Module submission Net::ESMTP

2001-07-14 Thread Perl Authors Upload Server


The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:

  modid:   Net::ESMTP
  DSLIP:   cdpOp
  description: ESMPT (RFC2821) client and server framework.
  userid:  VIPUL (Vipul Ved Prakash)
  chapterid:5 (Networking_Devices_IPC)
  communities:

  similar:
Net::SMTP

  rationale:

The namespace choice is obvious.

  enteredby:   VIPUL (Vipul Ved Prakash)
  enteredon:   Sat Jul 14 09:20:36 2001 GMT

The resulting entry would be:

Net::
::ESMTP   cdpOp ESMPT (RFC2821) client and server framework. VIPUL


Thanks for registering,
The Pause Team

PS: The following links are only valid for module list maintainers:

Registration form with editing capabilities:
  
https://pause.perl.org/pause/authenquery?ACTION=add_mod&USERID=d200_9b7df81a7bcf3daf&SUBMIT_pause99_add_mod_preview=1
Immediate (one click) registration:
  
https://pause.perl.org/pause/authenquery?ACTION=add_mod&USERID=d200_9b7df81a7bcf3daf&SUBMIT_pause99_add_mod_insertit=1



Re: Module submission Speech::Recognition::ViaVoice

2001-07-14 Thread David Huggins-Daines

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perl Authors Upload Server) writes:

>   rationale:
> 
> Speech::Recognizer is a lame name. Speech::Recognition would be
> considerably better. If you disagree, I can change my module to use
> the already establish naming hierarchy. I have already created
> Speech::Recognition::ViaVoice. It's in my upload space.

Thank you for your civil and constructive criticism :/

I'm not wedded to 'Recognizer', it was just chosen by analogy to the
existing Speech::Synthesiser (except that, uh, I spelled it wrong, or
something).

'Recognition' at least avoids the inevitable flamage from people on
one or the other side of the Atlantic who feel that their spelling is
the One True Way.

I wish you'd given a better explanation than just "lame".  I think
Speech::Recognizer is a fine name; ViaVoice and Sphinx-II are both
speech recognizers.  (please do not waste electrons by saying "but
`recognizer' isn't a word!" or similar pedantries).  Also, if the
modules were object-oriented (which they aren't, but which they might
become in the future), it would certainly look better to say:

my $spx = new Speech::Recognizer::SPX;

than:

my $spx = new Speech::Recognition::SPX;

Though I do admit that:

use Speech::Recognition;

sounds rather good.  (If there were a common interface to different
speech recognizers, this might be a good name for it)

I would, however, like to get an outside opinion on the appropriate
namespace.  The tone of your message quoted above does not predispose
me to cooperation but it's more important for the naming scheme to be
consistent than aesthetically/semantically ideal...



Re: Module submission Speech::Recognition::ViaVoice

2001-07-14 Thread Chris Nandor

At 10:15 -0400 2001.07.14, David Huggins-Daines wrote:
>I would, however, like to get an outside opinion on the appropriate
>namespace.  The tone of your message quoted above does not predispose
>me to cooperation but it's more important for the naming scheme to be
>consistent than aesthetically/semantically ideal...

I personally feel that neither is necessarily better (David's points were
all good) and therefore I would prefer to defer to the preexisting
namespace.

-- 
Chris Nandor  [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/



Re: Module submission Speech::Recognition::ViaVoice

2001-07-14 Thread David Huggins-Daines

Richard Kilgore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The message was not intended to be hostile.  I apologize if I
> stepped on your toes or something.  If you'll note, my third
> sentence is a deferment to your judgment.

Ah.  Don't worry, I'm pretty thick-skinned, I just enjoy a good
flamewar :)

> Speech::Recognition sounds better to me simply because it sounds
> more like a category of modules, than does Speech::Recognizer.
> Actually, I suppose from that perspective Speech::Recognizers
> would also work pretty well.

Sure.  Like I said, really either one is fine with me.  I'm not sure
if a single module in the Speech::Recognizer namespace is enough to
establish a precedent or not, though I think the analogy with
Speech::Synthesiser is valid (modulo the issue of 's' vs 'z' :)

> If someone had a good reason to choose the current name, then it
> does not make a big difference to me.  I just figured it was
> possible that it had not been given a lot of thought, and that I
> could bring it to someone's attention.

You're right, it wasn't given a lot of thought.  An informal poll of
the people in the same room with me at the moment prefers
"Recognizer", I could go either way, though it is kind of inconvenient
to change the name of a module so I'd rather not if I don't have to.



New Developer

2001-07-14 Thread Jonathan Leto

Name: Jonathan Leto
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.leto.net
UserID: LETO
Description: I have written a perl module to interface the GSL, The GNU
Scientific Library. It currently implement the entire Special Functions
library. Available at: http://www.leto.net/code/gsl/

Thanks.

-- 
Jonathan Leto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 





Module submission Math::BigInt::Pari

2001-07-14 Thread Perl Authors Upload Server


The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:

  modid:   Math::BigInt::Pari
  DSLIP:   bdphp
  description: Use Math::Pari for Math::BigInt routines
  userid:  BTROTT (Benjamin Trott)
  chapterid:6 (Data_Type_Utilities)
  communities:
private email with Tels

  similar:
Math::BigInt::BitVect, Math::BigInt, Math::Pari

  rationale:

Math::BigInt::Pari is a plugin to override the core math routines
in Math::BigInt with functions that use Math::Pari and the PARI
library.

Namespace is fairly obvious and follows the convention that
Math::BigInt::BitVect has established.

The main benefit of this library is speed, along with the
consistent interface that Math::BigInt brings.

  enteredby:   BTROTT (Benjamin Trott)
  enteredon:   Sun Jul 15 01:34:01 2001 GMT

The resulting entry would be:

Math::BigInt::
::Paribdphp Use Math::Pari for Math::BigInt routines BTROTT


Thanks for registering,
The Pause Team

PS: The following links are only valid for module list maintainers:

Registration form with editing capabilities:
  
https://pause.perl.org/pause/authenquery?ACTION=add_mod&USERID=e200_402ba938f7ce30ac&SUBMIT_pause99_add_mod_preview=1
Immediate (one click) registration:
  
https://pause.perl.org/pause/authenquery?ACTION=add_mod&USERID=e200_402ba938f7ce30ac&SUBMIT_pause99_add_mod_insertit=1



User update for TIMMY

2001-07-14 Thread Perl Authors Upload Server

(This Mail was generated by the server
  http://pause.perl.org/pause/authenquery;ACTION=edit_cred
automatically)

Record update in the PAUSE users database:

 userid: [TIMMY]
   fullname: [Tim Hammerquist]
  asciiname: []
  email: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] was [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   homepage: []
cpan_mail_alias: [publ]


Data were entered by TIMMY (Tim Hammerquist).
Please check if they are correct.

Thanks,
The Pause