Now OK (Re: cvs commit: ports/games/kuklomenos Makefile)
games/kuklomenos, which was previously failing is OK after this commit. Thanks for fixing it! A description of the testing process can be found here: http://T32.TecNik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/ Thanks for your work on making FreeBSD better, -- QAT - your friendly neighborhood Daemon, preparing a heck of an error trapping system: - "HMC and EOI?" - "Halt, Melt and Catch fire or Execute Operator Immediately." ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Tornadoweb
There's been a lot of hype about Tornado lately. (http://www.tornadoweb.org/) So being curious, I played around with it a bit. It seems like it might be worthwhile to have in the ports collection. Is anyone out there already working on a port for this? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Problem building Openoffice 3.1.1 at -current
From: Olivier Gautherot Subject: Re: Problem building Openoffice 3.1.1 at -current Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:12:10 -0500 > Hi folks! > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Alexey Shuvaev < > shuv...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: >> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:39:44PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> > >> > The above ln and cp were sufficient to complete my build. >> > I haven't tested the resulting exectuables. >> > >> > Thanks, Andriy >> > >> Rrrr >> The openoffice guys are trying to bundle every piece of code under >> the sun into their tarball in attempt to not depend upon system >> libraries... >> ... and are getting away from what they want to achieve (IMHO). >> >> OOO is as fragile as porcelain plate and >> still as complex to repair as nuclear u-boot. >> > > It sounds like OOO is designed to be compiled on a fresh system: I > reformated a disk yesterday and the compilation of OOO just finished > successfully. I loaded 8.0-RC1. > > As a matter of fact, I used the bundled modules - it takes longer but seems > to be a bit more stable. Hi, Olivier Gautherot thanks for your e-mail. this is just a maintaing issue. if you provide some human resources I'm very happy to use python from ports tree instead. Serious problem may be that when some cws (child work space, smallest unit of development) wrt python is introduced, or when ports python is updated. Then there may be a conflict, and I'd like to ask you to fix it. Usually very easy, but sometimes very hard. thanks, -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , http://ja.openoffice.org/ Nakata Maho's PGP public keys: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Problem building Openoffice 3.1.1 at -current
Hi Maho Nakata, First of all, thanks for all your good work - I've been your faithful "customer" for several years already and really appreciate your dedication. > It sounds like OOO is designed to be compiled on a fresh system: I > > reformated a disk yesterday and the compilation of OOO just finished > > successfully. I loaded 8.0-RC1. > > > > As a matter of fact, I used the bundled modules - it takes longer but > seems > > to be a bit more stable. > > Hi, Olivier Gautherot > > thanks for your e-mail. this is just a maintaing issue. > if you provide some human resources I'm very happy to use > python from ports tree instead. > I'll have to reissue the compilation in the data partition since I already started using the necessary space. I'll let you know. Serious problem may be that when some cws (child work space, smallest > unit of development) wrt python is introduced, or when ports > python is updated. Then there may be a conflict, and I'd like > to ask you to fix it. Usually very easy, but sometimes very hard. > >From my past experience, I tend to use the ports as released and do not update the ports tree. The few times I did were tough experiences, usually ending with a complete reinstall... :-S So I'm an easy customer on the ports. System upgrades usually end up in a backup and start from scratch (which was a real exercise on a VIA motherboard). So I may be somewhat atypical... I'll let you know the results. Cheers -- Olivier Gautherot oliv...@gautherot.net Cel:+56 98 730 9361 www.gautherot.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ogautherot ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Problem building Openoffice 3.1.1 at -current
Can you guys trim your CC list? I have no interest in the stupidity of OOo in including every project under the sun into its build system. -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
random fetch location
Hi, Maybe it's a naive question. When I install a package from ports, it often needs to fetch some files. But sometimes it takes a long time before finding an available server to fetch. I also notice that it will try the locations/urls one by one, however the order doesn't change (correct me if I'm wrong). So the very first server on the list will get a lot of traffic since everyone will fetch the files from it. Is there any way to let it randomly pick a url from the list to evenly distribute the traffic among all the servers? Cheers, Guoqin Ren ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Problem building Openoffice 3.1.1 at -current
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:39:44PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> > on 20/09/2009 14:38 Sam Fourman Jr. said the following: >> > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Vinicius Abrahao >> > > wrote: >> > >> Hello dear fellows, >> > >> >> > >> I'm trying to upgrade my openoffice.org3 from 3.1.0 to 3.1.1, but I'm >> > >> getting an strange error (associated with python). >> > >> This is the error that appears many hours after I start the upgrade: >> > > >> > > >> > > I am getting this same error on FreeBSD 8.0 Beta4 >> > > any idea how to fix the build? >> > >> > I also had a compilation problem like this. >> > Perhaps this is related to having python 2.6 installed on a system? >> > >> > Anyway, I was able to continue the build by doing the following (adjust >> > the paths >> > to your environment): >> > >> > $ ln -s >> > /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO310_m19/solver/310/unxfbsdx.pro/lib/python >> > /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO310_m19/solver/310/unxfbsdx.pro/lib/python2.6 >> > >> > $ cp >> > /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO310_m19/python/unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/Python-2.6.1/build/lib.freebsd-9.0-CURRENT-amd64-2.6/*.so >> > /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO310_m19/solver/310/unxfbsdx.pro/lib/python2.6/ >> > >> > Maybe something else, it was a while ago. >> > >> >> The above ln and cp were sufficient to complete my build. >> I haven't tested the resulting exectuables. >> >> Thanks, Andriy >> > Rrrr > The openoffice guys are trying to bundle every piece of code under > the sun into their tarball in attempt to not depend upon system libraries... > ... and are getting away from what they want to achieve (IMHO). > > OOO is as fragile as porcelain plate and > still as complex to repair as nuclear u-boot. > > I hate OOO... > > With the attached patch I was able to complete the build on > amd64 9-CURRENT. Will charge 9-amd64-Ports and 9-i386-Ports tinderboxes > to test in a clean environment. Testing on 8-RC is still welcome. > Just drop patch-OOO_XXX_CURRENT into files/ and try to rebuild. > > Alexey. This Worked on 9-CURRENT i386 thanks. Will this patch be included in the ports tree so it isn't broken Sam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: random fetch location
Guoqin Ren wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe it's a naive question. When I install a package from ports, it > often needs to fetch some files. But sometimes it takes a long time > before finding an available server to fetch. I also notice that it will > try the locations/urls one by one, however the order doesn't change > (correct me if I'm wrong). So the very first server on the list will > get a lot of traffic since everyone will fetch the files from it. Is > there any way to let it randomly pick a url from the list to evenly > distribute the traffic among all the servers? Two solutions: 1. Add 'RANDOMIZE_MASTER_SITES=true' to /etc/make.conf 2. Check out ports-mgmt/fastest_sites hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Tornadoweb
It's in ports tree now. (www/py-tornado) :) On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Mike Depot wrote: > There's been a lot of hype about Tornado lately. ( > http://www.tornadoweb.org/) So being curious, I played around with it a > bit. It seems like it might be worthwhile to have in the ports collection. > Is anyone out there already working on a port for this? > > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
