Re: acroread9 crashes after maybe 10 seconds of operation.

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Similar problem.

Related problem here:

-
f8-64$ acroread9  

(process:47993): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C library.
Using the fallback 'C' locale.
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'RSException'

-

with acroread9-9.2 from the ports.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137211 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: acroread9 crashes after maybe 10 seconds of operation.

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Kurt Jaeger writes:
[...]
> >  (process:47993): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C library.
> >  Using the fallback 'C' locale.
> >  terminate called after throwing an instance of 'RSException'

> >  with acroread9-9.2 from the ports.
> 
>   Three.
>   Also acroread-9.2; also amd64; but f10..

With most recent 8.0-RC1 sources and f10 and linuxprocfs mounted and
with sysctl security.bsd.map_at_zero=1: still the same Problem.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137211 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: acroread9 crashes after maybe 10 seconds of operation

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Install acroread8 instead of acroread9.

Thanks, works.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137211 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD Port: qtcreator-1.2.1: Not installable

[Kurt Jaeger]

Adrian Glaubitz  wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Gary Jennejohn
>  wrote:
> > The qtcreator port was created on May 7, 2009.  Seems to me that 7.2R
> > is older than that.  Obviously, qtcreator can't exist for 7.2R if the
> > port didn't exist when it was released.
> 
> Well, ok. Seems another case of "different systems, different
> philosophies" here for me.
> 
> My idea was that I was downloading the latest STABLE release of
> FreeBSD and I assumed that the ports directory always applies to the
> current STABLE version, noone should use a development version for
> daily use, should one.

The ports tree is being mopped up for each release.

The latest release was 7.2, so the latest ports tree known to be
pretty consistent is the one with the CVS tag RELEASE_7_2_0.

> Besides, the ports website doesn't list at all what versions of
> FreeBSD include this port as opposed to Debian, for example; I don't
> want to start a flamewar though. It's not really user-friendly, is it.

One way to do this e.g. for port editors/openoffice.org-3/:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/

and show only those with a certain tag:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/?only_with_tag=RELEASE_7_2_0

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137211 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: x11/kdelibs4 (kdelibs-4.3.4) compile file (bad C++ code) on portupgrade

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Freebsd 7.2 p3 amd64 on intel quadcore system
> Thanks in advance for advice on this one

You still have qt-3.3.8_10 installed, kdelibs4 catches the wrong qt
headers and fails.

There are some apps which apparently still require qt-3, e.g.

arts-1.5.10_2,1
kphone-4.2_3
opera-10.10.20091120
opera-linuxplugins-10.10.20091120
scribus-1.3.3.13_1
twinkle-1.4.2_2

I did the following:

pkg_delete -f qt-3.3.8_10

then recompiled kdelibs4 (works). Those apps that break then need
to be fixed.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137211 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

[Kurt Jaeger]

> portname:   java/dbvis
> broken because: does not fetch
> build errors:   none.
> overview:   
> http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=java&portname=dbvis

See

  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147493

Already approved by maintainer, waiting for commit.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Who to bug to commit some ports ?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

I recently submitted some PRs for updates and new ports and would
like to know whom to ask for them to be committed. Yes, I know, I can
try to bug some ports committers using e-mail 8-), but if possible,
I would like to avoid this 8-)

So, if someone points me to the right way of getting a committer
to commit it, I would be grateful. 

Here's the list:

- java/dbvis, update to new dbvis version
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147493

- devel/cego-base as new port
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147819

- devel/cego-xml as new port
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147820

- databases/cego as new port
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147822

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Who to bug to commit some ports ?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hello,

> I recently submitted some PRs for updates and new ports and would
> like to know whom to ask for them to be committed. Yes, I know, I can
> try to bug some ports committers using e-mail 8-), but if possible,
> I would like to avoid this 8-)

It's approx. 8 days later, and the ports are still not committed.

I'm aware there's something like a ports freeze (not a full freeze,
only a 'major upgrade freeze'. What are my options ?

> - java/dbvis, update to new dbvis version
>   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147493
> 
> - devel/cego-base as new port
>   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147819
> 
> - devel/cego-xml as new port
>   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147820
> 
> - databases/cego as new port
>   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147822

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Who to bug to commit some ports ?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > - java/dbvis, update to new dbvis version
> >   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147493
> 
> I grabbed this one and will try to get to it this week.

There is a newer of dbvis version available (7.1).

Should I update my patch or how is this supposed to be handled ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: security/hydra and www/hydra

[Kurt Jaeger]

> 21.07.2010 20:47, Ashish SHUKLA ??:
> > In case of multiple ports installing files with same name at same path, then
> > one of them needs to alter the file names by using suffix or prefix, like 
> > GNU
> > projects do when they collide with BSD equivalents by using 'g' as prefix.
> 
> I don't think that prefixing gnu tools is good example.
> For example we have native make in /usr/bin and gmake
> in /usr/local/bin.And native make is in base system, and
> gmake is a port.
> 
> So why CONFLICTS needed then for?

It's needed here because both ports install into the same file.

But you are absolutly right, two ports with the same name (hydra)
are also bad. One of the should be changed, e.g. to hydra-webserver.

> And is this ok to have two ports with the same name.

No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some
portupgrade tool will break.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: why is archivers/xz marked as IGNORE?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> why is archivers/xz marked as IGNORE?
> 
> 
> 
> pkg_delete: package 'xz-4.999.9_1' is required by these other packages
> and may not be deinstalled:
> gtar-1.23_2
> kdeutils-3.5.10_6

Because it became part of the base system with 8.1.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: security/clamav: Segmentation fault when running clamav in a 32-bit jail on a 64-bit host

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> I have a few clamav instances running in jails on 32-bit hosts without
> any issues.  A few days ago one of these jails was migrated to a 64-bit
> host (8.1-RELEASE), where I noticed clamd (0.96.2_1) segfaults when queried.
> 
> The issue seems specific to 32bit/64bit compatibility.  I have a gdb
> session available here: http://gist.github.com/549964
> 
> Any thoughts on if this is possible?

Try

Bytecode no

in clamd.conf ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: mc 4.7.4

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> I'm having trouble compiling it.
> 
>   CC textconf.o
>   CC treestore.o
>   CC user.o
>   CC mountlist.o
>   CCLD   mc
> /usr/local/lib/libslang.so: undefined reference to `tgetnum'
> /usr/local/lib/libslang.so: undefined reference to `tgetflag'
> /usr/local/lib/libslang.so: undefined reference to `tgetent'
> /usr/local/lib/libslang.so: undefined reference to `tgetstr'
> gmake[3]: *** [mc] Error 1
> gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/obj/usr/ports/misc/mc/work/mc-4.7.4/src'
> gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/obj/usr/ports/misc/mc/work/mc-4.7.4/src'
> gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/obj/usr/ports/misc/mc/work/mc-4.7.4'
> gmake: *** [all] Error 2
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/misc/mc.
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/misc/mc.

cd /usr/ports/misc/mc/work/mc-4.7.4/src
vi Makefile

Find ^LIBS and add -lcurses:

LIBS = -lcurses

then:

cd /usr/ports/misc/mc
make install

should work, but still, why does it not pick it up in the configure script ?
 
-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

evolution problem even after libgweather (was Re: Missing libproxy.la?)

[Kurt Jaeger]

On 28/08/2011 Jonathan Chen wrote:

> > and this mostly succeeded except where it failed. In particular
> > x11/gnome-panel complains:
> > CCLD clock-applet
> > gnome-libtool: link: cannot find the library
> > `/usr/local/lib/libproxy.la' or unhandled argument
> > `/usr/local/lib/libproxy.la'
> >
> > This leaves me with a slightly unusable system. Reinstalling libproxy
> > still does not resolve the problem. How can I make this work again?
> 
> So, after reading the problems that other people had been having, I took 
> a punt and resintalled libgweather, and this corrected my build. This 
> one's for the archives.

I still have a similar problem, but with evolution, even
after I reinstalled libgweather.

Any ideas ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: evolution problem even after libgweather (was Re: Missing libproxy.la?)

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > I still have a similar problem, but with evolution, even
> > after I reinstalled libgweather.
> >
> > Any ideas ?
> 
> I had to reinstall libgweather, libgdata and evolution-data-server 
> before I was able to continue.

Thanks, that did help.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/procmail Makefile

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> >   Modified files:
> > mail/procmailMakefile 
[...]
> Now that you're maintaining it I seek you to please let this
> unmaintained unclean code from our FreeBSD ports world and deprecate it.
[...]
> maildrop (courier's filtering agent) has been around for nearly as long
> and works well.

- Can maildrop be used with other MTAs like exim ?
- Can it use the 700+ lines long .procmailrc I have running
  in a criticial application or do I have to migrate that ?

Thanks!

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/procmail Makefile

[Kurt Jaeger]

[maildrop]
> > - Can it use the 700+ lines long .procmailrc I have running
> >   in a criticial application or do I have to migrate that ?
> 
> You'd have to migrate that.

That's what I assumed.

> Bottom line: the sooner we get rid from procmail the better.

There are many other applications that have issues, as well.

It's already a lot of work just to keep up with the bug-de-jour
and the upgrade-de-jour and doing it all in parallel does
not scale very well.

Therefore, one has to choose what one can work on.

If the fbsd ports drop procmail, it will just add more on
my plate that I have to do myself. Similar to many other
apps and ports and you-name-it.

While I dislike bitrot like anyone else, I have an issue with
the dropping of ports in general, because that will not scale.

I'm aware, that the other approach (keeping everything)
does not scale either. I've read the recent mail flood
on ports etc. I maintain approx. 200 boxes, so I know
the issues at hand, but right now, I can't offer solutions.
It's just not looking good either way.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Update GnuTLS

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> GnuTLS has been updated. URL:
> 
> 
> I was wondering if there is any work being done on getting the new
> version into the ports tree. GnuTLS 3.0.x branch replaces the GnuTLS
> 2.12.x branch as the supported stable branch. The experimental 2.99.x
> branch is now probably comatose as well.

gnutls-3.0.1 needs p11-kit in version 0.4 or newer, maybe that's why
we're still at 2.x ?

And re-testing the whole dependencies on that -- sounds like a
close call for 9.0-REL...

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Update GnuTLS

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > gnutls-3.0.1 needs p11-kit in version 0.4 or newer, maybe that's why
> > we're still at 2.x ?
> 
> I am not even going to pretend to know what the problem is there.
> Perhaps you can enlighten me as to why the "p11-kit" port cannot be
> updated to the latest version.

I can't enlighten you, but submitted

  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160334

to update it to 0.5. But I have not checked its dependencies.

> > And re-testing the whole dependencies on that -- sounds like a
> > close call for 9.0-REL...
> 
> That doesn't sound so good either.

I tested gnutls-3.0.1 and it had compilation issues in nettle/. Had no
time to dig deeper.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: rid.so missing in samba34/35

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> I've just compiled samba35 from ports with the extra config settings
> ADS/SWAT/DNSUPDATE, no default settings were removed.

I looked at the port and

http://www.linuxhacker.at/bugs/all/hoary-samba-idmap-rid.so-error

Maybe this works: do a

make config

and add

with experimental modules

to the modules to compile with. Recompile, try again.
This should produce/install an idmap/rid.so file ?

I'm not sure whether this error message solves your problem.

> looking in the logs I get the error message "failed to open
> /usr/local/lib/samba/idmap/rid.so" as the file doesn't exist there.
> I noticed this folder was empty for 3.4, but had some modules there in
> 3.5 (which ones, I don't remember now)
> 
> running FreeBSD 8.2 AMD64
> 
> anyone know if this is missing from ports, compile issue or.. ??

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Ports system quality

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > http://pkgin.net/
[...]
> > pkgin is known to work and have been tested under the following platforms
[...]
> So, what do you actually mean by this?

Probably just this: What about trying to port pkgin for FreeBSD, so that
pkgin can also be used on FreeBSD ?

If this solves the binary pkg-install problem in a generic
way on many plattforms (I have not looked at the implementation),
that might be a nice feature.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: sysutils/cfs

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> One thing I've seen come up that I definitely think would be a good idea,
> though, is more accessible documentation of the CVS "attic", though.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/?hideattic=0#dirlist

For example, net/ztelnet is no longer in the ports, but:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net/ztelnet/?hideattic=0

will list the files and you can download from there.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

sysutils/fusefs-kmod compiles only with ruby 1.8

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

With ruby 1.9:

env RUBYLIB=./lib RUBYPATH=./lib ruby -S deplate -x -D manual -f plain -d 
/usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod/work/fuse4bsd-498acaef33b0/doc/plaintext_out 
doc.dpl 
:29:in `require': no such file to load -- 
deplate (LoadError)
from :29:in `require'
from /usr/local/bin/deplate:2:in `'
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod/work/fuse4bsd-498acaef33b0/doc.

With ruby 1.8:

env RUBYLIB=./lib RUBYPATH=./lib ruby -S deplate -x -D manual -f plain -d 
/usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod/work/fuse4bsd-498acaef33b0/doc/plaintext_out 
doc.dpl 
No permission: :
No permission: :
No permission: :

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

dns/opendnssec fails with ruby 1.9

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

With ruby 1.9:

[...]
checking for ruby library xsd/datatypes... not found
configure: error: Ruby library 'xsd/datatypes' not found
configure: error: ./configure failed for auditor
===>  Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to j...@nlnetlabs.nl [maintainer] and attach the
"/usr/ports/dns/opendnssec/work/opendnssec-1.3.2/config.log" including the
output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to
provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls
/var/db/pkg`).
*** Error code 1
[...]

It works with ruby 1.8.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: dns/opendnssec fails with ruby 1.9

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > With ruby 1.9:
[...]
> > It works with ruby 1.8.

> That's why the port is marked as broken with Ruby 1.9:

If it finds a ruby binary in the path, it does not check...

> Makefile:
> .if ${RUBY_VER} == 1.9
> BROKEN=   does not work with ruby 1.9
> .endif

> Is your tree out of date?

The ports tree is updated every night. But: I have both versions
of ruby installed, and no /usr/local/bin/ruby (only a ruby18 and a ruby19).

> What do you have in make.conf?

Only this:

-
# added by use.perl 2011-09-12 23:47:37
PERL_VERSION=5.14.1
-

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: sysutils/fusefs-kmod compiles only with ruby 1.8

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > :29:in `require': no such file to 
> > load -- deplate (LoadError)
> > from :29:in `require'
> > from /usr/local/bin/deplate:2:in `'
> > *** Error code 1
> > 
> 
> I recall seeing this before, but I can't reproduce it right now and I'm
> not sure why. Here's my build log:

> http://people.freebsd.org/~swills/fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1.20080208_8.log

As I described in the other post, I've /usr/local/bin with ruby18 and
ruby19.

If I put a link to -18 somewhere in my $PATH as ruby, it
compiles. If the link goes to -19, it fails.

> Could you check that everything is up to date and try again. If it still
> fails, send the complete build log and complete list of what's installed.

Maybe some similar contruct as in dns/opendnssec would help ?

.if ${RUBY_VER} == 1.9
BROKEN= does not work with ruby 1.9
.endif

And: Maybe some construct in bsd.ruby.mk which sets the ruby version?
[I have no patch on how to do this, but it sounds helpful
in general]

ruby --version seems to be helpful there ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > >   Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it
> > >   determines the local interfaces and their netmasks).

[quote
 http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html]
> > >   I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where
> > > the user-land library was out of sync with kernel-land, resulting
> > > in data structure mis-matches and system calls returning
> > > nonsensical results.

> > Is it a clever idea to hardcode local interfaces on build machine
> > into a package that will then be redistributed to other machines?

No.

> > Sounds like postfix will have to do without official packages on
> > FreeBSD from now on.
> 
> I would find that unacceptable. If the problem is with FreeBSD as
> Wietse has indicated, then the problem should be rectified on the
> FreeBSD side of the equation.

Well, the problem is on both sides. On FreeBSD, one can have "systems"
without any interface -- and postfix assumes that every system
it is built on has some kind of interface.

So, maybe it's time to change that assumption for the postfix
built process, if possible ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > > > >   Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it
> > > > >   determines the local interfaces and their netmasks).
[...]
> Postfix does none of that. 

The fbsd postfix-current port during the post-install script does
something which fails on a jail-based build-cluster where the
jail itself has no network connectivity.

See this message for some analysis:

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-November/071419.html

And this message explains it:

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-November/071421.html

It says:
--
It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail.
What networking activity postconf wants to run?
--

> Can someone please explain what socket call is failing, and what
> the reasons for that might be? 

The reason is that postconf is called during post-install
and fails because the build jail is without any interface.

> I tend to believe that network-less build environments are not
> representative for the environment where an Internet MTA would run,
> but hey, what do I know.

The build environment seems to be network-less. It's not the
environment where the package will run.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Fwd: Lousy timekeeping in VirtualBox 4.0.14

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> I've set up VirtualBox 4.0.14 on my FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (r228498)
> box, and have a FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT VM running underneath it.
> 
> While the VM is running, it doesn't keep time worth a flip.
> 
> This is even with the VirtualBox-Additions in it.
> 
> 1) is this expected/known?

I have seen similar behaviour on other systems (Linux+Qemu)
and other versions of vbox+fbsd, so: I'm not surprised.

>From what I've heard, its a common virtualization issue.

> 2) What can we do to fix it?
> 
> What diagnostics do you need?
> 
> I *CAN* provide ssh access to both the host and the guest.

I'd be willing to provide access to test hosts as well.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Doing SQL to the FreeBSD ports index

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> it might be vaguely useful here and there, so I've stuck a copy on my
> website:
> 
>http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/articles/portindexdb/

http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/articles/portindexdb.html

works better 8-)

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: i386/164629: OpenSIPS package is not avaible

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> FreeBSD is supperting SER and OpenSER. But i cannot see OpenSIPS. It is not
> avaible in yout port list ? why ?

Nobody provided a port, probably.

Are you looking for 1.7.1 or 2.0 ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

making ports on NFS fails sometimes ?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

I'm running a port build for "my" preferred ports list (approx. 1500).

The /usr/ports comes via NFS from an ZFS server.

Some of the port builds fail because of that. Is this well-known ?
Should I move back to a local disk ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: portupgrade -> portmaster Rosetta Stone?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > Doug, is there a way to emulate portupgrade's "-k" (keep going) option,
> > to have the remaining list of ports to be built still continue
> > processing even if one port's build fails?
> 
> You haven't missed it, the answer is no. It's part of that "portmaster
> can't read minds" problem that if something fails, I have no way of
> knowing if the rest of the updates should stop as a result.

They should not stop.

> I may add it someday, but it's not trivial, and it's not a priority.

I have two (in fact, 5) reference hosts, whose only reason of existence
is: csup the ports tree, build all updated stuff.

The script that does this uses:

  portupgrade -arR -m BATCH=yes

and it worked the last few years.

I'm trying to use portmaster on one of the hosts, with:

  portmaster --no-confirm --no-term-title --index --no-index-fetch -a

If it waits for some input, I'm unhappy 8-(

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: portupgrade -> portmaster Rosetta Stone?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> PAGER=CAT portmaster --no-confirm --no-term-title --index 
> --no-index-fetch -a -y

That one waits for the config option screen and does not work
in my daily cron job.

> or  portmaster --no-confirm --no-term-title --index --no-index-fetch -a 
> -y > /dev/null

I wrap the call to portupgrade (or portmaster) in some 'script' to
be able to see what happened. So redirecting stdout (and probably
stderr and stdin) is a problem.

Some said that I should use some tinderbox setup. Well, I'm not yet
ready for this 8-}

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: portupgrade -> portmaster after freebsd-update

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> What is the proper portmaster commands in relation to freebsd-update?
[...]

The portmaster man page lists the following list of commands in the
EXAMPLES section:

 Using portmaster to do a complete reinstallation of all your ports:
   1. portmaster --list-origins > ~/installed-port-list
   2. Update your ports tree
   3. portmaster -ty --clean-distfiles
   4. portmaster --check-port-dbdir
   5. portmaster -Faf
   6. pkg_delete -a
   7. rm -rf /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg
   8. Back up any files in /usr/local you wish to save,
  such as configuration files in /usr/local/etc
   9. Manually check /usr/local and /var/db/pkg
  to make sure that they are really empty
   10. Re-install portmaster
   11. portmaster `cat ~/installed-port-list`

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: p0f v3

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at  
> detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get higher  
> than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were Windows XP,  
> which is causing spam filter accuracy issues.
> 
> I think this would be a great benefit to everyone. The current p0f port  
> does not have a maintainer.

As I've read your mail, I had a look at p0f 3. It looks doable.

I'll give it a try.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: p0f v3

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> I'll give it a try.

I prepared a patch, see

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166224

It still has an issue with the pkg-plist and I would appreciate
hints on what's wrong.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: p0f v3

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166224

> > It still has an issue with the pkg-plist and I would appreciate
> > hints on what's wrong.
> You replaced in Makefile:
> PORTDOCS=   COPYING CREDITS ChangeLog KNOWN_BUGS README TODO
> win-memleak.txt
> 
> With in pkg-plist:
> share/doc/p0f/COPYING
> 
> The PORTDOCS variable respects NOPORTDOCS and does all the automatic
> pkg-plist stuff.

Ah, thanks!

I submitted a fixed pkg-plist to the PR.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Mason 2 - anyone updating? (www/p5-HTML-Mason)

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Can you give any link towards 2.X branch? Ports tree has 1.45 while CPAN
> has 1.48.

http://search.cpan.org/~jswartz/Mason-2.17/

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: KDE4 load libicui18n.so.38 not found - can create system crash!

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> My guess is the primary may be solveable by rebuilding icu and its
> dependencies (quit a lot I believe!).

Yes, rebuilding devel/icu and it dependencies works.

I also deleted the stuff in /usr/local/lib/compat/, just to make it
sure it does not collect the wrong libicui18n.

/usr/local/lib/libicui18n.so.46.0 was installed by package icu-4.6

Hope this helps.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: duplicate origin for perl-based port

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> huff@>> pkgdb -F
> --->  Checking the package registry database
> Duplicated origin: devel/p5-Locale-gettext - p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3 
> p5-gettext-1.05_3
> Unregister any of them? [no] no
> 
>   I don't see anything in UPDATING that covers this.
>   Which of the two should I remove?

p5-gettext-1.05_3

See

http://www.freshports.org/devel/p5-Locale-gettext/

and

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/148166

for this change.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
> 
> diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-
> jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so
> 
> Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ?

Yes.

> When attempting to install databases/libodbc++  (includes unixODBC) which 
> would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report:
> 
> unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): 
>   libiodbc-3.52.7
>   virtuoso-6.1.2_1
> 
> I need virtuoso on this system.
> 
> How do I preceed?

The only file where libiodbc and unixODBC conflict is in

/usr/local/include/sql.h

which contains the API of ODBC. Both libiodbc and unixODBC implement
ODBC, so it's pretty much the same contents, but it's formatted
differently.

What I would suggest:

cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/
make deinstall
cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/
make install
cd /usr/ports/databases/libodbc++
make install
cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/
make install
cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/
make deinstall
cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/
make reinstall

This is messy. Some other suggestion:

File a PR and we bug both upstream providers to seperate their two sql.h
files, so that libiodbc and unixODBC can coexist.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

Dima Panov write:
> jh...@dataix.net wrote:

> > Replace libiodbc with unixODBC
> >
> > They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC.

> Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features,
> exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso.

Ah, interesting. What's the difference ? So a drive to
replace unixODBC in every port would be more useful ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD Port: xpra-0.0.7.16p4

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> >> I only just noticed that you've added a port for xpra.
> >> I wasn't aware of that and you're pointing to the source on my server,
> >> so I guess that it means I have to be careful not to remove it from now on?
> > 
> > The files should eventually get automatically mirrored to the FreeBSD
> > ftp server at ftp.freebsd.org (and it's mirrors), so worst case users
> > get it from there, but it's always nice to get it from the originator.

> OK, I normally move old source releases to /old/ eventually.
> I guess I can still do that as long as the port file has been updated to
> use the newer source snapshots?

There are always hosts out there that still have old port Makefiles
on their disks, so having a stable path would be useful.

E.g. on cpan, the files just are added to the directory, not moved
after newer ones are added.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD Port: xpra-0.0.7.16p4

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > There are always hosts out there that still have old port Makefiles
> > on their disks, so having a stable path would be useful.

> Well, in truth, the port's Makefile may be trivially configured to look
> into the old/ subdirectory if the distfile is not found in the "real" one
> (see the security/stunnel Makefile for an example).

Ah, I was not aware of that. Which part of the config provides this ?

The /%SUBDIR%/ in combination with the MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Call for Testers: VirtualBox 4.0.4

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

Tested it against a windows sbs 2011 test install that I had
prepared using the vbox 3.2.12 port. Harddisk images are
on ZFSv28, amd64, freebsd-9.0-current.

VBoxHeadless --startvm sbs11 --vnc --vncport 5911 --vncpass [...]

vbox 4 crashed with a segfault.

What can I do to debug it ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Call for Testers: VirtualBox 4.0.4

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Tested it against a windows sbs 2011 test install that I had
> prepared using the vbox 3.2.12 port. Harddisk images are
> on ZFSv28, amd64, freebsd-9.0-current.
> 
> VBoxHeadless --startvm sbs11 --vnc --vncport 5911 --vncpass [...]
> 
> vbox 4 crashed with a segfault.
> 
> What can I do to debug it ?

A second start like this worked fine.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Call for Testers: VirtualBox 4.0.4

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > What can I do to debug it ?
> 
> A second start like this worked fine.

While doing a shutdown, this happened:

ipcDConnectService Stats
 => number of worker threads: 1
Segmentation fault: 11

But it did not drop a core file.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Call for Testers: VirtualBox 4.0.4

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

Tested it against a windows 7-64:

VBoxHeadless --startvm win7-64 --vnc --vncport 5912

After approx. 24 hours, it crashed:

!!Assertion Failed!!
Expression: RTLockValidator
Location  : 
/usr/home/pi/myp/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-4.0.4_OSE/src/VBox/VMM/VMMR3/PDMBlkCache.cpp(654)
 void pdmBlkCacheCommit(PDMBLKCACHE*)
Detected deadlock!  [uId=000803e71abc  thrd=AioMgr0-F]
Lock: 000805fa4800 RTSemRW-22 own= r=1 cls=anon-31/none 
pos={PDMBlkCache.cpp(2439) pdmBlkCacheIoXferCompleteEntry 000803e720a4} [x]
 start of lock stack for 0008077d6100 AioMgr0-F - 1 entry 
#00: 000809228190 RTCritSect-49 own=AioMgr0-F r=1 cls=anon-23/none 
pos={PDMBlkCache.cpp(117) pdmBlkCacheLockEnter } [x]
 end of lock stack 
 start of deadlock chain - 2 entries 
#00: s 000805fa4800 RTSemRW-22 srec=000805fa48a0 cls=anon-31/none [s]
#01: 000809228190 RTCritSect-49 own=AioMgr0-F r=1 cls=anon-23/none 
pos={PDMBlkCache.cpp(117) pdmBlkCacheLockEnter } [x]
 end of deadlock chain 
Trace/BPT trap: 5

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: KDE and GNOME release packages do not play well together

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> John Baldwin ha scritto:
> > This would appear to no longer be a supported use case in for 8.2 packages
> > (and if you believe posts on the forums, 8.1 was equally broken).  Namely,
> > some package the GNOME depends on wants to use unixODBC, and some other
> > package that KDE depends on wants to use libiodbc.  The simplest suggestion 
> > in
> > the forums appears to be to change the gnome package (devel/ptlib26) to use
> > libiodbc instead.
> 
> Even if it could be simpler (is it?), I think unixODBC is a more common 
> choice these days, so changing the KDE ports could be better.

Both ports CONFLICT right now, only because both install 

/usr/local/include/sql.h

Otherwise, they could be installed in parallel and there would be
no problem.

The contents of include/sql.h is very similar, because it contains
the interface definitions of ODBC (mostly 'defines').

> I don't have personal experience, but the two ports should be completely 
> interchangeable, so we could add support for USE_ODBC in 
> bsd.databases.mk and allow the user to choose the odbc implementation 
> (with one [unixODBC?] as default to create consistent packages).

As far as I heard from some ppl, they are not 100% interchangeable.

Maybe some clever construct of ifdef in a generic sql.h
and two install-locations for the two sql.h files would
help to resolv the CONFLICT ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > No, it's more than that.  I got the distinct impression that many of the
> > committers would be unhappy if I took maintainership of some of the
> > ports I might identify as "popular", because it would interfere with
> > their plans to trim the portstree.

> Then you have misunderstood things.  I don't think anybody would be
> unhappy if you (or anybody else) took maintainership of one or more of
> the currently unmaintained ports.

There are two things. Becoming a maintainer seems to be really easy.

Having one's PRs committed is a bit more difficult and sometimes
takes 4-6 weeks (I had a case recently with 155399 and 155400).

Maybe, if maintainer can "somehow easily" become ports committer,
this hurdle might be lower ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

[Kurt Jaeger]

Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Kurt Jaeger  wrote:
> > Then you have misunderstood things.  I don't think anybody would be
> > unhappy if you (or anybody else) took maintainership of one or more of
> > the currently unmaintained ports.
> 
> > There are two things. Becoming a maintainer seems to be really easy.
> 
> Becoming a maintainer requires that you commit to do the work to
> ensure that a certain program works on FreeBSD. How easy this is
> depends on you.

Yes, that's how I handle it.

> > Having one's PRs committed is a bit more difficult and sometimes
> > takes 4-6 weeks (I had a case recently with 155399 and 155400).
> 
> There is a lot of work that has to be done in the background even if
> no new ports are added.

I'm aware of this. What I see is that only a few ports committer
do most of the commits of the small leaf ports. This would burn
me out as well, if I had to do it 8-}

So, if the maintainers of the small leaf ports would be able
to commit their work themselves, it would free the ports committers
with the large ports projects on their hands to work on those ?

Would this work ?

> Things like the gmake upgrade and new ports
> features take a lot of time.  Furthermore adding a port seems to be a
> "trivial" task, however the committers have to (a) fix it up if it is
> formatted badly (b) test it in a tinderbox and only then (c) commit
> it.

I use three boxes (for 8.1 i386, amd64 and 9-current amd64) to
test. I do not use a tinderbox, as I assume considerable complexity
to set one up.

Does using a tinderbox make a large difference ?

> This takes more time than just "cvs commit". A lot of work has
> been done in recent years to make this process faster and I'm sure
> more could be done - but a lot of people don't realize how much work
> goes on behind the scenes

I agree, the infrastructure is massive!

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Ports with a broken PKGORIGIN: chinese/joe, security/p5-Auth-Yu...

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> I took care of security/p5-Auth-YubikeyDecrypter

Sorry, I had a temporary spam flood on the maintainer e-mail
fbsd-po...@opsec.eu.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Spamassassin vs Perl

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > I have updated my Perl version yesterday but now my Spamd doesn't work 
> > anymore.

> Did you run perl-after-upgrade command after update?

Same perl upgrade, yes, I ran perl-after-upgrade after the upgrade, similar
problem:

fa8# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd start
Starting spamd.
Can't locate NetAddr/IP.pm in @INC (@INC contains: 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.1/BSDPAN 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.1/mach 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.1 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.1/mach 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.1) at 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NetSet.pm line 25.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NetSet.pm line 25.
Compilation failed in require at 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm line 86.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm line 86.
Compilation failed in require at 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 71.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 71.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 85.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 85.
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd: WARNING: failed to start spamd

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Spamassassin vs Perl

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > > Did you run perl-after-upgrade command after update?
> > 
> > Same perl upgrade, yes, I ran perl-after-upgrade after the upgrade,
> > similar problem:
[...]
> > fa8# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd start
> > Starting spamd.
> > Can't locate NetAddr/IP.pm in @INC (@INC
[...]

> reinstall net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP

It's not only net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP, there are approx. 20+ dependencies
which also did not work due to the upgrade.

Interestingly, approx. 4000 manual pages are still in

/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0

and approx. 8000 other 5.14.0 files are in

/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0

I assume that short of a full rebuild nothing helps if the perl
version increases. This is a bit painful 8-(

How can one reconstruct a good dependency tree of all perl related ports
which allows to cleanly rebuild them all ?

portupgrade -fr perl seems to have issues, as well.

I'll start one and report back.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Spamassassin vs Perl

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > > > Did you run perl-after-upgrade command after update?
[yes...]
> I assume that short of a full rebuild nothing helps if the perl
> version increases. This is a bit painful 8-(
> 
> How can one reconstruct a good dependency tree of all perl related ports
> which allows to cleanly rebuild them all ?
> 
> portupgrade -fr perl seems to have issues, as well.
> 
> I'll start one and report back.

After an portupgrade -fr perl run, I still have approx. 4200 files
in /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0.

This is a huge amount of files, much larger than I expected.

What went wrong ? I can provide a copy of the portupgrade -fr perl run.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

freebsd databases/p5-DBD-Oracle and perl-5.14 ?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

>From what I can see, databases/p5-DBD-Oracle seems to have issues
with perl 5.14 and DBD-Oracle in its most recent version seems to
have issues with Oracle8.

Are you or someone else working on that ? Is there a PR somewhere ?

Does

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/157544

help ? Thanks!

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> On 21 August 2011 10:05, Michel Talon  wrote:
> > I notice in the list the port math/pari which is not some obscure
> > abandonware, but one of the most proeminent free computer algebra software.
[...]
> > In other words everything works completely out of the box, without any
> > intervention.
> 
> Looks like the outdated version we have in ports isn't kept there any
> more. Would you like to be the port's new maintainer?

I'll have a look at it.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: textproc/p5-XML-SAX: prerequisite XML::SAX::Base 1.05 not found

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> When I try to update textproc/p5-XML-SAX I get the following warning:
[...]
> Warning: prerequisite XML::SAX::Base 1.05 not found. We have 1.04.
[...]
> This happens on several boxes with recent 10.0-CURRENT (amd64). Does 
> anyone else see this behaviour?

Yes. The fix seems to be to install textproc/p5-XML-SAX-Base.
Tested on 8.3-REL-amd64

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Stop in /usr/ports/devel/qt4-makeqpf

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > devel/qt4-makeqpf:make reinstall
> > ===>  Patching for qt4-makeqpf-4.8.2
> > ===>  Applying extra patch
> > /usr/ports/devel/qt4-makeqpf/../../devel/qt4/files/patch-configure
> > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
> > 5 out of 5 hunks ignored--saving rejects to ./configure.rej
> > *** Error code 5
> >
> > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/qt4-makeqpf.
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/qt4-makeqpf
> 
> `make patch' works just fine here. My guess is that you did not clean
> your work directory and the patch is then being applied to an already
> patched tree.

Nope, happens where with 8.1 as well due to:

.if ${OSVERSION} < 802502
EXTRA_PATCHES+= ${FILESDIR}/extra-patch-tools__makeqpf__qpf2.cpp
.endif

or so.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: graphics/gdal: gifdataset.cpp:599:23: error: 'PrintGifError' was not declared in this scope

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Since the last port update, I get this sticky error in gdal:

It's in graphics/giflib, the latest update to 4.2.0 dropped
the symbol PrintGifError. All the dependent packages need
to be recompiled 8-(

Yes, I know. This is messy.

> libtool: compile:  g++46 -O3 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=native
> -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46 -Wall
> -I/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.0/port
> -I/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.0/gcore
> -I/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.0/alg
> -I/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.0/ogr
> -I/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.0/ogr/ogrsf_frmts -DOGR_ENABLED
> -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.0/port
> -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local -I/usr/local/include
> -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local
> -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local
> -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local -I/usr/local/include -I/usr
> -I/usr/include -c gifdataset.cpp  -fPIC -DPIC -o ../o/.libs/gifdataset.o
> gifdataset.cpp: In static member function 'static GDALDataset*
> GIFDataset::CreateCopy(const char*, GDALDataset*, int, char**,
> GDALProgressFunc, void*)':
> gifdataset.cpp:599:23: error: 'PrintGifError' was not declared in this scope
> gifdataset.cpp:625:23: error: 'PrintGifError' was not declared in this scope
> gmake[2]: *** [../o/gifdataset.lo] Error 1
> gmake[2]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.0/frmts/gif'
> gmake[1]: *** [gif-install-obj] Error 2
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.0/frmts'
> gmake: *** [frmts-target] Error 2
> *** [do-build] Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/gdal.
> *** [build] Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/gdal.
> 
> ===>>> make failed for graphics/gdal
> ===>>> Aborting update
> 
> Terminated
> 
> ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line:
>portmaster  graphics/gdal
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Oliver
> 



-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Any news on Suhosin?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> When will the patch and extension be available for 5.4?  Any idea?

When I look at their webpage:

http://www.hardened-php.net/suhosin/download.html

It's not yet available for any php5.4.

So it's an issue upstream, not at the fbsd ports side.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: multimedia/linux-realplayer port marked as BROKEN

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > The "multimedia/linux-realplayer" port has been marked
> > "BROKEN=unfetchable" for awhile now. Has there been any movement on a
> > resolution for this problem.
> 
> Unless a legal mirror is found, I'm afraid we can't provide it; mirroring
> is forbidden.
> 
> http://www.real.com/licensing/faq.html

I opened a ticket with Real: 120629-000315 

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: multimedia/linux-realplayer port marked as BROKEN

[Kurt Jaeger]

> On 6/29/12 11:12 AM, Jerry wrote:
> > The "multimedia/linux-realplayer" port has been marked
> > "BROKEN=unfetchable" for awhile now. Has there been any movement on a
> > resolution for this problem.
> if you have a copy of it, that matches SIZE and SHA256, why not host it 
> and open a pr to change the master_sites?

I would do that if the issue with

http://www.real.com/licensing/faq.html  

can be solved. That's why I opened a ticket.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: ports/164072 : [NEW PORT] databases/percona-{server,client} status

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Could someone comment on status of ports/164072?
> Have been percona ports ever committed to ports tree?

Other ones: percona-toolkit

I would love to see their database in the ports tree!

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [HEADS-UP] Announcing the end of port CVS

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > Can I just ask something about changing over to use sv - should I delete
> > the entire /usr/ports tree before I use :
> > 
> > svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/ports/head /usr/ports
> 
> You might want to consider saving away /usr/ports/distfiles and/or
> /usr/ports/packages first, but (basically): yes.

What happens, if one does:

svn update

and then adds some files to distfiles/

and then does some

svn update

again. Will the distfiles be deleted ? Ignored ? ... ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: inkskape

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Inkskape build without problem (gcc) on FreeBSD 9.1 RC1 but when I ran it I 
> got:
> Shared object "libpcre.so.0" not found, required by "liblqr-1.so.3"
> 
> locate libpcre.so shows:
> 
> /compat/linux/lib/libpcre.so.0
> /compat/linux/lib/libpcre.so.0.0.1
> /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so
> /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1

cd /usr/local/lib/
ln -s libpcre.so.1 libpcre.so.0

will allow it to start, I assume. The side effects are an open question.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: sysutils/ntfsprogs: problem with GNOMEVFS2

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> If GNOMEVFS2 option is selected in sysutils/ntfsprogs, then make-ing of any 
> target
> becomes impossible:
> 
> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk", line 657: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk 
> part
> is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOME=yes before bsd.port.pre.mk?

See 

  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=172453

for a fix.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: graphics/png status, when will 1.5.13 appear in ports?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > > I didn't realize the FreeBSD ports people would be so cautious with png.
> 
> > [5810 eitan@radar ~ ]%grep png-1.5 -c /usr/ports/INDEX-10
> > 6036
> 
> > might help explain why. :)
> 
> 
> > Eitan Adler
> 
> I don't have INDEX-10, but ran 
> grep png-1.5 -c /BETA1/usr/ports/INDEX-9
> and got 6032.
> 
> Does that mean so many ports depend on png-1.5?

Yes.

> I guess they don't want to risk the small chance of png-1.5.13 breaking a 
> whole lot of ports?

Yes, that's the reason. The ports tree has stability targets, freshness
targets and time targets (like getting a RELEASE out), and probably
some other targets as well.

Sometimes, one target looses against one of the others.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [Call for Testers] VirtualBox 4.2.4

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

I compiled 4.2.4 on a generic 9.0-RELEASE amd64. It compiled and
started, thank you very much!

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Committer needed: net/kamailio

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> I???ve patched net/kamailio and raised a ticket:
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227677 
> 

Sorry for the delay, I'll work it in.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Could a committer please look at bug 219793, www/geneweb?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> It's been open 11 months now. I'm not sure if there's an alternate
> procedure to request somebody's attention other than posting to this
> list.
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219793

testbuilds@work

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Could a committer please look at bug 219793, www/geneweb?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > It's been open 11 months now. I'm not sure if there's an alternate
> > procedure to request somebody's attention other than posting to this
> > list.
> > 
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219793
> 
> testbuilds@work

Done.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: How long does a new port sit in the Bugs queue?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> I created a new port for a Perl library I'm using, and then added an
> entry for it to freebsd-bugs.  This was back on April 24th.
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227751
> 
> My addition has been sitting in the queue in "New" status since then.
> I'm in no rush to get it added, but I am curious about how long I can
> expect new ports to sit in the queue before being acted on.

It depends on the work load of the committers, and unfortunatly,
the time has no upper bound.

I've checked and committed the port.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Port update -- commit required

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> >> May some kind committer take a look at the patch
> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224405  with
> >> www/payara port update? I am a port mainteiner for the port. The patch
> >> was submitted in the middle of December 2017, updated two times and
> >> would be nice to have it committed.

> >Take it !

> Sorry, I didn't understand. What you mean?

It means he's working on it. Btw, I've test-build the port, looks good.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Committer TLC needed for ports devel/sope4, www/sogo4 and www/sogo4-activesync

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227578

There's a devel/sope4 already in the ports. Can you provide a
diff if it needs an update or can we close this PR ?

> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227579

Testbuilds@work.

Please note that bapt sees this version crashing, and no update
on that patch about this problem.

> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227580

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Committer TLC needed for ports devel/sope4, www/sogo4 and www/sogo4-activesync

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227578

> > There's a devel/sope4 already in the ports. Can you provide a
> > diff if it needs an update or can we close this PR ?

> I'll look into it.
> My best guess is that bapt must have committed this one but did
> not update the PR?

acm@ committed it.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Bug report commit request

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Would someone please commit following bug report with maintainer
> timeout?
> 
> Bug 227497 - devel/dash.el: Update to 2.14.1
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227497

Testbuilding will take a while. Ideas to speed up the commits:

- note if you did testbuilds (if with poudriere, list the OS versions)
- note if you did run-tests, on which OS version
- add links to the release note (what changes?)

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Bug report commit request

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Would someone please commit following bug report with maintainer
> timeout?
> 
> Bug 227497 - devel/dash.el: Update to 2.14.1
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227497

Done.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: PR looking for committer

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Could someone committer please have a look at this?
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227507

Done, thanks for the submission!

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Practice of "Sponsored by" in commit messages

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to qualify
> "Sponsored by" lines to indicate which participant(s) is(are) sponsored,
> in way that is equivalent to the way that the actual work itself is
> customarily attributed.

This sounds reasonable, so I suggest that you submit a
patch to the ports handbook that describes it for maintainers
and committers. 

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Practice of "Sponsored by" in commit messages

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

>  The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to qualify
>  "Sponsored by" lines to indicate which participant(s) is(are) sponsored,
>  in way that is equivalent to the way that the actual work itself is
>  customarily attributed.

> >>> This sounds reasonable, so I suggest that you submit a
> >>> patch to the ports handbook that describes it for maintainers
> >>> and committers.

> >> One thing to note: FreeBSD has a custom patch to subversion to detect
> >> "ORGANIZATION_NAME" and automatically append it to the default
> >> template. This is likely why its getting added in unexpected places.

> > How do you think I should handle that in my forthcoming doc patch? Is
> > there a related bug I should file against services?

> Its a client side patch of the subversion binary.  I'm not sure the
> best way to handle it beyond perhaps changing the template a bit?

What change would be needed ? There's already a Sponsored by field ?

The custom patch is here:

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/subversion/files/extra-patch-fbsd-template?revision=411397&view=markup

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Practice of "Sponsored by" in commit messages

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> You guys are still trying to read and interpret labels on the t-shirts I
> think. "Sponsored by: XYZ" in the commit message only means that some
> undefined portion of the work has been in some form supported or encouraged
> by XYZ.

John suggests a way to improve the precision of that "Sponsored by".

Do you think his patch for the handbook helps ?

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228353

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Phabricator to ports commit broken?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> I'm getting some issues due to these systems: svn hooks and phabricator 
> apparently being out of sync:
> 
> Can anyone help or suggest a way forward?

Eitan Adler wrote on phabric-admin@:

> Not currently. https://secure.phabricator.com/T2920 is the upstream
> tracking bug.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Commiter needed

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227750
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191526

Done. Thank you for the reminder and your patience. The lua one
really slipped through the cracks 8-(

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: PHP 7.2

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> PHP 7.2.6 has been out since Friday.  
> 
> Why no updates yet?

The update already hit the tree thanks to tz@!

https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2018-May/184475.html

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: net/frr 4.0 crashing

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> seems that FRR 4.0 crash if there are tun,gre,gif interfaces??? on FreeBSD.
> https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/1907
> https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/2338

Ah, thanks for the pointer! That's the same problem I had!

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD Port: leofs-1.4.1

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Hi, do you have some news about porting of new LeoFS version?

I've prepared a patch, see

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228887

Can you run-test this patch ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD Port: leofs-1.4.1

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Yes, I can test the match. Give me some day (4-5), 

Yes, no problem. Maintainer already commented, as well. Maybe
he can run-test, too 8-)

> I'm very busy with my work in University!!

Keep it that way! Do not let this distract you 8-)

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: How to install phpMyAdmin as a package

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Sorry for asking as I think the question hasbeen raised some time 
> before(ducking):
> 
> Can somebody tell me how I can install phpMyAdmin from the packages?

It depends on the version of php you want to depend on:

  pkg install phpMyAdmin-php72

or 71, 70 or 56.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Of Git and M$

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > github != git
> 
> I didn't say that it was; did you misunderstand my message or something?

Well, your message suggests moving to a different version
control system because of github. But why should git itself
be touched by this move ? gitlab or gitea or other open source
solutions use git.

So why change the version control system if a source repo is
changing owners ? Can you elaborate ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Bug report commit request

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> Bug 228241 - games/ninix-aya: Change MASTER_SITES to DEBIAN_POOL
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228241

The official dist-site is SF, and there's a version 5.0.5 available.

Any reason why updating from 4.4 to 5.0.5 is not feasable ?

> Bug 228242 - japanese/font-ume: Fix MASTER_SITES
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228242

We have 0.0.660, but the dist site @osdn has 0.0.670 ?

> Bug 228243 - japanese/FreeWnn-server: Remove ftp.freewnn.org from MASTER_SITES
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228243

We have 1.1.1.a021, the dist-site has a023 ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Bug report commit request

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> >> Bug 228241 - games/ninix-aya: Change MASTER_SITES to DEBIAN_POOL
> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228241
> > 
> > The official dist-site is SF, and there's a version 5.0.5 available.
> > 
> > Any reason why updating from 4.4 to 5.0.5 is not feasable ?

> 5. I myself don't have motivation to update these ports because I
>don't use any of then. Especially there seems to be large change of
>build conditions of games/ninix-aya from 4.4 to 5.0.5. So I only
>fixed fetching problem of these ports.

I understand. I committed the two PRs where updating the
distsite fixes the problem. The ninix-aya PR is still open.
As far as I understand the policy says to not accept other projects
distcache-like infrastructure as MASTER_SITES. DEBIAN_POOL
is very similar to the FreeBSD distcache.

Because I'm not that eager to fix games 8-}, I'll stay away
from fixing it, too.

Thanks for your patches!

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: net-p2p/qbittorrent needs to be unblocked by portmgr

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Yuri  wrote:
> > Committing transaction...
> > svn: E165001: Commit failed (details follow):
> > svn: E165001: Commit blocked by pre-commit hook (exit code 1) with output:
> > Do not commit a port with FLAVORS without first
> > getting approval from portmgr.
> 
> 
> Yes,  you didn't receive approval to do this.
> 
> Antoine (with hat: portmgr)

Can you give more details on approvals for new flavors ?

I remember some other PR about a requested new flavor:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224319

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: head/audio/jack-keyboard

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> In any case, for any future update you need to do, please provide a
> patch, either in a PR or in the email. Preferably in a PR.

I approved that update, as I assumed that it's just a version
bump and new distinfo values, FYI.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Maintainership revocation due to unavaliable email

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> I've had problems with my e-mail - it was unavailable for some time, and 
> found out that it caused maintainership revocation for my ports in r473941.
> 
> I'm willing to take it back. Should I issue PR on this?

Yes, please submit a PR to change it back.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Please test!

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> I'm sorry.
> The URL was wrong.
> 
> The correct URL is http://taurus.ics.nara-wu.ac.jp/my/singular-port.tar.gz

It was committed with quite a few modifications, see:

https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2018-July/187954.html

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Hadoop-ecosystem ports

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> I will be working on making Hadoop a first class citizen on FreeBSD.

Thanks, that sounds helpful, as that is a large group of applications.

> This will include bumping the existing ports for Hadoop, HBase, Oozie,
> Spark (probably some others as well), and creating ports for HUE, Sqoop,
> Zeppelin, Flume, Ambari and a variety of other projects maintained by
> the ASF. Think Hortonworks HDP/Cloudera CDH/MapR, just on FreeBSD.
> 
> This can't be done on just one laptop  and I'm looking for people
> interested in testing and reviewing them.

> Preferably also someone with hardware to stand up a large enough cluster
> as reference architecture, to show that Hadoop on FreeBSD trumps Hadoop
> on Linux.

I can provide a 32 GB / 4c+4t box as a testing environment, if it
helps.

> What's a good mailing list to coordinate this effort on? Given that
> they're mostly Apache projects, would apache@ be a good fit?

apache@ looks very limited to the webserver (if you review
the last few month of posts).

For a start, use ports@. If ports@ gets too much hadoop-related
posts, you can always ask postmaster@ to add a list, like
freebsd-hadoop@ or something similar.

https://wiki.freebsd.org/Teams/postmaster#How_to_create_a_new_list.3F

says:

What we need

Terse (one-line) description of list.
More verbose description of list.
Any deviations from these defaults:
Max message body size: 200KB
Not moderated
Open (subscription not required for) posting
Public archives
"Official" name of list "foo" is "freebsd-foo"
List is a technical list (vs. freebsd-chat@)
List is for discussions (vs. freebsd-announce@)
No designated non-postmaster "moderator" or "list administrator" 

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Hadoop-ecosystem ports

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> > For a start, use ports@. If ports@ gets too much hadoop-related
> > posts, you can always ask postmaster@ to add a list, like
> > freebsd-hadoop@ or something similar.
> > 
> > https://wiki.freebsd.org/Teams/postmaster#How_to_create_a_new_list.3F
[...]

> The link you cite above, only returns the following:
> 
> You are not allowed to view this page.
> 
> Is this the intended output?

It's complicated. I'll try to work on that.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Is there an index of all central poudriere builds?

[Kurt Jaeger]

Adam wrote:
> Yuri. Third time you're being told this in this thread: 11.2 uses THE
> SAME PACKAGES as 11.1.

There are corner cases (virtualbox-ose-kmod and others) which
fail. So users who no not operate their own pkg builder
have problems. I think that's why yuri is unhappy, because he assumes
that users will be unhappy.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"