* Bernard Massot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 15:49]:
> Is it possible to change the function executed first when entering a box ?
> It seems that mutt calls "next-new" whereas I'd like it to
> call "next-unread". I've tried to use "exec first-entry
> next-unread" but when I enter a box with no unread message,
> it lets the cursor on the 1st message, and I don't want that.
* On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 12:54:15AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> so what do you expect to happen when you enter a folder
> with *no* unread messages and you tell mutt to jump
> to the next-unread message - when there is *none*?
* Bernard Massot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 23:12]:
> I'm expecting what mutt does for the moment:
> jump to last message.
but if *all* messages are *not* unread
(read: all messages have been read)
then the last one is read, too.
so in this case mutt would be doing
something wrong, now, wouldn't it?
> Mutt behaves right for me on empty boxes.
well, you cannot do a lot of wrong stuff
on *empty* folders, now, can you? ;-)
but mutt cannot even jump to the last
messages because there is no such...
Sven [who gave up reasoning with people
who argue that 1+1 cannot be 10]
--
there are 10 kinds of people in this world -
one understand binary - and the other don't.
