Re: Point and Click does not work on Windows

2013-05-15 Thread ArnoldTheresius
Eluze wrote
> ...
> I think the new files and registry entries should be added to the next
> release - the feed-back will tell us if we missed something (and everybody
> can still go back to the old - and partially not working - version)!
> 
> Eluze

Hello, here are my tow diff files.
diff_gub-master.txt
  
diff_lilypond-2.17.18.txt
  
The file pathes in this diff files may be different from the entries
required for the git patch upload.
Eluze, check the /lilypond diff/ please, and submit it when possible.

When preparing the diffs, I wondered if the /argv0 relocation/ in
/lilypond-invoke-editor/ will work for linux, too. In the UBUNTU VM where I
installed the version 2.17.18, the DATADIR did end with "current", too, not
with the version number, just the same as on Windows. So I did choose
another method to make the argv0 relocation work again: check read access to
the directory .../2.17.18 (resp. the current version number), and if this
fails use .../current instead. This made it working for both Windows and
UBUNTU.

In the /gub-master diff/ I only modified the strings for two windows
registry settings done at the installation, they reflect the changes I did
manually on my computer: I removed the file extension .scm from
lilypond-invoke-editor in the textedit-open command, and I removed »-e main«
in both the textedit-open and the scm-file-open command.

ArnoldTheresius



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Point-and-Click-does-not-work-on-Windows-tp115986p145932.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Beams: be transparent if the first stem is transparent; issue 2866 (issue 9239046)

2013-05-15 Thread dak


https://codereview.appspot.com/9239046/diff/1/scm/music-functions.scm
File scm/music-functions.scm (left):

https://codereview.appspot.com/9239046/diff/1/scm/music-functions.scm#oldcode1947
scm/music-functions.scm:1947: (map (lambda (st)
That's a case for for-each, not map.

https://codereview.appspot.com/9239046/

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: stylesheet structure

2013-05-15 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Urs,

> I don't know if it's the _best_ and _most flexible_ structure, but it
> definitely looks like a _good_ and _flexible_ structure. 

I probably can't ask for any more at this stage.  ;)

> (Just one question: Why is 6. named as it is?)

Good question. I guess I'm thinking of a situation where one wants to restyle a 
certain piece of 'piano' (the "top level") music:

Berceuse_Henle_concert.ly
\include Berceuse_notes.ily
\include piano_Henle_concert.ily

Berceuse_Barenreiter_letter_landscape.ly
\include Berceuse_notes.ily
\include piano_Barenreiter_letter_landscape.ily

Somehow that hierarchy seemed more logical. Thoughts?

Thanks,
Kieren.


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: Point and Click does not work on Windows

2013-05-15 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - 
From: "ArnoldTheresius" 

To: 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: Point and Click does not work on Windows



Eluze wrote

...
I think the new files and registry entries should be added to the next
release - the feed-back will tell us if we missed something (and 
everybody

can still go back to the old - and partially not working - version)!

Eluze


Hello, here are my tow diff files.
diff_gub-master.txt

diff_lilypond-2.17.18.txt

The file pathes in this diff files may be different from the entries
required for the git patch upload.
Eluze, check the /lilypond diff/ please, and submit it when possible.

When preparing the diffs, I wondered if the /argv0 relocation/ in
/lilypond-invoke-editor/ will work for linux, too. In the UBUNTU VM where 
I
installed the version 2.17.18, the DATADIR did end with "current", too, 
not

with the version number, just the same as on Windows. So I did choose
another method to make the argv0 relocation work again: check read access 
to

the directory .../2.17.18 (resp. the current version number), and if this
fails use .../current instead. This made it working for both Windows and
UBUNTU.

In the /gub-master diff/ I only modified the strings for two windows
registry settings done at the installation, they reflect the changes I did
manually on my computer: I removed the file extension .scm from
lilypond-invoke-editor in the textedit-open command, and I removed »-e 
main«

in both the textedit-open and the scm-file-open command.

ArnoldTheresius



This is something for me to do before the next LilyPond release.

--
Phil Holmes 



___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: stylesheet structure

2013-05-15 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Urs,

> Does that mean "concert" represents a paper format?

Yes: 9x12 (or sometimes up to 9.5x12.5).

Cheers,
Kieren.

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: stylesheet structure

2013-05-15 Thread Urs Liska
Am Mittwoch, den 15.05.2013, 06:03 -0400 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Urs,
> 
> > I don't know if it's the _best_ and _most flexible_ structure, but it
> > definitely looks like a _good_ and _flexible_ structure. 
> 
> I probably can't ask for any more at this stage.  ;)

Exactly.
You should take that as a "yes, but I won't take any responsibility"
answer ;-)

> 
> > (Just one question: Why is 6. named as it is?)
> 
> Good question. I guess I'm thinking of a situation where one wants to restyle 
> a certain piece of 'piano' (the "top level") music:
> 
> Berceuse_Henle_concert.ly
> \include Berceuse_notes.ily
> \include piano_Henle_concert.ily
> 
> Berceuse_Barenreiter_letter_landscape.ly
> \include Berceuse_notes.ily
> \include piano_Barenreiter_letter_landscape.ily
> 
> Somehow that hierarchy seemed more logical. Thoughts?

Does that mean "concert" represents a paper format? Then it is clear.
Otherwise I'd still not understand the naming scheme.

Urs

> 
> Thanks,
> Kieren.
> 



___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: stylesheet structure

2013-05-15 Thread Urs Liska
Am Sonntag, den 12.05.2013, 21:51 -0400 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hello all,
> 
> I'm working on putting together some "house style" stylesheets, and wanted to 
> see if I had the best structure…
> 
> As one example, I'm tweaking up a Henle piano score stylesheet (e.g. 
> Beethoven Piano Sonatas Urtext, ca. 1980):
> 
> 1. Lilypond.ily
> -- basic settings [that really should be Lilypond defaults!]
> 
> 2. Score.ily
> -- \Score context settings [that really should be Lilypond defaults!]
> -- \include Lilypond.ily
> 
> 3. PianoStaff.ily
> -- \PianoStaff context settings [that really should be Lilypond defaults!]
> -- \include Score.ily
> 
> 4. Henle_house.ily
> -- settings that are Henle- (but not piano-) specific
> 
> 5. Henle_piano.ily
> -- settings that are Henle-piano-specific
> -- \include Henle_house.ily and \PianoStaff.ily
> 
> 6. piano_Henle_concert.ily
> -- final settings that make it all look like (e.g.) the Beethoven Piano 
> Sonatas edition
> -- \include Henle_piano.ily
> 
> Does that look like the best (i.e., most flexible) structure?

I don't know if it's the _best_ and _most flexible_ structure, but it
definitely looks like a _good_ and _flexible_ structure. 
You can modularely exchange files at any level, and you can include any
style with one line in your main .ly file.
(Just one question: Why is 6. named as it is?)
I'd suggest to go for it.

And I think we all would be quite interested in your results ;-)

Urs

> 
> Thanks,
> Kieren.
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-u...@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


LSR-snippets: "Creating a delayed turn"

2013-05-15 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi,

the LSR currently contains two snippets about "Creating a delayed turn".

The old one:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=573

The new, not yet approved one:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=877

Should the newer snippet _replace_ the older or is it worth a second snippet?


-Harm

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: Point and Click does not work on Windows

2013-05-15 Thread Eluze
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
> This is something for me to do before the next LilyPond release.

thanks, Phil - I wouldn't know how to do this!

Eluze



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Point-and-Click-does-not-work-on-Windows-tp115986p145985.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: Point and Click does not work on Windows

2013-05-15 Thread ArnoldTheresius
Eluze wrote
> 
> Phil Holmes-2 wrote
>> This is something for me to do before the next LilyPond release.
> thanks, Phil - I wouldn't know how to do this!
> 
> Eluze

Thank you, too.

ArnoldTheresius



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Point-and-Click-does-not-work-on-Windows-tp115986p145994.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel