Re: how to mark all as read?
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, Ed Blackman wrote: > macro index c > "~T\n~N\n~T\n" Does it work if there is no new messages? -- regards, GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 唐詩241 李端 聽箏 鳴箏金粟柱 素手玉房前 欲得周郎顧 時時誤拂絃
Compiling Mutt on a Macbook Pro and recommendation for mailing list
I got a MBP for Christmas (yippie) and am looking for a good howto on compiling Mutt on it. I have been running 1.5.18 from HEAD, and would like to continue. I don't want, at least initially, to install either MacPorts or Fink. I'm also looking for a good Mac mailing list that leans toward the admin side of things. Any and all help appreciated. Thanks, festus -- I just want to break even.
Re: Compiling Mutt on a Macbook Pro and recommendation for mailing list
I got a MBP for Christmas (yippie) and am looking for a good howto on compiling Mutt on it. I have been running 1.5.18 from HEAD, and would like to continue. I don't want, at least initially, to install either MacPorts or Fink. I'm also looking for a good Mac mailing list that leans toward the admin side of things. Without MacPorts or Fink, the installation instructions are really the same as for any barebone Unix system. Enjoy. (In other words, you *really* want MacPorts. Or Fink.) -- Thomas Roessler
Re: how to mark all as read?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, January 6 at 12:12 AM, quoth bill lam: >On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, Kyle Wheeler wrote: >> ~T~N~T > >Thanks. I tried and apparently it needs to expand all collapsed >threads first, otherwise only those visible messages will be affected. Ahh, right, I forgot about that. Talk about a pain, eh? ~Kyle - -- I married beneath me---all women do. -- Nancy Astor -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iEYEARECAAYFAkliMnkACgkQBkIOoMqOI14HEACg4Px/QVtS77IxJGBxAqMPBFdE ulYAni1HL2Xh+c44RYxe8u0wSwQ2VFhH =KS8K -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: how to mark all as read?
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > ~T~N~T Thanks. I tried and apparently it needs to expand all collapsed threads first, otherwise only those visible messages will be affected. -- regards, GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 唐詩137 劉長卿 新年作 鄉心新歲切 天畔獨潸然 老至居人下 春歸在客先 嶺猿同旦暮 江柳共風煙 已似長沙傅 從今又幾年
Weird sorting possibilites?
A friend has some rather peculiar needs in dealing with large volumes of mail. I'm trying to show her mutt, but I've just noticed that sort=from sorts all the mails from one's self together, which really isn't what we want. Is there any way to sort by "from address unless it's mine, in which case use the to address"? -Robin -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" -- http://shorl.com/tydruhedufogre http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Re: how to mark all as read?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, January 5 at 11:40 PM, quoth bill lam: >On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, Ed Blackman wrote: >> macro index c >> "~T\n~N\n~T\n" > >Does it work if there is no new messages? First of all, that only works if you have $auto_tag set. Otherwise the function won't apply to all the tagged messages. The way to do it that will work no matter your configuration and no matter whether there are any new messages is this: ~T~N~T ~Kyle - -- If after I depart this vale you ever remember me and have thought to please my ghost, forgive some sinner, and wink your eye at some homely girl. -- H.L. Mencken's Epitaph -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iEYEARECAAYFAkliLRIACgkQBkIOoMqOI17TagCfRoXYfFH2MKrIGmx20RMlQ+6o kTYAn18ovC5Fl1+M38CrdaVXiVadHPWu =Zmy0 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Weird sorting possibilites?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, January 5 at 11:34 AM, quoth Robin Lee Powell: > Is there any way to sort by "from address unless it's mine, in which > case use the to address"? Well, you asked a difficult question, so I'll break it into two parts: Part 1: Is there an *easy* way to sort by "from address unless it's mine, in which case use the to address"? No, unfortunately, there's not. Part 2: Is there ANY way to sort that way? I think there is, but it'd require a *LOT* of work. One of the sort methods is "score" where you sort your messages by a score that you have control over. I *think* it would be possible to design a sufficiently clever set of scoring rules that would allow you to create the sort order that you like. But like I said, that would require a TON of work. It would be much easier to ask the developers to make a from-or-to sort order (to match the %F field of the index_format). This could be painful for the IMAP driver, though, since the sorting cannot be done on the server side. ~Kyle - -- It is only possible to live happily ever after on a day-to-day basis. -- Margaret Bonnano -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iEYEARECAAYFAkliancACgkQBkIOoMqOI14/+QCfREWFFJXGTodcp/+eMFHyeZ1o 8tkAni2EKPbOpWQKxu00zIynMyRVkG+q =XlG7 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Weird sorting possibilites?
On Monday, 05 January 2009 at 14:15, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Monday, January 5 at 11:34 AM, quoth Robin Lee Powell: > > Is there any way to sort by "from address unless it's mine, in which > > case use the to address"? > > Well, you asked a difficult question, so I'll break it into two parts: > > Part 1: Is there an *easy* way to sort by "from address unless it's > mine, in which case use the to address"? > > No, unfortunately, there's not. > > Part 2: Is there ANY way to sort that way? > > I think there is, but it'd require a *LOT* of work. One of the sort > methods is "score" where you sort your messages by a score that you > have control over. I *think* it would be possible to design a > sufficiently clever set of scoring rules that would allow you to > create the sort order that you like. But like I said, that would > require a TON of work. > > It would be much easier to ask the developers to make a from-or-to > sort order (to match the %F field of the index_format). This could be > painful for the IMAP driver, though, since the sorting cannot be done > on the server side. We don't use server-side search yet anyway (which is one of the reasons mutt loads the whole mailbox on open). When (if?) we get server-side search and partial mailbox loading, we'll just have to have a fallback client-side mode for sort modes that the server doesn't support. That's what we do for search right now.
long loading time when entering mailbox
hi, im using maildir. and it taks several seconds to load all mails when entering a mailbox. is there anyway such as lazy loading to speedup? thanks. lars
Re: long loading time when entering mailbox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, January 6 at 12:08 PM, quoth Chengqi(Lars) Song: > im using maildir. and it taks several seconds to load all mails when > entering a mailbox. is there anyway such as lazy loading to speedup? > thanks. Header caching. ~Kyle - -- To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. -- Voltaire -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iEYEARECAAYFAkli4IMACgkQBkIOoMqOI17O7ACgmEDPT7nIv48TxMKOu6Bc+kDs zdkAoM9k5hSG2ICxv9O6PIt7fFpuntEz =hzkq -END PGP SIGNATURE-
