Re: 5.3 STABLE for production server?
PawelG wrote: I would like to know your opinion about 5.3-STABLE for this pourpose. I googled some and found that it isn't good idea but all those opinions was pretty old (related for ex. to older BETA version of 5.X branch) At this moment I think that when setting up a new box (fresh install) 5 will just do fine, in my case however I have a couple boxes already using 4.10, in that case I will not upgrade to 5 but instead to 4.11, actually I use RELENG_4 and rebuild everything (when appropriate, depends on SA) on a build/test machine and then install it on the production machines. So it depends a bit on your taste, someday I have to upgrade my machines too, because SA will no longer be patched in the 4 tree (not in the near future though). Till then I have time to decide if I go with 5 or something else like DragonFly, it all depends if I feel comfortable with that OS and even more important is it a good enough solution for my technical problems/needs. my0.02€ -- mph ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Alright you primitive screwheads, LISTEN UP!!
John Well with my last name it doesn't even matter in what country/language you are... However I must say (otherwise I would not write to the list anyway) that I can imagine that it gets frustrating when people are begging for your help but don't have the politeness to address you correctly. Post ponding it ten years, hell yes I would definitely at least express my frustration. Sure there are people having much bigger problem then that (I even knew people who didn't have a official name). But I seem to fail to see the logic that somebody else's big problem makes an total unrelated other persons problem less annoying, perspective is a nice thing but doesn't usually solve the root if the problem. Of course Bill expressed himself in his usual writing style which always make me (at least) smile, don't know though if that is intentional or that I have a freaking sense of humor (being born German I don't rule that out). However in defense I also must say that Paul is not a bad name, I even got it in my middle! Concluding, if Bill wants to be called Bill, what is the problem with that? He is not demanding that the next new discovered planet is named after him. His post has lighten up my day (middle in the night just before getting to bed you bastard!) and even got me to reply on someone saying he should take it more easy. So I and move along. -- mph ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Alright you primitive screwheads, LISTEN UP!!
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: You have my symphaty, no-one ever gets Wilko right. And it is dead simple derivative of Willem Coenraad. Wilko. Not Wilco. Right? Roger, wilco. DES Well make up you mind, roger or wilco, not both of them, jezz no wonder that modern communication only confuses if nobody uses the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] protocol! -- mph ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: routing question
Matt Smith wrote: Hello all, I have a situation where I have my FreeBSD box that I want to run 2 Unreal IRCD's on both using port 6667. I've set up virtual IP addressing and one IRCD will run on 192.168.1.5:6667 and the other one will run on 192.168.1.7:6667. my problem is how would I go about routing the traffic into the machine so both the IRCD's can be used by different people using just a linksys router (I don't think it's possible, but I thought I bounce it off you guys. Only if there on your own private subnet, otherwise you must have multiple public IP addresses and (nat)forward them to the private ones accordingly. If you have only 1 public IP adress you could use multiple ports on the public IP and mapped them back to the right IP & ports, say (public IP):6667 -> 192.168.1.7:6667 and (public IP):6668 -> 192.168.1.7:6667 however with this option you could have saved your hassle to create a alias and just used the 6668 port for your other daemon on 192.168.1.5 -- mph ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Change IP address
Willie Winslow wrote: I need to change the IP address of my FreeBSD box, it is also our Name Server. I am aware that I need to change the following; /etc/rc.conf /etc/resolv.conf /etc/namedb/mydomain.com Is there anything else that needs to be changed? Perhaps /etc/hosts, but that depends on your configuration. -- mph ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
