the reply to go out as > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not sure if using send-hooks for > $reverse_name setting solves this problem, but it might help. > > > Regards, > Mikko > -- > // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ > // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / > // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs / > Gather 'round like cattle and ye shall be herd. > Sean -- Born Nov 12 1999 Amber Rose and Victoria May at 2.36pm and 2.49pm. Mother and babies doing fine *all donations of Beer welcome* Linux Uptime = 0 Days, 18 Hours and 31 Minutes
Re: why those copies ??
Hi Niels! When you send the message you may have FCC =mutt-users which is caused by the config option set save_name. You could unset it. Sean On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Niels Rasmussen wrote: > Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 02:46:41PM -0600, skrev Chris Costello: > > On Sun, Nov 14, 1999, Niels Rasmussen wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > > > I still dont get it ?? > > > > > > Why do mutt send a copy of my outgoing messages in the mailfolders of the > > > mailingslists that I am sending to, and noone in my outgoing folder ?? > > > >Because you're on the list, and you're getting your own email > > through the mailing list. > > Oh no, you are getting me all wrong. > > See, the problem is that when I am writing a mail, a copy of that mail > goes directly to the "folder" that I write to ! > > i.e > I write to mutt-users, the message appears immediately in folder > "mutt-users". > > The message is sent! > > After a while, fetch/procmail catch the mail from my ISP and put in the > same folder. > Now I have two messages that is similar, except that the first one > contains Mail-followup-to in the header ?? > > Now, what I want to, is that the first mail goes to sent-mail > > Do you see my point ?? > > How can I change that ?? > > BTW. thanks for your first reply (editor) :-) > > /Niels > > -- > > Niels Rasmussen | "To do is to be" -- Plato > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "To be is to do" -- Kant > Registred Linux user #133791| "Do be do be do" -- Sinatra > > Sean -- Born Nov 12 1999 Amber Rose and Victoria May at 2.36pm and 2.49pm. Mother and babies doing fine *all donations of Beer welcome* Linux Uptime = 2 Days, 04 Hours and 24 Minutes
Re: Since we have PGP support...
Hi Martin! On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Martin Schröder wrote: > On 1999-11-17 13:00:45 -0700, Eric Brunson wrote: > > Unfortunately most of the people on this mailing list use RSA keys > > which is a copyrighted algorithm and, therefore, not implemented in > > The patent will on RSA will expire sometime around 2000-06. > I think it is late 2000 which would be good as I would just like to use one. Using 2 is a PITA. Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Base64 iso-8859-1
Hi, I get mail from someone using Netscape who sends me mutipart mail. I can view the html part fine but the text/plain section seems to be under base64 encoding. How do I get mutt to view it as plain chars instead of hi-ascii chars. Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux...
PGP/GPG
Anyone know of a way to have a hook so that Mutt locads the necessary gpg.rc/pgp.rc depending on who the message is from. Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: PGP/GPG
Hi Bennett! On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Bennett Todd wrote: > 1999-11-22-14:28:52 Sean Rima: > > Anyone know of a way to have a hook so that Mutt locads the necessary > > gpg.rc/pgp.rc depending on who the message is from. > > I use one .gnupg/options regardless of who the message is run, and always use > gpg. I'm pretty sure I don't understand what you're asking for. > > Why not have one gpg (or pgp) config file for all correspondents? > The problem is the fact that there are a few people on the Mutt list who use PGP2 and PGP5. These keys are not able to be used in GPG AFAIK. I have both GPG and PGP to get around this but would like to be able to set Mutt to choice the correct encryption tool depending on who the message is from Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: PGP/GPG
Hi brian! On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, brian moore wrote: > > > > Anyone know of a way to have a hook so that Mutt locads the necessary > > > > gpg.rc/pgp.rc depending on who the message is from. > > > > > > I use one .gnupg/options regardless of who the message is run, and always use > > > gpg. I'm pretty sure I don't understand what you're asking for. > > > > > > Why not have one gpg (or pgp) config file for all correspondents? > > > > > The problem is the fact that there are a few people on the Mutt list who use > > PGP2 and PGP5. These keys are not able to be used in GPG AFAIK. I have both > > GPG and PGP to get around this but would like to be able to set Mutt to > > choice the correct encryption tool depending on who the message is from > > Then you know wrong. > > GPG is quite content with PGP5 messages out of the box. For PGP2 (ie, > RSA/IDEA), you can download and install the correct modules for GPG and > it will be glad to work with those. (Though it will probably refuse to > accept some keys that are not self-signed, since PGP2 allowed creation > of such, but then such keys are not secure anyway, and people shouldn't > trust them.) > I have never got a PGP 5 sig to work with GPG. But then maybe it has something to do with the fact that they keys are no self signed. Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: PGP/GPG
Hi A! On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, A Guy Called Tyketto wrote: > > > Why not have one gpg (or pgp) config file for all correspondents? > > > > > The problem is the fact that there are a few people on the Mutt list who use > > PGP2 and PGP5. These keys are not able to be used in GPG AFAIK. I have both > > GPG and PGP to get around this but would like to be able to set Mutt to > > choice the correct encryption tool depending on who the message is from > > > > Sean > > There's two ways to do this. > > First, to solve the receiving part, on your end. grab the rsa.c > program that's on the GnuPG FTP site (ftp.gnupg.org:/pub/gcrypt/contrib). That > will allow you to use GnuPG, to decrypt keys signed by PGP2 (which uses RSA). > With that, there is also an option that you can pass to GnuPG, that could sign > with an RSA key, that PGP2 would be able to understand. PGP5 should have no > problem with GnuPG, for sending or receiving. But, that extension for RSA > saved me a lot of trouble with GnuPG. Try it. > I grabbed rsa.c and idea.c and compiled and put to the lib directory. I then tried a couple of archived messages available but still it says the encryption is unknown. One did say about Not being a self signed sig. Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: PGP/GPG
Hi David! On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, David DeSimone wrote: > Sean Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The problem is the fact that there are a few people on the Mutt list > > who use PGP2 and PGP5. These keys are not able to be used in GPG > > AFAIK. > > >From what I have read, GPG can be configured or built with external > module support, so that it can read and use these RSA and IDEA based > message formats. > > However, I haven't really found any good instructions for building such > a version of GPG. There are some nice files in the "contrib" directory, > but I don't know how to put them together to make it work. > I just subscribe to the gpg users mailing list so I will attempt to find out. Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: PGP/GPG
Hi Rob! On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Rob Reid wrote: > At 3:54 PM EST on November 22 Sean Rima sent off: > > > Why not have one gpg (or pgp) config file for all correspondents? > > > > > The problem is the fact that there are a few people on the Mutt list who use > > PGP2 and PGP5. These keys are not able to be used in GPG AFAIK. > > Ah but they are! Look for RSA, etc, plugins in the contrib directory of > gnupg's ftp server. It's up to you to decide whether or not to use them. > You are correct, installed and working :) Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: PGP/GPG
Hi Mutt! On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Sean Rima wrote: > Anyone know of a way to have a hook so that Mutt locads the necessary > gpg.rc/pgp.rc depending on who the message is from. > > Sean Thanks to everyone who came forward with suggestions, I now have GPG working for PGP 2 and 5 keys. Thanks :) Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: PGP/GPG
Hi Eric! > ... [ Deletia ] > > > > Then you know wrong. > > > > > > GPG is quite content with PGP5 messages out of the box. For PGP2 (ie, > > > RSA/IDEA), you can download and install the correct modules for GPG and > > > it will be glad to work with those. (Though it will probably refuse to > > > accept some keys that are not self-signed, since PGP2 allowed creation > > > of such, but then such keys are not secure anyway, and people shouldn't > > > trust them.) > > > > > > > I have never got a PGP 5 sig to work with GPG. But then maybe it has > > something to do with the fact that they keys are no self signed. > > > > Sean > > > > Please see my posting of 5 minutes ago to get RSA working. You do > bring up a good point, though. GPG will *not* use an unsigned key. Got it and sorted. > You'll see output like the following: > > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Mon Nov 22 16:54:17 1999) --] > gpg: Signature made Wed Aug 11 11:36:48 1999 MDT using RSA key ID 98645519 > gpg: requesting key 98645519 from pgp5.ai.mit.edu ... > gpg: public key is 43099 seconds newer than the signature > gpg: key 98645519: invalid self-signature > gpg: public key is 43476 seconds newer than the signature > gpg: key 98645519: invalid self-signature > gpg: key 98645519: no valid user IDs > gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature > gpg: Total number processed: 1 > gpg: w/o user IDs: 1 > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > [-- End of PGP output --] > > e. > > P.S. > Jeremy, you should sign your key. ;-) > I got around it by manually importing Jeremy's pgp key :) Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: PGP/GPG
Hi Jeremy! On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > > > You'll see output like the following: > > > > > > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Mon Nov 22 16:54:17 1999) --] > > > gpg: Signature made Wed Aug 11 11:36:48 1999 MDT using RSA key ID 98645519 > > > gpg: requesting key 98645519 from pgp5.ai.mit.edu ... > > > gpg: public key is 43099 seconds newer than the signature > > > gpg: key 98645519: invalid self-signature > > > gpg: public key is 43476 seconds newer than the signature > > > gpg: key 98645519: invalid self-signature > > > gpg: key 98645519: no valid user IDs > > > gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature > > > gpg: Total number processed: 1 > > > gpg: w/o user IDs: 1 > > > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > > > [-- End of PGP output --] > > > > > > e. > > > > > > P.S. > > > Jeremy, you should sign your key. ;-) > > Heh. It's signed, but for some reason the date on the sig was earlier than > the creation date of the key (apparently a date-change snafu on the box I > created it on). > > Anyway, people report this to me about once a month... the solution is to > get my key(s) from http://jblosser.firinn.org/pgp.key instead of the key > servers. I've tried updating the version on the servers with no success so > far. > I have had your PGP file on my hd for awhile but never knew what to do to get GPG to import the key. It works fine now that I have the rsa/idea modules compiled and installed. Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: filenames from attached files
Hi Mike! Try it as: mutt -a test.pdf -s "subject here" [EMAIL PROTECTED] -i messagebody.txt Sean On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Mike Schwendener wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm trying to use mutt to send a message, with an attached pdf file. > I do something like this: > > mutt -a test.pdf -s "subject here" [EMAIL PROTECTED] < messagebody.txt > > Everything works fine, except the name of the attached file gets lost. > The name comes out as "NoName". The same thing happens when I tried > the program "mailto". Pine gets the filename okay, but doesn't have > a batch mode. > Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: [Feature Request] ordering of headers
Hi Timothy! You need to set hdr_order ie: hdr_order From: Subject: To: Cc: Bcc: Sean On Tue, 07 Dec 1999, Timothy Ball wrote: > Is there a way to make mutt display headers in the same order for each > mail? It seem that mutt is just printing the headers in the order that > is inside each email. Like sometimes I get: > > Date: > From: > To: > Subject: Uh huh. > Message-ID: > > and other times I get: > Message-ID: > To: > Date: > Subject: Uh huh. > From: > > I already use the ignore and uninore thingie. I was just hoping to order > the headers so that reading email becomes more uniform. > > --timball > > -- > Send mail with subject "send pgp key" for public key. > pub 1024R/CFF85605 1999-06-10 Timothy L. Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Key fingerprint = 8A 8E 64 D6 21 C0 90 29 9F D6 1E DC F8 18 CB CD > Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Send-Hooks
Hi folks, I have a strange problem, I use this mailbox for several different forwarding addresses and I am wondering if I can configure Mutt to use the original To address instead of the default. Mutt is set to use thecivvie@(softhome.net|yifan.net...) and so if someone sends me and email using my Yifan.net account that Mutt replies using the Yifan.net as the from address instead of the softhome.net one. Any suggestions, as I played around with Send-hooks. Using 1.1.1i Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: Send-Hooks
Hi David! On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote: > Sean -- > > If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your > yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets > your from address as yifan when it sees that the email was sent there. > > If that's correct, then I believe you want to unset "use_from", and you > might also want to specify a "my_hdr From" command to force a particular > address. > > No the other way around. If a mail comes in addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I want Mutt to set the reply as coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Currently it sets all mail to From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: Send-Hooks
Hi David! On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote: > Sean -- > > ...and then Sean Rima said... > % Hi David! > > Hi there! > > > % > % On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote: > % > % > yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets > % > > % > If that's correct, then I believe you want to unset "use_from", and you > % > might also want to specify a "my_hdr From" command to force a particular > % > address. > % > % No the other way around. If a mail comes in addressed to > % [EMAIL PROTECTED], I want Mutt to set the reply as coming from > % [EMAIL PROTECTED] Currently it sets all mail to From: > % [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Ah. Well, then, you probably want to set "use_from" and "alternates" > in your .muttrc so that mutt will send the reply out as the person to > whom it was addressed. Give it a shot. > > Both set and still no joy. I tried unsetting (commenting out) my defaults send-hook my_hdr but to no avail. I think I will just for the moment have to have several commented out my_hdr From lines to suit. Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: Send-Hooks
Hi John! On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, John P . Looney wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 02:39:23PM +0000, Sean Rima mentioned: > > Hi David! > > > > On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote: > > > > > Sean -- > > > > > > If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your > > > yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets > > > your from address as yifan when it sees that the email was sent there. > > > > > > If that's correct, then I believe you want to unset "use_from", and you > > > might also want to specify a "my_hdr From" command to force a particular > > > address. > > > > > > > > > > No the other way around. If a mail comes in addressed to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], I want Mutt to set the reply as coming from > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Currently it sets all mail to From: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I've in my .muttrc: > > send-hook . my_hdr reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > send-hook . my_hdr From: John P. Looney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > send-hook ilug my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > send-hook ilug my_hdr Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > send-hook compapp.dcu.ie my_hdr reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > send-hook compapp.dcu.ie my_hdr From: John P. Looney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > send-hook online.ie my_hdr From: John P. Looney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > send-hook online.ie my_hdr Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I've loads more, but you get the idea... > I have these set for mailing lists etc, but if someone writes me direct, my default email address may not be the one he/she wrote to and I don't want to confuse anyone :) Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux... PGP signature
Re: how to reply to cc addresses?
Hi Dominik! On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Dominik Vogt wrote: > What is the easiest way to reply to the sender and all > cc'ed addresses at once with mutt? THere must be a > simpler method than cut-and-paste. > > Bye > > Dominik ^_^ > > P.S.: Please cc me, I'm not on the list. > Use "G" w/o the quotes which is a global reply. Sean -- GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject My Current Uptime is 1d, 21h and 23m on Linux 2.2.13 ...See my Uptime: http://www.uptimes.net/hostinfo.html?hid=110 PGP signature
Changing Groups in Mutt/NNTP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I cannot see any details howto change the current Group or even change back to the list of active groups when using Mutt/NNTP Sean - -- Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjyg8WAACgkQeR/L2ZZp3E8pxgCfQoxA3GjlDv9PBE1DUeJO5jAq 1Q0An1LtC+jgVXlmved4ux3FZmXMyPBo =QP+i -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Changing Groups in Mutt/NNTP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rocco! On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:08:33:PM +0000 Sean Rima wrote: > > I cannot see any details howto change the current Group or even change back > > to the list of active groups when using Mutt/NNTP > > Probably does depend on the patch. Which one do you use? I use the > vvv.nntp patch. Just move around as in mailboxes, but press 'i' instead > of 'c'. Inside a group pressing 'i' and '?' on the prompt for the group > should get you back to your list. > Sorry should have said but yes it is the vvv patch, so thanks a million :) Sean - -- Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjyhrB0ACgkQeR/L2ZZp3E/xigCfTn07BfF8vhDhq1RI5xxb2Yq2 u4MAn1JgfLc9kuVDgWKMUYfG3dRd5oG0 =aVav -END PGP SIGNATURE-
