Re: problem with regtest's index.html
Harm, On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:09:08 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote: > Am Di., 26. Feb. 2019 um 11:55 Uhr schrieb James Lowe : > > > > Harm > > > > > > On 26/02/2019 00:12:41, Thomas Morley > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > after running the regtests the file > > `lilypond-git/build/out/test-results/index.html` is created. > > Opening it in a browser the very first line is: > > click to filter rows by type: ly / profiling / signature / midi / > > log / gittxt / reset to all > > Those filtering-links don't work anymore, at least for me. > > > > Can someone confirm? > > > > Thanks, > > Harm > > > > *** > > > > They appear to work for me - I used Firefox on Ubuntu 1604 > > > > James > > > > I can't make it work with > $ firefox --version > Mozilla Firefox 65.0 > on Ubuntu 18.04 64 bit > > Though, all's fine with chromium-browser > > > Do we have a problem or is it firefox? > > I'd say it could be you. While I am on 1604 my FF version is the same as yours. I don't use any special FF settings for my patch test (as I do for my home set up) rig so perhaps you are using an extension or have set up some 'blocking of something' that is intefering with this for you? James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Gvim point and click guide
Andrew, On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:57:09 +1100, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Hi Federico, > > Yes, I can generalise this to Linux not just Ubuntu. > > There are bound to be mistakes in it! > > Andrew If you want to submit your own git formatted patch (and don't have commit access) I can help shepherd this for you. Else you can send me directly the text you want to add, bear in mind that I'll need to know where you think it should go in the doc and that putting in non-LP generated images (i.e. using LilyPond-book) is not something we do in the main docs, so your descriptions need to be useful without pictures. I can then at least create an issue tracker and, time permitting make the edits myself. rergards James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
GSOC and stylesheet work
Hi all: I'm an undergraduate student at McGill University. As I've personally wanted to tweak LilyPond to improve the stylistic output of my scores, I was hoping to do some work on LilyPond this summer, perhaps through GNU's involvement in GSOC. I have some background in font design (although mostly with outline fonts, not METAFONT, as I've only messed around with that), and would be interested in improving either the font or stylesheet support (so, sort of touching on two suggestions in the project list from last year). My main caveat is that I'm not especially experienced in Scheme (mostly having just messed around with it for LilyPond purposes), though I'm eager to learn more and interested in working on these issues, esp. if a mentor is available. Are there any comments/suggestions on the current status of these components and what I might be best advised to look at/work on? Thanks! DBM ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?
On 2/26/2019 12:30 PM, Karlin High wrote: the "hackintosh" and Virtual Machine possibilities I expect Apple's this uptight about using their hardware because their business model for macOS has income coming from hardware sales instead of software. Instructions I've seen for getting macOS running in a VM include adding a configuration string like this: "ourhardworkbythesewordsguardedpleasedontsteal(c)AppleComputerInc" -- Karlin High Missouri, USA ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: GSOC and stylesheet work
Hi Daniel, Am 27.02.19 um 15:00 schrieb Daniel Benjamin Miller: Hi all: I'm an undergraduate student at McGill University. As I've personally wanted to tweak LilyPond to improve the stylistic output of my scores, I was hoping to do some work on LilyPond this summer, perhaps through GNU's involvement in GSOC. I have some background in font design (although mostly with outline fonts, not METAFONT, as I've only messed around with that), and would be interested in improving either the font or stylesheet support (so, sort of touching on two suggestions in the project list from last year). Great. Be assured that the project suggestions listed on http://lilypond.org/google-summer-of-code.html are strictly that: suggestions. There's absolutely nothing speaking against tailoring an alternative project. My main caveat is that I'm not especially experienced in Scheme (mostly having just messed around with it for LilyPond purposes), though I'm eager to learn more and interested in working on these issues, esp. if a mentor is available. Are there any comments/suggestions on the current status of these components and what I might be best advised to look at/work on? This is a bit difficult to assess since you give us a pretty sparse idea of your skillset. "Not especially experienced in Scheme" is a bit vague, especially as we have no idea what "eager to learn more" would turn out in practice. If you're interested in font design there would be no way around dealing with METAFONT, the other options will require dealing with Scheme and/or C++, to various extents. Do you have any experience with C++? If you should be heading toward a project that requires dealing with Scheme you should maybe try to familiarize yourself with it and show yourself and us how that would be going. AFAICS with any projects in the realm of fonts/stylesheets there would be mentors available, so you can go ahead and try to figure out somewhat more concretely what you might be interested in. Best Urs Thanks! DBM ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?
Karlin High writes: > On 2/26/2019 12:30 PM, Karlin High wrote: >> the "hackintosh" and Virtual Machine possibilities > > I expect Apple's this uptight about using their hardware because their > business model for macOS has income coming from hardware sales instead > of software. That makes little enough sense for a development environment since the actually relevant sales are for the machines running the resulting applications. If people can just buy one Mac to develop software running on 10 non-Macs, Apple hasn't gained anything worthwhile. In our case people are restrained from using one non-Mac to develop software running on 10 Macs. Using software that cannot sensibly be offered in Apple's Appstore. This is not as much about protecting the hardware sales model (which definitely was the case when desktop Macs were much more relevant but precedes this kind of Xcode license) but about keeping the walled gardens locked up. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: problem with regtest's index.html
Am Mi., 27. Feb. 2019 um 10:08 Uhr schrieb James Lowe : > > Harm, > > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:09:08 +0100, Thomas Morley > wrote: > > > Am Di., 26. Feb. 2019 um 11:55 Uhr schrieb James Lowe : > > > > > > Harm > > > > > > > > > On 26/02/2019 00:12:41, Thomas Morley > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > after running the regtests the file > > > `lilypond-git/build/out/test-results/index.html` is created. > > > Opening it in a browser the very first line is: > > > click to filter rows by type: ly / profiling / signature / midi / > > > log / gittxt / reset to all > > > Those filtering-links don't work anymore, at least for me. > > > > > > Can someone confirm? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Harm > > > > > > *** > > > > > > They appear to work for me - I used Firefox on Ubuntu 1604 > > > > > > James > > > > > > > I can't make it work with > > $ firefox --version > > Mozilla Firefox 65.0 > > on Ubuntu 18.04 64 bit > > > > Though, all's fine with chromium-browser > > > > > > Do we have a problem or is it firefox? > > > > > > I'd say it could be you. > > While I am on 1604 my FF version is the same as yours. > > I don't use any special FF settings for my patch test (as I do for my home > set up) rig so perhaps you are using an extension or have set up some > 'blocking of something' that is intefering with this for you? > > James > Uhh -- Ohh You're right. Default-NoScript had disabled those links, it didn't do so in earlier versions, though. Thanks for the hint. Cheers, Harm ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel