Re: lilypond book problem (psfont?)
Mitico! (ita)
Thanks for the quick answer!
I read the lilypond-book documentation but i can't understad everything
(because i can understand english but not very well.. sorry)
so I have another little question.
The best way to work with lilypond-book is to set the layout of
the page with latex and include only the "music code" (with out the \paper
or \layuot block)
is this right?
Is the manual the only "place" where i can find info?
Thanks a lot
Bainos
Mats Bengtsson-4 wrote:
>
> This is a known problem in Windows. Please use the pdflatex
> approach instead:
>
> lilypond-book --pdf -o out yourfile.pdftex
> cd out
> pdflatex yourfile.tex
>
>
> /Mats
>
> Quoting Bainos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>> I have a probelm with lilypond-book that i cant solve..
>> I use lilypond-book 2.10.25 on winXP
>>
>> lilypond-book -o out --psfont myfile.lytex
>>
>> this is the output.
>> there are some prolem with psfont (?)
>>
>> ("C:\Programmi\MiKTeX 2.5\tex\latex\base\article.cls"
>> Document Class: article 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class
>> ("C:\Programmi\MiKTeX 2.5\tex\latex\base\size10.clo"))
>> No file tmplxn50q.aux.
>> textwidth=345.0pt
>> columnsep=10.0pt
>> (tmplxn50q.aux) )
>> No pages of output.
>> Transcript written on tmplxn50q.log.
>> Dissecting...
>> Writing snippets...
>> All snippets are up to date...
>> Compiling prova1.tex...
>> prova1.tex is up to date.
>> Writing fonts to prova1.psfonts...Failed to extract CenturySchL-Roma,
>> Emmentaler
>> -20, CenturySchL-Ital from lily-ba9fb15dcd.eps
>> Failed to extract CenturySchL-Bold from lily-58dba3023a.eps
>> Failed to extract Emmentaler-26 from lily-0edaabf90e.eps
>>
>>
>> DVIPS usage:
>>dvips -h out\prova1.psfonts out\prova1.dvi
>>
>> thanks in advance
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Bainos
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/lilypond-book-problem-%28psfont-%29-tf4038520.html#a11473719
>> Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>> lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/lilypond-book-problem-%28psfont-%29-tf4038520.html#a11476607
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Underlined + double underlined fingering instructions for accordion scores
Hi
I could write in french, but this might be usefull for someone else, it was
a pain in the but for me to find this out.
I'm a guitarrist, so I adapted the code for the four fingers, as the thumb
is not used in the Left Hand.
In the code bellow, you find code for fingering for the left end (Ln - none,
Li - index, LM - long, La - ring, Lm - little), and underlines (Lui), double
underline (Luui). I trust in your cleverness to continue the job! ;)
You'll have to tweak the "-1.4 -0.2 moveto" to align the postscripts.
I didn't need anything else than lilypond to obtain an output whith the
following code. I'm running linux.
\version " 2.10.25"
Ln = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "0" }
Li = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "1" }
LM = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "2" }
La = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "3" }
Lm = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "4" }
Lun = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "0" \postscript #" 0.08 setlinewidth -1.46 -0.2 moveto 0.88 0
rlineto stroke"}
Lui = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "1" \postscript #"0.08 setlinewidth -1.4 -0.2 moveto 0.85 0
rlineto stroke"}
LuM = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "2" \postscript #"0.08 setlinewidth -1.5 -0.2 moveto 0.95 0
rlineto stroke"}
Lua = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "3" \postscript #"0.08 setlinewidth -1.4 -0.2 moveto 0.8 0
rlineto stroke"}
Lum = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "4" \postscript #" 0.08 setlinewidth -1.55 -0.2 moveto 1 0
rlineto stroke"}
Luui = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "1" \postscript #"0.08 setlinewidth -1.4 -0.2 moveto 0.85 0
rlineto stroke" \postscript #"0.08 setlinewidth -2 -0.4 moveto 0.85 0
rlineto stroke"}
\new Staff {
c^\Li
d^\Lui
d^Luui
\once \override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'(0 . 1) d^\Luui
}
Tiago
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: PSPad: a Lily-friendly editor for Windows
Citando madhg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I used to use Crimson for writing lilypond. Excellent for small projects, > less convenient for a large project with one main file to be compiled and > several other files contaning the music for individual staves. > > I can now recommend another editor, PSPad, which like Crimson is a general > programmer's editor and useful for Lilypond. > > * freeware > > * supports compilation, viewing compiler output, and parsing the output to > jump to a line in the source file which produces an error or warning > > * [This is what made me move from Crimson to PSPad] supports projects in > which you can specify a "Main file", so that when you press the button to > compile, lilypond is run on the main file that you have specified, even if > you are currently working on a different file (for instance, if you have the > music for different staves held in individual files) > > * support for UTF-8, so accented characters are handled easily > > * syntax highlighting; I attach a PSPad highlighter file for lilypond > > * configurable keyboard shortcuts, so you can set up keys for compiling, > and for viewing the result in GSView or other viewers. > > PSPad is Windows only, available from http://www.pspad.com/ > > There are many editors, and I don't want to start an argument about whether > X is better than Y. Just to point interested users to one that has a > broadly similar style to Crimson but has an extra feature that saves me a > lot of trouble. And is freeware. > > David Griffel > > http://www.nabble.com/file/p11462658/Lilypond.INI Lilypond.INI > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/PSPad%3A-a-Lily-friendly-editor-for-Windows-tf4034990.html#a11462658 > Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > Hello! I've downloaded it. What else do I need to do after installing the program and copying the Lilypond.ini to the folder syntax, so it can start working, that is, using syntax highlighting? Can you use point-and-click features with this editor? Eduardo Have a good day! ___ Para fazer uma ligação DDD pra perto ou pra longe, faz um 21. A Embratel tem tarifas muito baratas esperando por você. Aproveite! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: PSPad: a Lily-friendly editor for Windows
Eduardo Vieira-3 wrote: > >> Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > Hello! I've downloaded it. What else do I need to do after installing the > program and copying the Lilypond.ini to the folder syntax, so it can start > working, that is, using syntax highlighting? > Can you use point-and-click features with this editor? > > * put the file into the Syntax subfolder of the PSPad application folder (usually in C:\Program Files) * Open PSPad * In the Settings menu open Highlighters Settings * Get a dialog with a list of programming languages etc. in a left-hand pane. * There will probably be an item called Lilypond. If not, go to the items at the end labelled , check the checkbox and highlight that line There will be various things to be done next, I forget exactly what, try the program help, and if no luck, email me (but I'm away Sunday-Tuesday) * In the Compiler tab for the Lilypond syntax: - in Compiler enter the path of the lilypond executable - in Parameters enter %Name% or maybe %Name%.ly (I run lilypond via a batchfile which requires only the %Name% without extension - in Default Directory enter %Dir% - check all 3 checkboxes - in LOG Parser enter %F:%L:%C (that enables automatic jumping to an error-producing line in your lilypond code - very nice! * In the External Applications tab enter "C:\Programs\gs\Ghostgum\gsview\gsview32.exe" "%Name%.pdf" for Ghostview (obviously you may have a different path) and/or similar for Acrobat * In the "colours" tab you can choose the highlighting colours. To set your own keyboard shortcuts, choose Program Settings in the Settings menu, go to the last item, Key Map, look in the File menu item settings, you should find Compile and Acrord and/or Ghostview, double-click to enter a new shortcut (can use Ctrl+shift+Z etc. if you want). Hope this helps. There's a user forum on the PSPad website. David PS you asked about point-and-click, I assume this means clicking on a note in Adobe Acrobat Reader and getting the editor's cursor display the relevant piece of code. I don't see why it shouldn't work with any text editor, but I haven't been able to get this to work at all on WinXP. The browser doesn't seem to recognise and act on the message sent by Acrobat Reader. I asked about this on the lilypond list (via Nabble) many months ago, and still can't fix the problem. If you know how to do it, I'd be interested in any help you can give. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PSPad%3A-a-Lily-friendly-editor-for-Windows-tf4034990.html#a11481532 Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
odd staff spacing on 2nd page
The space between the staves on page one are quite wide but ok however the
second page they are considerably closer together. Is this correct? Or did I
do something to cause this?
\version "2.10.25"
\header {
title = "Sketch 1"
subtitle = "for guitar for now"
composer = "Jay Hamilton"
copyright = \markup { \tiny \override #'(baseline-skip . 0.5)
\center-align
{ "CC lic 2.5 some rights reserved Jay Hamilton 2007"
"see http://creativecommons.org/licenses!/by-nd/2.5/";
} }
}
melody = \relative c'
{
\clef treble
\key c \major
\time 4/4
#(set-global-staff-size 28)
\override Staff.Timesignature #' style = #' ()
\cadenzaOn
g16-3 [c-4 es!-1 g] fis!-4 [c-3] a'-2 [fis!-4] g [c-1 bes!-3 a-2]
fis!8-4\fermata \bar "|"
g16 [c bes! a] fis! [c es!] g,[ (bes!] a8)\fermata
\once \override TextScript #'padding = #1.2
\acciaccatura {\stemDown g16-1_\markup {\tiny \italic "on E"}
[bes!]\stemNeutral} a8\fermata^\markup {\italic short} \bar "|"
a'16\p bes! g fis! c' es,! c' d es!4
\once \override TextScript #'padding = #1.2
\acciaccatura {\stemDown bes!16_\markup {\tiny \italic "on G"}
([g]\stemNeutral} a8)\fermata^\markup {\italic short} \acciaccatura {\stemDown
bes!16 ([g]\stemNeutral} a8)\bar "|"
c16_\markup {\italic "a bit slower"} [c d a] c [bes!8.]\fermata^\markup
{\italic short} a16 [a bes! fis!] bes! ([a] es!8)\fermata^\markup {\italic
short}\bar "|"
d16 [g fis! es!] c [es! d bes!] a16 ([c] bes!4) \acciaccatura {\stemDown a16
([c]\stemNeutral} bes!4)\fermata^\markup {\italic short}\bar "|"
g16 [c es! g] fis! [c a'] fis!_\markup {\italic accel.} ([g c bes! a])\bar "|"
fis! ([g c bes! a]) fis! ([g c bes! a]) bes!_\markup {\italic "rit!"} ([c]
d8)\fermata\bar "|"
\once \override TextScript #'padding = #1.5
\times 2/3 {es!16-4^\markup{\italic"a tempo" }bes!-2 es! bes! es! bes!} fis!-3
[g] \times 2/3 {c-1 a-2 c a c a} \times 2/3 {es!8 [fis! es!]} c4 \times 2/3
{es!8 [fis! es!]}\bar "|"
\acciaccatura {\stemDown d8^\markup {\italic "on D"}\stemNeutral} a'4
\acciaccatura {\stemDown d,8 \stemNeutral} g4 d16 [bes'!8.]
c8\glissando^\markup {\teeny \italic "gliss"} a4 \bar "|"
g,16 [ c es! g] fis!4 g16 [ bes!-2 d-3 fis!-1] es!4-4 \bar "|"
\once \override TextScript #'padding = #1.8
d16^\markup {\tiny \italic "Alternative to play these on G and D strings for
next 3 measures"} [c\< bes! c] d [a bes! c] d [g, a bes!] c4 \bar "|" d16 [c
bes! c] d [a bes! c] d [g, a bes!] c4 \bar "|" d16 [c bes! c] d [a bes! c] d
[g, a bes!] c4\! \bar "|"
bes!8\mf [a] g [fis!] c' [es,!] c' (d,4) ~ \fermata \bar "|"
g8^\markup {" Rit."} [c] es,! [g] fis! [c'] a (fis'!4.)\bar "|" 1
\bar "|."
}
\score {
\new Staff \melody
\layout { }
\midi { }
}
Yours-
Jay
Jay Hamilton
www.soundand.com
206-328-7694
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: odd staff spacing on 2nd page
On Sunday 08 July 2007 07:47, Jay Hamilton wrote:
> The space between the staves on page one are quite wide but ok however the
> second page they are considerably closer together. Is this correct? Or
> did I do something to cause this?
I suspect it is because ragged-last-bottom is true by default. Use
\paper { ragged-last-bottom = ##f }
to change it.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: odd staff spacing on 2nd page
2007/7/8, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sunday 08 July 2007 07:47, Jay Hamilton wrote:
> The space between the staves on page one are quite wide but ok however the
> second page they are considerably closer together. Is this correct? Or
> did I do something to cause this?
I suspect it is because ragged-last-bottom is true by default. Use
\paper { ragged-last-bottom = ##f }
to change it.
Strangely, ragged-last-bottom doesn't seem to work in this case.
However Jay, you still can add a \paper block with something like
between-system-space = 5\cm
or
between-system-padding = #12
by the way, maybe you'd better add a \break just after
g16 [ bes!-2 d-3 fis!-1] es!4-4 \bar "|"
to be sure that your long text markup "Alternative to play etc." will
be entirely printed.
Regards,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Fonts in SVG output
Benjamin Esham wrote: > I'm having some issues with Lilypond 2.10.x's SVG export. I seem to have fixed most (all?) of my font problems. I now have another problem, however. In order to submit one of LilyPond's SVGs to e.g. the Wikimedia Commons, it is necessary to convert all of its text into paths; that way, users need not have LilyPond's fonts in order to view the image correctly. Before converting text into paths in Inkscape, you must make sure that none of the text is contained within a group. Therefore, I started to process my file by selecting everything and issuing an Ungroup command. When I did so, the staff lines disappeared! Apparently every object in the file is in a one-element group. For some reason, ungrouping the staff lines made them disappear—they were still present, just not visible. I think there may be an Inkscape bug at play here too, since "Select All" couldn't find the lines, but on the LilyPond end... how can I get Lily to create a sane, usable SVG file? Any help is greatly appreciated here. -- Benjamin D. Esham [EMAIL PROTECTED] | AIM: bdesham128 | Jabber: same as e-mail "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."— attributed to Edmund Burke ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Problems with midi2ly
Hi everyone. New lilypond user here. trying to use midi2ly to convert a
score I made in Overture and saved as type 1 mid. The midi file was from
notation, not from performance(so the times and durations should be
quantized already).
When I run midi2ly, it produces an ly file, no error, but the only thing in
the output file is the following which is obviously wrong, its a complete
orch score. Any ideas what I'm missing? I have lilypond 2.10.25 installed
on windows. This is what it currently outputs with no error messages:
% Lily was here -- automatically converted by C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\midi2ly.py from 1M2-orch-sketch-v3.mid
\version "2.7.18"
\score {
<<
>>
}
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-midi2ly-tf4042420.html#a11483753
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Fonts in SVG output
Benjamin Esham wrote: In order to submit one of LilyPond's SVGs to e.g. the Wikimedia Commons, it is necessary to convert all of its text into paths; that way, users need not have LilyPond's fonts in order to view the image correctly. Before converting text into paths in Inkscape, you must make sure that none of the text is contained within a group. Therefore, I started to process my file by selecting everything and issuing an Ungroup command. When I did so, the staff lines disappeared! Apparently every object in the file is in a one-element group. For some reason, ungrouping the staff lines made them disappear—they were still present, just not visible. I think there may be an Inkscape bug at play here too, since "Select All" couldn't find the lines, but on the LilyPond end... how can I get Lily to create a sane, usable SVG file? Any help is greatly appreciated here. There have been some discussions about SVG recently; it's an area of considerable interest to some users, including me. Another example is this: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2007-07/msg9.html Unfortunately, nobody is working on LilyPond SVG output. We currently lack the developer resources to keep up with the current bug reports, let alone adding new features like improved SVG support. I strongly urge anybody who is interested in SVG support to consider contributing resources (either source code or offering a bounty) to this end. If you are involved in a project that uses SVG (like this Wikimedia Commons thing), then perhaps you could encourage one of their programmers (who is familiar with SVG) to work on lilypond's output. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: new markup doc
Germain G. Ivanoff-Trinadtzaty wrote: Well in fact, I _do_ want to learn Scheme. And I do understand the general object of this doc page. But reading it, you notice that the very first example, which is used in the next examples, is incomplete... (Same thing appears on the web site, and on my local 2.11.26 doc pages) I don't quite understand your suggestion. The first "example" is the general layout of the define-markup-command. This is followed by showing, line by line, how we would change this into a \smallcap markup command. At the end of the page, we show the complete \smallcap command. If you have a specific suggestion about these docs, please see http://lilypond.org/web/devel/participating/documentation-adding ps: is there any good place (besides lily doc pages) where I can find more about scheme / lilypond ? (documented examples, syntax, list of functions) A general scheme tutorial might help; otherwise, see the Snippets->scheme stuff. That's all I can think of. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Nested \includes in different subdirectories?
Valentin Villenave wrote: 2007/7/6, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: perhaps this _should_ become an official feature request after all. What is the protocol? Should we forward it to the -devel list? What makes a feature request "official"? Err, you tell me, and I get around to adding it. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=391 (feature requests get sent to the bug- list, and from there they get onto the google tracker) Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Rendering two documents as one musical score
HI: I did not intend this to be two documents, but the score got complicated enough that it made sense to stop at the end of the A section and begin a new lilypond file at the beginning of B. There are only 4 pages of piano score. If I cut and paste them together there are now octave displacement problems (the very problems I sought to dispense with by using two files). Is there a way to have lilypond produce one document but still render each one as its own separate entity? There are probably ways to shorten my coding but for now, I want to do things the longer way until I really understand what's going on. The short cuts may just serve to confuse things I just barely understand. Cheers, David -- David Fedoruk B.Mus. UBC,1986 Certificate in Internet Systems Administration, UBC, 2003 http://recordjackethistorian.wordpress.com "Music is enough for one's life time, but one life time is not enough for music" Sergei Rachmaninov ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
accidentals in cadenzas
I'm writing a cadenza, and it seems that < \bar "" > does not have the effect of accidentals being reset as if there was a real bar line. For instance d16 [e fis g a b cis d e f e d] \bar "" e,16 [fis gis a b cis d e f g f e] In the second phrase, only a sharp will be printed for the gis, not for the fis. Is there any way to get the effect that at the invislble bar line all previous accidentals are forgotten/reset? Victor. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Fonts in SVG output
Graham Percival wrote: > I strongly urge anybody who is interested in SVG support to consider > contributing resources (either source code or offering a bounty) to this > end. If you are involved in a project that uses SVG (like this Wikimedia > Commons thing), then perhaps you could encourage one of their programmers > (who is familiar with SVG) to work on lilypond's output. I have posted a call for help to that effect to the Wikimedia Commons mailing list; hopefully someone there will be able to contribute, or will know someone who can. (There should be a number of SVG experts on that list, and a bunch of coders as well.) I would help myself, but know very little about SVG's internals, and nothing whatsoever about Scheme. Maybe if I get some free time I can learn... Cheers, -- Benjamin D. Esham [EMAIL PROTECTED] | AIM: bdesham128 | Jabber: same as e-mail "As Gregor Samsa woke one morning from uneasy dreams he found himself transformed in his bed into a monstrous vermin." — Kafka, /The Metamorphosis/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Underlined + double underlined fingering instructions for accordion scores
Hi Tiego,
that's GREAT !! :-)
I copy your codes into an existing file.ly and it worked at once =-O + :-) .
many (they could never be enough) THANKS for your time
to have found this out!
I believe that's also the magic rising from exchanges within a community
with a common project.
In Brussels Belgium, I heard some people saying "Il y a plus dans 2
têtes que dans... ½..." ;-)
english translation attempt " two minded people can more than one half... "
I 'm using Lilypond v.2.10.23 running on Windows XP ; test editor is
Notepad with UTF-8 save option (I'm just beginning with testing jEdit as
text editor). I got a Debian distribution ±5 years ago and have not yet
installed it because of supposed huge amount ot time to do it.
Best regards
Charlie
Tiago Morin a écrit :
Hi
I could write in french, but this might be usefull for someone else,
it was a pain in the but for me to find this out.
I'm a guitarrist, so I adapted the code for the four fingers, as the
thumb is not used in the Left Hand.
In the code bellow, you find code for fingering for the left end (Ln -
none, Li - index, LM - long, La - ring, Lm - little), and underlines
(Lui), double underline (Luui). I trust in your cleverness to continue
the job! ;)
You'll have to tweak the "-1.4 -0.2 moveto" to align the postscripts.
I didn't need anything else than lilypond to obtain an output whith
the following code. I'm running linux.
\version " 2.10.25"
Ln = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "0" }
Li = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "1" }
LM = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "2" }
La = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "3" }
Lm = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding .
fetaNumber) "4" }
Lun = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding
. fetaNumber) "0" \postscript #" 0.08 setlinewidth -1.46 -0.2 moveto
0.88 0 rlineto stroke"}
Lui = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding
. fetaNumber) "1" \postscript #"0.08 setlinewidth -1.4 -0.2 moveto
0.85 0 rlineto stroke"}
LuM = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding
. fetaNumber) "2" \postscript #"0.08 setlinewidth -1.5 -0.2 moveto
0.95 0 rlineto stroke"}
Lua = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding
. fetaNumber) "3" \postscript #"0.08 setlinewidth -1.4 -0.2 moveto 0.8
0 rlineto stroke"}
Lum = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding
. fetaNumber) "4" \postscript #" 0.08 setlinewidth -1.55 -0.2 moveto 1
0 rlineto stroke"}
Luui = \markup{\override #'(font-size . -5) \override #'(font-encoding
. fetaNumber) "1" \postscript #"0.08 setlinewidth -1.4 -0.2 moveto
0.85 0 rlineto stroke" \postscript #"0.08 setlinewidth -2 -0.4 moveto
0.85 0 rlineto stroke"}
\new Staff {
c^\Li
d^\Lui
d^Luui
\once \override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'(0 . 1) d^\Luui
}
Tiago
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.0/886 - Release Date: 4/07/2007 13:40
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Rendering two documents as one musical score
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 06:59:52PM -0700, David Fedoruk wrote: > HI: > > I did not intend this to be two documents, but the score got > complicated enough that it made sense to stop at the end of the A > section and begin a new lilypond file at the beginning of B. There are > only 4 pages of piano score. If I cut and paste them together there > are now octave displacement problems (the very problems I sought to > dispense with by using two files). > > Is there a way to have lilypond produce one document but still render > each one as its own separate entity? > I'm not entirely sure what you're asking, but I suspect you can get what you want by using separate \score blocks in your file. -- = Cameron Horsburgh = ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
