Re: Simple substitution for oddFooterMarkup?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi --
Your macro definition:
boldPageNumber = \markup { \fill-line { \bold \fontsize #3
\on-the-fly #print-page-number-check-first \fromproperty
#'page:page-number-string } }
Question: if print-page-number-check-first is a defined function,
does it have to be referenced as a literal symbol
(by adding an apostrophe after the #)? --
#'print-page-number-check-first
No, here you want to actually apply the function. If you add an apostrophe
(you "quote" it in Scheme terminology), you just get a symbol named
print-page-number-check-first.
See http://community.schemewiki.org/?howto-learn-scheme for more
information.
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [Q] Rehearsal marks in parts
Hi Victor! Victor Eijkhout schrieb: If I put "\mark \default" in each part, then I get an annoying warnnig message about duplicate marks when I include the parts in a score document. What's the easiest way around this? Just as many users have a global section to be included in every staff within a score I have a globalMarkup definition that contains my markups. That definiton is included only in the topmost staff of my score as well as in every indiviual part for printing individual instrument parts. Post a small example and I will show you in detail what this is all about. Kind regards, Thies Albrecht ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with the server?
> "Cameron" == Cameron Horsburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Cameron> My lilypond-user mail seems to be coming in rather big Cameron> batches maybe a dozen or so messages at once), and now Cameron> I'm starting to receive duplicate posts. You're lucky; I seem to get 5 or 6 dozen messages a couple of times a week. I don't notice duplicate posts, but the order the messages come in is more than usually confusing. And of course reading that many messages at a time makes it more likely that I'll miss something I'm interested in. Cameron> I am aware of problems with my email at my ISP, but this Cameron> doesn't seem to be the same thing. As far as I know, I'm not having problems with any other mail. -- Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ ) (617) 661-8097 fax: (501) 641-5011 233 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: LilyPond 2.9.28 released
> "Han-Wen" == Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Han-Wen> this is (hopefully) the last release before 2.10 is released.
Han-Wen> Please report any serious bugs.
abc2ly ISSUE:
It still doesn't include the patch so that abc2ly translates a Q line
into a valid tempo specification.
Test file:
testq.abc
Description: Binary data
Patch:
? scripts/out
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /sources/lilypond/lilypond/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.5342
diff -u -r1.5342 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 30 Sep 2006 12:35:37 - 1.5342
+++ ChangeLog 30 Sep 2006 14:46:57 -
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+2006-09-30 Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * Fix abc2ly translation of Q: so that it uses new tempo syntax.
+ * Also fixes annoying error message about numerator of 1.
+
+2006-09-30 Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * abc2ly.py adds segno (S) and Coda (O) to articulations.
+
+2006-09-29 Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * abc2ly.py fix so that entering " -- " will translate to a -- in
+ the lilypond instead of a " - - "
+
2006-09-30 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lily/align-interface.cc: fix typo
@@ -55,6 +69,7 @@
* lily/source-file.cc (get_line): fix off-by-one error
and clean up some of the logic
+>>> 1.5342
2006-09-29 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lily/page-breaking.cc (make_pages): honour the first-page-number
Index: VERSION
===
RCS file: /sources/lilypond/lilypond/VERSION,v
retrieving revision 1.713
diff -u -r1.713 VERSION
--- VERSION 27 Sep 2006 09:36:54 - 1.713
+++ VERSION 30 Sep 2006 14:46:57 -
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
MAJOR_VERSION=2
MINOR_VERSION=9
PATCH_LEVEL=20
-MY_PATCH_LEVEL=
+MY_PATCH_LEVEL=lec3
Index: scripts/abc2ly.py
===
RCS file: /sources/lilypond/lilypond/scripts/abc2ly.py,v
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -r1.60 abc2ly.py
--- scripts/abc2ly.py 19 Sep 2006 13:10:25 - 1.60
+++ scripts/abc2ly.py 30 Sep 2006 14:47:01 -
@@ -254,13 +254,13 @@
if string.count(a, '/') == 1:
array=string.split(a,'/')
numerator=array[0]
-if numerator != 1:
+if int(numerator) != 1:
sys.stderr.write("abc2ly: Warning, unable to translate a Q
specification with a numerator of %s: %s\n" % (numerator, a))
array2=string.split(array[1],'=')
denominator=array2[0]
perminute=array2[1]
duration=str(string.atoi(denominator)/string.atoi(numerator))
-midi_specs=string.join(["\\tempo", duration, "=", perminute])
+midi_specs=string.join(["\n\t\t\context {\n\t\t \Score
tempoWholesPerMinute = #(ly:make-moment ", perminute, " ", duration, ")\n\t\t
}\n"])
else:
sys.stderr.write("abc2ly: Warning, unable to parse Q specification:
%s\n" % a)
@@ -617,6 +617,7 @@
def slyrics_append(a):
a = re.sub ( '_', ' _ ', a)# _ to ' _ '
a = re.sub ( '-', '- ', a)# split words with -
+a = re.sub ( ' - - ', ' -- ', a) # unless was originally " -- "
a = re.sub ( '- ', '-', a) # unless \-
a = re.sub ( '~', '_', a)# ~ to space('_')
a = re.sub ( '\*', '_ ', a)# * to to space
@@ -889,6 +890,8 @@
'~' : '^"~" ',
'J' : '',# ignore slide
'R' : '',# ignore roll
+'S' : '^\\segno',
+'O' : '^\\coda',
'v' : '^\\downbow'
}
The workaround for this issue is to run convert-ly on the abc2ly
output, but I really don't see any reason to have the bug, since we
know how to fix it.
lilypond-book ISSUE:
The bounding box problem, which makes it impossible to print
lilypond-book output double-sided correctly, still exists. If anyone
wants my script that works around it, I'll be happy to send it, but
this is another serious problem that there's no reason to make people
work around. The workaround adds a major time penalty to rebuilding a
large book.
FIXED ISSUES:
The error in the order of the figures in the figured bass context
seems to be fixed.
The problem with the disappearing UTF-8 characters which appeared in
2.9.25 or so seems to be fixed.
--
Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ )
(617) 661-8097 fax: (501) 641-5011
233 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
せん？
ȽÍoï¢nTCgðpµÜ·©H
http://5596.cc?oa10ex03
«ðÎÛÉÊbÉæé{lmF
lÈêåÅÀSÅ«é
TNF³j«Ì×ÌTCgÅ·B
http://5596.cc?oa10ex03
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linux-c1 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-c1
Re: Problems with the server?
I have indeed noticed duplicate posts, especially over the last week or two. It isn't usually as many as 5 or 6 dozen messages at a time, but it feels like it, especially when some random number of them turn out to be messages I already read. Laura Conrad wrote: "Cameron" == Cameron Horsburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Cameron> My lilypond-user mail seems to be coming in rather big Cameron> batches maybe a dozen or so messages at once), and now Cameron> I'm starting to receive duplicate posts. You're lucky; I seem to get 5 or 6 dozen messages a couple of times a week. I don't notice duplicate posts, but the order the messages come in is more than usually confusing. And of course reading that many messages at a time makes it more likely that I'll miss something I'm interested in. Cameron> I am aware of problems with my email at my ISP, but this Cameron> doesn't seem to be the same thing. As far as I know, I'm not having problems with any other mail. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Ghostscript question
I have a very old version of ghostscript that I use outside my lilypond work... I want to upgrade ghostscript on my Windows machine for the work I do in concatenating lily outputs into books, printing to PDF, etc. But I am unsure as to what ghostscript to get the GPL or the AFPL? I just want the latest stable release that I can use outside lily (because I know lilypond already installs it's own dedicated copy) and should not be affected. Should I be installing the GPL or the AFPL ghostscript to have the fewest compatibility issues? Which is better? Which one does lilypond use? thanks Rick -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ghostscript-question-tf2569799.html#a7163582 Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ghostscript question
Am 2006-11-03 um 19:03 schrieb Rick Hansen (aka RickH): But I am unsure as to what ghostscript to get the GPL or the AFPL? Since a while also the latest version of GS is available unter the GPL, see http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/ For private use it doesn't matter which you use, it's the same code. Greetlings from Lake Constance --- fiëé visuëlle Henning Hraban Ramm http://www.fiee.net http://angerweit.tikon.ch/lieder/ http://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ghostscript question
Thanks, Actually I went ahead and uninstalled my very old copy and re-installed version 8.54 which is supposed to be the most current stable one. It all went pretty painlessly and all my ghostscript-based applications are working fine, actually I upgraded all of those too: CutePDF GhostWord GhostWriter GhostView LilyPond All appears to be working better than before, dont know what I was afraid of, but I remember the last time I upgraded ghostscript and suddenly all my apps gave an error that the "gs_init.ps" file could not be found or something. This time it all went smoothly no errors so far. fiëé visuëlle wrote: > > Am 2006-11-03 um 19:03 schrieb Rick Hansen (aka RickH): > >> But I am unsure as to what ghostscript to get the GPL or the AFPL? > > Since a while also the latest version of GS is available unter the > GPL, see > http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/ > > For private use it doesn't matter which you use, it's the same code. > > Greetlings from Lake Constance > --- > fiëé visuëlle > Henning Hraban Ramm > http://www.fiee.net > http://angerweit.tikon.ch/lieder/ > http://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer) > > > > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ghostscript-question-tf2569799.html#a7168024 Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
invoke abc2ly
I have several musical tunes in ABC format. Could I see a specific example of the full command line; or command lines; for converting an ABC file to lilypond(ly)format. For the example the original ABC will be named tune.abc Thank you, Auburn Steen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: invoke abc2ly
> "Auburn" == Auburn Steen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Auburn> I have several musical tunes in ABC format. Could I see a Auburn> specific example of the full command line; or command Auburn> lines; for converting an ABC file to lilypond(ly)format. Auburn> For the example the original ABC will be named tune.abc abc2ly tune.abc This of course assumes that the abc2ly executable is in a directory on your path. And that you know what directory tune.abc is in. If you do, then you can expect tune.ly (the output from abc2ly) to be in the same directory. There's one option which may be useful -- if you want the lilypond output to obey the ABC beaming conventions instead of just using lily's ideas of how your time signature should be beamed, you might want to say: abc2ly -b tune.abc -- Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ ) (617) 661-8097 fax: (501) 641-5011 233 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
