[Orgmode] Vertical lines are broken in 6.28?
Hello, I've regenerate my .org doc with 6.28trans (was with 6.24) and Vertical Lines, I want to keep -- not working anymore. Ex: | Legasy machines | # of BC | # of RTI connected | |-+-+| | / | < | < | | pca/ellse1 | 1 | none | This was OK before. Thanks in advance, Yury ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: R: [Orgmode] Vertical lines are broken in 6.28?
Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: --- Ven 24/7/09, Yury GEORGIEVSKIY ha scritto: I've regenerate my .org doc with 6.28trans (was with 6.24) and Vertical Lines, I want to keep -- not working anymore. what does it mean "vertical lines I want to keep?" keep when? when exporting? and exporting to what? LaTeX? HTML? Yes, when exporting to HTML (C-c C-e h), I want to keep vertical lines. Ex: | Legasy machines | # of BC | # of RTI connected | |-+-+| | / | < | < | | pca/ellse1 | 1 | none | This was OK before. This what? Could you, please, add more detail, add an example of the output (if the problen is during exporting) ? If C-c C-e h is done on the example above -- boundaries between column groups are not marked with vertical lines upon export. While doing it in 6.24 -- produce vertical lines upon export. Cheers, Yury ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: suggestion: converting plain lists to subtrees
Bastien writes:
>> Bastien -- I think C-c * could do with a mention in the manual section
>> on Plain Lists. Here's a patch which just copies the section on C-c *
>> from the Structure Editing section.
>
> Applied, thanks!
I'm not such a big fan of code or documentation duplication. Here's a
patch that removes this duplication and simply refers to the original
section on C-c *.
Thanks
Christian
diff --git a/doc/org.texi b/doc/org.texi
index 8a65f1a..37cad40 100644
--- a/doc/org.texi
+++ b/doc/org.texi
@@ -1437,13 +1437,8 @@ list. Finally, even without an active region, a normal
line will be
converted into a list item.
@kindex C-c *
@item C-c *
-Turn a normal line or plain list item into a headline (so that it
-becomes a subheading at its location). Also turn a headline into a
-normal line by removing the stars. If there is an active region, turn
-all lines in the region into headlines. If the first line in the
-region was an item, turn only the item lines into headlines. Finally,
-if the first line is a headline, remove the stars from all headlines
-in the region.
+Turn a plain list item into a headline (so that it becomes a subheading at
+its location). @xref{Structure editing}, for a detailed explanation.
@kindex s...@key{left}
@kindex s...@key{right}
@item s...@key{left}/@key{right}
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
R: [Orgmode] Vertical lines are broken in 6.28?
--- Ven 24/7/09, Yury GEORGIEVSKIY ha scritto: > I've regenerate my .org doc with 6.28trans (was with 6.24) > and Vertical Lines, I want to keep -- not working anymore. what does it mean "vertical lines I want to keep?" keep when? when exporting? and exporting to what? LaTeX? HTML? > Ex: > | Legasy machines | # of BC | # of RTI connected | |-+-+| | / | < | < | | pca/ellse1 | 1 | none | > This was OK before. This what? Could you, please, add more detail, add an example of the output (if the problen is during exporting) ? cheers, Giovanni ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: Org-mode and GPG (EasyPG)
Hello org-moders, Maybe : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503480 Where the maintainer said: , | Removing /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/easypg prevents | this problem. | | EasyPG is already integrated in the development version of Emacs, | which will be 23.1 release. So, please don't install the easypg | files for the flavors emacs-snapshot and emacs23. ` I use easypg without any problem. Maurice ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Spreadsheet bug?
Andreas Burtzlaff wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:29:30 +0200 meingbg wrote: >> > | a | b | c | >> > |---++---| >> > | a | 2 | 2 | >> > | b | 3 | 7 | >> > | c | -3 | 4 | >> > | d | 5 | 9 | >> > #+TBLFM: $3=...@-1::@2$3=$2 > > If @2$3 is manually set to 2 in the table, then the formulas produce > the expected outcome. So, the problem seems to be the order of > execution. If column c is cleared and the formulas are executed, @2$3 > is read to be 0 for the summation and is set to 2 only afterwards. > Swapping the order in the TBLFM line doesn't help. > > Is the order something like field formulas after column formulas? > Any chance to influence that? Evaluating the field formulas before the column formulas is in general a bad idea. Results of the field formulas will always be overwritten by the column formulas (if there is a conflict). Here you need to evaluate the spreadsheet twice to yield the intended result (I get a 5 in field @2$3). From info:org:Updating the table: > `C-u C-u C-c *' > `C-u C-u C-c C-c' > Iterate the table by recomputing it until no further changes occur. > This may be necessary if some computed fields use the value of > other fields that are computed later in the calculation sequence. hth, Stephan ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode and GPG (EasyPG)
At Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:05:36 +0200, Maurice wrote: > > Hello org-moders, > > Maybe : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503480 Brilliant!! Many thanks. Problem solved. (now why didn't I think of checking Debian's bug reports??? sigh) Thanks again, eric ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Results of the SourceForge Community Award
Hi all, the results of the SCCA 2009 have been announced and the winner in our category is portableapps.com, a platform to carry computer programs on a USB key. Org-mode didn't win but it was really great to participate and to have all these nice contributions from so many people! A big thanks to all of you. Let's keep making Org a tool which changes the way _we_ do everything :) -- Bastien ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Results of the SourceForge Community Award
That's not great news but in my book, org won. Thanks for the update Bastien. On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Bastien wrote: > Hi all, > > the results of the SCCA 2009 have been announced and the winner in our > category is portableapps.com, a platform to carry computer programs on > a USB key. > > Org-mode didn't win but it was really great to participate and to have > all these nice contributions from so many people! > > A big thanks to all of you. > > Let's keep making Org a tool which changes the way _we_ do everything :) > > -- > Bastien > > > ___ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Results of the SourceForge Community Award
the results of the SCCA 2009 have been announced and the winner in our category is portableapps.com, a platform to carry computer programs on a USB key. Blah :P -- Jose E. Marchesijema...@gnu.org GNU Project http://www.gnu.org ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Results of the SourceForge Community Award
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Bastien wrote: > > Hi all, > > the results of the SCCA 2009 have been announced and the winner in our > category is portableapps.com, a platform to carry computer programs on > a USB key. > > Org-mode didn't win but it was really great to participate and to have > all these nice contributions from so many people! > > A big thanks to all of you. I regularly use both PortableApps.com and Org-mode extensively. IMHO, we lost to a worthy opponent. > > > Let's keep making Org a tool which changes the way _we_ do everything :) Yeah. My sincere thanks to Carsten, you and all the contributors. Best regards -- Manish ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] How to track time spent on a project
Hi, I want to track the time that I'll spend on a new project. For this I'm planning to use org-mode's clocking feature, so far my first tests (I've never used org-agenda before) showed me that I can do this easily from the agenda view, as long as I have a DATE: property in my node. And that's a bit of a problem because I don't really have a scheduled date when I'm going to work on a part of this project. Is there a way in org-mode to just clock the time and have the agenda view show me on the views for every day (or time interval) just the clocked times for every tree item that fall into this time interval/range? And how can I start clocking items that do not show up in the agenda view? I'm not sure if it's understandable what I want, so I here's a small example org-file and a description of what I want to see and how I want to work on it: Basic layout of the org-file: * Part 1 :CLOCK: CLOCK: [2009-07-20 Mon 12:40]--[2009-07-20 Mon 14:43] => 2:03 CLOCK: [2009-07-23 Thu 22:28]--[2009-07-23 Thu 22:48] => 0:20 :END: * Part 2 :CLOCK: CLOCK: [2009-07-24 Fri 09:45]--[2009-07-24 Fri 11:15] => 1:30 :END: What I want: (Re-)start at any time the clocking of one of either Part 1 or Part 2 whenever I'm working on it and get summaries of the total working times on a day, week, or whatever time interval I want and the total working time I've spent on the project or single parts on it. I assume that a lot of you are using org-mode exactly for this purpose and probably you know how to do it better, so if you have any suggestions how I could do it better please tell me :-) Thanks, Geralt. ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] How to track time spent on a project
Take a look at this: http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html#sec-7I use this exact setup and it works perfectly *Greg Newman* http://20seven.org twitter: 20seven On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Geralt wrote: > Hi, > > I want to track the time that I'll spend on a new project. For this > I'm planning to use org-mode's clocking feature, so far my first tests > (I've never used org-agenda before) showed me that I can do this > easily from the agenda view, as long as I have a DATE: property in my > node. And that's a bit of a problem because I don't really have a > scheduled date when I'm going to work on a part of this project. > Is there a way in org-mode to just clock the time and have the agenda > view show me on the views for every day (or time interval) just the > clocked times for every tree item that fall into this time > interval/range? > And how can I start clocking items that do not show up in the agenda > view? I'm not sure if it's understandable what I want, so I here's a > small example org-file and a description of what I want to see and how > I want to work on it: > Basic layout of the org-file: > * Part 1 > :CLOCK: > CLOCK: [2009-07-20 Mon 12:40]--[2009-07-20 Mon 14:43] => 2:03 > CLOCK: [2009-07-23 Thu 22:28]--[2009-07-23 Thu 22:48] => 0:20 > :END: > * Part 2 > :CLOCK: > CLOCK: [2009-07-24 Fri 09:45]--[2009-07-24 Fri 11:15] => 1:30 > :END: > > What I want: > (Re-)start at any time the clocking of one of either Part 1 or Part 2 > whenever I'm working on it and get summaries of the total working > times on a day, week, or whatever time interval I want and the total > working time I've spent on the project or single parts on it. > > > I assume that a lot of you are using org-mode exactly for this purpose > and probably you know how to do it better, so if you have any > suggestions how I could do it better please tell me :-) > > > > > Thanks, > > Geralt. > > > ___ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: How to track time spent on a project
Geralt writes: > I want to track the time that I'll spend on a new project. For this > I'm planning to use org-mode's clocking feature, so far my first tests > (I've never used org-agenda before) showed me that I can do this > easily from the agenda view, as long as I have a DATE: property in my > node. And that's a bit of a problem because I don't really have a > scheduled date when I'm going to work on a part of this project. > Is there a way in org-mode to just clock the time and have the agenda > view show me on the views for every day (or time interval) just the > clocked times for every tree item that fall into this time > interval/range? > And how can I start clocking items that do not show up in the agenda > view? Just visit the org file with the task you want to clock in and do C-c C-x C-i to clock it in. C-c C-x C-o stops the clock (or when you clock in something else it stops). You can only clock one thing at a time. Play with it in a test task to see how it works. You can clock in from the agenda directly (if it's visible there) with just I (and O for clock out) I've documented how I use clocking stuff here: http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html#Clocking >I'm not sure if it's understandable what I want, so I here's a > small example org-file and a description of what I want to see and how > I want to work on it: > Basic layout of the org-file: > * Part 1 > :CLOCK: > CLOCK: [2009-07-20 Mon 12:40]--[2009-07-20 Mon 14:43] => 2:03 > CLOCK: [2009-07-23 Thu 22:28]--[2009-07-23 Thu 22:48] => 0:20 > :END: > * Part 2 > :CLOCK: > CLOCK: [2009-07-24 Fri 09:45]--[2009-07-24 Fri 11:15] => 1:30 > :END: > > What I want: > (Re-)start at any time the clocking of one of either Part 1 or Part 2 > whenever I'm working on it and get summaries of the total working > times on a day, week, or whatever time interval I want and the total > working time I've spent on the project or single parts on it. > > > I assume that a lot of you are using org-mode exactly for this purpose > and probably you know how to do it better, so if you have any > suggestions how I could do it better please tell me :-) The agenda is not limited to date ranges. You can find tasks to clock in via the agenda in lots of ways such as: - tags searches (C-c a m) - org-occur searches by regexp (C-c a /) - custom agenda view etc. I tend to clock in tasks that show up on my agenda for today, or from STARTED or NEXT tag searches. HTH, Bernt ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: org-mode meets git a first proposal ?!
Matthew Lundin writes: > That said, I think it would be nice to be able to create links to > particular git commits. Yes, I think that's 80% of the benefit of this idea for 20% of the work. It might be generalizable to, to say when creating a file link that if the file is under version control, to have a simple link syntax for specifying a revision, and make it simple to specify the revision that was active when the link was made. -- +---+ | Jason F. McBrayerjmcb...@carcosa.net | | If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in | | battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one | | is the greatest of all conquerors. --- The Dhammapada| ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Clean Org Clock with step
Thank you, this one would save my eyes a bit! Just looking at the output, maybe this could be implemented as a regexp replace on the entire block performed after putting together the tables? Just thinking it might save you some headache, if you don't think it's too ugly of a hack. And while I'm at it - my employer requires me to report not only what I'm doing and how long it takes, but also when I'm doing it. I assume most people wouldn't benefit from a feature like this, and that there are many other things on the wish list with higher priority, so I'm just asking if someone could point out an API guide or something like that, it would be wonderful. Thanks again! //meingbg On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Bastien wrote: > meingbg writes: > > > When using the :step day option in the clocktable, every day gets it's > own > > table. This is a great option! It can however easily be a lot of tables, > even > > if there's not too much information. Say for example there are only items > in > > two out of thirty tables. > > > > Is there an option to show only non-empty tables? If not, would it be a > good > > idea to add such an option? > > Yes, I think it would be a good idea. > > I've been looking into the code for this, but this is not trivial. > I let Carsten sort this out :) > > -- > Bastien > ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Script to get org-mode working on your cell phone.
Hi, I recently ran across this comment in the org-mode survey: > I'm on the lookout for a cell phone that runs Emacs, but… I haven't > found any mechanisms for remotely adding/editing timestamps, > changing the state of TODO items, etc. Neither have I found a way > to trigger reminder sounds, e-mails, phone calls, or IM messages. > I'm not sure about the best way to approach "mobile org-mode"… > A web-interface like Webjimbo? More robust import/export/sync to > iCal or GData? If we can find a way to usefully sync org-mode with > mobile devices, it'll be just about perfect. After reading that comment, I wrote cellphone.el that makes it possible to actually do stuff in emacs on your cell phone. I have a cell phone with a ssh app, a (very) small qwerty keyboard and left/right arrow keys, but since there's no Ctrl or Alt keys, working in Emacs is a pain (every time you need the Ctrl key, you need to go through a menu). cellphone.el works by setting up several "cellphone keymaps". Each cellphone keymap binds the letter keys a-z to commands of your choice. An "orgmode" keymap is included as an example. You can easily select the keymap with left/right arrow keys. Please let me know your opinion about the script, as well as any tips of getting more productive with orgmode on your cell phone. The script is attached. //meingbg meingbg-cellphonemode.el Description: Binary data ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Results of the SourceForge Community Award
Maybe we should make a portable org-mode! ;] On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 05:07:14PM +0530, Manish wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Bastien wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > the results of the SCCA 2009 have been announced and the winner in our > > category is portableapps.com, a platform to carry computer programs on > > a USB key. > > > > Org-mode didn't win but it was really great to participate and to have > > all these nice contributions from so many people! > > > > A big thanks to all of you. > > I regularly use both PortableApps.com and Org-mode extensively. IMHO, we lost > to a worthy opponent. > > > > > > > Let's keep making Org a tool which changes the way _we_ do everything :) > > Yeah. My sincere thanks to Carsten, you and all the contributors. > > Best regards > -- > Manish > > > ___ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > -- Russell Adamsrlad...@adamsinfoserv.com PGP Key ID: 0x1160DCB3 http://www.adamsinfoserv.com/ Fingerprint:1723 D8CA 4280 1EC9 557F 66E8 1154 E018 1160 DCB3 ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Results of the SourceForge Community Award
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Russell Adams wrote: > Maybe we should make a portable org-mode! ;] [snip (50 lines)] All ready using it on my USB stick! TTFN Chris. -- "May I say you look beautiful this morning." Neelix ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Spreadsheet bug?
> I suspect @2$3 was 4 when you evaluated the formulas, hence the 7. > If you clear column c completely, what is the output of the evaluation then? The same. And so now I can't reproduce my original problem... that's good, I guess. > A good solution is to use > $3=vsum(@-I$-1..$-1) That works. Thanks! Here's another thing I'm trying: | a | b | c | | | 7 | 210 | |---++-| | a | 2 | 30 | | b | 3 | 5 | | c | -3 | 2 | | d | 5 | 7 | #+TBLFM: @2$2=vsum(@3$...@6$2)::@2$3=vsum(@3$3..$LR3) I want row 2 to contain sums for what's below. Is there a way to make the LR-reference work here? //meingbg ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
Chris Willard writes: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Russell Adams wrote: > >> Maybe we should make a portable org-mode! ;] > [snip (50 lines)] > > All ready using it on my USB stick! > > TTFN Yes, that's the irony here: if you exclude webapps (which aren't nearly as capable), emacs + org-mode is one of the most portable PIMs available right now. I.e., it will run on any platform, on a usb stick, via ssh, etc. Thanks again to Carsten, Bastien, and everyone for org-mode! - Matt ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: org-mode meets git a first proposal ?!
2009/7/24 Matthew Lundin > Torsten Wagner writes: > > [...] > > > First of all everything which org-mode is aware of is within a > > git-repro. That makes it highly portable. If you like to use your > > complete working environment (your org-files and all linked files) on > > another computer a easy "git clone git://myfirstcomputer/org.git" will > > do the job never miss a file For sure, a little script within > > emacs might make it easier as well, just ask for the source address > > and destination and a few seconds to minutes later you will find your > > complete org-mode work-environment on the other machine. > > Though I can't address your idea of creating links to git revisions (I > believe this idea was discussed here recently), you might want to check > out org-attach.el as a way of pulling all relevant files into a git > repo. > > Thanks Matt to guide me to org-attach.el. You are right it might cover great parts of what I was looking to do. I will try it and see how fare it fits one of my org-files, I simply use vc-next-action (C-x v v) to check in > recent changes. Also I make heavy use of vc-log, vc-annotate, vc-diff, > etc. to survey changes to a file. > > I also highly recommend magit. It makes it very easy to manage all > recent uncommitted changes to a git repo. Thanks to magit and vc-git, I > I use a git-mode too. Unfortunately it seems there are several concurrent git-mode implementations available. I will check out for vc and magit... overall it look like maybe great portions of "my" idea are realised in one or the other form already. Maybe there is only some more glue necessary to bind all this together to make it even more easy to use it directly in org-mode ?! > That said, I think it would be nice to be able to create links to > particular git commits. In my post I thought I like to give a picture of what might be all possible by combining git and org-mode. However my initial idea was to preserve links. Thus, I have no problem to synthesis the idea to a much more clean and foccused point of having *frozen-links*. If I link to a file which is part of a git-repro (maybe added by org-attach.el) I would like to have the option to tag the git-repro and visit the state of the git-repro at the time the link was created. A link might look like [the link]@ or [the link]@"first commit line" to indicate that this is a "frozen" link in a git system, different colours might indicate whehter the content changed already over time. I think only this new feature might be able to introduce org-mode as a very nice tool the managment of programming projects. All programmers of an project can beside of the source code keep org-files for more verbose description and ideas with plenty links to the source code itself and the frozen links make sure that the thinks they refer to never become wrong or obsolete. In general, I just realised that org-mode might be an nice solution for programming project managment. Starting from writing up your requirement specification, discussion and explaination among the dev-team as well as the documentation. All can be done in a org-file beside the source code helping to make make comments in the source code itself not to verbose. Nice will try it out soon As for all the other parts which might be an advantage by using git, you might be right and it is covered by the tools you mentioned already. Thanks for your ideas and suggestions. Greetings, Totti ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: org-mode meets git a first proposal ?!
2009/7/24 Jason F. McBrayer > Matthew Lundin writes: > > > That said, I think it would be nice to be able to create links to > > particular git commits. > > Yes, I think that's 80% of the benefit of this idea for 20% of the > work. It might be generalizable to, to say when creating a file link > that if the file is under version control, to have a simple link syntax > for specifying a revision, and make it simple to specify the revision > that was active when the link was made. Dear Jasonm thanks for focusing my woolly thoughts you and Matt are right... first of all I like the idea of having frozen links everything else might be a "nice to have" or might be covered by other modes already Greetings Totti ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
Org-mode has virtually replaced a large number of Emacs modes for me. I haven't even figured out how to communicate to Emacs users and non-users alike how much it has changed my workflow. Every day it seems I discover some new feature, or try to hack something on that's already there. Thank you Carsten, Bastien, and everyone, especially the community, for such a useful tool! On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Matthew Lundin wrote: > Chris Willard writes: > >> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Russell Adams wrote: >> >>> Maybe we should make a portable org-mode! ;] >> [snip (50 lines)] >> >> All ready using it on my USB stick! >> >> TTFN > > Yes, that's the irony here: if you exclude webapps (which aren't nearly > as capable), emacs + org-mode is one of the most portable PIMs available > right now. I.e., it will run on any platform, on a usb stick, via ssh, > etc. > > Thanks again to Carsten, Bastien, and everyone for org-mode! > > - Matt > > > ___ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Script to get org-mode working on your cell phone.
At Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:56:24 +0200, meingbg wrote: [...] > After reading that comment, I wrote cellphone.el that makes it possible to > actually do stuff in emacs on your cell phone. Thanks. This looks quite useful for use on my Nokia N800 (not a phone; it's an internet tablet but it's just a little bigger than a phone). I like the concept of your switchable keymaps. I'll let you know how I get on when I get around to trying it out! eric ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: How to track time spent on a project
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: > Just visit the org file with the task you want to clock in and do C-c > C-x C-i to clock it in. C-c C-x C-o stops the clock (or when you clock > in something else it stops). You can only clock one thing at a time. > Play with it in a test task to see how it works. > > You can clock in from the agenda directly (if it's visible there) with > just I (and O for clock out) > Hi, thanks, that's working fine :-) > I've documented how I use clocking stuff here: > > http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html#Clocking > I already looked into that, but I couldn't find how to track the time of entries without a DATE property. > The agenda is not limited to date ranges. You can find tasks to clock > in via the agenda in lots of ways such as: > > - tags searches (C-c a m) > - org-occur searches by regexp (C-c a /) > - custom agenda view > I tried that, but when searching for matching tasks I can't see their clocked time in this view (when pressing R org tells me that this operation is not allowed in such a buffer). What I just tried was to add a DATE property like this: :DATE: DATE: <2009-07-24 Fri> DATE: <2009-07-20 Thu> :END: With this I can see the task in the agenda and see the clocked time(s), but I have to add an entry every time I'm working on it (and it's redundant because this information is already in the CLOCK property). I haven't used a custom agenda before, is there a way to create one that shows tasks in a timeline by looking at the dates in the CLOCK property? Thanks for your replies, yours too Greg. Geralt. ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
Bastien googlemail.com> writes: > > Org-mode didn't win but it was really great to participate and to have > all these nice contributions from so many people! No wonder it didn't win. Non-emacs users have few incentive to try it, since they think emacs is bad looking and primitve in general, so they are looking for something more flashy instead and do not even try it. On the other hand org-mode needs some marketing in the emacs community as well. I'm a longtime emacs user and heard about org mode before, but I thought it was something overly complex and looked for simpler solutions. Then I tried it one day and was blown away by how mature it was and how well written the documentation was. So it's a natural fit for an emacs user, but obviously alien for people how don't use emacs and don't know the Emacs Way of doing things. ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
That's an interesting point. I started using org-mode randomly, because I was writing an outline and didn't care for outline-mode and figured org-mode should be compatible. After I'd used it for a couple outlines, I found it could export to HTML. And LaTeX. And worked as a day planner... In terms of marketing within the Emacs community, it might be worth advertising it as an outline-mode replacement. Has anyone written a simple tutorial explaining how to use org-mode just in this way, and then providing a link to, say, the manual/Worg at the end? Most of the tutorials I've seen have been focused on org's time-management capabilities. But the ability to type up an outline, manage that outline, expand it into a document, and export it separately as a Beamer presentation with notes, a PDF, and a webpage are "killer app" functionality in their own right! On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:19 PM, User wrote: > Bastien googlemail.com> writes: >> >> Org-mode didn't win but it was really great to participate and to have >> all these nice contributions from so many people! > > No wonder it didn't win. Non-emacs users have few incentive to > try it, since they think emacs is bad looking and primitve in > general, so they are looking for something more flashy instead > and do not even try it. > > On the other hand org-mode needs some marketing in the emacs > community as well. I'm a longtime emacs user and heard about org > mode before, but I thought it was something overly complex and > looked for simpler solutions. Then I tried it one day and was > blown away by how mature it was and how well written the > documentation was. > > So it's a natural fit for an emacs user, but obviously alien for > people how don't use emacs and don't know the Emacs Way of doing > things. > > > > > > ___ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
Until about a month ago, I was a non-emacs user; and indeed, I thought it's bad looking and, in some respects, primitive. The reason I started using it anyway is org-mode: I wanted a decent outliner, and none of the others I tried fit my way of working. So I gave it a try despite the way it looks. Now I use emacs+org-mode for outlining, planning, taking notes, drafting papers, and almost anything else that has to do with text. As far as I'm concerned, org-mode is no longer just 'likely to change' the way I do everything. Gabi User wrote: > No wonder it didn't win. Non-emacs users have few incentive to > try it, since they think emacs is bad looking and primitve in > general, so they are looking for something more flashy instead > and do not even try it. ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
Raffi R writes:
> That's an interesting point. I started using org-mode randomly,
> because I was writing an outline and didn't care for outline-mode and
> figured org-mode should be compatible. After I'd used it for a couple
> outlines, I found it could export to HTML. And LaTeX. And worked as a
> day planner...
>
> In terms of marketing within the Emacs community, it might be worth
> advertising it as an outline-mode replacement. Has anyone written a
> simple tutorial explaining how to use org-mode just in this way, and
> then providing a link to, say, the manual/Worg at the end? Most of the
> tutorials I've seen have been focused on org's time-management
> capabilities. But the ability to type up an outline, manage that
> outline, expand it into a document, and export it separately as a
> Beamer presentation with notes, a PDF, and a webpage are "killer app"
> functionality in their own right!
This is a very helpful discussion. I'm currently working on a tutorial
and screencast that highlights the outlining/publishing features of
org-mode that work without any customization ("org-mode out of the box,"
so to speak). I'll try to get it online as soon as I can.
I think GTD-fatigue is one of the major reasons that people might not be
aware of just how powerful and versatile org-mode is. My highly
unscientific conclusion is that many people think of it as one more
GTD/day-planner/time-management application, when, in fact, it could can
as a fully functional outliner, plain-text database, "word processor,"
spreadsheet, etc.
As evidence in support of your point, here's an article on "5 Linux
Outliners" from Linux.com (Oct. 2008) that only mentions Emacs outliner
in passing ("very basic," it says). Org-mode is conspicuous in its
absence:
http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/149401
Best,
Matt
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
At Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:43:04 -0400, Raffi R wrote: > > That's an interesting point. I started using org-mode randomly, > because I was writing an outline and didn't care for outline-mode and > figured org-mode should be compatible. After I'd used it for a couple > outlines, I found it could export to HTML. And LaTeX. And worked as a > day planner... > > In terms of marketing within the Emacs community, it might be worth > advertising it as an outline-mode replacement. Has anyone written a > simple tutorial explaining how to use org-mode just in this way, and > then providing a link to, say, the manual/Worg at the end? Most of the I am a very long time emacs user (~25 years) (mind you, I'm an even longer vi user... ;-) but even I didn't start using org-mode until recently (last year). I did try it a couple of years ago but wasn't impressed for some reason. In the meantime, I started using planner, muse and todo. I'd used outline-mode for quite a while. Anyway, I subsequently ran across Carsten's google tech talk and I decided to try org-mode again. What a difference! I think having used all these disparate tools, each with their own way of working, and then finding that org-mode essentially handled all of them in a consistent manner was a huge selling point. Essentially, what I'm saying is that Carsten's tech talk is one key advertising element we should ensure stays prominent wherever possible! eric ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Subfloats in LaTeX
Dear community, How do I stick a group of figures together (i.e. so that I have Fig. 1 and then a, b, c)? Alternatively, is there a way I can keep images inline and yet use captions? Whenever I add a #+CAPTION:, it's turned into \figure and floating is turned on. What I'm trying to do is make a section that consists of a sequence of images. I've searched the orgmode manual but can't figure out a way short of generating the LaTeX file and editing it directly (hardly ideal!). That said, I've never tried to do this in LaTeX so I guess it may not be possible (although it would surprise me!). Thank you very much, - Raffi. ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: Subfloats in LaTeX
A table seems to work to force the inlining. For curiosity's sake, is there a more idiomatic way to do it? On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Raffi R wrote: > Dear community, > > How do I stick a group of figures together (i.e. so that I have Fig. 1 > and then a, b, c)? > > Alternatively, is there a way I can keep images inline and yet use > captions? Whenever I add a #+CAPTION:, it's turned into \figure and > floating is turned on. > > What I'm trying to do is make a section that consists of a sequence of images. > > I've searched the orgmode manual but can't figure out a way short of > generating the LaTeX file and editing it directly (hardly ideal!). > > That said, I've never tried to do this in LaTeX so I guess it may not > be possible (although it would surprise me!). > > > Thank you very much, > > - Raffi. > ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
Gabi Danon writes: Org-mode is the killer app for emacs, surely? It is the reason I'm using Emacs again after a five year gap - and not just org-mode, but BBDB and GNUS as well. One of the things that I find astonishing is that it does so many disparate things so well. For planning and organising there is nothing to match its flexibility AND its power; yet it doesn't force any particular method of organising on you. They all work, and you can be as sloppy as you like. As an outliner...well it is THE outliner as far as I'm concerned. For years I've been searching for the perfect writing tool. I found it. Cian > Until about a month ago, I was a non-emacs user; and indeed, I thought > it's bad looking and, in some respects, primitive. The reason I started > using it anyway is org-mode: I wanted a decent outliner, and none of > the others I tried fit my way of working. So I gave it a try despite > the way it looks. > > Now I use emacs+org-mode for outlining, planning, taking notes, > drafting papers, and almost anything else that has to do with text. As > far as I'm concerned, org-mode is no longer just 'likely to change' the > way I do everything. > > Gabi > > User wrote: > >> No wonder it didn't win. Non-emacs users have few incentive to >> try it, since they think emacs is bad looking and primitve in >> general, so they are looking for something more flashy instead >> and do not even try it. > > > ___ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
Raffi R writes: > In terms of marketing within the Emacs community, it might be worth > advertising it as an outline-mode replacement. Has anyone written a > simple tutorial explaining how to use org-mode just in this way, and > then providing a link to, say, the manual/Worg at the end? I am working on a simple Worg page which will describe what are the benefits of org-mode over outline-mode as a major-mode for the Emacs files like etc/TODO and admin/FOR-RELEASE. I hope this will be good enough to convince Emacs developers. If so, it will certainly give more exposure to org-mode. -- Bastien ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
Matthew Lundin writes: > http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/149401 Well, I guess the writer had a small bias toward Vim against Emacs and for sure he wasn't aware of Org-mode :) -- Bastien ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
Bastien,Might I suggest taking it a little further and maybe put a matrix. Include apps outside of org like OmniFocus, Things, Remember the milk, etc. Might get some non-emacs users to look at it. *Greg Newman* http://20seven.org twitter: 20seven On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Bastien wrote: > Raffi R writes: > > > In terms of marketing within the Emacs community, it might be worth > > advertising it as an outline-mode replacement. Has anyone written a > > simple tutorial explaining how to use org-mode just in this way, and > > then providing a link to, say, the manual/Worg at the end? > > I am working on a simple Worg page which will describe what are the > benefits of org-mode over outline-mode as a major-mode for the Emacs > files like etc/TODO and admin/FOR-RELEASE. > > I hope this will be good enough to convince Emacs developers. > If so, it will certainly give more exposure to org-mode. > > -- > Bastien > > > ___ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
Greg Newman writes: > Might I suggest taking it a little further and maybe put a matrix. Include > apps outside of org like OmniFocus, Things, Remember the milk, etc. Might get > some non-emacs users to look at it. Good idea! I've just created a page for this on Worg: http://orgmode.org/worg/gtd-software-comparison.php But I was talking about something different. The page I had in mind is just about why we should org-mode in some Emacs files like etc/TODO. -- Bastien ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
Bastien writes: > Greg Newman writes: > >> Might I suggest taking it a little further and maybe put a matrix. Include >> apps outside of org like OmniFocus, Things, Remember the milk, etc. Might >> get >> some non-emacs users to look at it. > > Good idea! I've just created a page for this on Worg: > > http://orgmode.org/worg/gtd-software-comparison.php Oops... I forgot to add flashy DIY affordances: *PlEaSe CoNtRiBuTe To ThE WoRg FiLe AbOVe!* :) -- Bastien ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award
At Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:40:08 +0200, Bastien wrote: [...] > But I was talking about something different. The page I had in mind is > just about why we should org-mode in some Emacs files like etc/TODO. Further on what can sell org-mode, having pondered why I started using org-mode in earnest once I had my interest in it piqued by Carsten's video, I realised that it was org-remember! Being able to effortlessly file away notes, with minimal interruption to the task at hand, and knowing that I would be able to find these notes easily and quickly again, was a key attraction in my continued use of org-mode. eric ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Current Documentation
Which documentation is maintained better, the online HTML or PDF? Thanks. --- David A. Gershman gersh...@dagertech.net http://dagertech.net/gershman/ "It's all about the path!" --d. gershman ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] SEQ_TODO and Headline percentages
Hi Everyone, Is there a way for non-SEQ_TODO labeled sub-headings to still count in the headline percentage? Examples are in order... Currently: * Some Project [100%] As you can see in this example, the headings % is 100 because the first sub heading has no "SEQ_TODO" label. * Sub heading with no SEQ_TODO label * DONE sub heading with label Desired: * Some Project [50%] Note the non-labeled sub-heading results in only 50% * Sub heading with no SEQ_TODO label * DONE sub heading with label At the current time, my "fix" is to go ahead and give a label to all sub-headings. So the above example would have to have something, perhaps "CREATED" or "Qd" (queued). I'm hoping to alleviate this. Thanks, and glad to be back with Org-Mode... --- David A. Gershman gersh...@dagertech.net http://dagertech.net/gershman/ "It's all about the path!" --d. gershman ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Current Documentation
"David A. Gershman" writes: > Which documentation is maintained better, the online HTML or PDF? The org.texi file, which is part of org-mode and regularily exported as html or PDF on the website. HTH, -- Bastien ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
