Am Mittwoch, den 15.05.2013, 06:03 -0400 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: > Hi Urs, > > > I don't know if it's the _best_ and _most flexible_ structure, but it > > definitely looks like a _good_ and _flexible_ structure. > > I probably can't ask for any more at this stage. ;)
Exactly. You should take that as a "yes, but I won't take any responsibility" answer ;-) > > > (Just one question: Why is 6. named as it is?) > > Good question. I guess I'm thinking of a situation where one wants to restyle > a certain piece of 'piano' (the "top level") music: > > Berceuse_Henle_concert.ly > \include Berceuse_notes.ily > \include piano_Henle_concert.ily > > Berceuse_Barenreiter_letter_landscape.ly > \include Berceuse_notes.ily > \include piano_Barenreiter_letter_landscape.ily > > Somehow that hierarchy seemed more logical. Thoughts? Does that mean "concert" represents a paper format? Then it is clear. Otherwise I'd still not understand the naming scheme. Urs > > Thanks, > Kieren. > _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
