building profiling libraries in ports
To determine whether to build profiling libraries in a port, should we use NO_PROFILE as the check? IIRC, on -current, src.conf does not pollute ports build. Therefore, the port does not know this variable. Or, shall I use WITHOUT_PROFILE for this purpose? Thanks, rong-En Fan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [Mulberry-discuss] Problem with mail/mulberry
Hi Paul, Sounds strange that it complains about libXext.so.6, but perhaps you just didn't have linux-xorg-libs installed or up to date. Seens like the deinstall/reinstall process fixed that. How did you portupgrade, with `-R'? What versions of linux-emulation and other linux ports do you have? I can confirm that S/MIME plugin is not loaded for me either. Did it work with the previous version? /Palle --On tisdag, januari 02, 2007 13.46.10 -0600 Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Recently I portupgraded mail/mulberry. Afterwards, mulberry wouldn't start. It generated an error complaining about a missing libXext.so.6. After deinstalling and reinstalling, mulberry launches and works as expected. However, I now cannot sign messages. I removed and re-imported my certs to make sure that wasn't the problem. This is the error I'm getting: GPG Plugin Error: gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory! gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information gpg: skipped "[EMAIL PROTECTED]": secret key not available gpg: signing failed: secret key not available The strange thing is, I'm not using GPG. I'm using S/MIME. Looking at the security preferences, I can see that S/MIME is not loaded. Checking in the plugins directory, the S/MIME plugin is there. I did a complete deinstall and distclean and reinstalled, but the problem still exists. I'm not sure if this is a port problem or a distro problem, so I'm mailing both the FreeBSD ports list and the mulberry discussion list. (I'm also cc'ing the FBSD port maintainer.) uname -a FreeBSD utd59514.utdallas.edu 6.0-SECURITY FreeBSD 6.0-SECURITY #0: Tue Apr 18 08:56:09 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 mulberry -v 4.0.7 Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD Port: joomla-1.0.11
Hello Giovanni First of all, Happy New Year! :) Many thanks for your alert, and sorry only to anwser today. I was on vacation but I will patch it as soon as I can. Best Regards Francisco Cabrita -- Nucleo Portugues de FreeBSD - Core Member http://npf.pt.freebsd.org http://npf.pt.freebsd.org/~include/ On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Giovanni wrote: There are security fix in Joomla: http://www.joomla.org/content/view/2446/1/ I hope port will come as soon as. I know that now it's holiday time :) . Happy new year all of you. Giovanni ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
NMAP 4.20 Port broken?
Hi, I can't compile NMAP 4.20 with my freshly updated ports collection. It stops when compiling the file output.cc Here is the error message: c++ -c -Ilibdnet-stripped/include -I/usr/local/include -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron -Wall -I/usr/include -Ilibpcap -Inbase -Insock/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNMAP_VERSION= \"4.20\" -DNMAP_NAME=\"Nmap\" -DNMAP_URL=\"http://insecure.org\"; -DNMAP_PLATFORM=\"amd64-portbld-freebsd6.1\" -DNMAPDATADIR= \"/usr/local/share/nmap\" output.cc -o output.o output.cc: In function `void log_vwrite(int, const char*, __va_list_tag*)': output.cc:746: error: incompatible types in assignment of `__va_list_tag*' to `__va_list_tag[1]' gmake: *** [output.o] Error 1 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/security/nmap. Is there a problem with nmap or a depending library? Regards, Daniel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports/106813: Can I get a maintainer-timeout and commit?
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:35:24 -0600 (CST) Larry Rosenman mentioned: > This is a simple patch add to fix an obvious issue. > > Can I get a committer to declare a maintainer-timeout and commit: > ports/106813? > > Thanks! > I think we'll probably wait until holidays is over - sure, mnag@ will commit it soon. BTW, have you submitted your patch upstream? -- Stanislav Sedov Against HTML mail and Flash PGP: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~stas/stas.key.asc pgpIpVXOfJQ95.pgp Description: PGP signature
The port ntfs-3g-0.20061115-BETA.tgz is not found.
The port http://www.ntfs-3g.org/ntfs-3g-0.20061115-BETA.tgz is not accessible on your site. Please correct this problem. I need this port. Thanks. Regards. -- Isaia Luciano ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports/106813: Can I get a maintainer-timeout and commit?
the dbmail guys are in contact with the upstream author. No replies yet. They (the dbmail folks) are putting a workaroundin for an additional issue with the library. Without this patch, bad things will happen. I've stopped using dbmail pending their fix. Having this patch committed would help. Thanks --- Original Message --- From: Stanislav Sedov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Larry Rosenman Sent: 1/3/07, 5:20:43 AM Subject: Re: ports/106813: Can I get a maintainer-timeout and commit? On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:35:24 -0600 (CST) Larry Rosenman mentioned: > This is a simple patch add to fix an obvious issue. > > Can I get a committer to declare a maintainer-timeout and commit: > ports/106813? > > Thanks! > I think we'll probably wait until holidays is over - sure, mnag@ will commit it soon. BTW, have you submitted your patch upstream? -- Stanislav Sedov Against HTML mail and Flash PGP: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~stas/stas.key.asc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[patch] Fix for fetch-error of graphics/py-cairo
Hi list,
I just tried updating py24-cairo (graphics/py-cairo) to the current
version. The package pycairo-1.2.6.tar.gz is neither on the official
server, nor on the FreeBSD ftp-servers.
To fix that, I searched (and obviously found) a "new" source for that
package. With the following patch, the port can be updated/installed again:
--- Makefile.orig Wed Jan 3 13:41:42 2007
+++ MakefileWed Jan 3 13:41:26 2007
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
PORTNAME= cairo
PORTVERSION= 1.2.6
CATEGORIES=graphics python
-MASTER_SITES= http://cairographics.org/releases/
+MASTER_SITES= http://cairographics.org/releases/ \
+ http://zeqadious.homelinux.net/zenwalk/buildscripts/official/pycairo/
PKGNAMEPREFIX= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}
DISTNAME= py${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}
Perhaps someone can commit the patch, so nobody has to reinvent the
wheel twice ;)
Regards,
Philipp
--
www.familie-ost.info/~pj
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: NMAP 4.20 Port broken?
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 11:48:31AM +0100, Daniel Prinz wrote: > Hi, > > I can't compile NMAP 4.20 with my freshly updated ports collection. It > stops when compiling the file output.cc > > Here is the error message: > > c++ -c -Ilibdnet-stripped/include -I/usr/local/include -O2 > -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron -Wall -I/usr/include > -Ilibpcap -Inbase -Insock/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNMAP_VERSION= > \"4.20\" -DNMAP_NAME=\"Nmap\" -DNMAP_URL=\"http://insecure.org\"; > -DNMAP_PLATFORM=\"amd64-portbld-freebsd6.1\" -DNMAPDATADIR= > \"/usr/local/share/nmap\" output.cc -o output.o > output.cc: In function `void log_vwrite(int, const char*, > __va_list_tag*)': > output.cc:746: error: incompatible types in assignment of > `__va_list_tag*' to `__va_list_tag[1]' > gmake: *** [output.o] Error 1 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/nmap. Are you building on AMD64? There has been a recent post regarding this under AMD64 (5.5 (I think) and 6.1). I can confirm that it's currently broken under 6.1 AMD64 but don't have the time to dig deeper into it. I'll see about submitting a PR shortly which notes this problem. I'm also CC'ing the maintainer on this. > Is there a problem with nmap or a depending library? I'm not entirely sure and don't have the time today to look into it. Hopefully the maintainer can take care of it soon, otherwise I will put it on my TODO list for this weekend. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
portaudit "forgot" 2006 vulnerabilities
Whilst catching up with the daily run and security run e-mails from the past few days, I noticed the portaudit database was restarted at the beginning of the year. Is this the expected behaviour? Now I still have vulnerable ports (with problems from last year which, until Monday, were faithfully reported to me every week), but get the message: # portaudit -Fa auditfile.tbz 100% of 5693 B 27 kBps New database installed. 0 problem(s) in your installed packages found. -- David Taylor ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: The port ntfs-3g-0.20061115-BETA.tgz is not found.
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:04:45 +0100 Isaia wrote: > The port http://www.ntfs-3g.org/ntfs-3g-0.20061115-BETA.tgz is not accessible > on your site. Please correct this problem. I need this port. > Thanks. > Regards. You may give it a try: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=107475 WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: NMAP 4.20 Port broken?
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 11:48:31AM +0100, Daniel Prinz wrote: > Hi, > > I can't compile NMAP 4.20 with my freshly updated ports collection. It > stops when compiling the file output.cc [snip] Daniel, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/107478 The patch there fixed the build on a 6.1 AMD64 box of mine. I haven't tested it on 5-STABLE or -CURRENT but it should work there. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: PLIST_FILES question
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 23:09, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> Beech Rintoul schrieb:
> > On Tuesday 02 January 2007 13:43, you wrote:
> >> Beech Rintoul schrieb:
> >>> Thanks to everyone who responded. I somehow missed that handbook
> >>> section, but I have it figured out now. What I needed to do is the
> >>> following:
> >>>
> >>> .if defined(WITH_MYSQL)
> >>> USE_MYSQL=yes
> >>> MODULES:=${MODULES}:mod_sql:mod_sql_mysql
> >>> INCLUDEDIRS:=${INCLUDEDIRS}:${LOCALBASE}/include
> >>> LIBDIRS:=${LIBDIRS}:${LOCALBASE}/lib/mysql
> >>> PLIST_FILES= include/proftpd/mod_sql.h
> >>> .endif
> >>>
> >>> The extra header file is not copied to include unless that option is
> >>> checked and hard coding it in pkg-plist broke the pkg build. It didn't
> >>> show up on pointyhat because that option is off by default.
> >>
> >> Oh, do you want to mix PLIST_FILES and pkg-plist, did I catch it right?
> >> That should not be done. You can list that file in pkg-plist as
> >> %%MYSQL%%include/proftpd/mod_sql.h and do the following in Makefile:
> >>
> >> if defined(WITH_MYSQL)
> >> PLIST_SUB+= MYSQL=""
> >> [...another things here...]
> >> .else
> >>
> >> PLIST_SUB+= MYSQL="@comment "
> >> .endif
> >>
> >> Look at e.g. security/amavisd-new, I do something similar there.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Gabor
> >
> > Thanks, It doesn't say anything in the handbook about not doing that and
> > it works. In the interest of being correct I'll try what you suggest.
>
> Yep. PH doesn't say it, but portlint does. Maybe this should be noted in
> PH as well.
That would be a good idea. I did change the Makefile and pkg-plist as you
suggested, but before doing so I ran portlint again and it did NOT complain
about using both pkg-plist and PLIST_FILES. The PH in the advanced section
would lead one to believe that it's acceptable to use both. I'm glad I
posted what I was trying to do, this release was rushed to address a security
issue and was a real pain to get all the options building correctly. I
definitely don't want to add problems on top of it. Anyway, thanks again for
your input.
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501
/ \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: NMAP 4.20 Port broken? - PR ports/107478
Daniel Prinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-01-03: > output.cc:746: error: incompatible types in assignment of > `__va_list_tag*' to `__va_list_tag[1]' > gmake: *** [output.o] Error 1 A previous 4.x fix was broken, enabling the 4.x workaround on all FreeBSD releases. I am correcting this error in PR ports/107478, which should fix build on AMD64. Cheers Dan -- Daniel Roethlisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Fixing broken dependencies
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 13:39 +, Mark Ovens wrote: > I used pkg_delete(1) to remove several unwanted ports but now > portmanager reports them as missing because they are still listed as in > the +CONTENTS of other packages, e.g. I pkg_delete'd koffice but > portmanager now lists it as MISSING because it is still listed in the > +CONTENTS of the kde meta-port as a @pkgdep. > > What is the best way to fix this? If I run ``portmanager -u'' to upgrade > all the ports I suspect that it will simply reinstall all the ports it > considers are missing. > > I'm sure I know how to do this, but I can't remember :( If you delete the meta-port, portmanager will track the individual components separately and not complain about the missing deps. robert. > Thanks. > > Regards, > > Mark > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: PLIST_FILES question
Beech Rintoul schrieb:
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 23:09, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Beech Rintoul schrieb:
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 13:43, you wrote:
Beech Rintoul schrieb:
Thanks to everyone who responded. I somehow missed that handbook
section, but I have it figured out now. What I needed to do is the
following:
.if defined(WITH_MYSQL)
USE_MYSQL= yes
MODULES:=${MODULES}:mod_sql:mod_sql_mysql
INCLUDEDIRS:=${INCLUDEDIRS}:${LOCALBASE}/include
LIBDIRS:=${LIBDIRS}:${LOCALBASE}/lib/mysql
PLIST_FILES=include/proftpd/mod_sql.h
.endif
The extra header file is not copied to include unless that option is
checked and hard coding it in pkg-plist broke the pkg build. It didn't
show up on pointyhat because that option is off by default.
Oh, do you want to mix PLIST_FILES and pkg-plist, did I catch it right?
That should not be done. You can list that file in pkg-plist as
%%MYSQL%%include/proftpd/mod_sql.h and do the following in Makefile:
if defined(WITH_MYSQL)
PLIST_SUB+= MYSQL=""
[...another things here...]
.else
PLIST_SUB+= MYSQL="@comment "
.endif
Look at e.g. security/amavisd-new, I do something similar there.
Regards,
Gabor
Thanks, It doesn't say anything in the handbook about not doing that and
it works. In the interest of being correct I'll try what you suggest.
Yep. PH doesn't say it, but portlint does. Maybe this should be noted in
PH as well.
That would be a good idea. I did change the Makefile and pkg-plist as you
suggested, but before doing so I ran portlint again and it did NOT complain
about using both pkg-plist and PLIST_FILES. The PH in the advanced section
would lead one to believe that it's acceptable to use both. I'm glad I
posted what I was trying to do, this release was rushed to address a security
issue and was a real pain to get all the options building correctly. I
definitely don't want to add problems on top of it. Anyway, thanks again for
your input.
Beech
Hmm, you might have an old portlint, I still can see this warning if a
port uses both pkg-plist and PLIST_FILES:
WARN: Makefile: [20]: You may remove pkg-plist if you use PLIST_FILES
and/or PLIST_DIRS.
Gabor
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portaudit "forgot" 2006 vulnerabilities
David Taylor wrote: > Whilst catching up with the daily run and security run e-mails > >from the past few days, I noticed the portaudit database was restarted > at the beginning of the year. Is this the expected behaviour? > > Now I still have vulnerable ports (with problems from last year which, > until Monday, were faithfully reported to me every week), but get the > message: > > # portaudit -Fa > auditfile.tbz 100% of 5693 B 27 kBps > New database installed. > 0 problem(s) in your installed packages found. Same here... -- Best regards / Viele Grüße, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Simon Barner[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgprMWQajRtJw.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: portaudit "forgot" 2006 vulnerabilities
On 2007.01.03 19:32:58 +0100, Simon Barner wrote: > David Taylor wrote: > > Whilst catching up with the daily run and security run e-mails > > >from the past few days, I noticed the portaudit database was restarted > > at the beginning of the year. Is this the expected behaviour? > > > > Now I still have vulnerable ports (with problems from last year which, > > until Monday, were faithfully reported to me every week), but get the > > message: > > > > # portaudit -Fa > > auditfile.tbz 100% of 5693 B 27 kBps > > New database installed. > > 0 problem(s) in your installed packages found. > > Same here... There is a bug in the portaudit database generator so when the VuXML document is broken so it's not valid XML the portaudit database generator just stops and produces an incomplete database file instead of not updating the database... This should of course be fixed so it's not a problem, but there are only so many hours in a day. I fixed the VuXML file about an hour ago so database should be OK now (of course you have to download a new one with -F if testing). BTW. if people see this thing please poke secteam@ like barner@ did, since I will see the problem much faster than mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Security Team ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't upgrade proftpd in FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE
On 01/01/07, Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 01 January 2007 02:28, Chris wrote: > On 31/12/06, Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sunday 31 December 2006 06:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On all of my installations that have proftpd-1.3.0_5 I get the > > > following error when attempting to upgrade to proftpd-1.3.1rc1. > > > > > > cc -o proftpd src/main.o src/timers.o src/sets.o src/pool.o > > > src/table.o src/regexp.o src/dirtree.o src/support.o src/netaddr.o > > > src/inet.o src/child.o src/parser.o src/log.o src/lastlog.o > > > src/xferlog.o src/bindings.o src/netacl.o src/class.o src/scoreboard.o > > > src/help.o src/feat.o src/netio.o src/response.o src/ident.o > > > src/data.o src/modules.o src/display.o src/auth.o src/fsio.o > > > src/mkhome.o src/ctrls.o src/event.o src/var.o src/trace.o src/utf8.o > > > modules/mod_core.o modules/mod_xfer.o modules/mod_auth_unix.o > > > modules/mod_auth_file.o modules/mod_auth.o modules/mod_ls.o > > > modules/mod_log.o modules/mod_site.o modules/mod_delay.o > > > modules/mod_auth_pam.o modules/mod_ifsession.o modules/mod_ldap.o > > > modules/mod_wrap2.o modules/mod_rewrite.o modules/mod_readme.o > > > modules/mod_ratio.o modules/module_glue.o > > > -L/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib -L/usr/local/lib > > > -lsupp -lcrypt -lutil /usr/local/lib/libldap.so -lssl -lcrypto > > > /usr/local/lib/liblber.so -lpam -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib > > > -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib > > > /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.t > > >ext+ 0x5c5): In function > > > > > > `_getopt_internal': > > > : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' > > > > > > /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.t > > >ext+ 0x687): In function > > > > > > `_getopt_internal': > > > : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' > > > > > > /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.t > > >ext+ 0x8b1): In function > > > > > > `_getopt_internal': > > > : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' > > > > > > /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.t > > >ext+ 0xa3a): In function > > > > > > `_getopt_internal': > > > : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' > > > > > > /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.t > > >ext+ 0xa99): In function > > > > > > `_getopt_internal': > > > : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' > > > > > > /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.t > > >ext+ 0xb04): more undefined references to `libintl_gettext' follow > > > gmake: *** [proftpd] Error 1 > > > *** Error code 2 > > > > > > The reference to libintl_gettext has me comfused. Could I be missing > > > a dependency? I have tryed compiling in ftp/proftpd, using portmaster > > > and portupgrade and none seem to detect anything missing and all end > > > as above. > > > > > > A couple of the boxes are running un to date current the rest are > > > RELENG_6 and up to date with daily cvsup and build. > > > > > > My configuration includes: > > >Use LDAP > > >Include mod_ifsession > > >Include mod_readme > > >Include mod_ratio > > >mod_rewrite > > >mod_wrap2 > > > > > > All suggestions appreciated. > > > > That linker error was fixed and committed yesterday. Make sure you're > > building 1.3.1rc1_1. > > > > Beech (Maintainer) > 1.3.1rc1_1 overwrites /usr/local/etc/proftpd.conf instead of making a dist > file. > > Chris That problem has also been fixed and is waiting commit. Beech (Maintainer) -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- Now it simply deletes the existing proftpd.conf, luckily I am keeping backups now :) Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: PLIST_FILES question
On 1/3/07, Gabor Kovesdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Beech Rintoul schrieb:
> Thanks to everyone who responded. I somehow missed that handbook section, but
> I have it figured out now. What I needed to do is the following:
>
> .if defined(WITH_MYSQL)
> USE_MYSQL=yes
> MODULES:=${MODULES}:mod_sql:mod_sql_mysql
> INCLUDEDIRS:=${INCLUDEDIRS}:${LOCALBASE}/include
> LIBDIRS:=${LIBDIRS}:${LOCALBASE}/lib/mysql
> PLIST_FILES= include/proftpd/mod_sql.h
> .endif
>
> The extra header file is not copied to include unless that option is checked
> and hard coding it in pkg-plist broke the pkg build. It didn't show up on
> pointyhat because that option is off by default.
>
>
Oh, do you want to mix PLIST_FILES and pkg-plist, did
I catch it right? That should not be done.
Why not?
You can list that file in pkg-plist as
%%MYSQL%%include/proftpd/mod_sql.h and do the following in Makefile:
if defined(WITH_MYSQL)
PLIST_SUB+= MYSQL=""
[...another things here...]
.else
PLIST_SUB+= MYSQL="@comment "
.endif
Look at e.g. security/amavisd-new, I do something similar there.
PLIST_FILES is a bit simpler to use. Personal feelings
about the variable, or whether it smells well when mixed
with pkg-plist are interesting, but they are not quite
relevant if there's no technical problem.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: PLIST_FILES question
Andrew Pantyukhin schrieb:
On 1/3/07, Gabor Kovesdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Beech Rintoul schrieb:
> Thanks to everyone who responded. I somehow missed that handbook
section, but
> I have it figured out now. What I needed to do is the following:
>
> .if defined(WITH_MYSQL)
> USE_MYSQL=yes
> MODULES:=${MODULES}:mod_sql:mod_sql_mysql
> INCLUDEDIRS:=${INCLUDEDIRS}:${LOCALBASE}/include
> LIBDIRS:=${LIBDIRS}:${LOCALBASE}/lib/mysql
> PLIST_FILES= include/proftpd/mod_sql.h
> .endif
>
> The extra header file is not copied to include unless that option
is checked
> and hard coding it in pkg-plist broke the pkg build. It didn't show
up on
> pointyhat because that option is off by default.
>
>
Oh, do you want to mix PLIST_FILES and pkg-plist, did
I catch it right? That should not be done.
Why not?
You can list that file in pkg-plist as
%%MYSQL%%include/proftpd/mod_sql.h and do the following in Makefile:
if defined(WITH_MYSQL)
PLIST_SUB+= MYSQL=""
[...another things here...]
.else
PLIST_SUB+= MYSQL="@comment "
.endif
Look at e.g. security/amavisd-new, I do something similar there.
PLIST_FILES is a bit simpler to use. Personal feelings
about the variable, or whether it smells well when mixed
with pkg-plist are interesting, but they are not quite
relevant if there's no technical problem.
Well, I don't know why portlint warns you about it, but I also think it
should be avoided. I think it's just misleading. When I look at a port I
presuppose it uses either pkg-plist or PLIST_FILES, but not both, since
it is the common practise, and probably other people think in this way,
so one might overlook PLIST_FILES if one sees that pkg-plist exists.
Gabor
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Problems with PR system?
I submitted a PR yesterday updating devel/byaccj. My maillogs show the message being accepted, but I've not gotten a response. Is the PR system backlogged? Down? Wassup? Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [Mulberry-discuss] Problem with mail/mulberry
Yes, I think the deinstall/reinstall properly registered the library. I ran portupgrade -ai and manually approved each upgrade. linux-emulation: pkg_info -a | grep linux_base Information for linux_base-fc-4_9: Yes, the S/MIME plugin worked in previous versions. Not sure what happened, because the plugin is there. --On Wednesday, January 03, 2007 10:16:58 +0100 Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Paul, Sounds strange that it complains about libXext.so.6, but perhaps you just didn't have linux-xorg-libs installed or up to date. Seens like the deinstall/reinstall process fixed that. How did you portupgrade, with `-R'? What versions of linux-emulation and other linux ports do you have? I can confirm that S/MIME plugin is not loaded for me either. Did it work with the previous version? /Palle --On tisdag, januari 02, 2007 13.46.10 -0600 Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Recently I portupgraded mail/mulberry. Afterwards, mulberry wouldn't start. It generated an error complaining about a missing libXext.so.6. After deinstalling and reinstalling, mulberry launches and works as expected. However, I now cannot sign messages. I removed and re-imported my certs to make sure that wasn't the problem. This is the error I'm getting: GPG Plugin Error: gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory! gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information gpg: skipped "[EMAIL PROTECTED]": secret key not available gpg: signing failed: secret key not available The strange thing is, I'm not using GPG. I'm using S/MIME. Looking at the security preferences, I can see that S/MIME is not loaded. Checking in the plugins directory, the S/MIME plugin is there. I did a complete deinstall and distclean and reinstalled, but the problem still exists. I'm not sure if this is a port problem or a distro problem, so I'm mailing both the FreeBSD ports list and the mulberry discussion list. (I'm also cc'ing the FBSD port maintainer.) uname -a FreeBSD utd59514.utdallas.edu 6.0-SECURITY FreeBSD 6.0-SECURITY #0: Tue Apr 18 08:56:09 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 mulberry -v 4.0.7 Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Massive upgrade after updating gnutls-1.4.5 port
I read in the UPDATING file:
###
gnutls has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libraries' versions
have been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that
depend on gnutls. Do something like:
portupgrade -rf gnutls
###
I run pkg_glob -r gnutls-1.4.5 and get 42 packages, including
k3b-0.12.17 and abiword-2.4.6 among other (I mentioned only
some of the biggest to build in my slow pentium III computer).
However, I have noticed that only a few ports depends directly on gnults
port (search for those ports which depends on gnutls but do not depend
on the rest of ports listed in /var/db/pkg/gnutls-1.4.5/+REQUIRED_BY,
see [1]). These ports are (in my system):
aMule-2.1.3
gconf2-2.16.0
gkrellm-2.2.10_1
gnome-icon-theme-2.16.1
gtkspell-2.0.11_4
k3b-i18n-0.12.17
ktorrent-2.0.3
libglade2-2.6.0_2
mplayer-0.99.10
pinentry-gtk2-0.7.2_5
sdl-1.2.11,2
tinyca-0.7.5
wxgtk2-common-2.6.3_1
xvid4conf-1.12
My aim is rebuild only the above ports, and ignore the others listed
in the output of pkg_glob -r gnutls-1.4.5. The question is: do you
think is my approach right, or shall I need to rebuild all the ports of
pkg_glob output?
For example, suppose libA depends on libB, and libB depends in turn on
libC. If version of libC changes, I need rebuild libB but, shall I to
rebuild libA?
PD: excuse my poor english
[1]
#!/bin/sh
inputPort="$1"
vardbpkg="/var/db/pkg"
#
completePath(){
while read p
do
if [ -r "$vardbpkg/$p/+REQUIRED_BY" ]
then
echo "$vardbpkg/$p/+REQUIRED_BY"
fi
done
}
portname=`pkg_info -qo $inputPort`
if test $? != 0
then
exit 1
fi
###
while read port
do
if ! grep $port `grep -v $port $vardbpkg/$inputPort/+REQUIRED_BY |
completePath` > /dev/null 2>&1
then
echo "$port"
fi
done < $vardbpkg/$inputPort/+REQUIRED_BY
--
http://personales.ya.com/banach
pgpYvLLvw6ZrC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: Problems with PR system?
There seems to have been a temporary problem with the email system either involving spasassassin or NFS. The message is queued and I will rescue it tomorrow; I am simply too tired tonight. I will note, again, that these problems should always be forwarded to bugmeister@ rather than the public lists. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Request new Java-based finance application be added to FBSD ports
jGnash is a java-based "personal finance manager" using either single or double entry transactions that is open source and covered by several GPL/BSD licenses and one "free to use/redistribute" license (for Foxtrot component). I am not trying to promote jGnash as better than any other financial (or FBSD finance ports) application, but it does work, obviously requiring Java, and appears to have no commercial or proprietary encumberances. jGnash is not currently offered as a FreeBSD port. While I am not volunteering to be a port maintainer, I am submitting this problem report to request that jGnash be given consideration for inclusion in the FreeBSD finance ports. http://jgnash.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page http://jgnash.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/jGnash:About http://jgnash.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/jGnash:FAQ Test Environment: FreeBSD FreeBSD2.LocalNET10 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1: Wed Dec 27 00:34:05 CST 2006 jdk-1.5.0p3_6 Java Development Kit 1.5.0 linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.12 Sun Java Development Kit 1.4 for Linux ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [Mulberry-discuss] Problem with mail/mulberry
If you try to downgrade to the previous version, does it help? Just to let me know for sure it is the upgrade that gives you the trouble. /Palle 3 jan 2007 kl. 22.26 skrev Paul Schmehl: Yes, I think the deinstall/reinstall properly registered the library. I ran portupgrade -ai and manually approved each upgrade. linux-emulation: pkg_info -a | grep linux_base Information for linux_base-fc-4_9: Yes, the S/MIME plugin worked in previous versions. Not sure what happened, because the plugin is there. --On Wednesday, January 03, 2007 10:16:58 +0100 Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Paul, Sounds strange that it complains about libXext.so.6, but perhaps you just didn't have linux-xorg-libs installed or up to date. Seens like the deinstall/reinstall process fixed that. How did you portupgrade, with `-R'? What versions of linux-emulation and other linux ports do you have? I can confirm that S/MIME plugin is not loaded for me either. Did it work with the previous version? /Palle --On tisdag, januari 02, 2007 13.46.10 -0600 Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Recently I portupgraded mail/mulberry. Afterwards, mulberry wouldn't start. It generated an error complaining about a missing libXext.so.6. After deinstalling and reinstalling, mulberry launches and works as expected. However, I now cannot sign messages. I removed and re-imported my certs to make sure that wasn't the problem. This is the error I'm getting: GPG Plugin Error: gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory! gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information gpg: skipped "[EMAIL PROTECTED]": secret key not available gpg: signing failed: secret key not available The strange thing is, I'm not using GPG. I'm using S/MIME. Looking at the security preferences, I can see that S/MIME is not loaded. Checking in the plugins directory, the S/MIME plugin is there. I did a complete deinstall and distclean and reinstalled, but the problem still exists. I'm not sure if this is a port problem or a distro problem, so I'm mailing both the FreeBSD ports list and the mulberry discussion list. (I'm also cc'ing the FBSD port maintainer.) uname -a FreeBSD utd59514.utdallas.edu 6.0-SECURITY FreeBSD 6.0-SECURITY #0: Tue Apr 18 08:56:09 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 mulberry -v 4.0.7 Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [Mulberry-discuss] Problem with mail/mulberry
--On January 3, 2007 11:58:43 PM +0100 Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you try to downgrade to the previous version, does it help? Just to let me know for sure it is the upgrade that gives you the trouble. Downgrading to version 4.0.5 resolves the problem with the S/MIME plugin not loading, however, the memory error with gpg remains. I suspect that is a separate problem. GPG memory error: GPG Plugin Error: gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory! gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information gpg: skipped "[EMAIL PROTECTED]": secret key not available gpg: signing failed: secret key not available I need to test 4.0.6 tomorrow to be sure it doesn't work also, because I didn't make sure that all previous files had been removed before installing 4.0.6. I'll do that and report the results. I'm not sure where to look for the source of the gpg error though. I've already deinstalled and reinstalled security/gpgme twice, so that doesn't appear to be the source of the problem. Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
