[gentoo-user] Emerge break

2005-05-03 Thread Pere Gentoo
Hi,

while finishing an emerge process of KDE, the system shutdown. Problem!!

The process has been made on a PIII. Slow System, Two days working.

If I emerge again KDE, what would happens? Emerge will continue on the
point i t has break? or it will begin again from the beginning? If it
begins again could there be any problem whit the files it have
generated the first emerge process?

What is the best way to correct that?

Thanks in advance,

Pere

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge break

2005-05-03 Thread Pere Gentoo
Thanks,

The sysem has been rebooted.

I get an error after emerge --resume

"Emerge: It seems we have nothing to resume..."

Thanks again, 

Pere


On 5/3/05, Karsten Baumgarten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> emerge --resume
> 
> Pere Gentoo wrote:
> | Hi,
> |
> | while finishing an emerge process of KDE, the system shutdown. Problem!!
> |
> | The process has been made on a PIII. Slow System, Two days working.
> |
> | If I emerge again KDE, what would happens? Emerge will continue on the
> | point i t has break? or it will begin again from the beginning? If it
> | begins again could there be any problem whit the files it have
> | generated the first emerge process?
> |
> | What is the best way to correct that?
> |
> | Thanks in advance,
> |
> | Pere
> |
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFCd7uwgUNlsZQzobwRAmnxAJ9pWjqPNDMdOhYf1ATXHdq/+WMenACfd6Ri
> E+gH4X05XJprB2ZViJJAuFI=
> =0Q/U
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
>

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge break

2005-05-03 Thread Pere Gentoo
Thanks,

Two questions:

A.- I could repet emerge with no problem, my questions are:

   1. Is there any way to resume the process and win time?
   2. If not. Would be any problem with the files that the first
partial emerge would have left on the file system?

B.- I'm new on Gentoo, well, really I'm new on linux.

   1.- emerge -avt, shows me which ebuilds will install, isn't it?
Is it possible to select some of them but not the others?
   2.- the sufixes of each ebuild which give me emerge -avt, are
the required/optional/suggested USE switches?

Thanks again, 

Pere

On 5/3/05, Christoph Gysin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pere Gentoo wrote:
> 
> >If I emerge again KDE, what would happens? Emerge will continue on the
> >point i t has break? or it will begin again from the beginning? If it
> >begins again could there be any problem whit the files it have
> >generated the first emerge process?
> >
> >
> IIRC kde is a metapackage, so its not really one big package. It just
> depends on everything that is needed.
> Try: "emerge -avt kde", it will show what needs to be merged to complete
> kde.
> 
> >What is the best way to correct that?
> >
> >
> $ emerge -avt kde
> 
> If it fails at the same point (with the same error message), try
> searching bugzilla [1] with the package name and version.
> 
> If you can't find anything related, post the first error message in a
> reply to this thread.
> 
> Christoph
> 
>  [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org
> 
> --
> echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'<*>'|sed 's. ..'|tr "<*> !#:2" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
>

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge break

2005-05-03 Thread Pere Gentoo
On 5/3/05, Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> Haven't tested it but i know ;) (this ML) that you must also have
> FEATURES=...keepwork... as an option in your /etc/make.conf file.
> Then use 'emerge --resume' to continue, but don't emerge anything before
> running this command. It can resume only last emerge IMHO.
> The logic tells me this (keepwork) will cost you some extra space, or
> maybe not?
> HTH. Rumen
> 

Does this option, remember the last emerge done, and then it repeat
automaticly, or have in mind the work done, and then not repats the
part of the work which has been done previously?

Thanks,

Pere

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge break

2005-05-03 Thread Pere Gentoo
On 5/3/05, Christoph Gysin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rumen Yotov wrote:
> 
> >>Two questions:
> >>
> >>A.- I could repet emerge with no problem, my questions are:
> >>
> >>  1. Is there any way to resume the process and win time?
> >>
> >>
> Short answer: No.
> Long answer: read on below.
> 
> >>  2. If not. Would be any problem with the files that the first
> >>partial emerge would have left on the file system?
> >>
> >>
> No. If the package failed to compile, nothing has been installed in your
> system. If it failed during copying the files to your real system and
> emerge it again, they simply get overwritten.
> 
> >>B.- I'm new on Gentoo, well, really I'm new on linux.
> >>
> >>
> Welcome to gentoo, the best flavour of linux!
> 
> >>  1.- emerge -avt, shows me which ebuilds will install, isn't it?
> >>Is it possible to select some of them but not the others?
> >>
> >>
> No. All the other shown packages necessary to build and run the package
> your about to install.
> 
> >>  2.- the sufixes of each ebuild which give me emerge -avt, are
> >>the required/optional/suggested USE switches?
> >>
> >>
> These are the USE-switches available to customize this package.
> 
> [ebuild   R   ] net-misc/unison-2.12.2  -doc +gtk +gtk2 0 kB
> 
> Here, unison gets built with gtk and gtk2 support, but without
> documentation.
> 

Then how to specify I would like the documentation too. Adding the USE
flag on make.conf? or as an optional parameter on emerge?

If I leave make.conf with no one USE flag, then each package will
install with its default flags, isn't it? Would this be a good idea
for a begginer?



> FEATURE="keepwork" will cost you *a lot* of diskspace. If you build a
> complete system with this enabled, be prepared to spend a 50Gb+ disk
> just for /var/tmp/portage.
> 

I see keepwork is not a really good idea.


> Christoph
> 

Thanks for all

Would be easy to go inside Gentoo with an active list like this. I think, no?


Pere

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
I see, in Gentoo, we work for runlevel groups and not the individual
runlevels 0,1,2,3,4,5 and 6. They are resumed as boot, single,
nonetwork and default.

Fine. But how to get a runlevel as runlevel 3 on other distributions,
with the same services and daemons as runevelel 5 or default but
without graphical environment?

Can I create my own runlevel under directory /etc/runlevels?

Thanks in advance,

-- 

Pere ( --  Aesux  -- )

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
Yes, of course, this is the unique differences between runlevel 3 and
5, but I think it should be enough, isn't it?

I think have or not have the X working was a big difference about
resource using, isn't it? Why not maintain this difference with a run
level?

Thanks,



On 5/7/05, A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 May 2005, Mark Shields wrote:
> 
> > I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to).  See:
> > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level
> 
> AFAIK, the only difference between 5 and 3 is the lack of X in 3.
> So you can achieve the same result merely by disabling xdm from starting
> up.
> 
> 
> >

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
On 5/7/05, Mark Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to).  See:
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level
> 

Thanks, this is what I was looking for. And of course this is the
logical solution.

Thanks,

-- 

Pere ( --  Aesux  -- )

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
On 5/7/05, Mark Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to).  See:
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level
> 

And after creating the new runlevel, is it possible to modify
/etc/inittab so we could define the new runlevel in it without
modifying grub menu. And then runlevel 3 would return to its default
meaning.

-- 

Pere ( --  Aesux  -- )

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] euse error

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
Hi,

I'm getting an error using euse. 

Here is the stdout + stderr from euse -c


readlink: too many arguments
Try `readlink --help' for more information.
/usr/bin/euse: line 199: /make.defaults: No such file or directory
readlink: too many arguments
Try `readlink --help' for more information.
/usr/bin/euse: line 199: /make.defaults: No such file or directory
readlink: too many arguments
Try `readlink --help' for more information.
readlink: too many arguments
Try `readlink --help' for more information.
ERROR: /make.defaults is not readable



Thanks in advance,


-- 

Pere ( --  Aesux  -- )

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] euse error

2005-05-08 Thread Pere Gentoo
Thanks,


-- 

Pere ( --  Aesux  -- )

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-08 Thread Pere Gentoo
What about this way:

I've seen it on http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level

# mkdir /etc/runlevels/noxdm

# rc-update add x noxdm(add all services from the default
runlevel except xdm)

Modify /etc/inittab

id:3:initdefault:    id:3:initnoxdm:

l3:3:wait:/sbin/rc default  l3:3:wait:/sbin/rc noxdm

Whit this, I have runlevel 5 as default and runlevel 3 as the new one
without xdm

Could this be a good idea?

Thanks in advance,



-- 

Pere ( --  Aesux  -- )

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list