-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: TIGER192
Was Sat, 08 Apr 2006, at 13:58:45 +0400,
when lusfert wrote:
>>>> Is it possible to change date format in GPG output?
>>
>> I tried this to figure out many times but couldn't.
>>
>> I also expected that GPG will take over the local User's setting of the
>> OS, as most programs do, but not, it doesn't. I don't know reasons.
>>
> That's very bad. :(
> I haven't found any problem report about this at http://bugs.gnupg.org/
> Should I create a new one?
> http://bugs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?debug=&database=gnupg&cmd=create
I couldn't classify it as a bug, rather a matter of a style of coding,
where the optimal "tweak" of related code(s) has been neglected. An
omission rather.
***
I see, by the way and by, that my previous message arrived with
signature BAD (at least here was so), so just to confirm that the entire
signed text was mine. If the Archive needs it signed again, I'll do
that.
- --
Mica
PGP keys nestled at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/
~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given
in my "From|Reply To" field(s). ~~~
Don't put a cat on your lap, it hurts real bad!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEVAwUBRDeSULSpHvHEUtv8AQaaSAf+Mq881aAgz5bHKC35pVc3T3FWVKslyIPb
IF/bVFNyOAfPF2fax3puSmlYYIgqZ4dV9ziVSp/sJyobvg7qUNil4vDm/RPwHj/A
n6hu2inFetiRQg62GD/LjkXtI2GwrK/2TzVh6c9raMPnmDxlkfPnt3acs0Rgl/Al
lGEkBKpDrwXYwWNZd/aiinEjaYqrsuf7JwZOL74+h17iFyNE6bY5EBe9igUVslgn
FjNOSXkBl0ivejl6lR4mYmADX35AJk3w60JIjTe77QFb/97k4tbZT7aKEBGkxxiX
6yb0krkivLPgxYqhWjflBrwW3XxmFPCwB+WN1W0QAwCsynECAx+LUg==
=Vuvu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
