Re: Using alien to create a .deb
Pedro Kröger wrote: > Cameron Horsburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Thanks for your reply. >>1) Does anyone with any knowledge of the internals of Lilypond deb and >>RPM packages have any idea where alien might introduce any subtle problems? > > > yes, it may. debian has a strict policy regarding where things should be > and behave (which may be overkill sometimes). converting from alien > means that things may not be in the place where the system is expecting > it to be. > > >>2) Can anyone suggest a score somewhere that I could use to 'stress >>test' my installation? > > > I suppose if it's working with one score it will work with others. I > suggest you test if lilypond-book, the conversion scripts (like abc2ly), > emacs-mode, vi-mode, documentation, etc are working. > I've run a few tests so far (I've since moved to 2.7.13). abc2ly works, although I've got to do some work on the output to get lily to compile the resulting .ly. I suppose that fact that it produces output means it's installed properly. Lilypond-book seems to work better than it did before, so that's a good thing. I still have access to emacs-mode. Would the relevant files have been replaced? I haven't tested the documentation because that's provided in a separate package. I'm happy accessing the web version of it for now. Another poster suggested I run 'lintian' over my newly created deb. Apart from a few trivial errors (licensing details, maintainer addresses and so on), a few things come up which somebody with a clue might be able to help me with. For starters, there are a lot of complaints about permissions being wrong. For example: W: lilypond: non-standard-dir-perm usr/ 0700 != 0755 W: lilypond: non-standard-dir-perm usr/share/ 0700 != 0755 W: lilypond: non-standard-dir-perm usr/share/doc/ 0700 != 0755 I'll assume for now that these can be ignored, although I'd appreciate some explanation of what these mean. I've looked at a few of the files, and they don't seem to have the permissions Lintian's worried about. (Is there a mask applied?) W: lilypond: script-not-executable /usr/share/lilypond/2.7.13/make/ly.make Do I have to worry about this? The dependencies don't seem to be recorded in the file, but lintian picks them up anyway. For example: E: lilypond: python-script-but-no-python-dep ./usr/bin/abc2ly E: lilypond: python-script-but-no-python-dep ./usr/bin/convert-ly E: lilypond: python-script-but-no-python-dep ./usr/bin/etf2ly I've got no idea what this is: E: lilypond: unstripped-binary-or-object ./usr/share/lilypond/2.7.13/python/midi.so My completely untrained eye tells me that there is nothing here that should stop it from working, but I wouldn't expect Debian to uploading it any day either! Does anyone with any idea about these things have anything to add? Thanks for your time! Cameron ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
linebreak problem, sheet with chords, notes and lyrics
Hi,
the manual shows me sth. like this:
\repeat unfold 4 {
s2. \noBreak s2. \noBreak
s2. \noBreak s2. \noBreak
s2. \noBreak s2. \break }
This is ok, but I do not want to use polyphony (beams, rest postition...), so
how can I combine the skips with other notes?
I have the following lilypond file:
\version "2.7.9"
\paper {linewidth = 180 \mm}
\header {
title = "test"
poet = "test" }
linebreak = \repeat unfold 4 {
s2. \noBreak s2. \noBreak
s2. \noBreak s2. \noBreak
s2. \noBreak s2. \break }
melody = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\key f \major
\time 3/4
\linebreak
c2. d e f g a b c }
text = \lyricmode {
Aaa2. Bee Cee Dee e
}
harmonies = \chordmode {
f2. c/e d:m c4 g:7m/d c bes2.:maj
}
\score {
<<
\context ChordNames { \harmonies }
\context Voice = one {
\autoBeamOff
\melody }
\lyricsto "one" \new Lyrics \text
>>
\layout { }
}
-
Here I have a a big gap in the score. If I use \linebreak in the \score part,
I get an additional staff. So how could I solve the problem?
Thanks
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: giving up frustrated ... :-(
Hello list, hello /Mats, You wrote: > A quick search at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages will help you > find libltdl. Okay, I didn't look for libltdl or libltdl3, but for libltdl.so.3 with apt-cache search. :-I With apt-cache search this libltdl3 it was to find. Thanks and Best Regards Roland ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
The frust is growing up ... Was: Re: giving up frustrated ... :-(
Hello list, hello Jan, You wrote: > try >apt-get install libltdl3 Thank You, this did work, but afterwards there were two other libs to install, one after another ... That did work also, and then lilypond --version gave a good output. But then came the next desillusionation: Trying a little example with lilypond example-1.ly results in an error message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/noten/2.6.3.1/probe > lilypond example-1.ly GNU LilyPond 2.6.3.1 »example-1.ly« wird verarbeitet Analysieren... Interpretation der Musik...[2] Vorverarbeitung der grafischen Elemente... Berechne Zeilenumbrüche... Zeilenumbrüche werden berechnet... Layout nach »example-1.ps« ausgeben... /home/roland/.local/bin/lilypond-bin-2.6.3.1: relocation error: /home/roland/.local/lib/libguile.so.12: symbol regexec, version GLIBC_2.3.4 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference and creates only a .ps-file with 0 bytes. It's quite awful ... In the past it was so easy ... I would like to spend my time on typesetting further scores (under all for mutopia also) with lilypond, and not on failing tries to install the program ... :-( > or the fresh 2.6.4 package, that has libtool included too. On the lilypond-website I could only find 2.6.4 for fedora or as source code ... Best Regards Roland ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Link to http://www.lilypond.org/web/ in WeLoveSongs directory
Dear Sir/Madam, We are glad to inform you that a link to http://www.lilypond.org/web/ has been posted to Links Directory(http://www.welovesongs.com/dir/). Your URL will be listed at: http://www.welovesongs.com/dir/Songwriting/Songwriting-Software/ We truly hope to send many visitors your way. Thank you WeLoveSongs Administration Team www.welovesongs.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
problem with position of bar rest
Hi, I have an interesting problem here. In the first bar of "example.pdf",
the bar rest of the upper voice is too close to the notes on the lower
voice. How do I move the rest vertically upwards? I can't use pitched rests
as the bar rest would move to the left side of the bar.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Seng
\version "2.6.3"
\relative {
\key c \major
\time 4/4
<< { R1 } \\ { e'2 d } >> R1^\fermataMarkup
}
example.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
First Measure bar
Title: First Measure bar
All,
If I have a file with this:
{
\time 4/4
\repeat volta 2
{
c''2
c''
}
}
I get a single measure and a close repeat at the end of it. How do I get LilyPond to put the openning repeat in there as well? I tried this:
{
\time 4/4
\bar "|:"
\repeat volta 2
{
c''2
c''
}
}
but that puts the time signature inside the repeat. I tried moving the
\bar to various places but nothing would put it where I want it. I would like to have the symbols in this order:
1. Clef
2. Time signature
3. Open repeat
4. The rest of the music.
Thanks for any help you can provide.
Stephen
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Percent repeats at line breaks (v2.7.12)
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 15.39, Thies Albrecht wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> Any idea or hint on how to automatically expand percent repeats once at
> line breaks. For example
>
> \repeat percent 50 {c d e f}
>
> should lead to several line breaks. At each new line the repeat should
> be unfolded instead of printing a percent symbol.
>
> A question about that by someone in an earlier thread never led to an
> answer.
Line breaks are calculated after the repeats have been expanded, so this isn't
possible unless you do manual line breaks after the repeat (it could be
possible to invent a \percentBreak, which forces percent repeats to be
unfolded once after the break).
Insertion of such breaks _could_ be automated with hacks similar to
LaTeX's .aux files, but that solution is probably too dirty/inelegant to be
implemented in lilypond.
--
Erik
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: First Measure bar
I have the same problem. I don't know if lilypond can do that, but I use
the following cheap trick:
{
\time 4/4
\partial 128 s128 % create an empty tiny partial measure before the
repeat
\repeat volta 2
{
c''2
c''
}
}
which works form me. I'd recommend you to use raggedright=##t in the
layout for a single bar score though.
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:19:15 +0200, Kress, Stephen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
If I have a file with this:
{
\time 4/4
\repeat volta 2
{
c''2
c''
}
}
I get a single measure and a close repeat at the end of it. How do I
get LilyPond to put the openning repeat in there as well? I tried this:
{
\time 4/4
\bar "|:"
\repeat volta 2
{
c''2
c''
}
}
but that puts the time signature inside the repeat. I tried moving the
\bar to various places but nothing would put it where I want it. I
would like to have the symbols in this order:
1. Clef
2. Time signature
3. Open repeat
4. The rest of the music.
Thanks for any help you can provide.
Stephen
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Unusual Repeat Alternatives
I'm writing out some music at the moment which has an odd repeat structure in it. There are two distinct alternatives, a very long one and a short one. The long one is called after repeats 1 and 3, and the short one after repeat 2. So the music should look roughly like this: _ ___ | 1--3. :| | 2. The default method in lilypond for repeated alternatives labels the above as 1--2 and 3, assuming that the first alternative is played twice. I guess this is reasonable, but is there a way to override it to state the repeats in the correct way in this case? Thanks for your help, Jennifer -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 267.12.4 - Release Date: 18/10/2005 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
