Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [v3] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs
Le mercredi 02 juillet 2008 à 00:30 +, Duncan a écrit : > Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], > excerpted below, on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:29:56 -0400: > > > Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That said, I have no idea how many duplicate / incomplete bugs I have > > never seen due to the wonderful work of the wranglers. In some ways it > > would be a shame to lose that quality pre-reading of the bugs. > > Perhaps the best solution is to get the implementation in place, but not > completely automate it. Put the tools there so if it looks right, all > the wrangler needs to do is a single click, and it's auto-assigned, but > that single click is still necessary so that a human actually gets to > review things before doing the assignment. > > That would make it /much/ easier for the wranglers. > > If desired, a cron script or some such could then be setup to go thru and > automatically assign anything that wasn't assigned yet and that hadn't > been touched (no comments asking for more info, etc) for some period, say > a week, just to catch anything that fell thru the cracks or if the > wranglers all disappeared or went on strike/vacation/whatever. Then if > folks ever suddenly find themselves inundated with "raw" bugs, it'd be a > serious indication that the wranglers needed some help. sounds like a plan -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Re: [gentoo-dev] packages linked against the kernel sources
Dominique Michel wrote: > After a kernel update, sys-kernel/module-rebuild can be used to rebuild the > installed external kernel modules. > > Software like dev-libs/klibc or app-cdr/cdrtools are linked against the kernel > sources and not against the kernel headers. Is it other programs like them in > the tree? > > I am not a gentoo programmer but I want to have a list of those programs, or > to > make this list if nobody can provide one. > > So please, if you maintain such a program that is linked against the kernel > sources and not against the kernel headers, respond to this mail. > > Best, > Dominique > Hello Dominique, I just run following command: # equery depends gentoo-sources | sed 's/^/=/' | \ xargs | emerge -pv These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R ] sys-apps/v86d-0.1.3-r1 USE="-debug -x86emu" 0 kB [ebuild R ] sys-apps/pcmciautils-014-r1 USE="-debug -static -staticsocket" 0 kB [ebuild R ] sys-apps/lm_sensors-2.10.4 USE="sensord" 0 kB [ebuild R ] sys-apps/hal-0.5.9.1-r3 USE="acpi crypt dell disk-partition pcmcia -debug -doc (-selinux)" 0 kB [ebuild R ] net-wireless/ipw3945-1.2.2-r1 USE="-debug" 0 kB [ebuild R ] media-libs/svgalib-1.9.25 USE="-build -no-helper" 0 kB [ebuild R ] gnome-base/gnome-menus-2.20.3 USE="python -debug" 0 kB [ebuild R ] app-misc/lirc-0.8.3_pre1 USE="X -debug -doc -hardware-carrier -transmitter" LIRC_DEVICES="-accent -act200l -act220l -adaptec -all -alsa_usb -animax -asusdh -atilibusb -atiusb -audio -audio_alsa -avermedia -avermedia98 -avermedia_vdomate -bestbuy -bestbuy2 -breakoutbox -bte -bw6130 -caraca -chronos -cmdir -cph06x -creative -creative_infracd -devinput -digimatrix -dsp -dvico -ea65 -exaudio -flyvideo -gvbctv5pci -hauppauge -hauppauge_dvb -hercules_smarttv_stereo -igorplugusb -imon -imon_pad -imon_pad2keys -imon_rsc -inputlirc -irdeo -irdeo_remote -irman -irreal -it87 -knc_one -kworld -leadtek_0007 -leadtek_0010 -leadtek_pvr2000 -livedrive_midi -livedrive_seq -logitech -macmini -mceusb -mceusb2 -mediafocusI -mouseremote -mouseremote_ps2 -mp3anywhere -nslu2 -packard_bell -parallel -pcmak -pcmak_usb -pctv -pixelview_bt878 -pixelview_pak -pixelview_pro -provideo -realmagic -remote_wonder_plus -remotemaster -sa1100 -sasem -sb0540 -serial -serial_igor_cesko -silitek -sir -slinke -streamzap -tekram -tekram_bt829 -tira -ttusbir -tuxbox -tvbox -udp -uirt2 -uirt2_raw -usb_uirt_raw -usbirboy -usbx -userspace -xboxusb" 0 kB [ebuild R ] sys-fs/cryptsetup-1.0.5-r1 USE="nls -build -dynamic (-selinux)" 0 kB Total: 9 packages (9 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 0 kB Hope that helps. ;-) Have fun, Wolf. :-) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-irc/quassel: ChangeLog quassel-9999-r1.ebuild quassel-0.2.0_rc1.ebuild quassel-0.2.9999.ebuild
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Add missing eutils inherit for the non-git ebuilds as otherwise it seems to
> be failing.
> (Portage version: 2.2_rc1/cvs/Linux 2.6.25-gentoo-r4 x86_64)
>
The reason it's failing is because you have things after the . You
can do this:
if [[ ${PV} == ** ]]; then
inherit git
instead of:
> if [[ ${PV} == * ]]; then
> inherit git
Doing it my way doesn't fail for, say, -r1
Regards,
Thomas
pgp0Mzp7grOpD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-irc/quassel: ChangeLog quassel-9999-r1.ebuild quassel-0.2.0_rc1.ebuild quassel-0.2.9999.ebuild
Thomas Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The reason it's failing is because you have things after the . You > can do this: I actually don't... and it doesn't file for the git case, it fails for the non-git case (I only updated the git versions so the next time I copy over the git ebuild I don't have to fix it again) > Doing it my way doesn't fail for, say, -r1 -r1 has this values: P=quassel- PN=quassel PV= PF=quassel--r1 PVR=-r1 (was this the right variable name? I sincerely forgot) the -r1 part is only ever used for the revisions in PVR, not on PV. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpDthx7fgu6m.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-scheme/drscheme: ChangeLog reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +, Marijn Schouten (hkbst) wrote: > hkbst 08/06/28 16:53:06 > > Modified: ChangeLog > Added:reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild > drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild > Log: > add new major version 4.0.1 and reversion latest ~ > (Portage version: 2.2_rc1/cvs/Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r8 x86_64) ... > 1.1 dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup > plain: > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain Why was reversion.patch committed directly to dev-scheme/drscheme instead of files/? -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 pgpZvZsRnB2dA.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: [v3] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:07:03 -0700 "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 4. If we have a valid category name, but no valid package atoms (this > may be a new or misspelt package), try to figure out which team might > want it. Use the category-level metadata.xml file. I wonder how often this will do the right thing. Not to mention many categories don't have a team (eg. app-doc) and many have multiple teams (eg. media-libs). In fact, I don't see anyone using category-level metadata.xml for anything but category descriptions right now. Assigning bugs that don't have a valid package name to bug-wranglers for some human intervention might work better. -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] b.g.o down?
Hi, I'm getting "Connection refused" when trying to connect to http://bugs.gentoo.org. Is this intentional? Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wanheimerstraße 68 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40468 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: wwwkeys.pgp.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] b.g.o down?
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:08:38AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > I'm getting "Connection refused" when trying to connect to > http://bugs.gentoo.org. Is this intentional? Yeah, read the -dev topic. I broke it, and I'm working on it. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
