security/openssh-portable

[Cy Schubert]

Hi all,

Our openssh-portable port hasn't been updated to 5.9p1, so I took advantage 
of a free evening to see if I could update it. Unfortunately Simon 
Wilkinson's GSSAPI patch no longer applies, as it hasn't been updated since 
OpenSSH 5.8. It has been superceeded by the NCSA illinois.edu GSI patch, 
which not only include the Wilkinson's GSSAPI Patch but also the HPN patch, 
among others. Unfortunately this patch also conflicts with some of our own 
FreeBSD patches in the port. What I propose to do is remove the GSSAPI 
patch from security/openssh-portable and for those who need the GSSAPI 
server key exchange, create a new port (through a repocopy of course) which 
includes the illinois.edu GSI patch with reworked FreeBSD patches resolving 
patch conflicts, calling it security/openssh-portable-gsi. Does this make 
any sense to anyone?

Or, instead of the above, just include the GSI patch by default in a 
one-size-fits-all openssh-portable port? (Meaning that the GSI patch is 
applied regardless.) Does this make more sense to people?


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert 
FreeBSD UNIX: Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-2.4.X & php5-5.4.X

[Alex Dupre]

alexus wrote:
> slightly off topic yet still _VERY_ important peace and _VERY_ widely
> used is mod_php. I know that was discussed about million times through
> mailing lists and other ways

Exactly, so why are you jumping on for the million and one time? If you
want custom packages set up your own tinderbox or package builder machine.

-- 
Alex Dupre
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

libreoffice

[ajtiM]

Hi!

I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just OpenOffice 
maintained? I used on my wife Mageia Linux notebook LibreOffice 3.5.2 and has 
many improvemnts compare with 3.4 which we have in ports.

Thank.

Mitja

http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: libreoffice

[Rodrigo OSORIO]

On 14/03/12 05:44 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just OpenOffice 
> maintained? I used on my wife Mageia Linux notebook LibreOffice 3.5.2 and has 
> many improvemnts compare with 3.4 which we have in ports.
> 
> Thank.
> 
> Mitja
> 
> http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Hi,

In a post here[1] bapt@ gives some informations about the libreoffice status in 
ports
and the incomming improvements. A jump to 3.5.1 is expected as soon as this 
version
will be available.

regards,
Rodrigo

[1] http://lists.pcbsd.org/pipermail/pbi-dev/2012-March/001699.html
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: libreoffice

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:06:47PM +0100, Rodrigo OSORIO wrote:
> On 14/03/12 05:44 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just OpenOffice 
> > maintained? I used on my wife Mageia Linux notebook LibreOffice 3.5.2 and 
> > has 
> > many improvemnts compare with 3.4 which we have in ports.
> > 
> > Thank.
> > 
> > Mitja
> > 
> > http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa
> > ___
> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In a post here[1] bapt@ gives some informations about the libreoffice status 
> in ports
> and the incomming improvements. A jump to 3.5.1 is expected as soon as this 
> version
> will be available.
> 
> regards,
> Rodrigo
> 
> [1] http://lists.pcbsd.org/pipermail/pbi-dev/2012-March/001699.html

Btw libreoffice 3.5.2 doesn't exist yet, the next version if 3.5.1 (and as just
been released) btw porting libreoffice 3.5 is still not finished.

regards,
Bapt


pgp1Yzkjmbr2D.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: qpopper compile failure

[David Southwell]

On Tuesday 13 March 2012 07:23:37 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 13/03/2012 13:01, David Southwell wrote:
> > qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade
> > I am Getting the following error:
> > 
> > set MISSING_OBJS to  base64.o
> > set MISSING_SRCS to  base64.c
> > Set AR_FLAG =  -r ; RANLIB_CMD =
> > checking for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be
> > located ===>  Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
> > 
> > 
> > sendmail is
> > [root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/qpopper]# whereis sendmail
> > sendmail: /usr/local/sbin/sendmail /usr/local/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz
> > /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail
> > 
> > qpopper config log includes the following lines:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > PATH: /usr/local/kde4/bin
> > PATH: /sbin
> > PATH: /bin
> > PATH: /usr/sbin
> > PATH: /usr/bin
> > PATH: /usr/games
> > PATH: /usr/local/sbin
> > PATH: /usr/local/share/lprof
> > PATH: /usr/local/bin
> > PATH: /home/admin/bin
> > 
> > Does anyone have any idea why this error might occur?
> 
> Yes.  All unix apps that send e-mail expect to do it by piping the mail
> into /usr/sbin/sendmail.  Despite the name, on FreeBSD that is not
> actually sendmail-brand sendmail, but mailwrapper(8) -- a handy program
> that redirects that piped input into the MTA of your choice.
> 
> (sendmail q.v. is actually in /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail)
> 
> Restore /usr/sbin/sendmail and verify that the contents of
> /etc/mail/mailer.conf are sane, and qpopper should spring into life again.
> 
>   Cheers,
> 
>   Matthew
Does that not produce problems with postfix?
How do we retain mailwrapper functionality?

spf was working fine until upgrading. What has changed? Atm I have spf turned 
off until I get this sorted.
David

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: qpopper compile failure

[Matthew Seaman]

On 14/03/2012 12:35, David Southwell wrote:
> Does that not produce problems with postfix?
> How do we retain mailwrapper functionality?

When you install postfix, it sets up /etc/mail/mailer.conf so that it
pipes any new mail into postfix.  Or, at least, it tells you what to put
in that file to achieve the required effect.  That's the point of
mailwrapper.  It lets you use whatever MTA you want to without having to
overwrite bits of the base system or make all sorts of non-portable changes.

> spf was working fine until upgrading. What has changed? Atm I have spf turned 
> off until I get this sorted.

That is a completely different problem, and nothing to do with the
presence or absence of mailwrapper as /usr/sbin/sendmail.  It's also
impossible to answer with no more information than "it doesn't work."

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: qpopper compile failure

[Mel Flynn]

On 3/13/2012 14:01, David Southwell wrote:
> 
> qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade I am
> Getting the following error:
> 
> set MISSING_OBJS to  base64.o 
> set MISSING_SRCS to  base64.c 
> Set AR_FLAG =  -r ; RANLIB_CMD = 
> checking for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be located
> ===>  Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.

Something severely wrong with your setup. It looks at several places for
sendmail and does not actually check if the program is a valid sendmail
or even executable, just that the file exists.
Not even sure where to start looking. I guess the following is a good start:
sh -c 'test -f /usr/sbin/sendmail && echo sendmail found'

If that works on the shell, take portupgrade out of the equation and run
make -C /usr/ports/mail/qpopper clean configure.

FWIW: rev 1.104 of mail/qpopper/Makefile works for me(tm), except for
the configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apopuid

-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: ports/166058: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI

[nwhitehorn]

Synopsis: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ppc->freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: nwhitehorn
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 14 14:23:30 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Reassign to responsible party.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166058
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: ports/166058: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI

[scheidell]

Synopsis: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: scheidell
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 14 14:24:58 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Its freebsd-ports-bugs. Thanks.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166058
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[HEADS UP]: lang/perl5.8 and lang/perl5.10 are EOL, to be deprecated, and removed 8.3 + 3months

[Philip M. Gollucci]

lang/perl5.8 has been EOL since ~12/16/2008
lang/perl5.10 has been EOL since ~08/23/2009

lang/perl5.12 is currently in Maint mode (our current default)

lang/perl5.14(.2) is currently GA

lang/perl5.15 is currently Devel and in the works with a -exp run
  requested

lang/perl5.8 and lang/perl5.10 will have DEPRECATED and EXPIRATION_DATE
set after the freeze+slush are lifted for the 8.3-RELEASE cycle.
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.3R/schedule.html (seems like June 1).
We will set the date to be 3 months from that.  You should plan to
migrate then to perl 5.14 BEFORE then

September 1, 2012



-- 

1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
Member,   Apache Software Foundation
Committer,FreeBSD Foundation
Consultant,   P6M7G8 Inc.
Director Operations,  Ridecharge Inc.

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: qpopper compile failure

[David Southwell]

On Wednesday 14 March 2012 07:17:55 Mel Flynn wrote:
> On 3/13/2012 14:01, David Southwell wrote:
> > qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade
> > I am Getting the following error:
> > 
> > set MISSING_OBJS to  base64.o
> > set MISSING_SRCS to  base64.c
> > Set AR_FLAG =  -r ; RANLIB_CMD =
> > checking for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be
> > located ===>  Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
> 
> Something severely wrong with your setup. It looks at several places for
> sendmail and does not actually check if the program is a valid sendmail
> or even executable, just that the file exists.
> Not even sure where to start looking. I guess the following is a good
> start: sh -c 'test -f /usr/sbin/sendmail && echo sendmail found'
> 
> If that works on the shell, take portupgrade out of the equation and run
> make -C /usr/ports/mail/qpopper clean configure.
> 
> FWIW: rev 1.104 of mail/qpopper/Makefile works for me(tm), except for
> the configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apopuid
Here is what we have in response. As sendmail is in /usr/local/sbin a search 
in /usr/sbin fails:
[root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-perl]# sh -c 'test -f 
/usr/sbin/sendmail && echo sendmail found'
[root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-perl]# cd /usr/sbin/
[root@dns1 /usr/sbin]# ls -l |grep sendmail

whereis shows its location:
[root@dns1 /usr/sbin]# whereis sendmail
sendmail: /usr/local/sbin/sendmail /usr/local/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz 
/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail

And a modified search finds it:
[root@dns1 /usr/sbin]# sh -c 'test -f /usr/local/sbin/sendmail && echo 
sendmail found'
sendmail found
[root@dns1 /usr/sbin]# 

david
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[HEADS UP]: default perl version changing from lang/perl5.12 to lang/perl5.14 ~October 2012

[Philip M. Gollucci]

All,

1 month after the EOL lang/perl* cleanup, we will change the default
PERL_VERSION from lang/perl5.12 to lang/perl5.14 which should before
October 1, 2012.  lang/perl5.12 will remain in the tree as long as it is
supported upstream + our standard deprecation cycle.

Please plan accordingly.


-- 

1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
Member,   Apache Software Foundation
Committer,FreeBSD Foundation
Consultant,   P6M7G8 Inc.
Director Operations,  Ridecharge Inc.

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: qpopper compile failure

[Mel Flynn]

On 3/14/2012 14:53, David Southwell wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 March 2012 07:17:55 Mel Flynn wrote:
>> On 3/13/2012 14:01, David Southwell wrote:
>>> qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade
>>> I am Getting the following error:
>>>
>>> set MISSING_OBJS to  base64.o
>>> set MISSING_SRCS to  base64.c
>>> Set AR_FLAG =  -r ; RANLIB_CMD =
>>> checking for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be
>>> located ===>  Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
>>
>> Something severely wrong with your setup. It looks at several places for
>> sendmail and does not actually check if the program is a valid sendmail
>> or even executable, just that the file exists.
>> Not even sure where to start looking. I guess the following is a good
>> start: sh -c 'test -f /usr/sbin/sendmail && echo sendmail found'
>>
>> If that works on the shell, take portupgrade out of the equation and run
>> make -C /usr/ports/mail/qpopper clean configure.
>>
>> FWIW: rev 1.104 of mail/qpopper/Makefile works for me(tm), except for
>> the configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apopuid
> Here is what we have in response. As sendmail is in /usr/local/sbin a search 
> in /usr/sbin fails:
> [root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-perl]# sh -c 'test -f 
> /usr/sbin/sendmail && echo sendmail found'
> [root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-perl]# cd /usr/sbin/
> [root@dns1 /usr/sbin]# ls -l |grep sendmail

echo 'CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--sbindir=${PREFIX}/sbin' >> \
/usr/ports/mail/qpopper/Makefile.local

See if that fixes things.
-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available

[Gabor Kovesdan]

Hi Folks,

some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since 
the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to 
modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg Moskalenko 
 showed interest in continuing this version 
and he has made a very good job on this BSD sort variant. Now it is 
compatible with the base version of GNU sort but the performance in most 
cases (string sort and -n) is quite behind GNU sort (although with -g it 
is about *4 times* faster). Oleg is still working on optimizing the code 
and the long-term plan is to drop GNU sort once this variant is good 
enough to replace it. For now, it is only available in Ports Collection 
as textproc/bsdsort but if there is no objection or any serious bug 
report I plan to add it to base installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort 
still the default sort until it proves that we can safely drop GNU sort. 
If you are interested in this sort utility, could you please try the 
port and report us any issue that you experience?


Thanks in advance,
Gabor
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-2.4.X & php5-5.4.X

[alexus]

hey, nothing wrong with jumping up and down :))

I'm not looking for a custom package. What I am looking (and a lot of
other users out there) is:
mod_php & php-fpm as a separate mainstream package without using /usr/ports
mod_php is a must, right now the only way to reach that functionality
is to use /usr/ports (or build it from source)
php-fpm is just another way to accomplish php functionality in apache
some users would prefer php-fpm over mod_php, some would prefer the other way
but at this very moment neither of those solution is available through
package only through /usr/porsts
since this module is its own separate package admin who doesn't
require this functionality obviously doesn't have to install this
package.


On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Alex Dupre  wrote:
> alexus wrote:
>> slightly off topic yet still _VERY_ important peace and _VERY_ widely
>> used is mod_php. I know that was discussed about million times through
>> mailing lists and other ways
>
> Exactly, so why are you jumping on for the million and one time? If you
> want custom packages set up your own tinderbox or package builder machine.
>
> --
> Alex Dupre



-- 
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: qpopper compile failure

[David Southwell]

On Wednesday 14 March 2012 07:17:55 Mel Flynn wrote:
> On 3/13/2012 14:01, David Southwell wrote:
> > qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade
> > I am Getting the following error:
> > 
> > set MISSING_OBJS to  base64.o
> > set MISSING_SRCS to  base64.c
> > Set AR_FLAG =  -r ; RANLIB_CMD =
> > checking for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be
> > located ===>  Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
> 
> Something severely wrong with your setup. It looks at several places for
> sendmail and does not actually check if the program is a valid sendmail
> or even executable, just that the file exists.
> Not even sure where to start looking. I guess the following is a good
> start: sh -c 'test -f /usr/sbin/sendmail && echo sendmail found'
> 
> If that works on the shell, take portupgrade out of the equation and run
> make -C /usr/ports/mail/qpopper clean configure.
> 
> FWIW: rev 1.104 of mail/qpopper/Makefile works for me(tm), except for
> the configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apopuid
Brilliant

That worked

David
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

p0f v3

[Mark Felder]

Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at  
detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get higher  
than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were Windows XP,  
which is causing spam filter accuracy issues.


I think this would be a great benefit to everyone. The current p0f port  
does not have a maintainer.



http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f3/



Cheers,



Mark
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: p0f v3

[Michael Scheidell]

On 3/14/12 1:46 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at 
detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get 
higher than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were 
Windows XP, which is causing spam filter accuracy issues.


I think this would be a great benefit to everyone. The current p0f 
port does not have a maintainer.



http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f3/


Mark:
Thank you for your contributions to FreeBSD.  And, a second thank you 
from the maintainer of p5-Mail-SpamAssassin.


if you open a PR for an update to p0f, include in the txt of the pr (and 
in the Makefile), the necessary changes and take over maintainership.


I am sure everyone who uses this port in the future will thank you for 
your efforts.


--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

listing TrueType fonts?

[Robert Huff]

If I want to list the Type 1 fonts known to X, I can use
x11-fonts/xlsfonts.
Is there an equivalent tool for TrueType fonts?


Robert Huff

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: security/openssh-portable

[Mel Flynn]

Hello Cy,

On 3/14/2012 08:57, Cy Schubert wrote:

[snip]

> What I propose to do is remove the GSSAPI
> patch from security/openssh-portable and for those who need the GSSAPI 
> server key exchange, create a new port (through a repocopy of course) which 
> includes the illinois.edu GSI patch with reworked FreeBSD patches resolving 
> patch conflicts, calling it security/openssh-portable-gsi. Does this make 
> any sense to anyone?
> 
> Or, instead of the above, just include the GSI patch by default in a 
> one-size-fits-all openssh-portable port? (Meaning that the GSI patch is 
> applied regardless.) Does this make more sense to people?

Personally, I use HPN and LPK. If KRB5 becomes a requirement for HPN, I
don't find that an issue, but others may.

I'm also keeping a local fix you might want to properly integrate into
the LPK patch: it fixes a bug that TLS cannot be turned off if
LPKLdapConf is used.
-- 
Mel
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/security/openssh-portable/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.157
diff -u -r1.157 Makefile
--- Makefile23 Dec 2011 12:52:28 -  1.157
+++ Makefile14 Mar 2012 19:09:36 -
@@ -205,6 +205,9 @@
@${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|TMP_SSH_VERSION SSH_PORTABLE|TMP_SSH_VERSION 
SSH_PORTABLE SSH_HPN|' \
${WRKSRC}/version.h
 .endif
+.if defined(WITH_LPK)
+   @${PATCH} ${PATCH_DIST_ARGS} < ${FILESDIR}/fix-lpk-tls.patch
+.endif
 
 pre-su-install:
@${MKDIR} ${EMPTYDIR}
Index: files/fix-lpk-tls.patch
===
RCS file: files/fix-lpk-tls.patch
diff -N files/fix-lpk-tls.patch
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
+++ files/fix-lpk-tls.patch 2 Jan 2012 17:26:37 -
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+--- ldapauth.c.prev2012-01-02 07:15:19.0 -0900
 ldapauth.c 2012-01-02 08:21:23.0 -0900
+@@ -565,6 +565,8 @@
+ else if (!strcasecmp (k, "ssl")) {
+ if (!strcasecmp (v, "start_tls"))
+ l->tls = 1;
++  else if (!strcasecmp(v, "off"))
++  l->tls = 0;
+ }
+ }
+ 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: listing TrueType fonts?

[Mel Flynn]

On 3/14/2012 20:00, Robert Huff wrote:
> 
>   If I want to list the Type 1 fonts known to X, I can use
> x11-fonts/xlsfonts.
>   Is there an equivalent tool for TrueType fonts?

fc-list should show them all (part of fontconfig).
-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: qpopper compile failure

[Mel Flynn]

On 3/14/2012 17:27, David Southwell wrote:

> That worked

It worked to confirm my suspicions. I've filed a proper fix in:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166108

-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

listing TrueType fonts?

[Robert Huff]

Robert Huff writes:
>  
>   If I want to list the Type 1 fonts known to X, I can use
>  x11-fonts/xlsfonts.
>   Is there an equivalent tool for TrueType fonts?

There is: fc-list, part of fontconfig.


Robert Huff

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: security/openssh-portable

[Cy Schubert]

In message <4f60ef46.2040...@acsalaska.net>, Mel Flynn writes:
> Hello Cy,
> 
> On 3/14/2012 08:57, Cy Schubert wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > What I propose to do is remove the GSSAPI
> > patch from security/openssh-portable and for those who need the GSSAPI 
> > server key exchange, create a new port (through a repocopy of course) which
>  
> > includes the illinois.edu GSI patch with reworked FreeBSD patches resolving
>  
> > patch conflicts, calling it security/openssh-portable-gsi. Does this make 
> > any sense to anyone?
> > 
> > Or, instead of the above, just include the GSI patch by default in a 
> > one-size-fits-all openssh-portable port? (Meaning that the GSI patch is 
> > applied regardless.) Does this make more sense to people?
> 
> Personally, I use HPN and LPK. If KRB5 becomes a requirement for HPN, I
> don't find that an issue, but others may.

Given that the current LPK patch is unmaintained by our upstream, I think 
it should be removed and we either move toward a one size fits all port or 
have a second port with the one-size-fits-all GSI patch. Basically the 
current hodgepodge of patches in this port are unmaintainable, which is why 
this port is usually slow to be updated.

We can address the KRB5 requirement with an ifdefs.

I'm leaning toward gutting a one-size-fits-all approach with patches that 
are maintainable. Secondly, if there are requirements for an insecure 
backlevel port, we could repocopy it. I'm not entirely enamoured with that 
idea, caveat emptor of course.

> 
> I'm also keeping a local fix you might want to properly integrate into
> the LPK patch: it fixes a bug that TLS cannot be turned off if
> LPKLdapConf is used.

If I go ahead and have the port repocopied and move forward with this, I'll 
see if I can include this patch.

I'll give it another day before making the repocopy request. The current 
port should be repocopied to openssh-portable58 and the new port assume the 
openssh-portable name.

I've yet to hear from the maintainer of this port for his thoughts on this.


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert 
FreeBSD UNIX: Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available

[Adrian Chadd]

On 14 March 2012 08:59, Gabor Kovesdan  wrote:

> some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since the
> OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to modify.
> The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg Moskalenko
>  showed interest in continuing this version and
> he has made a very good job on this BSD sort variant. Now it is compatible
> with the base version of GNU sort but the performance in most cases (string
> sort and -n) is quite behind GNU sort (although with -g it is about *4
> times* faster). Oleg is still working on optimizing the code and the
> long-term plan is to drop GNU sort once this variant is good enough to
> replace it. For now, it is only available in Ports Collection as
> textproc/bsdsort but if there is no objection or any serious bug report I
> plan to add it to base installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort still the
> default sort until it proves that we can safely drop GNU sort. If you are
> interested in this sort utility, could you please try the port and report us
> any issue that you experience?

Hi,

This makes me think of the whole debian-y way of replacing the mailer
programs using some magic alias program.

So you could intall gnusort, bsdsort, and then some config file would
determine which was used.

'sort' would then be a symlink to said magic program, that'd look at
its argv[0], look at the contents of that file, and exec() the right
one.

Would that be helpful herE?



Adrian
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: libreoffice

[ajtiM]

On Wednesday 14 March 2012 07:57:58 Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:06:47PM +0100, Rodrigo OSORIO wrote:
> > On 14/03/12 05:44 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just
> > > OpenOffice maintained? I used on my wife Mageia Linux notebook
> > > LibreOffice 3.5.2 and has many improvemnts compare with 3.4 which we
> > > have in ports.
> > > 
> > > Thank.
> > > 
> > > Mitja
> > > 
> > > http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa
> > > ___
> > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> > > "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > In a post here[1] bapt@ gives some informations about the libreoffice
> > status in ports and the incomming improvements. A jump to 3.5.1 is
> > expected as soon as this version will be available.
> > 
> > regards,
> > Rodrigo
> > 
> > [1] http://lists.pcbsd.org/pipermail/pbi-dev/2012-March/001699.html
> 
> Btw libreoffice 3.5.2 doesn't exist yet, the next version if 3.5.1 (and as
> just been released) btw porting libreoffice 3.5 is still not finished.
> 
> regards,
> Bapt

Thank you ta everyone...
3.5.2 was mistyping. For Linux is recomandation for source 3.5.1 which I have.

Mitja

http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available

[Chad Perrin]

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:59:21PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> 
> some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch
> since the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was
> hard to modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg
> Moskalenko  showed interest in
> continuing this version and he has made a very good job on this BSD
> sort variant. Now it is compatible with the base version of GNU sort
> but the performance in most cases (string sort and -n) is quite
> behind GNU sort (although with -g it is about *4 times* faster).
> Oleg is still working on optimizing the code and the long-term plan
> is to drop GNU sort once this variant is good enough to replace it.
> For now, it is only available in Ports Collection as
> textproc/bsdsort but if there is no objection or any serious bug
> report I plan to add it to base installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort
> still the default sort until it proves that we can safely drop GNU
> sort. If you are interested in this sort utility, could you please
> try the port and report us any issue that you experience?

I meant to send this email yesterday.

It's on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/#!/CopyfreeNews/status/179985533911576576

I'll be testing the bsdsort for my own purposes, and report back if I
have any problems.  Thanks for the hard work!

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: ports/166058: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI

[Super Bisquit]

Be sure to let people know that it is for powerpc64 only. The
hypervisor was not present in powerpc 32bit cpus.

On 3/14/12, scheid...@freebsd.org  wrote:
> Synopsis: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs
> Responsible-Changed-By: scheidell
> Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 14 14:24:58 UTC 2012
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> Its freebsd-ports-bugs. Thanks.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166058
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available

[Jonathan Anderson]

On 14 Mar 2012, at 21:10, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This makes me think of the whole debian-y way of replacing the mailer
> programs using some magic alias program.
> 
> So you could intall gnusort, bsdsort, and then some config file would
> determine which was used.
> 
> 'sort' would then be a symlink to said magic program, that'd look at
> its argv[0], look at the contents of that file, and exec() the right
> one.

In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian "alternatives" system is simpler 
than that:
http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/

The custom Perl script with a config file is used to set up symlinks, which at 
runtime are... well, just symlinks. For instance, /usr/bin/vim is a symlink to 
/etc/alternatives/vim, which is itself a symlink to a binary like vim.gtk 
(example shamelessly stolen from the linked page, since I no longer have any 
Debian boxes to check for myself on :). No magic binaries or argv[0] fu.

In one way, it's an elegant solution. On the other, it's a classic example of 
Wheeler's Law in action. :)


Jon
--
Jonathan Anderson

Research Student, Security Group
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge

+44 (1223) 763747
jonathan.ander...@cl.cam.ac.uk___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

RE: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available

[Oleg Moskalenko]

This is true, debians do the symlinks trick.

In Ubuntu :

/usr/bin/java -> /etc/alternatives/java
/etc/alternatives/java - >/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/java

Oleg

From: Jonathan Anderson [mailto:jonathan.ander...@cl.cam.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 3:14 PM
To: Adrian Chadd
Cc: Gabor Kovesdan; freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org; Oleg Moskalenko; 
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available

On 14 Mar 2012, at 21:10, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,

This makes me think of the whole debian-y way of replacing the mailer
programs using some magic alias program.

So you could intall gnusort, bsdsort, and then some config file would
determine which was used.

'sort' would then be a symlink to said magic program, that'd look at
its argv[0], look at the contents of that file, and exec() the right
one.

In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian "alternatives" system is simpler 
than that:
http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/

The custom Perl script with a config file is used to set up symlinks, which at 
runtime are... well, just symlinks. For instance, /usr/bin/vim is a symlink to 
/etc/alternatives/vim, which is itself a symlink to a binary like vim.gtk 
(example shamelessly stolen from the linked page, since I no longer have any 
Debian boxes to check for myself on :). No magic binaries or argv[0] fu.

In one way, it's an elegant solution. On the other, it's a classic example of 
Wheeler's Law in action. :)


Jon
--
Jonathan Anderson

Research Student, Security Group
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge

+44 (1223) 763747
jonathan.ander...@cl.cam.ac.uk
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available

[Adrian Chadd]

I must be thinking of our mailer trick then?

I know i've seen it somewhere before.

Alternatives sounds fun though?



ADrian
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

skype-devel-2.2.0.35

[Edwin L. Culp W.]

I am running 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #89 r229960M: Mon Mar 12
05:11:09 CST 2012 amd64.  I am not a big skype user but the last couple of
weeks it hasn't worked and I've actually enjoyed the silence;) but someday
I need to get it going.

World and all ports are up to date and  the skype configuration that may be
different than default

 Video support not checked
 Audio is oss on all

The rest should be the same.

When I try to call I get an immediate call failed.  Messages don't go
through and I never see a user on line.  It almost seems like it isn't
connected but I don't see how.  I also tried going back to the 2.1.0.81
version and the same problem.  This must be something DUMB that I have done
but . . . . .

Thanks for any suggestions,

ed
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"