Re: automatic removal of duplicates
Sven,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> yup. in addition, here's a hook for this:
>
> folder-hook . "~="
>
using your proposal let to an error message "Unknown command".
Playing around let me to slight glimpse of improvement:
folder-hook (fain|mutt|vim|linuxdebian) 'push ~=\n'
^ ^^
seems to work.
wbr,
Lukas
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch http://www.maremma.ch
http://www.{{topsy,nodeos}.net,{promethos,netbeast,rawip}.org}
Wanna know anything about raw ip? Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] on www.rawip.org
Re: automatic removal of duplicates
Sven,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> folder-hook . "~="
>
right at the moment, I defined
folder-hook . push 'D~=\n'
>
> folder-hook . "!~="
>
It it works, I prefer this approach as well!
Thanks,
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch http://www.maremma.ch
http://www.{{topsy,nodeos}.net,{promethos,netbeast,rawip}.org}
Wanna know anything about raw ip? Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] on www.rawip.org
Re: function executed when entering a box
* Bernard Massot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 15:49]: > Is it possible to change the function executed first when entering a box ? > It seems that mutt calls "next-new" whereas I'd like it to > call "next-unread". I've tried to use "exec first-entry > next-unread" but when I enter a box with no unread message, > it lets the cursor on the 1st message, and I don't want that. * On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 12:54:15AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > so what do you expect to happen when you enter a folder > with *no* unread messages and you tell mutt to jump > to the next-unread message - when there is *none*? * Bernard Massot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 23:12]: > I'm expecting what mutt does for the moment: > jump to last message. but if *all* messages are *not* unread (read: all messages have been read) then the last one is read, too. so in this case mutt would be doing something wrong, now, wouldn't it? > Mutt behaves right for me on empty boxes. well, you cannot do a lot of wrong stuff on *empty* folders, now, can you? ;-) but mutt cannot even jump to the last messages because there is no such... Sven [who gave up reasoning with people who argue that 1+1 cannot be 10] -- there are 10 kinds of people in this world - one understand binary - and the other don't.
Re: iconv stuff on solaris still unresolved
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > and installed it, recompiled > mutt --with-iconv=$HOME - it can be. I have like you experiences with mutt, iconv, Solaris 7, gcc 3.2 and gnumake Piotr -- Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.am.torun.pl/~pekasz
Re: alias creation out of received emails (mutt 1.4i)
Sven,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> it all depends on how you treat your doggie.
> did you try to teach him new tricks, perhaps?
> fed him any weird patches lately? or
> maybe you should take it for walkies?
>
Well, if I fed any cookies I knew because I do not rely on dselect for
any important program like vim, mutt, openss[lh], postfix and
apache... However, I have not applied any patches to mutt.
> well, there is the option "alias_format" -
> but this would affect the presentation in the
> alias menu only. i hope. but if it *does*
> affect the creation of an alias with the
> create-alias command then it must be because
> you changed its value. but you didn't, right?
>
All I get when grepping muttrc and my private lpr_settings:
uccellina:~/.mutt!68> grep alias muttrc lpr_settings
muttrc:set reverse_alias # use realname from reverse alias lookup
muttrc:set sort_alias=alias
muttrc:set alias_format="%4n %t %-12a %r"
muttrc:set alias_file=~/.mutt/aliases # add the Aliases here
muttrc:source ~/.mutt/aliases # and include all existing aliases
For sure alias_format I have not changed.
> > Reply-To: Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> the Reply-To is completely redundant.
>
I know. But for business use, I have been asked several times why I
had not set my Reply-To. Finally, I got slightly mad about all these
questions. Since I am using mutt (and do rawip list-administration,
if there was action ,-), I re-configured the appropriate send-hooks.
Take look now.
By the way, I remember when you send me some requests not to top-post
and neither to include the full messages. There, you mentioned
something about guidelines you have written for posting to mailing
lists. Would you mind sending me the link again, and would you mind
me including this link on the rawip homepage?
Thanks,
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch http://www.maremma.ch
http://www.{{topsy,nodeos}.net,{promethos,netbeast,rawip}.org}
Wanna know anything about raw ip? Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] on www.rawip.org
http://www.mutt.org/mail-lists.html -- Request to change
Folks,
a few seconds ago, I wanted to re-subscribe under a different name on
http://www.mutt.org/mail-lists.html
A thing I did not like there was the way how you offer the different
mailing lists: You offer them as radio-buttons instead of checkboxes.
Why? Using mozilla 1.0, I was not unable to uncheck a radio-button
without pressing . This deleted also my email address.
Would anyone of the administrators mind changing the radio-buttons
into checkboxes?
Thanks,
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch http://www.maremma.ch
http://www.{{topsy,nodeos}.net,{promethos,netbeast,rawip}.org}
Wanna know anything about raw ip? Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] on www.rawip.org
Re: imap issues
* dan radom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > in the process of playing with imap i noticed something strange. when opening any >mailbox, the current highlighted message appears to have the same text, foreground >and background colors. in other words it appears as a solid red bar, where it should >have white text. if i move to another message sometimes the solid red bar will >remain on that first message, and the newly selected message also appears >hihglighted, but displays as it it should. has anyone seen this before? this was the problem all along color index green default '~h ^X-Spam-Status:.*Yes'
Re: function executed when entering a box
* Bernard Massot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 15:49]: > Is it possible to change the function executed first when entering a box ? > It seems that mutt calls "next-new" whereas I'd like it to > call "next-unread". I've tried to use "exec first-entry > next-unread" but when I enter a box with no unread message, > it lets the cursor on the 1st message, and I don't want that. so what do you expect to happen when you enter a folder with *no* unread messages and you tell mutt to jump to the next-unread message - when there is *none*? (now, that's a tough one...) Sven
Re: function executed when entering a box
mutt default's behavior is : - if the box has no messages matching ~N or ~O, go on last message in the bottom of the index (right for me) - if there are some messages matching ~N, go on the 1st message matching ~N (right for me) - if there are some messages matching ~O, go on the 1st message matching ~O (right for me) - if there are both messages matching ~N and ~O, go on the 1st message matching ~N (that's what I don't like, I'd like it to go on the 1st message matching ~O) Maybe I wasn't clear enough in my previous messages but this time I think I was ! -- Bernard Massot msg31755/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: host-hook
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 12:08:18AM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > Hello, > > is there a host-hook in mutt 1.4 or later? > I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the > hostname. hostname = `hostname` Is it what you want ? -- Bernard Massot msg31756/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: automatic removal of duplicates
* Lukas Ruf: > quite often I receive emails several times because > people do not know how to handle mailing list replies. > > Is there a possibility in mutt 1.4 of which I can make use such > that duplicates get automagically marked as deleted whenever I > enter a new folder. I assume, I would need to bind this to the > my folder-hook setings. But what would be the expression? * Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-13 08:46]: > Search for simple patterns in TFM. >~= duplicated messages (see $duplicate_threads) > > Alternately, use procmail to filter your duplicates > (use at your own risk) - see the procmailex man page. yup. in addition, here's a hook for this: folder-hook . "~=" however, i do not like automatic deletions - unless i am very very sure about it. so i suggest to "limit" the view on the non-duplicates first: folder-hook . "!~=" untested, but should work. Sven
automatic removal of duplicates
Dear all,
quite often I receive emails several times because people do not know
how to handle mailing list replies.
Is there a possibility in mutt 1.4 of which I can make use such that
duplicates get automagically marked as deleted whenever I enter a new
folder. I assume, I would need to bind this to the my folder-hook
setings. But what would be the expression?
Thanks
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch http://www.maremma.ch
http://www.{{topsy,nodeos}.net,{promethos,netbeast,rawip}.org}
Wanna know anything about raw ip? Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] on www.rawip.org
host-hook
Hello, is there a host-hook in mutt 1.4 or later? I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the hostname. -Hanspeter
Re: automatic removal of duplicates
Lukas Ruf wrote: > quite often I receive emails several times because people do not know > how to handle mailing list replies. > > Is there a possibility in mutt 1.4 of which I can make use such that > duplicates get automagically marked as deleted whenever I enter a new > folder. I assume, I would need to bind this to the my folder-hook > setings. But what would be the expression? Search for simple patterns in TFM. ~= duplicated messages (see $duplicate_threads) Alternately, use procmail to filter your duplicates (use at your own risk) - see the procmailex man page. -- Will Yardley input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >
Re: host-hook
Hi, * Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-10-13 00:08]: >I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the >hostname. For your own hostname, `hostname` should do, for the receiver's hostname, a sendhook should work. Thorsten -- If you don't claim your humanity, you will become a statistic. - Tyler Durden
Re: host-hook
* Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-13 00:08 +0200]: > is there a host-hook in mutt 1.4 or later? > I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the > hostname. What about "set hostname=`hostname`"? Nicolas
Re: iconv stuff on solaris still unresolved
* René Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 16:46]: > * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-2002 20:25]: > > [all context] > > > * Ren Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-11 16:01]: > > ^^ > > This grieves me, Sven... sorry, man. this iconv stuff just doesn't work on solaris. i downloaded the latest iconv lib and installed it, recompiled mutt --with-iconv=$HOME - but no go. this *really* bugs me, too... *grr* Sven
fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?
Dear all,
I would like to configure mutt 1.4 for outgoing emails such that every
outgoing email is saved in an folder according to one of the following
two methods:
a) some particular folders are configured according to well-known ,-)
email-addresses using the fcc-hook '~C pattern' 'folder_notation'
--> solved
b) all the emails I do not have specifically configured fcc-hooks for,
I would like to store in the folder where I actually read the
emails in. This is most useful when replying.
For b) I would like to make use of the folder-hook. When entering a
particular folder, I would like to set the fcc-hook such that every
outgoing email is saved in this folder.
I read again some of the mutt-documentation on the different hooks,
variables and also most of the example muttrc, but I have neither found a
solution to this problem nor a hint how I could figure out the name of
the actual folder.
Any hint is gratefully appreciated!
Thanks
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch http://www.maremma.ch
http://www.{{topsy,nodeos}.net,{promethos,netbeast,rawip}.org}
Wanna know anything about raw ip? Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] on www.rawip.org
Re: abook is ugly. What else is there?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 11:54:00PM +, MindFuq wrote: > > What do you non-abook users use? I don't care if it's textual or > graphical. Check out lbdb (Little Brother Data Base) -- google for 'lbdb'. It has a bunch of modules (including something called 'm_palm', and lots of others) that can import address and print them out in a mutt-readable manner (so the internal query utility can read them). But I'll leave that investigation to you. /db
function executed when entering a box
Hi Is it possible to change the function executed first when entering a box ? It seems that mutt calls "next-new" whereas I'd like it to call "next-unread". I've tried to use "exec first-entry next-unread" but when I enter a box with no unread message, it lets the cursor on the 1st message, and I don't want that. -- Bernard Massot msg31766/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: iconv stuff on solaris still unresolved
* Piotr Kasztelowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 23:04]: > On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > > and installed it, recompiled mutt --with-iconv=$HOME - > it can be. I have like you experiences with > mutt, iconv, Solaris 7, gcc 3.2 and gnumake so that makes two of us. well, i suppose i might be related because technically we use different versions: system: SunOS 5.8 Generic_108528-13 sun4u sparc programs: libiconv 1.8, gcc 2.95.3, GNU make 3.77, mutt 1.4 + ncurses 5.2 + +HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS so - is anyone using mutt 1.4 with iconv on solaris successfully? mind you - i am not root, so all my stuff resides in my $HOME. i once tried to resolve this but i think the bottom line was that it all is of no use because the solaris admin chose to install only the language stuff for "C" - and no others... Sven === $ ls -l libiconv-1.8.tar.gz .. 3514117 May 29 19:46 libiconv-1.8.tar.gz $ gcc --version 2.95.3 $ make --version GNU Make version 3.77.. $ mutt -v Mutt 1.4i (2002-05-29) ... System: SunOS 5.8 (sun4u) [using ncurses 5.2] Compile options: ... +HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS $ uname -a SunOS ritz 5.8 Generic_108528-13 sun4u sparc
Re: Macros using flag-message -> set resolve
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-2002 20:25]: [all context] > * Ren Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-11 16:01]: ^^ This grieves me, Sven... -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) No woman, no cry. -Bob Marley msg31768/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 the mental interface of Lukas Ruf told: > Dear all, > > I would like to configure mutt 1.4 for outgoing emails such that every > outgoing email is saved in an folder according to one of the following > two methods: > > a) some particular folders are configured according to well-known ,-) >email-addresses using the fcc-hook '~C pattern' 'folder_notation' >--> solved > > b) all the emails I do not have specifically configured fcc-hooks for, >I would like to store in the folder where I actually read the >emails in. This is most useful when replying. > > For b) I would like to make use of the folder-hook. When entering a > particular folder, I would like to set the fcc-hook such that every > outgoing email is saved in this folder. This means you want "set record=+inbox" ? Maybe fcc-hook . "inbox" , but this is a contradiction! HTH -- Ersatz des Zufalls durch den Irrtum. -unknown- msg31769/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: function executed when entering a box
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 12:54:15AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Bernard Massot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 15:49]: > > Is it possible to change the function executed first when entering a box ? > > It seems that mutt calls "next-new" whereas I'd like it to > > call "next-unread". I've tried to use "exec first-entry > > next-unread" but when I enter a box with no unread message, > > it lets the cursor on the 1st message, and I don't want that. > > so what do you expect to happen when you enter a folder > with *no* unread messages and you tell mutt to jump > to the next-unread message - when there is *none*? I'm expecting what mutt does for the moment : jump to last message. Mutt behaves right for me on empty boxes. -- Bernard Massot msg31770/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: host-hook
On Oct 13 at 02:20, Bernard Massot spoke: > hostname = `hostname` > Is it what you want ? No. I want something like this: if [ `hostname` == host1 ]; then set hostname=host2 fi It should also affect the domain in the envelope when using bounce. -Hanspeter
Re: host-hook
* Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-13 18:04 +0200]: > On Oct 13 at 02:20, Bernard Massot spoke: > > > hostname = `hostname` > > Is it what you want ? > > No. I want something like this: > > if [ `hostname` == host1 ]; then > set hostname=host2 > fi > > It should also affect the domain in the envelope when using bounce. Write a shellscript, which outputs the info you want (depending on whatever you want) and source it with 'source "pathtoscript"|'. Nicolas
Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?
Luka -- ...and then Lukas Ruf said... % ... % b) all the emails I do not have specifically configured fcc-hooks for, %I would like to store in the folder where I actually read the %emails in. This is most useful when replying. % % For b) I would like to make use of the folder-hook. When entering a % particular folder, I would like to set the fcc-hook such that every % outgoing email is saved in this folder. Why bother to be folder-specific? Back to TFM and you'll find the abbreviation for "the current folder" can help: fcc-save-hook . ^ Of course, you follow that with your specific cases and away you go. HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg31773/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: iconv stuff on solaris still unresolved
* On 2002.10.12, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Sven Dogbert Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > so - is anyone using mutt 1.4 with iconv on solaris successfully? > mind you - i am not root, so all my stuff resides in my $HOME. I'm using 1.5.1 on Solaris, and before that I used 1.3.x on Solaris, all successfully. I use the native iconv, though, not libiconv. I didn't do anything special; it "just worked". +HAVE_ICONV +ICONV_NONTRANS +HAVE_GETSID +HAVE_GETADDRINFO I've built 1.4 on Solaris with no trouble, but I don't regularly use it. > i once tried to resolve this but i think the bottom line was > that it all is of no use because the solaris admin chose to > install only the language stuff for "C" - and no others... Well, that would be a problem. But it's not fair or correct to say that this iconv stuff just doesn't work on Solaris. -- -D.We establised a fine coffee. What everybody can say Sun Project, APC/UCCO TASTY! It's fresh, so-mild, with some special coffee's University of Chicago bitter and sourtaste. "LET'S HAVE SUCH A COFFEE! NOW!" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please love CAFE MIAMI. Many thanks.
Re: host-hook
On Oct 13 at 18:49, Nicolas Rachinsky spoke: > Write a shellscript, which outputs the info you want (depending on > whatever you want) and source it with 'source "pathtoscript"|'. Ok. Thank you. -Hanspeter
Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?
Elimar,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> This means you want "set record=+inbox" ?
>
> Maybe fcc-hook . "inbox" , but this is a contradiction!
>
I do not have a folder named inbox. It does not really solve my
problem. Thanks, anyway.
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch http://www.maremma.ch
http://www.{{topsy,nodeos}.net,{promethos,netbeast,rawip}.org}
Wanna know anything about raw ip? Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] on www.rawip.org
Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?
David,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, David T-G wrote:
>
> Why bother to be folder-specific? Back to TFM and you'll find the
> abbreviation for "the current folder" can help:
>
> fcc-save-hook . ^
>
Pardon my non-understanding, but searching the text version of the
manual for "the current folder" as well as trying your proposal have
not helped me solving my problem. When I define a fcc-save-hook as
proposed, the Fcc: in the "send menu" (?) reads
Fcc: ^
-- but there is no message appended to the current folder.
Maybe, I misinterpreted something?
Thanks for any help!
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch http://www.maremma.ch
http://www.{{topsy,nodeos}.net,{promethos,netbeast,rawip}.org}
Wanna know anything about raw ip? Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] on www.rawip.org
Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 the mental interface of Lukas Ruf told: > Elimar, > > On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > > > This means you want "set record=+inbox" ? > > > > Maybe fcc-hook . "inbox" , but this is a contradiction! > > > > I do not have a folder named inbox. It does not really solve my > problem. Thanks, anyway. "inbox" is the folder where your incoming mails are saved! If you are using procmail it is your DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/YourInbox. If not try /var/spool/mail/YourUserName! Uff! -- Excellent day for drinking heavily. Spike the office water cooler;-) msg31778/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?
Elimar,
thanks.
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> "inbox" is the folder where your incoming mails are saved! If you
> are using procmail it is your DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/YourInbox. If not try
> /var/spool/mail/YourUserName!
>
Well, I know the name inbox from my pine-times -- some two or three
years ago. I do not like it since I make heavily use of procmail to
distribute my emails to appropriate folders. For this reason, I call
my "inbox" +def, which stands for default, i.e. the mails I could not
automagically deliver to the appropriate folder.
What I meant is that I would like to configure a
fcc-hook/fcc-save-hook the way that if I reply to a single user of a
mailing list, the email gets saved into the appropriate folder. For
example, assume I would have sent this email to you only. However,
since the email was delivered to my =mutt folder, I would like to have
the outgoind email sent into =mutt too. But, since I do not know how
to specify the current folder, I have specified
fcc-save-hook . =def
in my muttrc.
The other proposal sent by David directed to the point I wanted to
know. However, neither TFM nor the hint could really help me.
If anyone has any further help, I would really appreciate!
Thanks!
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch http://www.maremma.ch
http://www.{{topsy,nodeos}.net,{promethos,netbeast,rawip}.org}
Wanna know anything about raw ip? Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] on www.rawip.org
Re: automatic removal of duplicates
* Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-13 14:00]: > On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > > folder-hook . "~=" > > using your proposal let to an error message "Unknown command". > Playing around let me to slight glimpse of improvement: > > folder-hook (fain|mutt|vim|linuxdebian) 'push ~=\n' >^ ^^ > seems to work. yep - it needs to be "push"ed. however, i still prefer to issue such commands myself, so i may them a macro - where i usually leave out the "\n" so i can still decide whether to accept by typing enter - or abort with CTRL-G. so that's why the \n was "missing" - feature! :-) but for deleting duplicates i simply *know* that the pattern is "~=" - so i do not really need a macro for that. it's too easy... ;-) Sven
Re: imap issues -> color issue?
* dan radom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 23:38]: > * dan radom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > in the process of playing with imap i noticed something > > strange. when opening any mailbox, the current > > highlighted message appears to have the same text, > > foreground and background colors. in other words it > > appears as a solid red bar, where it should have white > > text. if i move to another message sometimes the solid > > red bar will remain on that first message, and the newly > > selected message also appears higlighted, but displays > > as it it should. has anyone seen this before? > > this was the problem all along > color index green default '~h ^X-Spam-Status:.*Yes' so the "green on default" thing made mutt place the red bar at the bottom of the screen? huh?? Sven [green things? it's *gotta* be aliens...]
Re: iconv stuff on solaris still unresolved
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-13 19:32]: > * On 2002.10.12, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > * "Sven Dogbert Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > so - is anyone using mutt 1.4 with iconv on solaris successfully? > > mind you - i am not root, so all my stuff resides in my $HOME. > > I'm using 1.5.1 on Solaris, and before that I used 1.3.x on > Solaris, all successfully. I use the native iconv, though, not > libiconv. I didn't do anything special; it "just worked". > > +HAVE_ICONV +ICONV_NONTRANS +HAVE_GETSID +HAVE_GETADDRINFO > > I've built 1.4 on Solaris with no trouble, but I don't regularly use it. > > > > i once tried to resolve this but i think the bottom line was > > that it all is of no use because the solaris admin chose to > > install only the language stuff for "C" - and no others... > > Well, that would be a problem. But it's not fair or correct > to say that this iconv stuff just doesn't work on Solaris. so - what *is* required then? well - +HAVE_ICONV, for sure. but is +ICONV_NONTRANS? what? besides, you did not specify the kind of solaris you use. Sven
Re: function executed when entering a box
* Bernard Massot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 23:41]: > mutt default's behavior is : > - if the box has no messages matching ~N or ~O, > go on last message in the bottom of the index (right for me) > - if there are some messages matching ~N, > go on the 1st message matching ~N (right for me) > - if there are some messages matching ~O, > go on the 1st message matching ~O (right for me) > - if there are both messages matching ~N and ~O, > go on the 1st message matching ~N (that's what I don't > like, I'd like it to go on the 1st message matching ~O) i'd limit to "(~N|~O)" and then jump to the first entry - but this might be either ~N or ~O - depending on the case. anyway, i suppose this requires a change of the code... Sven
Re: imap issues -> color issue?
* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > so the "green on default" thing made mutt place > the red bar at the bottom of the screen? huh?? > > Sven [green things? it's *gotta* be aliens...] yup. when vt100 worked fine i figured it was a runaway color line in muttrc. i commented then out one by one and that was the culprit. thanks for the help. dan
Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?
* Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-13 23:43 +0200]: > On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, David T-G wrote: > > Why bother to be folder-specific? Back to TFM and you'll find the > > abbreviation for "the current folder" can help: > > > > fcc-save-hook . ^ > > > Pardon my non-understanding, but searching the text version of the > manual for "the current folder" as well as trying your proposal have > not helped me solving my problem. When I define a fcc-save-hook as > proposed, the Fcc: in the "send menu" (?) reads > Fcc: ^ > -- but there is no message appended to the current folder. > > Maybe, I misinterpreted something? David forgot to mention that ^ is added by a patch. You find it: http://home.worldonline.dk/~byrial/mutt/patches/ Nicolas
Changing From header
I've been looking around for a painless way to modify the From header based on which account I am using. I am sure this has been done as I can't be the only person with way too many email accounts. I am looking for a patch or keybinding that will allow me to scroll through a list of email address that I use. This would be nice if it worked just like the t key does when sending mail ie: I could hit F then tab to scroll through a list of my email addresses. Is there a patch that will add this to mutt or is it already there and I am just missing it? -Brian
Problem compile mutt in FreeBSD
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 10:52:17PM +0700, adi wrote: >nggak apa-apa. mutt otomatis melakukan itu kalau mengira >mail yang ada di mailbox berasal dari kita. misalnya saya kirim >mail ke milis, maka index saya juga tambak begitu. malah enak, >jadi gampang melihat mana posting dari saya sendri :-) Hi, I was compile mutt-1.5.1i in FreeBSD box, I got some patching for compress folder too, So I followed the the instruction for to do that. but I got some error message like this: ---cut /usr/include/stdlib.h:108: warning: ANSI C does not support `long long' /usr/include/stdlib.h:112: warning: ANSI C does not support `long long' ---cut I think the problem is my version GCC to old, so I did to upgrade my GCC and compile again, it was nothing get solution. How about this..? Thank In Advance -- budsz
