Re: Guitar tablature fret selection problem
On Sunday 08 June 2008 07:44:00 Marc Hohl wrote:
> Torquil Macdonald Sørensen schrieb:
> > Hello, I am having no luck trying to get lilypond to specify fret 12 on
> > the third string, for the first note in this example:
> >
> > \new TabStaff { g4\3 f\3 e\3 c\4 }
>
> You have to specify the octave position, either absolute:
>
> \new TabStaff { g'4\3 f'\3 e'\3 c'\4 }
>
> or simpler using \relative:
>
> \new TabStaff { \relative c'' { g4\3 f\3 e\3 c\4 } }
>
Yes, that worked fine. Thanks Marc.
Torquil
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
setting max-stretch to a high value still leaves some space at the bottom
Can someone please explain to me how lilypond's vertical page layout works?
In particular, I'm writing a full score with one system per page, so I want
that one system to exactly stretch to the full page. I'm doing this by
setting max-stretch to some very high value. Unfortunately, there is always
some space at the bottom left free on all pages except for the first one. On
page 1, the system goes all the way to the margins, but leave some space
between the title and the system, on all other pages, there is some space of
9.46 left over.
Attached is an example with annotated spacing. Notice how on page 1 there is
no space left at the bottom, while on all other pages there is some free
space at the botom and the system ends far above the position where it ends
on page 1...
On all pages with more than one system, there is no space left at the bottom,
which makes pages with one and with more systems look really ugly if that
happens on subsequent pages.
So, how can I make my systems really take up all the available space on the
page?
Cheers,
Reinhold
PS: PDF is too large for the mailing list, so here's the link:
http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/~reinhold/temp/stretching1.pdf
PS2: The additional free space of 9.46 at the bottom of pages with only one
system exactly equals the sum of all "space after next-padding" on pages with
multiple pages, so maybe that space is simply reserved for spacing systems,
but someone missed the fact that on one-system pages that space should not be
reserved as space...
--
--
Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
* K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer
* Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/
\version "2.11.48"
#(set-default-paper-size "a5")
#(set-global-staff-size 15)
\layout {
\context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext }
\context { \Score
\override VerticalAlignment #'max-stretch = #10
}
}
\header {
title = "Der Titel"
composer = "Komponist"
subtitel = "Untertitel"
}
\paper {
% page-limit-inter-system-space = ##t
% page-limit-inter-system-space-factor = #1.1
ragged-bottom=##f
ragged-last-bottom=##f
annotate-spacing = ##t
}
\score {
\new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 6 { g'4 g' g' g' \pageBreak} }
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 6 { g'4 g' g' g' \break } }
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 4 { g'4 g' g' g' \break } s1*2 }
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 4 { g'4 g' g' g' \break } s1*2 }
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 4 { g'4 g' g' g' \break } s1*2 }
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 2 { g'4 g' g' g' \break } s1*4 }
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 2 { g'4 g' g' g' \break } s1*4 }
>>
\header { piece = "One system per page => 9.46 left at the bottom" }
}
\score {
\new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 16 { g'4 g' g' g' \break} }
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 16 { g'4 g' g' g' \break } }
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 14 { g'4 g' g' g' \break } s1*2 }
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 14 { g'4 g' g' g' \break } s1*2 }
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 4 { g'4 g' g' g' \break } s1*12 }
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 2 { g'4 g' g' g' \break } s1*14 }
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 2 { g'4 g' g' g' \break } s1*14 }
>>
\header { piece = "Multiple systems per page => no space left at the bottom" }
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Wish to specify staff length and note "justification"
I suggest you to include small chunks of staff with the desired notes into columns of your ooo table, that way always will be aligned, despite of whatever you want to put in the table. Or, the staff has to be continuous? 2008/6/8 Adam Orris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > I want to align Lilypond notes to tabbed columns of text in OpenOffice, -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Question about inserting a bracket: snippet "Bracketed passages"
Hi a user on the German Lilypond-Forum would like to insert several brackets one after the other in his score, as indicated with the snippet "bracketed passages". But the use of the \breathe obviously prevents to be put more than one time without anything in between. Does anybody have a quick idea how to improve the snippet to allow multiple bracketed passages? Greetings Till ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: constructing a jazz piece
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> This can certainly be a good practice to separate out annotations or
> dynamics and such. This is one aspect of separating musical content from
> typesetting layout.
i'm happy to find a way to "globalize" rehearsal marks, double bar lines,
etc. can anyone help me figure out why my /global block is creating a new
staff below my instrument staves each time? i get the rehearsal marks above
everything, but there's an unwanted blank staff below each staff group with
the text markup on it
these are (hopefully) the pertinent snippets:
global = {
\time 5/4
\set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-letters
\tempo 4=108
s1^"Intro - open" s4 | s1 s4 |
s4 \mark \default s1 |
\repeat unfold 7 { s1 s4 } \bar "||"
s4 \mark \default s1 |
\repeat unfold 7 { s1 s4 } \bar "||"
s4 \mark \default s1 |
\repeat unfold 6 { s1 s4 } \bar "|."
}
%% and then later on in the score block
\score {
<<
\new StaffGroup = "horns" <<
\global
\new ChordNames = "trpchords" \transpose c d {\harmony}
\new Staff = "trumpet" \trumpet
\new ChordNames = "tenorchords" \transpose c d {\harmony}
\new Staff = "tenorsaxone" \tenorsaxone
\new ChordNames = "chords" \harmony
\new Staff = "trbn" \trbn
>>
\new StaffGroup = "rhythm" <<
\global
\new ChordNames = "chords" \harmony
\new PianoStaff = "piano" \piano
>>
>>
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: constructing a jazz piece
Hi Bernie,
i'm happy to find a way to "globalize" rehearsal marks, double bar
lines, etc.
can anyone help me figure out why my /global block is creating
a new staff below my instrument staves each time?
Your code adds the \global in its own (implicit) Staff:
\new StaffGroup = "horns" <<
\global
\new ChordNames = "trpchords" \transpose c d {\harmony}
is the same as
\new StaffGroup = "horns" <<
\new Staff \global
\new ChordNames = "trpchords" \transpose c d {\harmony}
You need to COMBINE the global stuff with some other staff's music --
see the trumpet staff in the attached (modified) code.
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
%%
\version "2.11.47"
global =
{
\time 5/4 \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-letters
\tempo 4=108
s1^"Intro - open" s4 | s1 s4 |
s4 \mark \default s1 |
\repeat unfold 7 { s1 s4 } \bar "||"
s4 \mark \default s1 |
\repeat unfold 7 { s1 s4 } \bar "||"
s4 \mark \default s1 |
\repeat unfold 6 { s1 s4 } \bar "|."
}
harmony = { c'' }
trumpet = { c'' }
tenorsaxone = { c'' }
trbn = { c'' }
piano = { c'' }
%% and then later on in the score block
\score
{
<<
\new StaffGroup = "horns"
<<
\new ChordNames = "trpchords" \transpose c d { \harmony
}
\new Staff = "trumpet" << \global \trumpet >>
\new ChordNames = "tenorchords" \transpose c d {
\harmony }
\new Staff = "tenorsaxone" \tenorsaxone
\new ChordNames = "chords" \harmony
\new Staff = "trbn" \trbn
>>
\new StaffGroup = "rhythm"
<<
\new ChordNames = "chords" \harmony
\new PianoStaff = "piano"
<<
\new Staff = "rh" \piano
\new Staff = "lh" \piano
>>
>>
>>
}
%%
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: setting max-stretch to a high value still leaves some space at the bottom
Le 8 juin 08 à 16:21, Reinhold Kainhofer a écrit : Can someone please explain to me how lilypond's vertical page layout works? In particular, I'm writing a full score with one system per page, so I want that one system to exactly stretch to the full page. I'm doing this by setting max-stretch to some very high value. Unfortunately, there is always some space at the bottom left free on all pages except for the first one. On page 1, the system goes all the way to the margins, but leave some space between the title and the system, on all other pages, there is some space of 9.46 left over. Note that I'm not sure at all of what follows: The vertical spacing algorithm does not use all the space left when stretching systems, but let some part unoccupied, in case some heights were underestimated (and thus avoiding overful hbox), streching being based on extent estimations. This "security" amount is hard coded. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: double notes in stemless notation?
If you show how you combine these two lines of music
in the same stave, it's easier to provide a relevant
answer.
/Mats
Ivo Bouwmans wrote:
Hallo all,
I am writing four-part choral music in a stemless notation on two
staves. Here's a brief example:
notesOne = {
\relative {
\override Stem #'transparent = ##t
gis'2 a4 b e,
}}
notesTwo = {
\relative {
\override Stem #'transparent = ##t
e2 e4 dis e
}}
When the voices have the same note - like the final e in the example
above -, only one note head is shown (as expected). Is there a way to
let LP still write two notes, close to each other (like in the case of
two whole notes coinciding)?
Thanks for any suggestion!
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Place to write piano dynamics
Hello, everybody!
It is my first posting to this list. I am blind programmer from Russia
and music takes a very important part in my life. Lilypond is just brilliant
software
for me. Now I can make my own music publications by myself. Great thanks
to everybody, who made it possible!
There is one thing I cannot understand . In many examples
notes are not written in "\new Staff" block directly,
but placed in something like
upper = \relative c'' {
\clef treble
\key c \major
\time 4/4
a4 b c d
}
What is the advantage of such approach? I am asking,
because in "Piano centered dynamics" example melody and dynamics are written
separately.
In long composition it can be difficult to
think about a correct place for dynamics.
Are there problems to write melody and dynamics together? And why using special
blocks
for melody in most cases is more convenient?
Thanks!
--
With best wishes, Michael Pozhidaev.
Tomsk state university, computer science department.
ALTLinux Team.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
incorrect beams in 16th quintuplet
hello list,
sorry, i guess this must be in the docs somewhere, perhaps it has been
discussed in the list before, but i can't really find a solution...
when writing irregular 16th-note quintuplets (one 8th-note and three
16ths) i get incorrect beaming groups, depending where the 8th note is
placed
the first two tuplets (bar 1) are correct, but their mirrors (bar 2)
have their beams wrong (see attached image). here's the very simple
code:
\version "2.11.42"
\relative c'
{
\times 4/5 { f8 f16 f16 f16 } r4
\times 4/5 { f16 f8 f16 f16 } r4
\times 4/5 { f16 f16 f8 f16 } r4
\times 4/5 { f16 f16 f16 f8 } r4
}
\layout{ragged-right=##t}
thanks,
lj
<>___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: incorrect beams in 16th quintuplet
You might take a look at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-05/msg00481.html
Am 09.06.2008 um 04:24 schrieb luis jure:
hello list,
sorry, i guess this must be in the docs somewhere, perhaps it has been
discussed in the list before, but i can't really find a solution...
when writing irregular 16th-note quintuplets (one 8th-note and three
16ths) i get incorrect beaming groups, depending where the 8th note is
placed
the first two tuplets (bar 1) are correct, but their mirrors (bar 2)
have their beams wrong (see attached image). here's the very simple
code:
\version "2.11.42"
\relative c'
{
\times 4/5 { f8 f16 f16 f16 } r4
\times 4/5 { f16 f8 f16 f16 } r4
\times 4/5 { f16 f16 f8 f16 } r4
\times 4/5 { f16 f16 f16 f8 } r4
}
\layout{ragged-right=##t}
thanks,
lj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: incorrect beams in 16th quintuplet
This post from the archive solves the problem in Luis' third line of
code, but not the fourth. I've been fiddling with this for the last
half hour and can't make the fourth line beam the 16th notes as a single
group and still connect with the 8th note. Weird.
Jon
James E. Bailey wrote:
You might take a look at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-05/msg00481.html
Am 09.06.2008 um 04:24 schrieb luis jure:
hello list,
sorry, i guess this must be in the docs somewhere, perhaps it has been
discussed in the list before, but i can't really find a solution...
when writing irregular 16th-note quintuplets (one 8th-note and three
16ths) i get incorrect beaming groups, depending where the 8th note is
placed
the first two tuplets (bar 1) are correct, but their mirrors (bar 2)
have their beams wrong (see attached image). here's the very simple
code:
\version "2.11.42"
\relative c'
{
\times 4/5 { f8 f16 f16 f16 } r4
\times 4/5 { f16 f8 f16 f16 } r4
\times 4/5 { f16 f16 f8 f16 } r4
\times 4/5 { f16 f16 f16 f8 } r4
}
\layout{ragged-right=##t}
thanks,
lj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
different rehearsal mark settings in score and part
Hi,
I'm now working on a extreme serious piece, the suite about the earthquake.
So I want my score to be very formal.
I don't know how the remove empty staff function works. I added rehearsal
marks only above piccolo and violin I parts, but I don't know whether the marks
will let the parts appear during their silence. If no, the rehearsal marks will
disappear from my score. I ever read the score of The Rite Of Sprin in braille.
The transcribe's note said that the rehearsal marks are above the top of the
score and also the topmost string part. If the marks disappear, how to add
marks to other staves? If the \mark command hasn't appear in a part before,
will the rehearsal number be correct when writing on them when they become the
topmost score and string staves?
To make things clear (I can't express this very clearly in English), here's
the thing I want:
\version 2.11.47"
pic = \relative c'' { R1*10 \mark \default | R1*20 %{ should I add a \mark
\default even though it will not appear? %} | }
fl = \relative c'' { R1*10 | c1 \mark \default %{ can it be [2]? %} | \repeat
unfold 19 { c1 } | }
cl = { R1*30 | }
..
vI = \relative c' { c1 \mark \default | R1*29 | }
vII = \relative c' { c1 | R1*29 | }
vl = \relative c' { R1*10 | c1 \mark \default | c1 | R1*18 | }
..
I also created a "marks" variable containing all rehearsal marks, and will
use it for printing parts:
marks = { s1*10 \mark \default | s1*20 \mark \default | }
Will the marks of this line mess up the irregular marks I wrote for producing
full score? And, if I wrote c1 \mark \default | R1*29, will the second mark
appear in bar 11 (part version)? Must I split rests into R1*9 | R1*20?
In full score, I also don't know when the line breaks, so if I add marks in
other lines before break, it will cause visual mistake. Can I use the Dynamic
context as in piano score with marks (and therefore not write marks at other
places) and then place it before piccolo and violin I? Will it disappear when
the below staff is empty? Must I create a alias staff context instead?
Sorry for troubling you so much, because I can't check these myself!
Sincerely
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: incorrect beams in 16th quintuplet
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 23:24 -0300, luis jure wrote: > hello list, > > sorry, i guess this must be in the docs somewhere, perhaps it has been > discussed in the list before, but i can't really find a solution... > > when writing irregular 16th-note quintuplets (one 8th-note and three > 16ths) i get incorrect beaming groups, depending where the 8th note is > placed This is a bug that has been fixed in git. Please try 2.11.49 when it is released. Joe ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
