Re: Date and time format
Mica Mijatovic wrote on 2006-04-07 4:24: > Was Fri, 07 Apr 2006, at 01:31:40 +0400, > when lusfert wrote: > >>> Is it possible to change date format in GPG output? > > I tried this to figure out many times but couldn't. > > I also expected that GPG will take over the local User's setting of the > OS, as most programs do, but not, it doesn't. I don't know reasons. > That's very bad. :( I haven't found any problem report about this at http://bugs.gnupg.org/ Should I create a new one? http://bugs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?debug=&database=gnupg&cmd=create -- Regards OpenPGP Key ID: 0x9E353B56500B8987 Encrypted e-mail preferred. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Date and time format
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: TIGER192 Was Sat, 08 Apr 2006, at 13:58:45 +0400, when lusfert wrote: Is it possible to change date format in GPG output? >> >> I tried this to figure out many times but couldn't. >> >> I also expected that GPG will take over the local User's setting of the >> OS, as most programs do, but not, it doesn't. I don't know reasons. >> > That's very bad. :( > I haven't found any problem report about this at http://bugs.gnupg.org/ > Should I create a new one? > http://bugs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?debug=&database=gnupg&cmd=create I couldn't classify it as a bug, rather a matter of a style of coding, where the optimal "tweak" of related code(s) has been neglected. An omission rather. *** I see, by the way and by, that my previous message arrived with signature BAD (at least here was so), so just to confirm that the entire signed text was mine. If the Archive needs it signed again, I'll do that. - -- Mica PGP keys nestled at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/ ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given in my "From|Reply To" field(s). ~~~ Don't put a cat on your lap, it hurts real bad! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEVAwUBRDeSULSpHvHEUtv8AQaaSAf+Mq881aAgz5bHKC35pVc3T3FWVKslyIPb IF/bVFNyOAfPF2fax3puSmlYYIgqZ4dV9ziVSp/sJyobvg7qUNil4vDm/RPwHj/A n6hu2inFetiRQg62GD/LjkXtI2GwrK/2TzVh6c9raMPnmDxlkfPnt3acs0Rgl/Al lGEkBKpDrwXYwWNZd/aiinEjaYqrsuf7JwZOL74+h17iFyNE6bY5EBe9igUVslgn FjNOSXkBl0ivejl6lR4mYmADX35AJk3w60JIjTe77QFb/97k4tbZT7aKEBGkxxiX 6yb0krkivLPgxYqhWjflBrwW3XxmFPCwB+WN1W0QAwCsynECAx+LUg== =Vuvu -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
auto-key-locate pka (gpg version 1.4.3)
Hello, according to the readme and man pages, I should be able to use gpg --auto-key-locate pka --encrypt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to encrypt a message to this user even if I would not have the corresponding public key, if the dns system would be set up correctly. ok, the latest is not done yet, but is work in progress. But why I come to the list: the parameter "pka" seems not to be recognised by my version of pgp (1.4.3, downloaded as binary for Windows from gnupg.org) Did I miss something? Neither the new parameters pka nor cert are working. ldap and keyserver give no error. using gpg --auto-key-locate pka I get the following error message: gpg: invalid auto-key-locate list Any help, or a link to another version of gpg with this support compiled in, would be appreciated. Thank you very much, Dominique smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: auto-key-locate pka (gpg version 1.4.3)
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 12:17:51AM +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote: > Hello, > > according to the readme and man pages, I should be able to use > gpg --auto-key-locate pka --encrypt [EMAIL PROTECTED] > to encrypt a message to this user even if I would not have the > corresponding public key, if the dns system would be set up correctly. > > ok, the latest is not done yet, but is work in progress. > > But why I come to the list: > the parameter "pka" seems not to be recognised by my version of pgp > (1.4.3, downloaded as binary for Windows from gnupg.org) > > Did I miss something? Neither the new parameters pka nor cert are > working. ldap and keyserver give no error. > using gpg --auto-key-locate pka I get the following error message: > gpg: invalid auto-key-locate list This means that the build of GnuPG you has no DNS support (pka and cert require DNS support, and ldap and keyserver don't). David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: auto-key-locate pka (gpg version 1.4.3)
David Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 12:17:51AM +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote: >> Did I miss something? Neither the new parameters pka nor cert are >> working. ldap and keyserver give no error. >> using gpg --auto-key-locate pka I get the following error message: >> gpg: invalid auto-key-locate list > > This means that the build of GnuPG you has no DNS support (pka and > cert require DNS support, and ldap and keyserver don't). That's very bad, as I downloaded the official binaries from gnupg.org. Will there be a different version that supports this new feature? I think it's a very interestnig approach to distribute keys. Indeed the biggest problem that exists at the moment. Dominique smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
