Re: Podling release without IPMC vote

[rdb...@gmail.com]

+1 to modifying the download page. Would it also make sense for an IPMC
member to remove the source artifacts?

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 9:35 AM PJ Fanning  wrote:

> Can we remove the download links for the 0.1.0 release until the IPMC
> vote passes?
> https://xtable.apache.org/releases/downloads/
>
> On Tue, 10 Sept 2024 at 16:12, Craig Russell  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Stamatis,
> >
> > I agree that the project should quickly run a VOTE in general@inubator.
> Until that gets two additional binding votes, the release is available but
> not an official release.
> >
> > It appears that the mentors did not provide sufficient oversight here...
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > > On Sep 10, 2024, at 06:38, Stamatis Zampetakis 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > The VOTE had only two binding votes from IPMC.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 9:01 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> An important question to ask is if the VOTE on the dev list included
> 3 of the podling’s Mentors. If it did then it already had 3 +1 IPMC
> (binding) Votes and the general@ vote should quickly have those carried
> over by those mentors.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Dave
> > >>
> > >>> On Sep 9, 2024, at 11:48 AM, Daniel B. Widdis 
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > 
> >  see what can be done with the respective maven artifacts in
> >  central.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> By design there's not much anyone can do about that. [1]
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://central.sonatype.org/faq/can-i-change-a-component/
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:52 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <
> zabe...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  Hey everyone,
> > 
> >  Apache XTable (incubating) has recently published its first
> incubating
> >  release [1] after a successful vote in the dev list [2]. However,
> the
> >  podling didn't start a vote in general@incubator, which I believe
> >  violates the incubator release policy [3].
> > 
> >  I searched the incubator archives but couldn't find a similar
> >  situation in the past so I was wondering what is the best course of
> >  action to rectify the situation.
> > 
> >  I would be inclined to start a VOTE now and if there are no serious
> >  issues just leave things as they are. If blocking issues are found I
> >  guess we will have to remove the release from the ASF infrastructure
> >  and see what can be done with the respective maven artifacts in
> >  central.
> >  What do you think?
> > 
> >  Best,
> >  Stamatis
> > 
> >  [1] https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/xtable/0.1.0-incubating/
> >  [2]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/k2bcxbf23pmb43g46o5gzqf9bv1pkggz
> >  [3] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
> > 
> > 
> -
> >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > 
> > 
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Dan Widdis
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >>
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > Craig L Russell
> > c...@apache.org
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

[rdb...@gmail.com]

-1 (binding)

I did a quick build and saw that the xtable-utilities Jar

has dependencies bundled in, but doesn't have a LICENSE or NOTICE that
reflects those dependencies. Both look like the boilerplate ones from the
source repo (which may also not be correct).

In order to ship third-party code in bundled Jars, projects need to follow the
third-party license policy
.
There is quite a bit of work that goes into correctly documenting the
licenses of ASF releases, so I'd recommend that the podling get a release
or two done without a bundled Jar. That typically makes it easier.

Ryan

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:05 AM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
jcama...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 jcamacho (IPMC/PPMC), carried over from XTable dev mailing list [1]
>
> Thanks,
> Jesús
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/klqwmx814bph19fn2ypwsbgorzb776h1
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 12:59 AM PJ Fanning  wrote:
>
> > +1 binding fanningpj (IPMC)
> >
> > * file downloads
> > * sha512 and asc are ok
> > * incubating and apache in name
> > * LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER-WIP present
> > * Apache license headers in source files
> > * no unexpected binaries
> > * compiles from source - tests take lots of CPU and I had to cancel
> > them but that might be just my machine
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 08:35, Stamatis Zampetakis 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 zabetak (IPMC/PPMC) carried over from the dev list.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Stamatis
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 7:16 AM Vinish Reddy 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Apache XTable (incubating) has recently published its first
> incubating
> > > > release after a successful vote in the dev list. However, the podling
> > > > missed starting a vote in general@incubator. IPMC members
> recommended
> > > > removing the downloads page from the website [1] and starting a VOTE
> > thread
> > > > in general@incubator [2].
> > > >
> > > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
> this
> > > > incubator release.
> > > >
> > > > Apache XTable community vote thread:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/gl8xs904dnz6bbnx7dn0rwd35zs0gr4b
> > > >
> > > > Vote result thread:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/k2bcxbf23pmb43g46o5gzqf9bv1pkggz
> > > >
> > > > The release candidates:
> > > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/xtable/0.1.0-incubating-rc4/
> > > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/xtable/0.1.0-incubating/
> > > >
> > > > Release notes:
> > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-xtable/releases/tag/0.1.0-incubating
> > > >
> > > > Git tag for the release:
> > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-xtable/releases/tag/0.1.0-incubating
> > > >
> > > > Git commit ID for the release:
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-xtable/commit/9711bf1599eb2a69c0f094a45450f5638a189428
> > > >
> > > > Keys to verify the Release Candidate:
> > > > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/xtable/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > To compile from the source, please refer to:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-xtable/blob/main/README.md
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> > number
> > > > of votes is reached. Please vote accordingly:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://xtable.apache.org/
> > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q3o2qr64k2bwwyd1hd79y43q12vwgh85
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Vinish
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

[rdb...@gmail.com]

I thought that the purpose of the disclaimer was (at least partially) to
flag that the licensing may not be completely correct, but I haven't seen
it interpreted as a way to release code before beginning licensing work.
Maybe that's okay for a source release where the vast majority of the code
was developed by the project, but here it doesn't seem right to me to
release a bundled Jar with 600+ MB of dependencies and no licensing
documentation.

I think the right path forward is to remove the bundled Jar from the
release. After all, it's a convenience binary.

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 1:11 PM PJ Fanning  wrote:

> XTable is still at the DISCLAIMER-WIP stage and the DISCLAIMER-WIP
> mentions that they haven't finished work on the licensing.
> Maybe this could be logged as an issue at
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-xtable and fixed for the next
> release?
>
> On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 21:06, rdb...@gmail.com  wrote:
> >
> > -1 (binding)
> >
> > I did a quick build and saw that the xtable-utilities Jar
> > <
> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/xtable/xtable-utilities/0.1.0-incubating/xtable-utilities-0.1.0-incubating-bundled.jar
> >
> > has dependencies bundled in, but doesn't have a LICENSE or NOTICE that
> > reflects those dependencies. Both look like the boilerplate ones from the
> > source repo (which may also not be correct).
> >
> > In order to ship third-party code in bundled Jars, projects need to
> follow the
> > third-party license policy
> > <https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#asf-3rd-party-license-policy
> >.
> > There is quite a bit of work that goes into correctly documenting the
> > licenses of ASF releases, so I'd recommend that the podling get a release
> > or two done without a bundled Jar. That typically makes it easier.
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:05 AM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
> > jcama...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 jcamacho (IPMC/PPMC), carried over from XTable dev mailing list [1]
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jesús
> > >
> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/klqwmx814bph19fn2ypwsbgorzb776h1
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 12:59 AM PJ Fanning 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 binding fanningpj (IPMC)
> > > >
> > > > * file downloads
> > > > * sha512 and asc are ok
> > > > * incubating and apache in name
> > > > * LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER-WIP present
> > > > * Apache license headers in source files
> > > > * no unexpected binaries
> > > > * compiles from source - tests take lots of CPU and I had to cancel
> > > > them but that might be just my machine
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 08:35, Stamatis Zampetakis <
> zabe...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 zabetak (IPMC/PPMC) carried over from the dev list.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Stamatis
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 7:16 AM Vinish Reddy 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hey everyone,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apache XTable (incubating) has recently published its first
> > > incubating
> > > > > > release after a successful vote in the dev list. However, the
> podling
> > > > > > missed starting a vote in general@incubator. IPMC members
> > > recommended
> > > > > > removing the downloads page from the website [1] and starting a
> VOTE
> > > > thread
> > > > > > in general@incubator [2].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote
> on
> > > this
> > > > > > incubator release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apache XTable community vote thread:
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/gl8xs904dnz6bbnx7dn0rwd35zs0gr4b
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vote result thread:
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/k2bcxbf23pmb43g46o5gzqf9bv1pkggz
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release candidates:
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/xtable/0.1.0-incubating-rc4/
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

[rdb...@gmail.com]

Yes, I saw that and it's unfortunate. But I still don't think that the IPMC
should make this release, acting on behalf of the foundation, given the
state of this license documentation.

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 1:26 PM PJ Fanning  wrote:

> Unfortunately, the XTable team went ahead and released the jars
> without having an IPMC vote. I think it is nigh on impossible to get
> jars removed from Maven Central once they are released.
>
> On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 21:20, rdb...@gmail.com  wrote:
> >
> > I thought that the purpose of the disclaimer was (at least partially) to
> > flag that the licensing may not be completely correct, but I haven't seen
> > it interpreted as a way to release code before beginning licensing work.
> > Maybe that's okay for a source release where the vast majority of the
> code
> > was developed by the project, but here it doesn't seem right to me to
> > release a bundled Jar with 600+ MB of dependencies and no licensing
> > documentation.
> >
> > I think the right path forward is to remove the bundled Jar from the
> > release. After all, it's a convenience binary.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 1:11 PM PJ Fanning  wrote:
> >
> > > XTable is still at the DISCLAIMER-WIP stage and the DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > mentions that they haven't finished work on the licensing.
> > > Maybe this could be logged as an issue at
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-xtable and fixed for the next
> > > release?
> > >
> > > On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 21:06, rdb...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > I did a quick build and saw that the xtable-utilities Jar
> > > > <
> > >
> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/xtable/xtable-utilities/0.1.0-incubating/xtable-utilities-0.1.0-incubating-bundled.jar
> > > >
> > > > has dependencies bundled in, but doesn't have a LICENSE or NOTICE
> that
> > > > reflects those dependencies. Both look like the boilerplate ones
> from the
> > > > source repo (which may also not be correct).
> > > >
> > > > In order to ship third-party code in bundled Jars, projects need to
> > > follow the
> > > > third-party license policy
> > > > <
> https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#asf-3rd-party-license-policy
> > > >.
> > > > There is quite a bit of work that goes into correctly documenting the
> > > > licenses of ASF releases, so I'd recommend that the podling get a
> release
> > > > or two done without a bundled Jar. That typically makes it easier.
> > > >
> > > > Ryan
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:05 AM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
> > > > jcama...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 jcamacho (IPMC/PPMC), carried over from XTable dev mailing list
> [1]
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Jesús
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/klqwmx814bph19fn2ypwsbgorzb776h1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 12:59 AM PJ Fanning 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 binding fanningpj (IPMC)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * file downloads
> > > > > > * sha512 and asc are ok
> > > > > > * incubating and apache in name
> > > > > > * LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER-WIP present
> > > > > > * Apache license headers in source files
> > > > > > * no unexpected binaries
> > > > > > * compiles from source - tests take lots of CPU and I had to
> cancel
> > > > > > them but that might be just my machine
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 08:35, Stamatis Zampetakis <
> > > zabe...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 zabetak (IPMC/PPMC) carried over from the dev list.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Stamatis
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 7:16 AM Vinish Reddy <
> vin...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey everyone,
> > > > > > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

[rdb...@gmail.com]

Good point Justin about the importance of checking for problematic licenses.
That fat jar is 600Mb and includes the kitchen sink in terms of classes.

One set of classes is from OpenJDK JOL and this is GPL-2.0 licensed.

This seems like a big problem to me, especially because the artifact has
already been uploaded to maven central. Downstream users could accidentally
include or distribute GPL code by using and redistributing Apache XTable.

XTable may also need to be dual licensed because of 2.b) in the GPL-2.0
(the copyleft part):

You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in
part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be
licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties *under the terms of
this License*.

My interpretation of the incubator disclaimer is not that we can make
releases without attempting to produce license documentation -- that
doesn't change the consequences of distributing GPL code. It means that we
(the IPMC) have not fully checked and verified the license documentation.
Given the risks to people using ASF software, I don’t think it is at all
safe to make releases without due diligence here.

Ryan

On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 2:23 AM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > Thanks for sharing LEGAL-469 Justin. I have seen it at some point but
> > as time passed I forgot its existence.
> >
> > The DISCLAIMER-WIP contains the following snippet:
> > Some of the incubating project’s releases may not be fully compliant
> > with ASF policy. For example, releases may have incomplete or
> > un-reviewed licensing conditions. What follows is a list of issues the
> > project is currently aware of (this list is likely to be incomplete):
> > List of known issues goes here
> >
> > I didn't perform a thorough license check cause it was implied by the
> > disclaimer that this rather OK for this type of release. If we need to
> > check for all licenses involved then I don't see much point in having
> > this WIP file.
>
> As the WIP disclaimer states, "List of known issues goes here”, so you
> need to know (in general) what the issues are, particularly if they are
> Category X related the users need to be aware of those. It doesn't need to
> be perfect, as it's an incubating project, but you should still do a basic
> check.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.2.0-incubating, release candidate #2

[rdb...@gmail.com]

I didn't realize that there were binary Jars to verify with this release.
Why were they not listed in the vote thread?

That concerns me because the licensing for the binary Jars is what caused
the last release to fail.

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 2:16 AM Stamatis Zampetakis 
wrote:

> The vote started on November 5, 2024 8:42:00 AM GMT+1 and it was
> closed on November 8, 2024 6:49:55 PM GMT+1 [1] so the source release
> is already approved. Moreover, the maven released artifacts have been
> verified as part of the vote in the dev list. The 0.2.0 release is out
> so if there are any additional problems I would suggest creating new
> issues on the projects tracker.
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/mn1yq7wfhtnby5gl26yn7xgngtkgwvkp
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 11:02 AM PJ Fanning  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Vinish,
> > I am referring to
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/xtable/
> >
> > It appears that you intend to release some XTable 0.2.0 jars. There
> > may be some other binaries that you intend to release that I am not
> > aware of.
> > The jars and anything else like potentially Docker images, etc. should
> > be reviewed. There are licensing requirements for them.
> >
> > It, in fact, appears that you may have already released the jars to
> > Maven Central, despite the fact that the source release has not been
> > approved yet.
> > Example:
> >
> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/xtable/xtable-hudi-support-utils/0.2.0-incubating/
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 02:16, Vinish Reddy Pannala
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for your vote rdblue.
> > > PJ Fanning, there are no binary builds in the current release
> artifacts.
> > >
> > > -Vinish
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 2:57 AM PJ Fanning 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Would it be possible to provide details of any binary builds that you
> > > > intend to release based on this source release? It is useful to be
> able to
> > > > check them for potential licensing and other issues.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2024/11/09 00:35:47 "rdb...@gmail.com" wrote:
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Checked for instances of undocumented code copied from other
> sources, ran
> > > > > RAT tool, validated signature and checksum.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for fixing the licensing issues! It also looks like there's
> good
> > > > > progress on the shaded Jar's licensing as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 9:21 AM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
> > > > jcama...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Transferring my vote from the XTable dev list.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Jesús
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 3:33 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Casting my vote from dev mailing list.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > JB
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Le mar. 5 nov. 2024 à 08:42, Vinish Reddy 
> a
> > > > écrit :
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey everyone,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache XTable
> (Incubating)
> > > > > > > > for 0.2.0-incubating, rc2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Apache XTable (Incubating) community has voted and
> approved
> > > > > > > > the release of Apache XTable (Incubating)  0.2.0-incubating,
> rc2.
> > > > > > > > We now kindly request the IPMC members review and vote for
> this
> > > > > > release.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Apache XTable community vote thread:
> > > > > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/1pk38q20bsdpp84l0m93z5ff2f3p7dp7
> > > > >

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache DataFusion sqlparser-rs

[rdb...@gmail.com]

+1

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:11 AM tison  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Good luck :D
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
> Andy Grove  于2024年9月24日周二 01:33写道：
> >
> > Apache DataFusion is receiving a donation of sqlparser-rs [1], a SQL
> parser
> > implemented in Rust.
> >
> > Please vote to approve this contribution.
> >
> > This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process
> > [2], open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> > [1] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/datafusion-sqlparser
> > [2] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.2.0-incubating, release candidate #2

[rdb...@gmail.com]

+1 (binding)

Checked for instances of undocumented code copied from other sources, ran
RAT tool, validated signature and checksum.

Thanks for fixing the licensing issues! It also looks like there's good
progress on the shaded Jar's licensing as well.

On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 9:21 AM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez 
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Transferring my vote from the XTable dev list.
>
> Thanks,
> Jesús
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 3:33 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Casting my vote from dev mailing list.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > Le mar. 5 nov. 2024 à 08:42, Vinish Reddy  a écrit :
> >
> > > Hey everyone,
> > >
> > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache XTable (Incubating)
> > > for 0.2.0-incubating, rc2
> > >
> > > The Apache XTable (Incubating) community has voted and approved
> > > the release of Apache XTable (Incubating)  0.2.0-incubating, rc2.
> > > We now kindly request the IPMC members review and vote for this
> release.
> > >
> > > Apache XTable community vote thread:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/1pk38q20bsdpp84l0m93z5ff2f3p7dp7
> > >
> > > Vote result thread:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/9m247llmmzd688phj8fmk3h72x3l4m19
> > >
> > > The release candidate:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/xtable/0.2.0-incubating-rc2/
> > >
> > >
> > > Release notes:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-xtable/issues/551#issuecomment-2450887244
> > >
> > >
> > > Keys to verify the Release Candidate:
> > > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/xtable/KEYS
> > >
> > > Git tag for the release:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-xtable/releases/tag/0.2.0-incubating-rc2
> > >
> > > Git commit ID for the release:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-xtable/commit/ceae10803695f44d62e106148ed8558c712542ba
> > >
> > > To compile from the source, please refer to:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-xtable/blob/main/README.md
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> number
> > > of votes is reached. Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > >
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Vinish
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc6

[rdb...@gmail.com]

Carrying over my +1 from the dev list.

Because there is no intent to publish convenience binaries, I don't think
there are requirements for the Jars that are produced. If that
understanding is incorrect, please let me know and I'll start checking the
Jars even if they aren't going to be published. Otherwise, I'm planning to
validate the LICENSE and NOTICE of the Jars in the next release, when there
are convenience binaries.

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 5:51 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
wrote:

> Hi PJ
>
> You are right: this first Polaris release only includes source
> distribution (which is the minimum required).
> There are two reasons:
> - we did/do a change in the runtime framework and the binary
> artifacts, completely changing the LICENSE/NOTICE and layout (that's
> why we don't have LICENSE/NOTICE, see
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1031). So, technically
> speaking, we can do binary artifacts in this release, but we preferred
> to focus on the 1.0.0 release for binary artifacts.
> - we wanted to already do a pass on the source distribution in this
> release, and focus on the binary artifacts for the next release
>
> The next release (1.0.0) will include binary distributions (and binary
> artifacts).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 2:32 PM PJ Fanning  wrote:
> >
> > +0 binding
> >
> > * incubating in name
> > * LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER seem ok
> > * no unexpected binaries
> > * headers in files
> > * gradle build seems to work
> >
> > The reason that I am not voting +1 (yet) is that I don't know about
> > the plans (or otherwise) for releasing jars. There are no polaris jars
> > in repository.apache.org staging or snapshots areas.
> >
> > The jars that are built in the gradle build contain not META-INF
> > LICENSE or NOTICE (or DISCLAIMER). I think they should.
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 11:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ack:
> > > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/polaris/KEYS
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > Le ven. 21 févr. 2025 à 10:39, sebb  a écrit :
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 07:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache Polaris (incubating)
> > > > 0.9.0-rc6.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Polaris community has voted and approved Apache Polaris
> > > > > (incubating) 0.9.0-rc6.
> > > > > We are now asking the IPMC to review and vote for this release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Polaris community vote thread:
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/7jxoswynzpnhsmbt77t4klc7rp983o66
> > > > >
> > > > > Polaris community vote result:
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/3ymqrtlvtcq1pgtd14ghn2n158y6yl5t
> > > > >
> > > > > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-polaris-0.9.0-incubating-rc6
> > > > > *
> > > >
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/tree/apache-polaris-0.9.0-incubating-rc6
> > > > > *
> > > >
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/tree/4b18ec065ff16f74b11bc85fdc6ea9036eca7274
> > > > >
> > > > > The release source tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> > > > > *
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/0.9.0-incubating/
> > > > >
> > > > > You can find the KEYS file here:
> > > > > *
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/polaris/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Please use the public download URL for he KEYS file!
> > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> > > > > number of votes are reached.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0
> > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 votes and more
> binding
> > > > > +1 votes than -1 votes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > JB
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>