[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due ken69267 retirement

2012-03-04 Thread Pacho Ramos
Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
app-misc/ignuit
app-portage/gpytage
app-shells/squirrelsh (this only needs a proxy-maintainer)


Thanks for taking them




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[gentoo-dev] media-optical and net-zope herds are empty

2012-03-04 Thread Pacho Ramos
Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like herds
are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think we should drop
that herds and move their packages to maintainer-needed in a week or so.

What do you think? 



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-dev] media-optical and net-zope herds are empty

2012-03-04 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like herds
> are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think we should drop
> that herds and move their packages to maintainer-needed in a week or so.
> 
> What do you think? 
> 

The same applies to "sgml" now that cryos is retiring :(


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-dev] media-optical, net-zope, sgml, text-markup herds are empty

2012-03-04 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:51 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> > Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like herds
> > are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think we should drop
> > that herds and move their packages to maintainer-needed in a week or so.
> > 
> > What do you think? 
> > 
> 
> The same applies to "sgml" now that cryos is retiring :(

and text-markup, I think it's the last empty herd now


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-dev] media-optical and net-zope herds are empty

2012-03-04 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012, Pacho Ramos wrote:

> Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like
> herds are empty.

Sorry for nitpicking, but a "herd" is a collection of packages. So the
herds are not empty, but they have no maintainers.

> If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think we should drop that
> herds and move their packages to maintainer-needed in a week or so.

> What do you think? 

How many packages are in these two herds? If it's only a few, then
this certainly makes sense.

Ulrich



[gentoo-dev] Important problems to maintain gtk-sharp ebuilds in their current splitted way

2012-03-04 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello

We (dotnet team) are having a lot of problems to get gtk-sharp packages
updated and fixed. All started time ago when we were unable to bump it
due:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382491

Now, a new important bug has appeared and we are lose about what is
wrong and why has it broken recently:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404139

Any help with this is appreciated, if nobody can help us, we will
probably move back to monolithic gtk-sharp ebuild and hope that also
helps to fix bug #404139

Thanks a lot for your help


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-dev] media-optical and net-zope herds are empty

2012-03-04 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 14:06 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
> > On Sun, 04 Mar 2012, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> 
> > Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like
> > herds are empty.
> 
> Sorry for nitpicking, but a "herd" is a collection of packages. So the
> herds are not empty, but they have no maintainers.

Well, I knew what a "herd" means exactly per devmanual ;), but, in real
world, that "collection of packages" is really orphan (are like
maintainer-needed packages but, what is worse, out of radar as they are
not listed as orphan at all)

(Personally I completely disagree with that sense of "herd" but, as
looks the meaning is there since the beginning...)

> 
> > If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think we should drop that
> > herds and move their packages to maintainer-needed in a week or so.
> 
> > What do you think? 
> 
> How many packages are in these two herds? If it's only a few, then
> this certainly makes sense.
> 
> Ulrich
> 
> 

Only two for net-zope, but many more for, for example, sgml and
media-optical.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-dev] media-optical and net-zope herds are empty

2012-03-04 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 14:31 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 14:06 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
> > > On Sun, 04 Mar 2012, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > 
> > > Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like
> > > herds are empty.
> > 
> > Sorry for nitpicking, but a "herd" is a collection of packages. So the
> > herds are not empty, but they have no maintainers.
> 
> Well, I knew what a "herd" means exactly per devmanual ;), but, in real
> world, that "collection of packages" is really orphan (are like
> maintainer-needed packages but, what is worse, out of radar as they are
> not listed as orphan at all)
> 

Also, after re-reading devmanual, being 100% strict that collection of
packages need to be "associated to a set of maintainers" (that is
currently not the case :( )

> (Personally I completely disagree with that sense of "herd" but, as
> looks the meaning is there since the beginning...)
> 
> > 
> > > If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think we should drop that
> > > herds and move their packages to maintainer-needed in a week or so.
> > 
> > > What do you think? 
> > 
> > How many packages are in these two herds? If it's only a few, then
> > this certainly makes sense.
> > 
> > Ulrich
> > 
> > 
> 
> Only two for net-zope, but many more for, for example, sgml and
> media-optical.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-dev] Supporting GLES-only implementations

2012-03-04 Thread Luca Barbato
On 03/03/12 18:26, Luca Barbato wrote:
> I'm trying to get better support for efika and possibly other similar
> systems like pandaboard.

In order to make all the headers switchable I'd move the headers to
specific dirs, so we would have global/GL and all the implementations
(nvidia and ati) would have to move specific headers, if present,
accordingly.

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero




Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due ken69267 retirement

2012-03-04 Thread Anthony G. Basile

On 03/04/2012 07:21 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:

Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
app-misc/ignuit
app-portage/gpytage
app-shells/squirrelsh (this only needs a proxy-maintainer)


Thanks for taking them




I can take squirrelsh if no one else wants.

--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197



Re: [gentoo-dev] media-optical and net-zope herds are empty

2012-03-04 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 14:31, Pacho Ramos  wrote:
> Only two for net-zope, but many more for, for example, sgml and
> media-optical.

We just cleaned out most of the net-zope packages. The remaining
net-zope packages will be maintained by the python team; the net-zope
herd can probably be removed.

Cheers,

Dirkjan



Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2012-03-04 Thread Eray Aslan
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:17:12PM +, Markos Chandras wrote:
>   mail-client/nmh

net-mail will co-maintain it.

-- 
Eray Aslan 


pgpw6E6otB0aq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due ken69267 retirement

2012-03-04 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 13:21 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:


> app-portage/gpytage

I'll take this one, since I've been intermittently involved in it's
develoment.  And aside from bots, the only one consistently hanging
around in #gpytage.

-- 
Brian Dolbec 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-03-04 23h59 UTC

2012-03-04 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2012-03-04 23h59 UTC.

Removals:
app-text/xpdf   2012-02-28 20:40:09 
dilfridge
media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-other  2012-02-28 20:49:24 
dilfridge
media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-std2012-02-28 20:49:24 
dilfridge
net-misc/linux-igd  2012-02-28 21:22:30 
gurligebis
dev-java/sun-j2ee   2012-02-29 06:34:41 sera
media-libs/libbluray-xine   2012-02-29 11:23:29 
ssuominen
app-admin/zope-config   2012-03-01 15:07:19 patrick
app-admin/zprod-manager 2012-03-01 15:07:20 patrick
dev-python/manuel   2012-03-01 15:09:18 patrick
dev-python/martian  2012-03-01 15:09:18 patrick
dev-python/restrictedpython 2012-03-01 15:09:18 patrick
net-zope/abracadabraobject  2012-03-01 15:15:32 patrick
net-zope/accesscontrol  2012-03-01 15:15:33 patrick
net-zope/acquisition2012-03-01 15:15:33 patrick
net-zope/annotations2012-03-01 15:15:33 patrick
net-zope/archetypes 2012-03-01 15:15:33 patrick
net-zope/atcontenttypes 2012-03-01 15:15:33 patrick
net-zope/btreefolder2   2012-03-01 15:15:33 patrick
net-zope/cmf2012-03-01 15:15:33 patrick
net-zope/cmfactionicons 2012-03-01 15:15:34 patrick
net-zope/cmfboard   2012-03-01 15:15:34 patrick
net-zope/cmfcollectorng 2012-03-01 15:15:34 patrick
net-zope/cmfformcontroller  2012-03-01 15:15:34 patrick
net-zope/cmfforum   2012-03-01 15:15:35 patrick
net-zope/cmfmember  2012-03-01 15:15:35 patrick
net-zope/cmfoodocument  2012-03-01 15:15:35 patrick
net-zope/cmfopenflow2012-03-01 15:15:35 patrick
net-zope/cmfphoto   2012-03-01 15:15:35 patrick
net-zope/cmfphotoalbum  2012-03-01 15:15:36 patrick
net-zope/cmfquickinstallertool  2012-03-01 15:15:36 patrick
net-zope/coreblog   2012-03-01 15:15:37 patrick
net-zope/coreblog2  2012-03-01 15:15:38 patrick
net-zope/cvsfile2012-03-01 15:15:38 patrick
net-zope/datetime   2012-03-01 15:15:38 patrick
net-zope/documenttemplate   2012-03-01 15:15:38 patrick
net-zope/epoz   2012-03-01 15:15:38 patrick
net-zope/extensionclass 2012-03-01 15:15:38 patrick
net-zope/externaleditor 2012-03-01 15:15:38 patrick
net-zope/externalfile   2012-03-01 15:15:39 patrick
net-zope/externalmethod 2012-03-01 15:15:39 patrick
net-zope/externalstorage2012-03-01 15:15:39 patrick
net-zope/extfile2012-03-01 15:15:39 patrick
net-zope/exuserfolder   2012-03-01 15:15:40 patrick
net-zope/filesystemsite 2012-03-01 15:15:40 patrick
net-zope/five-formlib   2012-03-01 15:15:41 patrick
net-zope/five-grok  2012-03-01 15:15:41 patrick
net-zope/five-intid 2012-03-01 15:15:41 patrick
net-zope/five-localsitemanager  2012-03-01 15:15:41 patrick
net-zope/fle3   2012-03-01 15:15:41 patrick
net-zope/formulator 2012-03-01 15:15:41 patrick
net-zope/generator  2012-03-01 15:15:42 patrick
net-zope/genericuserfolder  2012-03-01 15:15:42 patrick
net-zope/grokcore-annotation2012-03-01 15:15:42 patrick
net-zope/grokcore-component 2012-03-01 15:15:42 patrick
net-zope/grokcore-formlib   2012-03-01 15:15:42 patrick
net-zope/grokcore-security  2012-03-01 15:15:43 patrick
net-zope/grokcore-site  2012-03-01 15:15:43 patrick
net-zope/grokcore-view  2012-03-01 15:15:43 patrick
net-zope/grokcore-viewlet   2012-03-01 15:15:43 patrick
net-zope/groups 2012-03-01 15:15:43 patrick
net-zope/groupuserfolder   

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2012-03-04 Thread Thomas Beierlein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:17:12 +
Markos Chandras  wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Due to lack of time and motivation, the following packages are up for
> grabs:
> 
>   sci-electronics/gresistor

Put it to herd sci-electronics. We will care.


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk9UZ0oACgkQQe4uqXYgU9XGqgCfSlCCJevf5IfBNiMVjWeNtC5b
hegAoJ/L2u7NZ5llphs+LsR1mJ8CiSEc
=79qk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-