Hi! > > Doug, is there a way to emulate portupgrade's "-k" (keep going) option, > > to have the remaining list of ports to be built still continue > > processing even if one port's build fails? > > You haven't missed it, the answer is no. It's part of that "portmaster > can't read minds" problem that if something fails, I have no way of > knowing if the rest of the updates should stop as a result.
They should not stop. > I may add it someday, but it's not trivial, and it's not a priority. I have two (in fact, 5) reference hosts, whose only reason of existence is: csup the ports tree, build all updated stuff. The script that does this uses: portupgrade -arR -m BATCH=yes and it worked the last few years. I'm trying to use portmaster on one of the hosts, with: portmaster --no-confirm --no-term-title --index --no-index-fetch -a If it waits for some input, I'm unhappy 8-( -- p...@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 8 years to go ! _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
