Re: ports/151405: [patch] new astro/viking version released 0.9.96
Synopsis: [patch] new astro/viking version released 0.9.96 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-port-bugs->freebsd-ports Responsible-Changed-By: glebius Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Oct 12 08:13:15 UTC 2010 Responsible-Changed-Why: Fix responsible. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=151405 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Users needed or not by ports
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:01 PM, David DEMELIER wrote: > Hello, > > Before writing a patch for the ports framework, I just want to be sure > that FreeBSD ports shouldn't use a same user added by ports. For > example pulseaudio adds some users to the system (pulse, > pulse-whatever) and should these users be needed from others ports ? > > My plan is : > > 1. Register users added and needed by ports in files like +USERS +GROUPS, > 2. When make deinstall or pkg_delete port_name check if the user is > still needed by other port (if this is possible) > 3. Print a message like "The following users and group are not needed > anymore by the system : xxx yyy" > > pkgsrc already use something like this, so a port should be really > easy to be done. This has already been discussed (including in a thread that you started [1]). This needs support in both ports and pkg_install. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-ports@freebsd.org/msg27486.html -- Florent Thoumie f...@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: ports/151405: [patch] new astro/viking version released 0.9.96
Synopsis: [patch] new astro/viking version released 0.9.96 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->sunpoet Responsible-Changed-By: sunpoet Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Oct 12 11:18:35 UTC 2010 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll take it. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=151405 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Users needed or not by ports
2010/10/12 Florent Thoumie : > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:01 PM, David DEMELIER > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Before writing a patch for the ports framework, I just want to be sure >> that FreeBSD ports shouldn't use a same user added by ports. For >> example pulseaudio adds some users to the system (pulse, >> pulse-whatever) and should these users be needed from others ports ? >> >> My plan is : >> >> 1. Register users added and needed by ports in files like +USERS +GROUPS, >> 2. When make deinstall or pkg_delete port_name check if the user is >> still needed by other port (if this is possible) >> 3. Print a message like "The following users and group are not needed >> anymore by the system : xxx yyy" >> >> pkgsrc already use something like this, so a port should be really >> easy to be done. > > This has already been discussed (including in a thread that you started [1]). > > This needs support in both ports and pkg_install. > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-ports@freebsd.org/msg27486.html > > -- > Florent Thoumie > f...@freebsd.org > FreeBSD Committer > Yes, for pkg_install I think I will talk to bapt because he's working on pkgng so maybe he has a great idea and a better knowledge in C, for the moment I made some changes in ports/Mk directory but not finished. I still need to know if a multiple ports could use a same user that has been added by one of them. I don't find any good example for this issue. -- Demelier David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Users needed or not by ports
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 05:56:34PM +0200, David DEMELIER thus spake: 2010/10/12 Florent Thoumie : On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:01 PM, David DEMELIER wrote: Hello, Before writing a patch for the ports framework, I just want to be sure that FreeBSD ports shouldn't use a same user added by ports. For example pulseaudio adds some users to the system (pulse, pulse-whatever) and should these users be needed from others ports ? My plan is : 1. Register users added and needed by ports in files like +USERS +GROUPS, 2. When make deinstall or pkg_delete port_name check if the user is still needed by other port (if this is possible) 3. Print a message like "The following users and group are not needed anymore by the system : xxx yyy" pkgsrc already use something like this, so a port should be really easy to be done. This has already been discussed (including in a thread that you started [1]). This needs support in both ports and pkg_install. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-ports@freebsd.org/msg27486.html -- Florent Thoumie f...@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer Yes, for pkg_install I think I will talk to bapt because he's working on pkgng so maybe he has a great idea and a better knowledge in C, for the moment I made some changes in ports/Mk directory but not finished. I still need to know if a multiple ports could use a same user that has been added by one of them. I don't find any good example for this issue. I had brought this up on #bsdports, and it was mentioned that this was in HEAD before, but no longer present is the ability to sign packages. I mentioned this because you can change the +CONTENTS file and it will be represented and read with no issue by subsequent queries of pkg_info. I would think that if you could edit the +CONTENTS file, or any file for that manner within pkgdb, this could pose potential security and/or stability issues. -jgh ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: openoffice.org-3 does not build anymore
2010/10/3 David DEMELIER : > 2010/10/3 ajtiM : >> On Sunday 03 October 2010 05:40:33 David DEMELIER wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I can't build openoffice.org-3 anymore, >>> >>> readlicense_oo >>> need(s) to be rebuilt >>> >>> Reason(s): >>> >>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making >>> /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.o >>> rg-3/work/OOO320_m19/readlicense_oo/ >>> >>> Attention: if you build and deliver the above module(s) you may prolongue >>> your t he build issuing command "build --from readlicense_oo" >>> >>> rmdir /tmp/aTcGY4w2lp >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3. >>> >>> Cheers, >> >> I didn't have problem with RC-3 and it works very good (started yesterday >> about eight in the evening and it is done). >> >> Mitja >> >> http://starikarp.redbubble.com >> > > So I don't understand. > > -- > Demelier David > It's my fault, I added LOCALIZED_LANG= fr_FR instead of fr-FR. Sorry for the noise ! -- Demelier David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: ports/150930: [UPDATE] databases/py-sqlalchemy to 0.6.4
Hi, I don't understand why to keep 'py-pysqlite23' for SQLite options, whereas this port is not up to date. On the Python Package Index (pypi) the last one is 2.6.0 [1]. Unfortunately, it does not compile with SQLite's version presents on the ports tree. It depends on 'sqlite-amalgamation' (see SQLite3 site). That's why I add the sqlite3 module, which is presents in standard library of Python. This « driver » is of course supported by SQLAlchemy [2]. Regards [1] http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pysqlite/2.6.0 [2] http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/core/engines.html#supported-databases 2010/10/11 : > Synopsis: [UPDATE] databases/py-sqlalchemy to 0.6.4 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: pgollucci > State-Changed-When: Mon Oct 11 20:57:36 UTC 2010 > State-Changed-Why: > duplicate of ports/150845 > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=150930 > -- olivier ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: openoffice.org-3 does not build anymore
2010/10/12 David DEMELIER : > 2010/10/3 David DEMELIER : >> 2010/10/3 ajtiM : >>> On Sunday 03 October 2010 05:40:33 David DEMELIER wrote: Hi, I can't build openoffice.org-3 anymore, readlicense_oo need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.o rg-3/work/OOO320_m19/readlicense_oo/ Attention: if you build and deliver the above module(s) you may prolongue your t he build issuing command "build --from readlicense_oo" rmdir /tmp/aTcGY4w2lp *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3. Cheers, >>> >>> I didn't have problem with RC-3 and it works very good (started yesterday >>> about eight in the evening and it is done). >>> >>> Mitja >>> >>> http://starikarp.redbubble.com >>> >> >> So I don't understand. >> >> -- >> Demelier David >> > > It's my fault, I added LOCALIZED_LANG= fr_FR instead of fr-FR. Sorry > for the noise ! > > -- > Demelier David > When building OOo my Xorg had frozen, the system not because I successfully shutdown it. Is this a shared memory issue? -- Demelier David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
