Re: send-hook (or something) for PGP?
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 02:56:19PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote: > Thus spake Arvid Warnecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Hm, sorry I don't think that I uderstood that :-( You want to encrypt > > _and_ not encrypt the same mail when you send it to two people where > > you have only a key for one of those persons? If so, I have no idea > > how to handle that. Sorry. > > No, because I know that that can't be done -- you need to send twice. > What I'm talking about is Mutt using the send hook for my "special > list", but not using it when it's a combination of list and non-list. > In other words, only using the send-hook when I'm addressing the people > in the send-hook exclusively. > > Hope I've clarified. > I think so ;) So, you wan't to use a special alias-file where all people are in, you have a key for? Maybe you can use some kind of grep command to lookup the address in the file. If it is found set pgp_autoencrypt, if not unset it. But I have no idea how to grep for that in your muttrc file. Best regards, Arvid -- .''`. [Arvid Warnecke] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [05323-715724] : :' : [ICQ 55906559] [ http://up.to/suck ] [PGP-Subject:"get pgp key"] `. `' Linux 2.4.2 i686 XFree86 Version 4.0.2 Uptime: 4 days, 11:55 `-- BOFH #327: The POP server is out of Coke PGP signature
Re: using lists "array" in regex
On 2001.09.02, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Eric Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible to apply all that comprise lists in the `lists' or > `subscribe' command to regex such as this > > send-hook "~C mutt-users" 'set signature="echo Eric Smith|"' > > So instead of explicitly specifying mutt-users, one may specify all > the lists in one statement. ~l message is addressed to a known mailing list So you can use send-hook ~l 'set signature="This is my list signature."' Is that what you mean, or do I misunderstand? -- -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
GPG, mutt and Outlook Express
Hi fellows Sorry about asking that (again?), but I didn't find a solution to this problem searching the web. I just installed GPG 1.0.6 on my linux box and configured mutt to work with it. Fine so far. Next, I set up a test win2k box with Outlook Express, PGP 6.5.8 and later with 7.0.3. Now, after exchanging keys (which are different, for testing purpose), I first tried to send an encrypted message to my mutt, that worked fine. Then I replied to OE and got two different files: a .dat file and a .asc file. You all know what follows: I was not able to open/decrypt the mail message. Now, is there a way using the old fashioned BEGIN PGP MESSAGE qwleiruas;dflkj END PGP MESSAGE to send mails with mutt, instead of Mime'ing it? TIA Andre -- The retribution of the valiant dwarves has come!
Re: GPG, mutt and Outlook Express
Andre Bonhote wrote: > > I just installed GPG 1.0.6 on my linux box and configured mutt to work > with it. Fine so far. Next, I set up a test win2k box with Outlook > Express, PGP 6.5.8 and later with 7.0.3. Now, after exchanging keys > (which are different, for testing purpose), I first tried to send an > encrypted message to my mutt, that worked fine. Then I replied to OE and > got two different files: a .dat file and a .asc file. You all know what > follows: I was not able to open/decrypt the mail message. Two Words: outlook! :-( Use Inline Signatures: set pgp_create_traditional=yes But note: This option controls whether Mutt generates old-style PGP encrypted or signed messages under certain circumstances. Note that PGP/MIME will be used automatically for messages which have a character set different from us-ascii, or which consist of more than a single MIME part. Also note that using the old-style PGP message format is strongly deprecated. CU, -volker -- http://die-moells.de/ * http://stama90.de/ * http://scriptdale.de/ This signature is inoperative. Please try another.
Re: Mysteriously purged emails
On 2001-08-31 12:10:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I use mutt both at home and at work on the same mailbox. >Yesterday it mysteriously purged the last 15 days worth of email. >I intended to quit and restart it, but it said 'writing >mailbox...', and then reopened it with 15 days worth of emails >gone. :'( This is a serious bug! I'm going to use Mutt in >read-only mode from now on in the hope that it will prevent these >spontanious large purges... I seem to recall that we didn't catch all errors which may be triggered by exhausted disk space at some point in the past. But I think we fixed that long ago... Please update to 1.3.22.1i, or AT LEAST to 1.2.5. -- Thomas Roesslerhttp://log.does-not-exist.org/
Re: GPG, mutt and Outlook Express
Hi! On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 12:44:33PM +0200, Volker Moell wrote: > Two Words: outlook! :-( You missed one word: sucks! > Use Inline Signatures: > set pgp_create_traditional=yes Does not work. > Note that PGP/MIME will be used automatically for messages which have > a character set different from us-ascii, or which consist of more than > a single MIME part. This is what I 've done: set charset="us-ascii" set pgp_create_traditional=yes Still no clue about it ... Any other Ideas? I mean, I don't have to stick on PGP on the windows side ... is there something else which can be handled easily? Or are there patches for PGP 6.5.X? TH Andre -- A 250 pound woman's gems!
Re: why "no visible messages"?
The attached patch should fix this.
Thanks for reporting.
On 2001-09-02 18:45:39 -0400, David T-G wrote:
>Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 18:45:39 -0400
>From: David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Mutt Users' List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: why "no visible messages"?
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i
>
>Hi, all --
>
>So I'm trying out 1.3.22.1 and, in particular, trying to make it bomb the
>same way that 1.2.5 did, and it doesn't, but it gives an interesting
>message.
>
>If I have a mailbox (my current test candidate is mbox =F.mutt at
>just shy of 8k messages) where I've [automatically] pushed -V to
>collapse all threads and I then set sort to unsorted, go to a message
>that is not a thread head (usually the last message in the box, or '*'),
>and then reset sort to threads/date, my index is blank. Hokay, I figure,
>I can handle that; mutt is pointing to a message that it can't really
>see.
>
>Under 1.2.5, if I try to move up or down, mutt bombs. Very ungraceful.
>
>Under 1.3.22.1, if I try to move up or down, I get "no visible messages"
>in my status line at the bottom of the screen. Now, that seems strange...
>There aren't *no* visible messages, since I haven't applied any limit,
>and I'd imagine that I'd move to the next visible message in the relevant
>direction from the thread containing the message that I grabbed in
>unsorted mode.
>
>Am I confused, or did I discover some unexpected (or at least undesirable)
>behavior?
>
>
>TIA & HAND
>
>:-D
>--
>David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
>(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
>(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
>
--
Thomas Roesslerhttp://log.does-not-exist.org/
Index: curs_main.c
===
RCS file: /home/roessler/cvsroot/mutt/curs_main.c,v
retrieving revision 2.64
diff -u -r2.64 curs_main.c
--- curs_main.c 2001/08/30 08:20:45 2.64
+++ curs_main.c 2001/09/03 13:58:32
@@ -363,10 +363,12 @@
static void resort_index (MUTTMENU *menu)
{
int i;
- const HEADER *current = CURHDR;
+ HEADER *current = CURHDR;
+ menu->current = -1;
mutt_sort_headers (Context, 0);
/* Restore the current message */
+
for (i = 0; i < Context->vcount; i++)
{
if (Context->hdrs[Context->v2r[i]] == current)
@@ -375,6 +377,13 @@
break;
}
}
+
+ if ((Sort & SORT_MASK) == SORT_THREADS && menu->current < 0)
+menu->current = mutt_parent_message (Context, current);
+
+ if (menu->current < 0)
+menu->current = ci_first_message ();
+
menu->redraw = REDRAW_INDEX | REDRAW_STATUS;
}
Index: thread.c
===
RCS file: /home/roessler/cvsroot/mutt/thread.c,v
retrieving revision 2.16
diff -u -r2.16 thread.c
--- thread.c2001/07/26 10:14:36 2.16
+++ thread.c2001/09/03 13:56:56
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@
{
while ((hdr = hdr->parent))
{
- if (!ctx->pattern || hdr->limited)
+ if (hdr->virtual >= 0 && hdr->collapsed && (!ctx->pattern || hdr->limited))
return (hdr->virtual);
}
mutt_error _("Parent message is not visible in limited view");
PGP signature
Content Disposition type from script
My problem is the following. I use mutt from a perl script to send different type of docs as an attachment automaticaly. It is working correctly but the Content-Disposition is inline and Outlook Express doesn't feel it to be attachment at all. On the other hand in interactive mode i can send email with Content-Disposition as attachment and it is also good for OE but not from script. What command line option or config setting will help me? Here is the command line i use to send email: echo "See attach!"|mutt -s "Subject $date" -a $filename $email bye vi
Re: Indent_string..
* Erika Pacholleck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010901 04:46]: > [23.08.01 18:45 +0100] Ailbhe Leamy <-- : > > On (18/08/01 18:57), David R?hr wrote: > > > When I answer a mail mutt always put "> " as quote on the last mail > > > according to the indent_string in my .muttrc. > > > > > > I want "> " only when no other has replyed, but if there already is a > > > "> " then i want it to become just ">" > > > > > > How do I fix this? > > > > I don't know, but if you find out, tell me. > > It hasn't been a problem for me since I started using par, but it's a > > reason I started using par. > > Did not want/need to do that myself, so just an idea how it might be > done. Set in mutt indent string to ">" and then change the vim call > to change all lines beginning with a ">" character with a next character > being a letter to convert the first ">" character to "> ". > So mutt would automatically do > >>> quoted3 > >> quoted2 > >quoted1 > And vim would change that to > >>> quoted3 > >> quoted2 > > quoted1 Or easier yet, keep mutt's setting to "> ", and have vim remove the space as appropriate. This should do it: set editor="vim +%s/^> >/>>/" Cheers, -- Vineet http://www.anti-dmca.org Unauthorized use of this .sig may constitute violation of US law. echo Qba\'g gernq ba zr\! |tr 'a-zA-Z' 'n-za-mN-ZA-M' PGP signature
Re: Indent_string..
* Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Mon-01 14:46 -0700]: > >* Erika Pacholleck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010901 04:46]: >> [23.08.01 18:45 +0100] Ailbhe Leamy <-- : >> > On (18/08/01 18:57), David R?hr wrote: [...snip...] >> done. Set in mutt indent string to ">" and then change the vim call >> to change all lines beginning with a ">" character with a next character >> being a letter to convert the first ">" character to "> ". >> So mutt would automatically do >> >>> quoted3 >> >> quoted2 >> >quoted1 >> And vim would change that to >> >>> quoted3 >> >> quoted2 >> > quoted1 > >Or easier yet, keep mutt's setting to "> ", and have vim remove the >space as appropriate. This should do it: > >set editor="vim +%s/^> >/>>/" [...snip...] just a minor suggestion. if you have vim6.x you can set editor="vim -X -c 'set filetype=mail'" then you can check in vim: :help filetype-plugin for instructions on how to make vim execute commands based on the filetype. so, if you were to make a mail.vim, place the commands in there, and set editor as above, you could make your editor do many different things for mail, without actually having to grow this huge string in your .muttrc. i do this, and it works really well (not to mention that vim6.x has lots of nice things in it not present in 5.x) a thing to note, however, is that it is still a beta, albeit pretty late one. hth, denis -- // mailto: Denis Perelyubskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // icq : 12359698 // PGP : http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~denisp/files/pgp.asc
switching to spool in browser
hello, is there an easy way to map something in browser (some macro maybe) that would present me with New file name: when i do 'select-new' (presently i have it mapped to g) right now, when i hit g (thus triggering 'select-new'), i am presented with the following: New file name: /home/denisp/Mail/ in other words, i would like to get rid of that /home/denisp/Mail/ thing. the only way i see is to map to a macro, which would do a g followed by 20 or so backspaces. that sounds pretty ugly. thanks, denis -- // mailto: Denis Perelyubskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // icq : 12359698 // PGP : http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~denisp/files/pgp.asc
Re: switching to spool in browser
So sprach »Denis Perelyubskiy« am 2001-09-03 um 16:16:50 -0700 : > the only way i see is to map to a macro, which would do a g > followed by 20 or so backspaces. that sounds pretty ugly. How about mapping CTRL-k -> \Ck to g? This would erase everything to the beginning of the line. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 21 hours 36 minutes
Re: switching to spool in browser
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Mon-01 21:40 -0700]: > >So sprach »Denis Perelyubskiy« am 2001-09-03 um 16:16:50 >-0700 : >> the only way i see is to map to a macro, which would do >> a g followed by 20 or so backspaces. that sounds pretty >> ugly. > >How about mapping CTRL-k -> \Ck to g? This would erase >everything to the beginning of the line. thanks, although this does not work. CTRL-K seems to work only when cursor at the beginning of the line, while in this case it is at the end of the line denis -- // mailto: Denis Perelyubskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // icq : 12359698 // PGP : http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~denisp/files/pgp.asc
Re: switching to spool in browser
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Mon-01 21:37 -0700]: > >So sprach »Denis Perelyubskiy« am 2001-09-03 um 16:16:50 >-0700 : >> the only way i see is to map to a macro, which would do >> a g followed by 20 or so backspaces. that sounds pretty >> ugly. > >How about mapping CTRL-k -> \Ck to g? This would erase >everything to the beginning of the line. Alex, now that you got me started with CTRL+ combinations :) i tried CTRL+u and it worked. so, when i did the macro browser f "g\Cu" it worked just fine. thanks again, denis -- // mailto: Denis Perelyubskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // icq : 12359698 // PGP : http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~denisp/files/pgp.asc
Re: GPG, mutt and Outlook Express
Am Mon, 03 Sep 2001, schrieb Andre Bonhote: > Hi! > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 12:44:33PM +0200, Volker Moell wrote: > > Two Words: outlook! :-( > > You missed one word: sucks! > > > Use Inline Signatures: > > set pgp_create_traditional=yes > > Does not work. > > > Note that PGP/MIME will be used automatically for messages which have > > a character set different from us-ascii, or which consist of more than > > a single MIME part. > > This is what I 've done: > > set charset="us-ascii" > set pgp_create_traditional=yes > > Still no clue about it ... Any other Ideas? I mean, I don't have to > stick on PGP on the windows side ... is there something else which can > be handled easily? Or are there patches for PGP 6.5.X? The Problem is not PGP, but Outlook. I defined two macros in my muttrc, so I can encrypt and sign messages in a way MS Outlook (and a lot of other Windows Email Clients) understand: (Sorry for > 68 characters, but the lines are so long) macro compose S "Fgpg --clearsig=on\nj^T^Utext/plain; format=text; x-action=sign\n" macro compose E "Fgpg -a -e -s\nj^T^Utext/plain; format=text; x-action=encrypt\n" The problem about this solution is that you'll have to know whether the recipient of your mail uses a PGP/Mime capable MUA (which are only mutt and Eudora AFAIK) or not. PGP/Mime has great advantages so I do not understand why so many MTAs cannot deal with it. Christoph -- Christoph Maurer - Paul-Röntgen-Straße 7 - D - 52072 Aachen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.christophmaurer.de On my Homepage: SuSE 7.0 on an Acer Travelmate 508 T Notebook
