Re: games/sauerbraten

[Mark Linimon]

On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:49:02AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> Submit a PR and request a maintainer timeout. This will take a long time,
> but it's the only way.

"long time" = "2 weeks"

mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: games/sauerbraten

[[LoN]Kamikaze]

Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:49:02AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>> Submit a PR and request a maintainer timeout. This will take a long time,
>> but it's the only way.
> 
> "long time" = "2 weeks"
> 
> mcl

The last time I requested a maintainer time out it was something like two 
months.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

qtstalker

[Brad McIntosh]

I've only changed over to BSD recently and I'm attempting to get away from 
microsoft altogether.I downloaded PC BSD it's up and running and I'm pretty 
happy with it.
I needed to get hold of stock charting software which I discovered in your 
ports\finance\qtstalker, I installed the program, started it and attempted to 
download data from yahoo and I continually received error messages (bad Date). 
Perhaps, I could possibly be doing something wrong, but if not is there any way 
that you could have someone look into it and maybe repair the bug.
regards
Brad
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: games/sauerbraten

[Mark Linimon]

On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:23:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> The last time I requested a maintainer time out it was something like
> two months.

I have been much more active in the last few months on enforcing the
maintainer-timeouts.

If you are having problems, please email portmgr@ directly.  Thanks.

mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans

[Ken Yamada]

  Would you please inform the progress (or, schedule), so far?
  port tree looks very quiet in these few days and I cannot see any xorg7.2 in 
my cvsup'd port tree...


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

xorg merge and git

[Andriy Gapon]

One question: will the ports still be accessible via git after the merge
of modular xorg branch ?
I started to like git very much (as a distribution tool), it seems to be
much faster than cvsup.

-- 
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans

[Rene Ladan]

2007/5/8, Ken Yamada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

  Would you please inform the progress (or, schedule), so far?
  port tree looks very quiet in these few days and I cannot see any xorg7.2 in 
my cvsup'd port tree...


Currently most development happens in the git repository.  You can
look at http://git.xbsd.org/?p=freebsd/ports.git;a=summary to see what
goes on.

Rene
--
GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0  4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6
(subkeys.pgp.net)

"It won't fit on the line."
-- me, 2001
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans

[Ken Yamada]

From: "Rene Ladan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Currently most development happens in the git repository.  You can
> look at http://git.xbsd.org/?p=freebsd/ports.git;a=summary to see what
> goes on.

No, "http://wiki.freebsd.org/ModularXorg"; says;

--Quote--
Disclaimer

If you read about the git repository, forget about it and hold your breath a 
couple days again. Everything should be merged back to the FreeBSD within a few 
days.
--Unqote--

git may be maintained, but the page already does not show any of git pages and 
information, anymore.  That is the reason why I am asking...

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans

[Florent Thoumie]

Ken Yamada wrote:
> From: "Rene Ladan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Currently most development happens in the git repository.  You can
>> look at http://git.xbsd.org/?p=freebsd/ports.git;a=summary to see what
>> goes on.
> 
> No, "http://wiki.freebsd.org/ModularXorg"; says;
> 
> --Quote--
> Disclaimer
> 
> If you read about the git repository, forget about it and hold your breath a 
> couple days again. Everything should be merged back to the FreeBSD within a 
> few days.
> --Unqote--
> 
> git may be maintained, but the page already does not show any of git pages 
> and information, anymore.  That is the reason why I am asking...

We're committing a last round of fixes and will submit a tarball for
testing hopefully tonight or tomorrow.

As soon as we'll get enough success reports, we'll go all-in.

-- 
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: qtstalker

[Stevan Tiefert]

Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 16:32 +1000 schrieb Brad McIntosh:
> I've only changed over to BSD recently and I'm attempting to get away from 
> microsoft altogether.I downloaded PC BSD it's up and running and I'm pretty 
> happy with it.
> I needed to get hold of stock charting software which I discovered in your 
> ports\finance\qtstalker, I installed the program, started it and attempted to 
> download data from yahoo and I continually received error messages (bad 
> Date). Perhaps, I could possibly be doing something wrong, but if not is 
> there any way that you could have someone look into it and maybe repair the 
> bug.
> regards
> Brad
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

This type of support you will get maybe in:

http://qtstalker.sourceforge.net/

described in:

/usr/ports/finance/qtstalker/pkg-descr

here you will get support when a problem with the portssystem and your
program occurs. For bughunting of their program they will be
responisble :-)





___ 
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: 
http://mail.yahoo.de
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: How to prevent make compiling a binary?

[Stevan Tiefert]

Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 08:02 +0200 schrieb [LoN]Kamikaze:
> Stevan Tiefert wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 07.05.2007, 20:12 +0400 schrieb Stanislav Sedov:
> >> On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:05:26 +0200
> >> Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> >>
> >>> Hello list,
> >>>
> >>> I've tar'ed and gzip'ed a binary library. Put on a web-server. Wrote a
> >>> Makefile like the Porter's Handbook describes. It fetches the *.tar.gz
> >>> and so on.
> >>>
> >>> But during the "make install" he asks for a Makefile (I think
> >>> PORTNAME/work/DISTNAME/Makefile) but there is no Makefile because it is
> >>> not needed. The library is compiled!
> >>>
> >>> I thought the "NO_BUILD= yes" would be enough. But it seems I need
> >>> addiotional work.
> >>>
> >>> Again: I want to prevent make to search for */work/*/Makefile!
> >>>
> >>> Can somebody kick me to the right direction?
> >> NO_BUILD should generally work. Could you, please, post the entire
> >> Makefile here for us to help you?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Stanislav Sedov
> >> ST4096-RIPE
> > 
> > Thank you for trying helping me. I am very thankfully but with the
> > "do-install:" -thing is it working!!! :-)  I have already posted my port
> > via send-pr.
> 
> For a binary port you will also have to set ONLY_FOR_ARCHS in your ports 
> Makefile. Also, I do not know what kind of irresistible magic is performed by 
> your library, but I do not think many people will be willing to use a 
> pre-compiled library.

It is not my decision to not deliver the sourcecode. It was the decision
of the ftp.mk.bsdclub.org. The port wouldn't be necessary when the
compat3x-port didn't stopped. It was since FreeBSD 6.0 not possible
anymore to use audio/mbrola as a native port! But after that my pc
speaks german :-)





___ 
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: 
http://mail.yahoo.de
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans

[Ken Yamada]

  Thank you, Florent.
  I understand that we need to be patient another two days...

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: How to prevent make compiling a binary?

[Peter Jeremy]

On 2007-May-08 12:22:03 +0200, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The port wouldn't be necessary when the
>compat3x-port didn't stopped.

The last FreeBSD 3.x release was 3.5.1 in July 2000.  3.x support has
long since ceased and it is no longer possible to correct security
holes in the compat3x port.  Since a variety of security holes are
known to exist, the port has been FORBIDDEN.

Your options appear to be:
1) Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get them to update the FreeBSD
   binaries to support 6.x
2) Override the 'FORBIDDEN' tag and install compat3x anyway.
3) Run the Linux version.

-- 
Peter Jeremy


pgpQWk2RBzDt4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: How to prevent make compiling a binary?

[Stevan Tiefert]

Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 21:43 +1000 schrieb Peter Jeremy:
> On 2007-May-08 12:22:03 +0200, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The port wouldn't be necessary when the
> >compat3x-port didn't stopped.
> 
> The last FreeBSD 3.x release was 3.5.1 in July 2000.  3.x support has
> long since ceased and it is no longer possible to correct security
> holes in the compat3x port.  Since a variety of security holes are
> known to exist, the port has been FORBIDDEN.
> 
> Your options appear to be:
> 1) Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get them to update the FreeBSD
>binaries to support 6.x
> 2) Override the 'FORBIDDEN' tag and install compat3x anyway.
> 3) Run the Linux version.
> 

4) I build a port with this only needed lib in it. Already done:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=112499





___ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: How to prevent make compiling a binary?

[Lowell Gilbert]

Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 21:43 +1000 schrieb Peter Jeremy:
>> On 2007-May-08 12:22:03 +0200, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The port wouldn't be necessary when the
>> >compat3x-port didn't stopped.
>> 
>> The last FreeBSD 3.x release was 3.5.1 in July 2000.  3.x support has
>> long since ceased and it is no longer possible to correct security
>> holes in the compat3x port.  Since a variety of security holes are
>> known to exist, the port has been FORBIDDEN.
>> 
>> Your options appear to be:
>> 1) Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get them to update the FreeBSD
>>binaries to support 6.x
>> 2) Override the 'FORBIDDEN' tag and install compat3x anyway.
>> 3) Run the Linux version.
>> 
>
> 4) I build a port with this only needed lib in it. Already done:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=112499

But that still installs the standard C library with the vulnerability
in it.  In what way is that better (or even significantly different)
than option 2?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: How to prevent make compiling a binary?

[Stevan Tiefert]

Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 08:35 -0400 schrieb Lowell Gilbert:
> Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 21:43 +1000 schrieb Peter Jeremy:
> >> On 2007-May-08 12:22:03 +0200, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > The port wouldn't be necessary when the
> >> >compat3x-port didn't stopped.
> >> 
> >> The last FreeBSD 3.x release was 3.5.1 in July 2000.  3.x support has
> >> long since ceased and it is no longer possible to correct security
> >> holes in the compat3x port.  Since a variety of security holes are
> >> known to exist, the port has been FORBIDDEN.
> >> 
> >> Your options appear to be:
> >> 1) Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get them to update the FreeBSD
> >>binaries to support 6.x
> >> 2) Override the 'FORBIDDEN' tag and install compat3x anyway.
> >> 3) Run the Linux version.
> >> 
> >
> > 4) I build a port with this only needed lib in it. Already done:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=112499
> 
> But that still installs the standard C library with the vulnerability
> in it.  In what way is that better (or even significantly different)
> than option 2?
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

I want to provide a new port for german text-to-speech-system. And as a
dependency I need the NATIVE running audio/mbrola.

It is NOT desireable that if somebody want to install my port he got the
error message: compat3x-20020925.tar.gz is forbidden to install! Should
I tell EVERY guy on my help-mailinglist (and I promise you it will be
almost 90% of the e-mails) you have to hack the Makefile-entry manually
to install my port?

It is easier to install my convinient "misc/mbrola_compat-1.0" without
the forbidden tag. And I don't want to be blamed that I write a patch
which is changing foreign Makefiles of other maintainer!

With regards
Stevan Tiefert





___ 
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: 
http://mail.yahoo.de
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: How to prevent make compiling a binary?

[Wesley Shields]

On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 02:51:46PM +0200, Stevan Tiefert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 08:35 -0400 schrieb Lowell Gilbert:
> > Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > > Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 21:43 +1000 schrieb Peter Jeremy:
> > >> On 2007-May-08 12:22:03 +0200, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > The port wouldn't be necessary when the
> > >> >compat3x-port didn't stopped.
> > >> 
> > >> The last FreeBSD 3.x release was 3.5.1 in July 2000.  3.x support has
> > >> long since ceased and it is no longer possible to correct security
> > >> holes in the compat3x port.  Since a variety of security holes are
> > >> known to exist, the port has been FORBIDDEN.
> > >> 
> > >> Your options appear to be:
> > >> 1) Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get them to update the FreeBSD
> > >>binaries to support 6.x
> > >> 2) Override the 'FORBIDDEN' tag and install compat3x anyway.
> > >> 3) Run the Linux version.
> > >> 
> > >
> > > 4) I build a port with this only needed lib in it. Already done:
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=112499
> > 
> > But that still installs the standard C library with the vulnerability
> > in it.  In what way is that better (or even significantly different)
> > than option 2?
> > ___
> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 
> I want to provide a new port for german text-to-speech-system. And as a
> dependency I need the NATIVE running audio/mbrola.
> 
> It is NOT desireable that if somebody want to install my port he got the
> error message: compat3x-20020925.tar.gz is forbidden to install! Should
> I tell EVERY guy on my help-mailinglist (and I promise you it will be
> almost 90% of the e-mails) you have to hack the Makefile-entry manually
> to install my port?
> 
> It is easier to install my convinient "misc/mbrola_compat-1.0" without
> the forbidden tag. And I don't want to be blamed that I write a patch
> which is changing foreign Makefiles of other maintainer!

Unless I'm missing something you're looking at providing the compat3x
libraries (or a sub-set thereof) in your port?

You do what you feel is necessary to get it to work, however; Is it your
intention to submit this port for inclusion in the tree?  I am
concerned that if you submit this new port for inclusion in the tree
that you will be introducing the exact vulnerabilities which are
documented in the compat3x port.

-- WXS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: FreeBSD Port: openvpn-devel-2.1.r2

[Matthias Andree]

Geno Salvati schrieb:
> Please let me know if you have plans to release a port upgrade to
> include rc4 of OpenVPN version 2.1.  The answer to this question is not
> mission critical but will make a slight difference in my planning if you
> are able to provide it.

I've already submitted the update to rc4 last week, but it's not yet
been committed: 

The ports updates have been far and few between the past days, but I
haven't checked or asked why.

Grab the -rc2 port and grab the patch from the PR if you want to try it
and let me know what you get.

HTH
Matthias
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: FreeBSD Port: openvpn-devel-2.1.r2

[Rong-en Fan]

On 5/8/07, Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Geno Salvati schrieb:
> Please let me know if you have plans to release a port upgrade to
> include rc4 of OpenVPN version 2.1.  The answer to this question is not
> mission critical but will make a slight difference in my planning if you
> are able to provide it.

I've already submitted the update to rc4 last week, but it's not yet
been committed: 

The ports updates have been far and few between the past days, but I
haven't checked or asked why.


We are in a ports freeze for the upcoming X.Org 7.2 merge.



Grab the -rc2 port and grab the patch from the PR if you want to try it
and let me know what you get.

HTH
Matthias
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: How to prevent make compiling a binary?

[Scot Hetzel]

On 5/8/07, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

It is not my decision to not deliver the sourcecode. It was the decision
of the ftp.mk.bsdclub.org. The port wouldn't be necessary when the
compat3x-port didn't stopped. It was since FreeBSD 6.0 not possible
anymore to use audio/mbrola as a native port! But after that my pc
speaks german :-)


Does audio/mbrola work if you add the following to /etc/libmap.conf?

[/usr/local/bin/mbrola]
libc.so.3 libc.so.4

NOTE: You'll need to have compat4x installed.

Scot
--
DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Weekly pre-formatted manpage generation

[Jeremy Chadwick]

I don't think this has been discussed before (or if it has, I can't find
any references to it).  I'm also not sure if this should go to ports@ or
doc@ or bin@ or what...

There are some of us who use weekly_catman_enable="yes" in periodic.conf
to rebuild pre-formatted manpages once a week.  I thought tinderbox
would catch some of these -- doh!

Regardless, it appears to me that there's a lot of ports which have
broken manpages in some way, and in one case (I think lang/perl5), some
missing directories which `catman.local | su -fm man` cannot create due
to preceeding directory permissions.

Below is output I get once a week from a few of my boxes (most have the
same ports installed, give or take a couple).  Sadly I have no way of
easily determining which manpages need fixing or what's broken and why,
because pipes are being used.  But at least these warnings/errors are
reproducable.

Any feedback is appreciated.  :)

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

=== SNIP ===

Rebuilding whatis database:

Reformatting manual pages:
:151: warning [p 1, 3.8i]: cannot adjust line
:300: warning [p 2, 9.7i, div `an-div', 0.0i]: cannot adjust 
line
:300: warning [p 2, 9.7i]: cannot adjust line
mdoc warning: Empty input line #91
:108: warning [p 2, 6.5i]: can't break line
:68: warning [p 1, 6.0i]: can't break line
Usage: .Ft function_type ... (#284)
Usage: .Ft function_type ... (#348)
:45: warning [p 1, 5.2i]: can't break line
:45: warning [p 1, 5.2i]: can't break line
:45: warning [p 1, 5.2i]: can't break line
:52: warning [p 1, 7.0i]: cannot adjust line
mdoc warning: A .Bl directive has no matching .El (#87)
mdoc warning: A .Bd directive has no matching .Ed (#40)
mdoc warning: .Fx: Unknown FreeBSD version `6.3' (#125)
mdoc warning: extraneous .El call (#96)
:254: warning [p 3, 3.3i]: can't break line
mdoc warning: A .Bl directive has no matching .El (#56)
mdoc warning: A .Bl directive has no matching .El (#156)
mdoc warning: Empty input line #179
mdoc warning: A .Bl directive has no matching .El (#75)
mdoc warning: A .Bl directive has no matching .El (#56)
:13: warning [p 1, 1.2i]: can't break line
mdoc warning: Empty input line #19
mdoc warning: Using a macro as first argument cancels effect of .Ic (#165)
mdoc warning: Using a macro as first argument cancels effect of .Ic (#170)
mdoc warning: Using a macro as first argument cancels effect of .Ic (#151)
mdoc warning: Using a macro as first argument cancels effect of .Ic (#156)
mdoc warning: A .Bl directive has no matching .El (#158)
mdoc warning: A .Bl directive has no matching .El (#215)
mdoc warning: A .Bl directive has no matching .El (#230)
mdoc warning: A .Bl directive has no matching .El (#262)
mdoc warning: A .Bl directive has no matching .El (#284)
mdoc warning: Empty input line #300
mdoc warning: Empty input line #308
:930: warning [p 8, 7.3i, div `3tbd25,1', 0.2i]: can't break 
line
:938: a newline character is not allowed in an escape name
:17: warning [p 1, 1.5i]: can't break line
:17: warning [p 1, 1.7i]: can't break line
:519: warning [p 6, 0.0i, div `3tbd1,2', 0.5i]: can't break line
:520: warning [p 6, 0.0i, div `3tbd1,2', 1.2i]: can't break line
:521: warning [p 6, 0.0i, div `3tbd1,2', 1.7i]: can't break line
:529: warning [p 6, 0.0i, div `3tbd2,2', 0.3i]: can't break line
:575: warning [p 6, 0.0i, div `3tbd8,1', 0.0i]: can't break line
:672: warning [p 6, 0.0i, div `3tbd21,2', 0.3i]: can't break 
line
:720: warning [p 7, 1.7i, div `3tbd1,1', 0.0i]: can't break line
:723: warning [p 7, 1.7i, div `3tbd1,2', 0.5i]: can't break line
:724: warning [p 7, 1.7i, div `3tbd1,2', 0.8i]: can't break line
:725: warning [p 7, 1.7i, div `3tbd1,2', 1.5i]: can't break line
:726: warning [p 7, 1.7i, div `3tbd1,2', 1.8i]: can't break line
:727: warning [p 7, 1.7i, div `3tbd1,2', 2.2i]: can't break line
:728: warning [p 7, 1.7i, div `3tbd1,2', 2.8i]: can't break line
:729: warning [p 7, 1.7i, div `3tbd1,2', 3.3i]: can't break line
:741: warning [p 7, 1.7i, div `3tbd3,1', 0.0i]: can't break line
:3822: warning [p 44, 4.3i]: can't break line
:3823: warning [p 44, 5.8i]: can't break line
:3823: warning [p 44, 6.2i]: can't break line
:3823: warning [p 44, 6.5i]: can't break line
:3823: warning [p 44, 6.8i]: can't break line
:3823: warning [p 44, 7.2i]: can't break line
:3823: warning [p 44, 7.5i]: can't break line
:3824: warning [p 44, 8.0i]: can't break line
:3824: warning [p 44, 8.5i]: can't break line
:3824: warning [p 44, 8.8i]: can't break line
:3824: warning [p 44, 9.2i]: can't break line
:3824: warning [p 44, 9.7i]: can't break line
:3824: warning [p 44, 10.0i]: can't break line
:3824: warning [p 45, 0.3i]: can't break line
:3824: warning [p 45, 1.3i]: can't break line
:3824: warning [p 45, 1.7i]: can't brea

Re: How to prevent make compiling a binary?

[Stevan Tiefert]

Scot Hetzel schrieb:

On 5/8/07, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

It is not my decision to not deliver the sourcecode. It was the decision
of the ftp.mk.bsdclub.org. The port wouldn't be necessary when the
compat3x-port didn't stopped. It was since FreeBSD 6.0 not possible
anymore to use audio/mbrola as a native port! But after that my pc
speaks german :-)


Does audio/mbrola work if you add the following to /etc/libmap.conf?

[/usr/local/bin/mbrola]
libc.so.3 libc.so.4

NOTE: You'll need to have compat4x installed.

Scot


Yes.

Ok, I will see how to update the port audio/mbrola after the code-freeze 
of the ports-tree, because it has still the dependency to compat3x. With 
your hint it is possible to run it even with compat4x...


Thanks.



___ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

OpenNMS request

[Paul Pathiakis]

Hello Ports!


u. PLEASE!?


http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Main_Page

Thank you!

Paul Pathiakis
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

FreeBSD Port: openvpn-devel-2.1.r2

[Geno Salvati]

Matthias,

 

Thank you for your good work with the OpenVPN ports.

 

I have been using them for years and they have always been reliable.

 

Please let me know if you have plans to release a port upgrade to
include rc4 of OpenVPN version 2.1.  The answer to this question is not
mission critical but will make a slight difference in my planning if you
are able to provide it.

 

Geno

 

Geno Salvati

 

Network Engineer

Fastroad Network Services

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

314-995-0500

314-503-5046 cell

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: How to prevent make compiling a binary?

[Scot Hetzel]

On 5/8/07, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Scot Hetzel schrieb:
> On 5/8/07, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It is not my decision to not deliver the sourcecode. It was the decision
>> of the ftp.mk.bsdclub.org. The port wouldn't be necessary when the
>> compat3x-port didn't stopped. It was since FreeBSD 6.0 not possible
>> anymore to use audio/mbrola as a native port! But after that my pc
>> speaks german :-)
>>
> Does audio/mbrola work if you add the following to /etc/libmap.conf?
>
> [/usr/local/bin/mbrola]
> libc.so.3 libc.so.4
>
> NOTE: You'll need to have compat4x installed.
>
> Scot

Yes.

Ok, I will see how to update the port audio/mbrola after the code-freeze
of the ports-tree, because it has still the dependency to compat3x. With
your hint it is possible to run it even with compat4x...


Look at security/vscan for how it was done to add support for FreeBSD/amd64

Scot
--
DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: games/sauerbraten

[Sam Stein]

I've already submitted a pr with the update; before I read about the
maintainer timeout; should I just wait it out a while, and if nothing
happens, request one? Or do it right away?

+++ [LoN]Kamikaze [freebsd] [08/05/07 07:49 +0200]:

Sam Stein wrote:

There is a new version out; the port has an old one, the new version works
fine; I've emailed the maintainer twice; no reply.. what should I do now?


Submit a PR and request a maintainer timeout. This will take a long time, but 
it's the only way.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


--
Sam Stein
Computer Technician/Programmer
b1tt3r


pgphziQFEEwmL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

DarwinStreamingServer doesn't build under 6-STABLE ...

[Marc G. Fournier]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



I'm assuming someone has been able to get it to compile, but without any
knowledge in C++, I'm stump'd ... if I try to build, its failing at
StreamingLoadTool:

StreamingLoadTool.cpp: In function `int main(int, char**)':
StreamingLoadTool.cpp:132: error: no match for 'operator=' in
'act.sigaction::sa_mask = 0'
/usr/include/sys/_sigset.h:51: note: candidates are: __sigset&
__sigset::operator=(const __sigset&)
StreamingLoadTool.cpp:134: error: invalid conversion from `void (*)(...)' to
`void (*)(int)'

There are other warnings, but these are the only errors ...

I'm working with FreeBSD 6-STABLE recent to yesterday, gcc 3.4.6 in /usr/bin
...

Thoughts?

Thank you ...


- 
Marc G. Fournier   Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]  MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy   Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGQQ3f4QvfyHIvDvMRAtsCAJ9elN82rpx2f3zx4yNbIRzOiH0zhACgtUkt
JQmEKfXeTiBrqonQ9Yt5n1s=
=X+lR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: xorg merge and git

[Florent Thoumie]

Andriy Gapon wrote:
> One question: will the ports still be accessible via git after the merge
> of modular xorg branch ?
> I started to like git very much (as a distribution tool), it seems to be
> much faster than cvsup.

Probably not, at least not the xorg branch. I'm hosting this tree on a
personal server and while it doesn't bother me to use bandwidth for
that, I can't tell it will stay there forever (I'll probably upgrade the
server soon, so the tree will be dropped and recreated) so I'm not
really comfortable seeing people using it as a day to day replacement
for portsnap (which IMHO is much faster, if you're not doing any
development).

-- 
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committe



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Mongolian localization to dsssl-docbook-modular port

[Ganbold]

Hi,

I have some patches for Docbook DSSSL stylesheets in order to support
Mongolian. I have sent my patches to Docbook/DSSSL maintainers and received
following response:

"Hi,
I checked in your update for mn.xml. It should appear in the next
snapshot of the XSL stylesheets.
Regarding the DSSSL patches, I'm not qualified to review and apply those.
I am copying the developers list to see who could do it. Is anyone
maintaining the DSSSL tree?
Did you know that the DSSSL stylesheets were last released on 3
November 2004? I'm not sure your patches will be released any time soon.

Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting"

According to his email it seems like my patches aren't going to be 
released any time soon.


Is it possible to include this kind of a patch in 
/usr/ports/textproc/dsssl-docbook-modular port?


I sent my email to kuriyama@ san (dsssl-docbook-modular maintainer), but 
no response from him.


thanks in advance,

Ganbold

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Mongolian localization to dsssl-docbook-modular port

[Jun Kuriyama]

At Wed, 09 May 2007 10:52:43 +0800,
Ganbold wrote:
> Is it possible to include this kind of a patch in 
> /usr/ports/textproc/dsssl-docbook-modular port?
> 
> I sent my email to kuriyama@ san (dsssl-docbook-modular maintainer), but 
> no response from him.

Sorry.  Of cource I can integrate your patch into our ports tree.


-- 
Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // S2 Factory, Inc.
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // IMG SRC, Inc.
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // FreeBSD Project
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Mongolian localization to dsssl-docbook-modular port

[Ganbold]

Jun Kuriyama wrote:

At Wed, 09 May 2007 10:52:43 +0800,
Ganbold wrote:
  
Is it possible to include this kind of a patch in 
/usr/ports/textproc/dsssl-docbook-modular port?


I sent my email to kuriyama@ san (dsssl-docbook-modular maintainer), but 
no response from him.



Sorry.  Of cource I can integrate your patch into our ports tree.

  

Thanks a lot, Kuriyama san. Here is the patch.
Please let me know if there is something wrong with this patch.

thanks,

Ganbold


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

php4-mysql-4.4.6 overrides *MYSQL* variables?

[Harlan Stenn]

I have been noticing that when I run 'portupgrade -Ppa' (or reasonable
variants thereof) on a system that contains:

 /etc/make.conf:
 ...
 DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER=  41
 WANT_MYSQL_VER= 41
 WITH_MYSQL_VER= 41

(I used to just use DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER=41 and that didn't seem to be
enough.)

Anyway, when I run portupgrade it seems that php4-mysql-4.4.6 goes ahead
and installs mysql-client-5.0.37 even though mysql-client-4.1.22 has
already been installed (and is the version I want to use).

Ideas?

Harlan
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"