New module HTML::FormTemplate

2001-01-06 Thread Perl Authors Upload Server


The next version of the Module List will list the following module:

  modid:   HTML::FormTemplate
  DSLI:adpO
  description: Store definition, make persist forms, report
  userid:  DUNCAND (Darren Duncan)
  chapterid:   15 (World_Wide_Web_HTML_HTTP_CGI)
  enteredby:   JV (Johan Vromans)
  enteredon:   Sat Jan  6 10:34:39 2001 GMT

The resulting entry will be:

HTML::
::FormTemplateadpO Store definition, make persist forms, report DUNCAND

Please allow a few days until the entry will appear in the published
module list.

Parts of the data listed above can be edited interactively on the
PAUSE. See https://pause.kbx.de/pause/authenquery?ACTION=edit_mod

Thanks for registering,
The Pause Team



Re: forwarded message from Brian Ingerson

2001-01-06 Thread Johan Vromans

[Quoting Andreas J. Koenig, on January 6 2001, 07:16, in "Re: forwarded messag"]
> > On Thu, 4 Jan 2001 21:55:04 +0100, Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 
> > Fellow modulars,
> > What do you think?
> 
> An option that goes around in my head is championizing the module
> list. We could say, just as Doug is champion of the Apache namespace,
> Brian I could be the champion of the Inline namespace.

Sounds like a good idea.

> This could be implemented in terms of permissions. The form to
> register a new module that all admins can use without restriction
> could be changed so that userid XXX can add modules in the YYY
> namespace. Then I could grant Brian the permission to add modules to
> the Inline namespace.

I think this is a slight oversimplification. People will apply to the
mailing list to register a module. That means that we (modulars) must
know what namespaces are championized, and who is their champion.
Would it be possible to have a user-mode "Register a Module" form,
that just sends the request to the mailing list, and --if
appropriate-- to the champion?

-- Johan



Re: forwarded message from Brian Ingerson

2001-01-06 Thread Andreas J. Koenig

> On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 11:34:04 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Johan Vromans) said:

 > I think this is a slight oversimplification. People will apply to the
 > mailing list to register a module. That means that we (modulars) must
 > know what namespaces are championized, and who is their champion.
 > Would it be possible to have a user-mode "Register a Module" form,
 > that just sends the request to the mailing list, and --if
 > appropriate-- to the champion?

Sounds good. I'll see how fast I can do it.

-- 
andreas



[RFC] Audio::SoundFile - Perl interface to libsndfile library

2001-01-06 Thread Taisuke Yamada


Hi.

I've written a Perl module that handles audio stream using
external libsndfile library and is now ready to upload it to CPAN.
But before doing so, I'd like to ask for a comment on module naming.

I'm planning to use following namespace:

  Audio::SoundFile
  Audio::SoundFile::Header
  Audio::SoundFile::Reader
  Audio::SoundFile::Writer

Basically, this module provides common read/write interface for
various sound formats supported by libsndfile (includes .au and
.wav). Also, in addition to standard I/O interface, I have added
direct PDL (Perl Data Language) interface, so data can be read/
manipulated/written efficiently, without copying to Perl's native
scalar/array.

I considered

  PDL::IO::SoundFile::
  SoundFile::
  Audio::LibSoundFile::
  Audio::SoundFile::

and Audio::SoundFile:: seems fairly clear and appropriate.

Anyone has comments/agreement/disagreement on this naming?

--
Taisuke Yamada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP fingerprint = 6B 57 1B ED 65 4C 7D AE  57 1B 49 A7 F7 C8 23 46



Re: [RFC] Audio::SoundFile - Perl interface to libsndfile library

2001-01-06 Thread Andreas J. Koenig

> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 04:44:16 +0900, Taisuke Yamada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

  > and Audio::SoundFile:: seems fairly clear and appropriate.

  > Anyone has comments/agreement/disagreement on this naming?

Sounds good:-)

-- 
andreas