Re: netscape and mutt
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann hat ueber "Re: netscape and mutt" geschrieben: > Would you be able to provide an adapted version for mutt? I don't know C and my > version segfaults Netscape, whenever I try it. I had the same problem with my netscape4.5 on my linux-box. all was correctly set up, the pathes for xterm, mutt and slrn where right. But my netscape got a bus error. Now I have 4.51 and all works fine and ist pretty kewl. CU -- \o/ Michael Thies --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bei dem koreanischen Autohersteller Kia wurde angeblich für zwei Tage gestreikt. Laut Geschäftsleitung nur ein Mißverständnis. Es war kein Streik, es war der Jahresurlaub. Mark Weigel
Re: limit question
Bevan Broun hat ueber "Re: limit question" geschrieben: > > Odd. I always just "l all". > > "l *" is shorter. But it shows me, that all messages are limited. And when using "l all" I get the normal state back, i.e. unlimit Maybe you can map a "Esc-U" to "l all" or anything like that bye -- \o/ Michael Thies --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wer arbeiten für wichtiger hält als beten, gleicht dem Autofahrer, der meint keine Zeit zum Tanken zu haben. Wilhard Becker
Re: Turn-off automatic marking as 'read'?
On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 22:13:08 -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote: > [...] and then 'c'hange back to the same mailbox > (if you use the patch from, um, either Byrial or Sec I think :-) then > you can just 'c'hange to '^' in shorthand); it's faster than quitting > and restarting mutt. The patch can now be fetched from my Mutt patch collection web page at http://www.image.dk/~byrial/mutt/patches/>. Add the patch name "patch-0.94.13.bj.current_shortcut.1" to the URL to get it directly. -- Byrial
Re: Turn-off automatic marking as 'read'?
Thanks for advice, David! > > * only mark as read when a command is given by the user > > * mark a message as read when it's been viewed in the pager for > > more than X seconds. (Just as an example, I would probably set > > X to something rather large in fact, like a minute) > > These kind of things will require source-code changes. If you're handy > with C, give it a shot. :) Alas, I'm not. The day mutt is rewritten in pascal or perl I can start working on it, though :) However, I think that the first, simpler suggestion would be relatively easy to implement. It just needs an additional .rc setting, an if clause somewhere in the code, and a key binding for 'mark-read'. > > Also, I can't seem to be able to bind a function to Ctrl-arrow key > > combination. > > That key-combination doesn't generate anything special in a typical > xterm. On my system they generate (arrow-key and ctrl-arrow-key) the > exact same escape sequences. So it doesn't matter if Mutt will let you > bind it or not. You can't type such a key sequence. :) That's weird: you're saying Linux can't do something DOS can? :) Anyway, I'm running mutt in the console (since I hate and despise X for several reasons, all deeply personal; perhaps in time I'll get over it). Are you saying that the inability to recognize Ctrl-arrow is only specific to the xterm, or to all terminals, inclusing the 'linux' console? .marek -- General Frenetics, Discorporated: http://www.lodz.pdi.net/~eristic/ At first there was nothing. Then God said 'Let there be light!' Then there was still nothing. But you could see it.
IMAP folders
Hi,
Im trying to switch to mutt, but im having some troubles getting IMAP
folders (UW server) to work. I have my inbox working ok by setting the
spoolfile to {server}INBOX. However, I cant get any of the other folders
to work that are located at {server}mail/folder. If I set the spoolfile
to {server}mail/folder it works ok, but i cant set multiple spoolfiles.
I tried "set folder" and "set mailboxes" in every combination i can think
of, but I still cant get it too work. What am i missing? Can one of the
other ppl on this list that use IMAP folders send me the relavant IMAP
sections of their .muttrc? Using version 95.4i and 96.1. Browsing
works with 96.1, but id rather have a stable 95.4 with a few
keyboard bindings to my folders.
Other than that, mutt is very impressive. Great job by the dev team..
Dan
Re: Automatice sending of e-mails?
Rejo writes: > ++ 16.04.1999, 17:09:54 (+0100) = Lars Hecking: > > If you're not relying on any special mutt features you're probably better > > off using /bin/mail or /bin/mailx instead or whatever your OS provides. > > Why is that? I have used this mutt consctruction myself a lot (i used it > in a script to send me the logs of a wget session -for a mirror- which > was done on another host daily). Works perfectly... I normally try to restrict myself to using only programs from /, /usr for cron jobs and shell scripts. One reason is portability (we have a heterogenous network here), the other is that the server where mutt and other stuff resides may not be available. Other than that, feel free to use whatever you like :)
