Re: premail better [was: Re: unMIME-Mutt v1.1 [was: Re: MuttEdit v1.0 - Sending PGP unMIMEd messages with Mutt.]]
On 1999-01-24 21:02:13 +0100, Daniel González Gasull wrote: > I haven't tried if my friends can read application/pgp messages. > Can I send them with Mutt (without unMIME-Mutt)? no. > BTW, now I have found a better tool for this than my > unMIME-Mutt. It's premail > (http://www.c2.net/~raph/premail). ack tlr -- Thomas Roessler · 74a353cc0b19 · dg1ktr · http://home.pages.de/~roessler/ 2048/CE6AC6C1 · 4E 04 F0 BC 72 FF 14 23 44 85 D1 A1 3B B0 73 C1 > Hi! I'm Signature Virus 99! Copy me into your signature and join the fun!
Re: premail better [was: Re: unMIME-Mutt v1.1 [was: Re: MuttEdit v1.0 - Sending PGP unMIMEd messages with Mutt.]]
: > BTW, now I have found a better tool for this than my : > unMIME-Mutt. It's premail : > (http://www.c2.net/~raph/premail). I get a File Not Found on this page. There is information at http://inetwire.net/doc/premail/doc-0.45.html, and probably other sources. Does anyone have a current URL? randy -- Five hundred, twenty-five thousand six hundred minutes, how do you measure...? [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.louisville.edu/~rjmill01/ Triangle Fraternity http://www.louisville.edu/rso/triangle/ Golden Key National Honor Society http://www.louisville.edu/rso/goldenkey/
scoring
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=jh06fhy6YTawvwPV; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Re: scoring
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 02:17:00PM -0700, Phil Humpherys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How sophisticated is scoring in mutt? I didn't see anything in the > help menu... is there decent scoring in mutt? Have you tried reading the manual yet? There is a whole section about it. -Daniel -- Daniel Eisenbud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: scoring
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Er1qpsOqk0l6oMce; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Re: scoring
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 03:47:12PM -0700, Phil Humpherys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hmm. Small section.. it'd be nice if you could configure some
> scoring on the fly...
You can (":score ...") but of course then it doesn't get written out to
your .muttrc. However, if you make a macro that calls a script that
takes your input and appends it to .muttrc.score, then sources
.muttrc.score, that would do it nicely (I think you'd need an unscore *
at the beginning of said file...)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: scoring
On 01/25/99 Daniel Eisenbud uttered the following other thing:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 03:47:12PM -0700, Phil Humpherys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. Small section.. it'd be nice if you could configure some
> > scoring on the fly...
>
> You can (":score ...") but of course then it doesn't get written out to
> your .muttrc. However, if you make a macro that calls a script that
> takes your input and appends it to .muttrc.score, then sources
> .muttrc.score, that would do it nicely (I think you'd need an unscore *
> at the beginning of said file...)
And yes, that's ugly. Something that a built in scripting language
might make quite a bit better, though (ie, you could set up macros for
"kill subject", "kill thread" or the like
Brandon
--
Brandon Long ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [http://www.fiction.net/blong/]
"my objection to the notion of God is that the idea lacks elegance."
-- Giles Bowkett
bug ... er, lack of feature .. report
Issue #1: If I print a message, from either the index or the pager, it prints it as I see it - the same headers are included or not. If I hit 'h', I will see the message with all headers intact. If I hit 'p' at that point, it prints the message ... without all the extra header information. Is it possible to make printing context-sensitive to the full headers? Issue #2: Shouldn't defining something with "lists" automagickally make it an alias? It would be nice. ( It there are reasons it wouldn't be nice, fire away <*ducks for cover*> ) -- Joe Rhett Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISite Services PGP keys and contact information: http://www.noc.isite.net/Staff/
Re: bug ... er, lack of feature .. report
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Re: bug ... er, lack of feature .. report
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 05:10:27PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote: > Shouldn't defining something with "lists" automagickally make it an alias? > It would be nice. if you defined a list say 'mutt-users' how is mutt suppoed to find out that the alias is supposed to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]? it would have to have a message from that list, so this alias would depend on whatever you have in your mailbox. what i would like to see though is a command similar to L (list reply) to send a new message to the list found in the current message. (this could be expanded to all reply functions: send a new mail to the sender or to all...) greetings, martin. -- Life is not fair. But the root password helps. -- unix systemadministrator iaeste.or.at iaeste.tuwien.ac.at mb.iaeste.or.at. institut hochbau II an der tu wien. email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at. black.linux-m68k.org. stuts.org. mud.at. Martin B"ahr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
