El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 14:31 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 14:06 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió: > > >>>>> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > > Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like > > > herds are empty. > > > > Sorry for nitpicking, but a "herd" is a collection of packages. So the > > herds are not empty, but they have no maintainers. > > Well, I knew what a "herd" means exactly per devmanual ;), but, in real > world, that "collection of packages" is really orphan (are like > maintainer-needed packages but, what is worse, out of radar as they are > not listed as orphan at all) >
Also, after re-reading devmanual, being 100% strict that collection of packages need to be "associated to a set of maintainers" (that is currently not the case :( ) > (Personally I completely disagree with that sense of "herd" but, as > looks the meaning is there since the beginning...) > > > > > > If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think we should drop that > > > herds and move their packages to maintainer-needed in a week or so. > > > > > What do you think? > > > > How many packages are in these two herds? If it's only a few, then > > this certainly makes sense. > > > > Ulrich > > > > > > Only two for net-zope, but many more for, for example, sgml and > media-optical.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
