Re: [mailop] Webmail

2016-04-05 Thread Luke Thompson

Rainloop works well for us.

Roundcube is fallback.

Luke Thompson
Systems Engineer

P: 1800 838 505
M: 0420 320 930
W: https://www.inksystems.com.au

On 4/04/2016 5:18 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
Sorry if this is off topic, but I'm just curious what folks are using 
for webmail nowadays.


Doug

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop



___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-05 Thread Dave Holland
On 2 April 2016 at 00:59, Brandon Long via mailop  wrote:
> Google Apps admins can specify incoming gateways, and we will treat the mail
> from them differently because we know it is being forwarded.

"This feature is not available in the legacy free edition of Google Apps."

I know us freeloaders should be grateful for everything we get - but
that's still a shame. :( Is there any way for you suggest internally
that this might be made available?

Cheers,
Dave

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Webmail

2016-04-05 Thread Alessio Cecchi

Il 03/04/2016 21:18, Doug Barton ha scritto:

Sorry if this is off topic, but I'm just curious what folks are using
for webmail nowadays.


Hi,

we are using (also) Sogo. It provider webmail but also 
calendars/contacts sharing via CardDAV, CalDAV and Exchange ActiveSync, 
and works very well.


http://sogo.nu/

--
Alessio Cecchi
Postmaster @ http://www.qboxmail.it
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] no traffic, yet blocked by Hotmail/Outlook/Live

2016-04-05 Thread Michael Beaugh
You have to use the word "ESCALATE" for mitigation to get anything done.
Otherwise, you will receive the same canned responses till communication
goes dark on their end.  Probably have to use "ESCALATE" at least 2 or more
times for it to happen and get someone that will honor the request.



Michael Beaugh
Mail Administrator | Salesforce
Office:  317-525-2524

--

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Udeme Ukutt  wrote:

> Andreas, you can reply directly to one of the statements/responses you got
> with a brief description of the issue
>
> Or - submit a brand new ticket, and then respond with a summarized
> description of the issue.
>
> Udeme
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Andreas Schamanek <
> scham...@fam.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, at 18:51, Michael Wise wrote:
>>
>> > Did you actually speak to a human?
>>
>> Yes, a total of 4.
>>
>> > I'd suggest asking them to escalate.
>>
>> I didn't use the word "escalate" but I did ask "how to proceed".
>> Haven't heard from the support folks since then.
>>
>> Escalate to who/where?
>>
>> I wonder whether I am just a tad bit too polite to provoke escalation.
>>
>> --
>> -- Andreas
>>
>>:-]
>>
>>
>> ___
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-05 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
I've tried to make the argument before, I can ping the thread again, but I
wouldn't bet on it.  I'd probably get the consumer version out first, we'll
have to make sure that works with free apps domains as well.

I know I'm paying for full Google apps for my personal domain after missing
too many of these features.

Brandon
On Apr 5, 2016 1:38 AM, "Dave Holland"  wrote:

> On 2 April 2016 at 00:59, Brandon Long via mailop 
> wrote:
> > Google Apps admins can specify incoming gateways, and we will treat the
> mail
> > from them differently because we know it is being forwarded.
>
> "This feature is not available in the legacy free edition of Google Apps."
>
> I know us freeloaders should be grateful for everything we get - but
> that's still a shame. :( Is there any way for you suggest internally
> that this might be made available?
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-05 Thread Dave Warren
I would, if I could pay for just the actual users. Sadly, I have too 
many other things that need mailboxes and/or accounts for other purposes 
and I just can't justify paying for each of them.


Instead, I just keep Gmail disabled and only use the features that 
aren't hobbled.


On 2016-04-05 11:44, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
I know I'm paying for full Google apps for my personal domain after 
missing too many of these features.





___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-05 Thread Dave Warren
I have the old one with 50 accounts. And "hobbled" might be a bit of an 
exaggeration, but I do run my own servers and I am used to having all 
sorts of flexibility :)


However, hobbled feels right since the features already exist, they're 
just... well...


--
Dave Warren
http://www.hireahit.com/
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren

On 2016-04-05 13:21, Brandon Long wrote:
Well, free edition should be limited to 5 accounts, but yeah, 
$300/year is pricey for consumers, no doubt about that.


And I wouldn't call Gmail hobbled, it's just more similar to the 
consumer version, doesn't add the bells & whistles of the paid 
version.  Though, when you're used to running your own server, not 
being able to do simple routing things feels really irritating.


Brandon

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Dave Warren > wrote:


I would, if I could pay for just the actual users. Sadly, I have
too many other things that need mailboxes and/or accounts for
other purposes and I just can't justify paying for each of them.

Instead, I just keep Gmail disabled and only use the features that
aren't hobbled.

On 2016-04-05 11:44, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:

I know I'm paying for full Google apps for my personal domain
after missing too many of these features.





___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org 
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop




___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-05 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
Well, free edition should be limited to 5 accounts, but yeah, $300/year is
pricey for consumers, no doubt about that.

And I wouldn't call Gmail hobbled, it's just more similar to the consumer
version, doesn't add the bells & whistles of the paid version.  Though,
when you're used to running your own server, not being able to do simple
routing things feels really irritating.

Brandon

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Dave Warren  wrote:

> I would, if I could pay for just the actual users. Sadly, I have too many
> other things that need mailboxes and/or accounts for other purposes and I
> just can't justify paying for each of them.
>
> Instead, I just keep Gmail disabled and only use the features that aren't
> hobbled.
>
> On 2016-04-05 11:44, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
>
>> I know I'm paying for full Google apps for my personal domain after
>> missing too many of these features.
>>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop