TOr
Does OpenBSD support Tor?
Re: TOr
it does e.g. https://community.torproject.org/relay/setup/bridge/openbsd/ On 30.08.24 10:11, openbsd_fr...@mail2tor.com wrote: Does OpenBSD support Tor?
Re: Installation USB
Dear openbsd_freak Am 2024-08-29 16:45, schrieb Zé Loff: On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 02:18:29AM -0400, openbsd_fr...@mail2tor.com wrote: The installer cannot find usb media. Unplug and plug the USB media back on, and see if the console spits out the device, something like: sd4 at scsibus5 targ 1 lun 0: ... Then enter "!" on the installer prompt to drop to a shell, check if the node exists in /dev (e.g. "ls /dev/sd4*", change sd4 to whatever is relevant in your case) and if it doesn't, create it using MAKEDEV (e.g.: "cd /dev; sh ./MAKEDEV sd4"). Exit the shell to get back to the installer and see if the media is now detected. I had a similar issue: The USB stick was not detected when plugged into one of the front ports of the PC. Plugging it into one of the back ports helped. Perhaps you can try using another USB port? Best regards Rolf
Re: TOr
On Fri, 2024-08-30 at 04:11 -0400, openbsd_fr...@mail2tor.com wrote: > Does OpenBSD support Tor? Here's everything OpenBSD supports: https://openbsd.app/ Cheers!
Re: Discrepancies between i386 port list and package list
On 2024-08-29, Elie Le Vaillant wrote: > Hello, > > I'm currently daily-driving a 2008 i386 machine on > -current. Earlier this month, I tried out ungoogled-chromium, > which was available as a package at the time. I've > tried again today, and though the ports tree still > lists i386 as a valid platform, the different mirrors > I've tried do not provide ungoogled-chromium as a > package. The same appears to be true for pandoc, > and chromium: listed in ports as a valid target, but > not available as a package. imho you should really be looking for a 64 bit machine if you want to run a web browser. > Is this due to a change of policy on i386 packages > which I've missed? Is this a known issue? No change of policy - those simply aren't getting built. pandoc depends on ghc, which is amd64 only. When attempting to build chromium and friends on i386, it usually fails for various reasons. In the most recent attempt, iridium and ungoogled-chromium fail with this In file included from ../../v8/src/compiler/turboshaft/int64-lowering-phase.cc:9: ../../v8/src/compiler/turboshaft/int64-lowering-reducer.h:295:24: error: call to member function 'Word32Constant' is a mbiguous 295 | new_index = __ Word32Constant(sizeof(int32_t)); | ~~~^~ and chromium fails earlier (I suspect typescript probably runs out of memory). FAILED: gen/third_party/devtools-frontend/src/front_end/panels/screencast/screencast-tsconfig.json gen/third_party/dev tools-frontend/src/front_end/panels/screencast/InputModel.js gen/third_party/devtools-frontend/src/front_end/panels/sc reencast/InputModel.js.map gen/third_party/devtools-frontend/src/front_end/panels/screencast/InputModel.d.ts gen/third _party/devtools-frontend/src/front_end/panels/screencast/ScreencastApp.js gen/third_party/devtools-frontend/src/front_ end/panels/screencast/ScreencastApp.js.map gen/third_party/devtools-frontend/src/front_end/panels/screencast/Screencas tApp.d.ts gen/third_party/devtools-frontend/src/front_end/panels/screencast/ScreencastView.js gen/third_party/devtools -frontend/src/front_end/panels/screencast/ScreencastView.js.map gen/third_party/devtools-frontend/src/front_end/panels /screencast/ScreencastView.d.ts python3 ../../third_party/devtools-frontend/src/third_party/typescript/ts_library.py --tsconfig_output_location gen/th ird_party/devtools-frontend/src/front_end/panels/screencast/screencast-tsconfig.json --deps ../../core/common/bundle-t sconfig.json ../../core/host/bundle-tsconfig.json ../../core/i18n/bundle-tsconfig.json ../../core/sdk/bundle-tsconfig. json ../../generated/protocol-tsconfig.json ../../ui/components/icon_button/bundle-tsconfig.json ../../ui/legacy/bundl e-tsconfig.json --front_end_directory ../../third_party/devtools-frontend/src/front_end/panels/screencast --reset_time stamps --sources ../../third_party/devtools-frontend/src/front_end/panels/screencast/InputModel.ts ../../third_party/d evtools-frontend/src/front_end/panels/screencast/ScreencastApp.ts ../../third_party/devtools-frontend/src/front_end/pa nels/screencast/ScreencastView.ts TypeScript compilation failed. Used tsconfig gen/third_party/devtools-frontend/src/front_end/panels/screencast/screenc ast-tsconfig.json ... Last time the chromium code was actually compilable on i386, linking failed about 80% of the time due to running into memory limits on a 32-bit platform (we do native builds on i386, not cross compiles from amd64). Browsers still built on i386: (w3m, lynx, links, links+, elinks) netsurf dillo seamonkey webkitgtk-based ones (epiphany, luakit, vimb, surf, badwolf) qtwebengine-based ones (qutebrowser, otter-browser) - though there's a fairly good chance that future updates will break i386 Also we are also having problems with programs written in rust, the compiler started using more memory in some more recent release, and seeing quite a few random build failures there, so some of those will drop in and out of package snapshots depending on whether they worked in any particular build. Many projects are simply not interested in resource requirements during compilation. Taking amd64 as 100%, here's how other archs compare in number of packages in the latest snapshots: arm 65 powerpc64 68 mips64 69 sparc64 70 powerpc 81 riscv64 84 i386 85 aarch64 98 amd64 100 I'm all for running hardware for a long time to get as much use out of it as possible. But a new machine costing around GBP/EUR/USD 175 (mini desktop, with 16GB ram / 500GB SSD included in that price) will run rings round a 2008 i386, use significantly less electricity, and if it's an intel >= 11th gen (e.g. intel n100 which is common in this class of machines - look for "Control- Flow Enforcement Technology" in the cpu specs) have a feature https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indirect_branch_tracking which is well supported by OpenBSD/amd64 (used in the majority of packages) that makes some classes of attack very much more difficult. (Though
Re: Discrepancies between i386 port list and package list
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 09:56:13AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote: > imho you should really be looking for a 64 bit machine if you want to > run a web browser. Lynx runs just fine on my i386 ;-)
Re: Alternative mailing lists
Vào Th 6, 30 thg 8, 2024 vào lúc 03:06 Anon Loli đã viết: > > Hello, OpenBSD friends! > Is there an alternative mailing list, or we can To and CC a bunch of people at > once, I believe. > The problem is that I have been censored plenty of times on @misc, @bugs and > probably also @tech, and although I despise that, it's someone else's servers > so what can I really do about it and should I even, right? :) > Are your mails not distributed by the server? Are your mails deleted on users' mailbox? Yes, I think some people will delete your mails right away when they see the title or your name. 1st You didn't accept the fact that devs do not *have to* satisfy you. 2nd Your emails are full of "fuck" and "shit", but not others. Review your behaviors: https://marc.info/?t=17211487322&r=1&w=2 3rd You think everyone have to follows your rules. like the guy Richard Stallman does. (review your "IP rights bullshit") Everyone here always keep calm and try to have constructive discussions. You respond to those constructive discussion with "fuck" and "shit". Then you said you are censored. While the fact is you are censoring everyone. And, if you are censored, why can this email popped up in my mailbox? > I don't have to talk about everything I want on OpenBSD official mailing lists > (even if it's a serious and an OpenBSD topic), and neither do you, all I'm > asking here that those who are interested in hearing what I, the censored > friend of yours has to say, can. > If you at all value not just the right, but the mere possibility to say > something to someone who wants to hear, allow this e-mail to go trough, pretty > please. > illusions about yourself and your power. > And if at all you found me in the least bit interesting, over all of my > e-mails to the formentioned lists, you should send me an e-mail and you will > hear from me. > > And would this e-mail pass trough, then I applaud you for taking up with this > empty e-mail. >
OpenBSD Guide Installing XFCE
Please ship OpenBSD with XFCE4 pre-built instead of with CWM or both.
[Fwd: Re: TOr]
Original Message Subject: Re: TOr From:"hahahahacker2009" Date:Fri, August 30, 2024 7:00 am To: openbsd_fr...@mail2tor.com -- Và o Th 6, 30 thg 8, 2024 vaÌo luÌc 15:16 Äã viết: > > Does OpenBSD support Tor? > Running pkg_info -Q tor, or searching "tor" on a site like openports.pl isn't something hard. Can you stop freaking the community, bitch? Replied off-list to not disrupt the community.
Re: OpenBSD Guide Installing XFCE
On 8/30/24 11:56 AM, openbsd_fr...@mail2tor.com wrote: Please ship OpenBSD with XFCE4 pre-built instead of with CWM or both. Please use `pkg_add xfce4` or go back to Ubuntu
Re: Desktop
Дана 24/08/30 02:28AM, Karsten Pedersen написа: > Slight nitpick, but the default is fvwm(1) based on what launches if > your user account has no custom ~/.xinitrc or ~/.xsession. > > For cwm(1) or twm(1), these need to be specified manually. I stand partially corrected. The actual "default" in /etc/X11/xenodm/Xsession is indeed fvwm. However, in the "Customizing X" part of the OpenBSD "The X Window System" FAQ[1], which a new user is expected to read, the sample configuration uses cwm. Дана 24/08/30 04:13AM, openbsd_fr...@mail2tor.com написа: > Ship it with XFCE4 pre-built instead of CWM or both. But there *are* pre-built XFCE-related packages for OpenBSD: # pkg_info -Q xfce | less # pkg_add xfce If you meant "installed by default", then (thankfully) that's not going to happen. The defaults in OpenBSD are chosen deliberately and with care. [1]: https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq11.html#CustomizingX
Re: OpenBSD Guide Installing XFCE
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 05:56:32AM -0400, openbsd_fr...@mail2tor.com wrote: > Please ship OpenBSD with XFCE4 pre-built instead of with CWM or both. After a successful install, running pkg_add xfce and following the instructions at the end of the package install will get you there. Also the FAQ about packages is worth reading (https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html). Actually *all* parts of the faq are worth reading if you are responsible for OpenBSD systems. - P -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team https://bsdly.blogspot.com/ https://www.bsdly.net/ https://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Re: OpenBSD Guide Installing XFCE
OpenBSD will not be doing this. You can of course install XFCE by running "pkg_add xfce" as root and following the instructions that are printed on screen. On 2024 Aug 30 (Fri) at 05:56:32 -0400 (-0400), openbsd_fr...@mail2tor.com wrote: :Please ship OpenBSD with XFCE4 pre-built instead of with CWM or both. :
E-mail address openly visible in the WWW
Dear friends I have observed the e-mail addresses of the misc@ contributors are openly visible in the World Wide Web. I'm not sure whether this might be a privacy hasard. Do you recommend using a separate, dedicated e-mail address for posting in the misc@ list? Best regards
Re: E-mail address openly visible in the WWW
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 05:06:32PM +0200, rfab...@mhsmail.ch wrote: > I have observed the e-mail addresses of the misc@ contributors are > openly visible in the World Wide Web. I'm not sure whether this might > be a privacy hasard. > > Do you recommend using a separate, dedicated e-mail address for > posting in the misc@ list? I would not consider the openbsd-misc archives a higher risk than any other mailing list archives. There are ways to mask addresses in mailing list archives, but whether the people in charge of the archives consider the effort required to set up such a thing worth it is entirely up to them. That said, if you have reason to believe that making your email address available in searchable archives on the Internet, using an alternate address for posting to the list might be a workable option. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team https://bsdly.blogspot.com/ https://www.bsdly.net/ https://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Re: E-mail address openly visible in the WWW
> Do you recommend using a separate, dedicated e-mail address for > posting in the misc@ list? I would recommend not reading misc. But that might just be me. -- In my defence, I have been left unsupervised.
Re: Alternative mailing lists
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 07:58:07AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 05:03:25PM +, Anon Loli wrote: > > Hello, OpenBSD friends! > > Is there an alternative mailing list, or we can To and CC a bunch of people > > at > > once, I believe. > > The problem is that I have been censored plenty of times on @misc, @bugs and > > probably also @tech, and although I despise that, it's someone else's > > servers > > so what can I really do about it and should I even, right? :) > > "I have been censored plenty of times" is a very serious accusation, and one > that > should not be made lightly. I know, I have known censorship for many many many years, and I know what freedom of speech is. I know the consequences of both, and I give myself a degree when it comes to this. Do not misunderstand me, I know that OpenBSD has specifically said in [1] that they will probably silently drop off-topic messages and subjects. But a lot of my messages, and even whole subjects have been silently dropped aka censored. For example I have posted a few times about my worries of C being replaced with something as obnoxious as Rust and Go, to @ports and even @misc. I have also given many of my reasons to the worries and have asked for other people's input. > Were messages of yours removed or suppressed? Answered exactly above this. > Keep in mind that having your messages ignored on mailing lists is just a > normal > part of daily life. Perhaps your issue was not interesting to others or > simply > poorly presented, or perhaps one that is more than adequately covered in the > FAQ. Not only do I have that in mind, but I have on many occasions specifically said myself that people who do not want to hear from me should ignore me, or even use functions if their e-mail client(s) have, to not even see my threads and/or even all of my messages. If it was poorly presented, let me tell you that I am not the only one or the 1st one to do that. In my opinion, OpenBSD has lied to us, primarily that bad manual pages are considered as bugs. > But sure, if you feel your needs would be better served by starting a mailing > list > or other service of your own, there is nobody stopping you from doing just > that. But it will do about exactly 0 of anything, if no one knows that it exists, hence I have started this thread. > I suspect that the effect of the message I am making the utterly poor choice > of > following up on will be that people who would likely be able to provide > valuable > input on any OpenBSD relevant issue you might raise will choose to filter away > messages from "Anon Loli" so they will not waste any time reading those > pieces of text. Again, I feel like that should be the viewer/reader's choice, since it is not spam. Anything else is exactly that - filtering and manipulating and malforming someone's words or even actions. Which of course they have all rights reserved to, but it's a poopy move since they have not warned people about that. I would have probably not even come join the OpenBSD mailing lists would I know that someone would choose what I get to say and what I do not... I would immediately ask if there's an alternative mailing list or something similar like group e-mailing. [1] https://www.openbsd.org/mail.html > -- > Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team > https://bsdly.blogspot.com/ https://www.bsdly.net/ https://www.nuug.no/ > "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" > delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds. -- Anonymous, one of world's highly advanced and thorough minds, philosopher, computer master, OPSEC master, master of learning and perfection, master of critical thinking, etc. currently mastering:psychology, remanipulation or demanipulation aka promoting critical thinking, moral, consequences aka butterfly/domino effect, human body, as many of top important skillsets as possible These are just some of my qualifications from the top of my head, partially because I did not yet master memonics and did not discover the full potential of my brain efficiency which is needed if I want to create a better life for myself and others, one of projects for that would be my own operating system and hardware with it, which in theory should be greatly inspired and improved from all of existing operating systems and especially the derivatives of the old and insufficient Unix, some of them are: GNU, Linux, *BSD, QubesOS, Plan9, TempleOS. I will not initiate it's development until I have perfected it "on paper". In other words, do not make the mistake that you are qualified enough to understand my messages and then deduce wether or not you want them on your mailing lists. This is one of reasons that censorship should not exits or even be accepted by other people who might not have something unusual to say. Another of reason is possible manipulation.
Re: Alternative mailing lists
Anon Loli writes: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 07:58:07AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 05:03:25PM +, Anon Loli wrote: > > > Hello, OpenBSD friends! > > > Is there an alternative mailing list, or we can To and CC a bunch of > > > people at > > > once, I believe. > > > The problem is that I have been censored plenty of times on @misc, @bugs > > > and > > > probably also @tech, and although I despise that, it's someone else's > > > servers > > > so what can I really do about it and should I even, right? :) > > > > "I have been censored plenty of times" is a very serious accusation, and > > one that > > should not be made lightly. > > I know, I have known censorship for many many many years, and I know what > freedom of speech is. There is a big difference between "censored" and "ignored". Matthew
Re: E-mail address openly visible in the WWW
On 2024-08-30, Florian Obser wrote: >> Do you recommend using a separate, dedicated e-mail address for >> posting in the misc@ list? > > I would recommend not reading misc. But that might just be me. I fear you may be right. If people would stop replying to stupid messages on-list it would help those of us who already have setup scorefiles to make the misc list semi-readable. -- Please keep replies on the mailing list.
Re: MariaDB install any different for OpenBSD 7.5 than 6.4?
chrooted daemons and MariaDB socket === For external program running under a chroot(8) to be able to access the MariaDB server without using a network connection, the socket must be placed inside the chroot. e.g. httpd(8) or nginx(8): connecting to MariaDB from PHP - Create a directory for the MariaDB socket: # install -d -m 0711 -o _mysql -g _mysql /var/www/var/run/mysql Adjust /etc/my.cnf to use the socket in the chroot - this applies to both client and server processes: [client-server] socket = /var/www/var/run/mysql/mysql.sock You have three progressively less restrictive ways of providing access to your database server: * A Unix socket: If all the database consumers will be running locally, you can use a socket. If any of the consumers will be running chrooted to /var/www, then you'll need to put the socket in the chroot, as described on the pkg-readme (and remember not to use the full path when configuring the chrooted clients). * TCP, listening on 127.0.0.1: If all consumers will be running on the same host, and if you don't want the hassle of setting up the socket -- the tradeoff being having the socket available for every process that can use inet -- then you can just configure mariadb to listen on the loopback interface. If you have "set skip on lo0" on pf.conf (it's there by default), then you won't need to add anything else to that file. * TCP, listening on other interfaces: You'll need this if the database is to be accessible to other hosts. Using this option might require adjusting your filtering rules on pf.conf. You can use any combination of the above methods (socket only, loopback only, socket+loopback, socket+other interfaces, etc). See the "port", "socket", "skip-networking" and "bind-address" options on the [mysqld] section of /etc/my.cnf, and remember to setup the [client] section accordingly (i.e., if you skip-networking, don't configure the client to use TCP/IP, and if you don't setup a server socket, don't configure the client to use it). I have several concerns with /etc/my.cnf The instructions I found here are somewhat generic https://mariadb.com/kb/en/configuring-mariadb-with-option-files/ Am I understanding them, correctly, please? 1. I need to uncomment both the socket and port lines? #socket=/var/run/mysql/mysql.sock #port=3306 2. I need to provide a password for MariaDB (or, does it want the user password)? #password=my_password 3. Is this address the same as for the machine? e.g. "bind-address=192.168.50.xxx"? 4. I do want to uncomment all of the following? #data=/var/mysql #log-basename=mysqld #general-log #slow_query_log Thanks! - [client-server] #socket=/var/run/mysql/mysql.sock #port=3306 # This will be passed to all MariaDB clients [client] #password=my_password # The MariaDB server [mysqld] # To listen to all network addresses, use "bind-address = *" bind-address=localhost # Directory where you want to put your data #data=/var/mysql # This is the prefix name to be used for all log, error and replication files #log-basename=mysqld # Logging #general-log #slow_query_log
Re: Alternative mailing lists
I will resolve this problem once and for all. Vào Th 7, 31 thg 8, 2024 vào lúc 00:29 Anon Loli đã viết: > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 07:58:07AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 05:03:25PM +, Anon Loli wrote: > > > Hello, OpenBSD friends! > > > Is there an alternative mailing list, or we can To and CC a bunch of > > > people at > > > once, I believe. > > > The problem is that I have been censored plenty of times on @misc, @bugs > > > and > > > probably also @tech, and although I despise that, it's someone else's > > > servers > > > so what can I really do about it and should I even, right? :) > > > > "I have been censored plenty of times" is a very serious accusation, and > > one that > > should not be made lightly. > > I know, I have known censorship for many many many years, and I know what > freedom of speech is. > I know the consequences of both, and I give myself a degree when it comes to > this. > > Do not misunderstand me, I know that OpenBSD has specifically said in [1] that > they will probably silently drop off-topic messages and subjects. > But a lot of my messages, and even whole subjects have been silently dropped > aka censored. > https://marc.info/?a=17157917311&r=1&w=2 Look, your messages popped up on the archive. Everyone just ignore you. Can you re-think about yourself and your behavior? Can you read the book "Absolute OpenBSD" to understand the community more? Your message isn't dropped, or suppressed, you are ignored by the whole community. You make up nonsense about censorship, you are disgusting. > For example I have posted a few times about my worries of C being replaced > with > something as obnoxious as Rust and Go, to @ports and even @misc. > I have also given many of my reasons to the worries and have asked for other > people's input. > It means no one care. Your messaged popped on the archive. > > > Were messages of yours removed or suppressed? > > Answered exactly above this. > > > > Keep in mind that having your messages ignored on mailing lists is just a > > normal > > part of daily life. Perhaps your issue was not interesting to others or > > simply > > poorly presented, or perhaps one that is more than adequately covered in > > the FAQ. > > Not only do I have that in mind, but I have on many occasions specifically > said > myself that people who do not want to hear from me should ignore me, or even > use functions if their e-mail client(s) have, to not even see my threads > and/or > even all of my messages. > Everyone ignored you, you see? The fact is, your mail popped on the archive. > If it was poorly presented, let me tell you that I am not the only one or the > 1st one to do that. > In my opinion, OpenBSD has lied to us, primarily that bad manual pages are > considered as bugs. > Analyzed your messages. There aren't any sign that you have read any docs. That's my opinion. You have the illusion that you have a genius brain. Anyone that do not understand and satisfy you are dumbass. But you forgot that you are an Anonymous Cowards. You speak as if a government should accept the opinion of an anonymous cowards claiming to be talented like Kongming. > > > But sure, if you feel your needs would be better served by starting a > > mailing list > > or other service of your own, there is nobody stopping you from doing just > > that. > > But it will do about exactly 0 of anything, if no one knows that it exists, > hence I have started this thread. > > > > > I suspect that the effect of the message I am making the utterly poor > > choice of > > following up on will be that people who would likely be able to provide > > valuable > > input on any OpenBSD relevant issue you might raise will choose to filter > > away > > messages from "Anon Loli" so they will not waste any time reading those > > pieces of text. > > Again, I feel like that should be the viewer/reader's choice, since it is not > spam. Anything else is exactly that - filtering and manipulating and > malforming > someone's words or even actions. > But it is their choice! Almost everyone except me ignored Anon Loli. > Which of course they have all rights reserved to, but it's a poopy move since > they have not warned people about that. > I would have probably not even come join the OpenBSD mailing lists would I > know > that someone would choose what I get to say and what I do not... > I would immediately ask if there's an alternative mailing list or something > similar like group e-mailing. r/openbsd, openbsd guys on youtube, irc, xmpp, matrix, facebook group, daemonforums, they are existing groups. No need to wait for the next life, you can find another operating system where the developers and community serves you like a god. I think Windows or proprietary Unixes is the most qualifying options. I hope no one will see you on this list again. Goodbye! > > > [1] https://www.openbsd.org/mail.html >
Re: Alternative mailing lists
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 05:03:25PM +, Anon Loli wrote: The problem is that I have been censored plenty of times on @misc, @bugs and probably also @tech, I cannot see, that you're being censored here: I've seen quite a few emails this month from you on various openbsd lists - the latest ones on @bugs in a thread that you started, and that continues until today. So given this: why don't you simply send an email to the list administrator and ask what's going on - that is, if you still think that something is going wrong with your emails to the various openbsd lists. -- Wolfgang
Can't load install75.img
Please help with error booting install75.img Hello, I'm new to openBSD. I wanted to install it on my pc (CPU: AMD ryzen 5 7600x, MB: Asus tuf gaming B650-plus wifi, NVME: kingston NV2 1T, GPU: asus dual radeon rx 6700XT 12gb, RAM: 32gb, dual boot with arch using refind). I downloaded the install75.img, copied it using dd to a 15.7GB flash drive cmd: `dd if=install75.img of=/dev/sdb bs=1m`. Rebooted the PC to eufi settings opened the boot menu with F8 clicked on `UEFI: General UDisk 5.00, Partition 1(15.7gb)`. Then the `boot>` prompt showed up, there was as well written `disk: hd0 hd1* hd2*` and `probing: pc0 mem[640k 153m 2m 13m 1590m 31m 30175m]` above the prompt. then I pressed enter (later I tried to type ` boot hd0:/bsd.rd`). Then blue text poped up and started scrolling I will include (hope) readable footage of that. And then it got stuck on `scibus2 at softraid0: 256 targets` I tried to wait for like a 30minutes or so but it didn't load. I tried to insert the flash disk to my notebook and it worked the first prompt showed up fine. I wander is it because of my hardware? And if so how to fix it? Or at least how to show more debug info on the startup? The link to the video of it booting can be found here: https://photos.app.goo.gl/aEeeNymJx9XF2E9R7
Re: Desktop
I think if you really want it, you can make it. ;) On Thursday, August 29, 2024 at 10:43:48 p.m. GMT+9, wrote: We need an XFCE desktop version of OpenBSD. Ready configured. Or alternatives to buy such a system.
